H.J. McCracken
and the OU-VIS team
OU-VIS: Status H.J. McCracken and the OU-VIS team What is OU-VIS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
OU-VIS: Status H.J. McCracken and the OU-VIS team What is OU-VIS for ? From raw VIS data , create the algorithms and software to produce calibrated images suitable for cosmic shear measurement Implications : We need to fully
H.J. McCracken
and the OU-VIS team
– We need to fully characterise the instrument – We need generate the instrument calibration models – We need to test algorithms for the data reductions, and write software to apply these algorithms – We need to to be able decide to first order if the data coming out of the pipeline meets the requirements.
Euclid-France 8.1.16
The OU-VIS team at MSSL, UK, September 2015
stability of PSF: focal plane instrument with no optics
maximise number of galaxies)
resolution
resource: HST-quality imaging over SDSS size areas
Euclid CCD on the test bench at MSSL (in silver halides!)
– No full FPA sims have been made with Besancon model and a realistic mix of stellar SEDs – Chromatic efgects need to be considered for many VIS requirements (PSF, astrometry) – Need to test requirements with more data and at a wider range
Euclid-France 8.1.16
Euclid-France 8.1.16
Image stacking Raw data Bias removal
CTI-correction
Flat-fielding Ghost flagging Dark subtraction? Background removal telemetry
R-GDP-CAL-020 R-GDP-CAL-030 R-GDP-CAL-058 R-GDP-CAL-052 R-GDP-CAL-010 R-GDP-CAL-056
Cosmic ray flagging Star-galaxy classification Geometric distortion calibr. Photometric calibration GAIA astro GAIA photo
R-GDP-CAL-059 R-GDP-CAL-061 R-GDP-CAL-069 R-GDP-CAL-002 R-GDP-DL2-060 R-GDP-DL2-065 R-GDP-DL2-001 R-GDP-DL2-002 R-GDP-DL2-003
TBC Stacked VIS images
R-GDP-DL2-030
Individual VIS images VIS PSF model
MRD-DAT-001 Shape measurement General requirements R-GDP-CAL-025 R-GDP-CAL-030 R-GDP-CAL-035 R-GDP-CAL-070 R-GDP-CAL-072 R-GDP-CAL-054 R-GDP-CAL-057
Individual VIS catalogues
R-GDP-DL2-026 R-GDP-DL2-040 VIS data products
VIS exposure / weight maps
Linearity correction
– We must decide now what scientific tests we want to do in
– In a complicated pipeline like EC-SGS this is probably the only way to proceed. – We need to carefully assess the efgects of residuals on each of the corrections
– Realistic simulations – Prototype code
Euclid-France 8.1.16
– Charge transfer ineffjciency – Brighter / fatter efgect (PSF changes with flux because of charge repulsion in the CCD lattice – Chromatic efgects in the PSF and the wavelength dependence of the instrumental flat field. Do we need (for example) to select the flat field we need based on the galaxy SED? – Efgect of CCD stitch-blocks on the galaxy shapes – And some other stufg we haven't thought about yet
Euclid-France 8.1.16
– Note that our pipeline is extremely hacked-up. Almost no coding standards, no API, no data model. Object is just to get something up and running. Will see later what the correct framework to apply is, etc, etc
Euclid-France 8.1.16
– At least seven difgerent iterations were required. Great flexibility in being able to run everything at CC.
Euclid-France 8.1.16