Other Hydrocarbons Presented by Sachin Joshi Licensing Manager - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Other Hydrocarbons Presented by Sachin Joshi Licensing Manager - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Topic Advances in Distillation for Petrochemicals and Other Hydrocarbons Presented by Sachin Joshi Licensing Manager GTC Technology US, LLC Improving Efficiency in Distillation Advanced Distillation GT-HIDS (Heat Integrated
Advanced Distillation GT-HIDS℠ (Heat Integrated Differential Separation)
Improving Efficiency in Distillation
What is HIDS ?
- Direct Heat Integration by
Vapor compression
- Low pressure Top Section
(Rectification)
- Low-Low Pressure Bottom
Section (Stripping)
- Maximizes Relative Volatility
Heat Integrated Differential Separation (HIDS)
Propane Feed Propylene
LLP Column LP Column
HIDS Application
- Applicable to close boiling pure component distillation
- Preferentially for C2 to C5 component fractions
- Reduces the CAPEX and OPEX compared to
traditional distillation and Vapor Re-Compression (Heat Pump)
- GTC patent protected
Case Study – C3 Distillation Traditional Process Options:
Mechanical Vapor Re-Compression (VRC) High pressure distillation (HP Distillation)
Case Study - C3 Distillation HP Distillation - Schematic
- Typically Operates at 220
Psig@Top
- Below feed or Bottom Section
(Stripping) operates at higher pressure
- Designed for utilizing cooling water
- Highest Energy for Separation due
to lower relative volatility
Case Study – C3 Distillation Vapor Re-Compression (VRC) - Schematic
- Lower Pressure, typically operates at 160 Psig
- Lower Temperature
- Higher Relative Volatility compared to HP distillation
- Compressor power is determined by reboiler
temperature pinch and overall system ΔP, and
- verflash from hot reflux
Case Study – C3 Distillation Vapor Recompression (VRC)
Effect of Pressure on Relative Volatility
HP Dist. VRC.
1.11 1.115 1.12 1.125 1.13 1.135 1.14 1.145 1.15 1.155 1.16 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250
Relative Volatility Pressure in Psig
Relative Volatility of Propylene to Propane
Relative Volatility
Traditional Process Options
- High pressure distillation (HP Distillation)
- Vapor recompression (VRC)
HP Distillation VRC CAPEX
Base Higher than Base
OPEX
Base Lower than Base
- GTC Option
– Heat Integrated Differential Separation
Case Study – C3 Distillation Process Options
GT-HIDS℠ - Heat Integrated Differential Separation
Propane Feed Propylene
LLP Column LP Column
Top Section Bottom Section
Pressure Reducing Valve
GT-HIDS℠ Advantage
- Non linearity of relative volatility is addressed by Pressure Segregation
– Pressure segregation between Stripping (Bottom) and rectification (Top) to optimize relative volatility – Temperature effect on Relative volatility is taken advantage – Significantly improved relative volatility
Relative Volatility Temperature Pinch
- Direct coupling of top (rectification) and bottom (Stripping) section
– Eliminates temperature pinch in the reboiler – Avoids overflash from hot reflux in VRC schemes – Thermally coupled columns reduces the overall energy consumption
GT-HIDS℠ Operating Range for C3 Separation
1.11 1.115 1.12 1.125 1.13 1.135 1.14 1.145 1.15 1.155 1.16 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
Relative Lolatility
Pressure in Psig
Relative Volatility of Propylene to Propane
Rectification Zone (Top Section) Stripping Zone (Bottom Section)
Case Study – C3 Distillation Process Options
1.08E+00 1.10E+00 1.12E+00 1.14E+00 1.16E+00 1.18E+00 1.20E+00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240
Relative Volatility Stages
Relative Volatility of Traditional Distillation methods & GT-HIDS
HP DIST-RV VRC Dist-RV HIDS Stripping HIDS-Rectification
VRC- FeedPoint HP DIST FeedPoint HIDS - LLP Column - Bottom HIDS LP Column - Top
GT-HIDS℠ Advantages
- Maximizes the natural behavior of components to
separate from each other
- Lower energy compared to traditional distillation
methods
- Distillation done at best relative volatility efficiency point
- Thermally coupled columns consume lower electricity
compared to a VRC
- Independent control of stripping and rectification zones
- ffer stability and ease of operation
Case Study: C3 Distillation Feed Specification Component Mol % Ethane 0.02 % Propane 20.86% Propylene 79.11% i-Butane 0.01%
- Feed Capacity = 30 KBPD
Case Study : C3 Distillation Product Specifications
Propylene specification
- Recovery: 99.87% of
Propylene Propane specification
- Recovery: 98% of
Propane
Component Mol % Ethane 0.02% Propane 0.38% Propylene 99.58% i-Butane 0.01% Component Mol % Ethane 0.01% Propane 99.38% Propylene 0.59% i-Butane 0.02%
Case Study: C3 Distillation Overall Comparison: CAPEX & OPEX
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% CAPEX OPEX HIDS 43% 85% VRC 100% 100%
Cost
- 1. 4Q of 2015
2.Electricity = $0.04 per KW-Hr 3.Cooling water = $0.075 per 1000 gallons
HIDS HIDS MVRC MVRC
C3 Splitter Debottleneck with HIDS
Distillation C3 Splitter C3 Splitter Revamped to GT-HIDS℠
- Capacity Increment: by up to 50%
- Energy Required: less by 40% compared to new system
Propylene Propane Feed Column B Column A New LLP Column New Compressor
C3 Splitter Debottleneck with HIDS
Vapor Recompression C3 Splitter C3 Splitter Revamped to GT-HIDS
- Capacity Increment: by up to 50%
- Energy Required: less by 40% compared to new system
Propylene Propane Feed Column A New LLP Column
Dividing Wall Columns
Improving Fundamental Efficiency in Distillation
Case Study: Grassroots Mixed Xylenes Recovery Unit at a Refinery in Japan
- TG had an existing unit which produced C7+ product for
gasoline blending.
- TG wanted to separate high purity petrochemicals (Toluene,
Mixed Xylenes) from the feed.
- TG decided for a DWC solution against a two column
configuration because of lower CAPEX and lack of plot space.
Case Study: Mixed Xylenes Recovery
GT-DWC℠ for Mixed Xylenes Recovery
Comparison: Two Column System vs DWC
Parameter Units Two Column Configuration GT-DWC℠ Configuration Mix-xylenes product Kg/hr 29,332 29,334 C8 aromatics wt%. 99.2 99.3 Reboiler duties MMkcal/hr. 21.6 17.2 Operating cost savings %
- 20.0
Capital cost US $ MM 26.0 21.0 Steam savings due to heat integration TPH
- 20.0
TonenGeneral Mixed Xylenes Recovery Unit
- Installation of GT-DWC℠ Column at Chiba Refinery, Japan
- Column Operational since March 2016
GT-DWC℠ Internals Manufacturing - Korea
GT-DWC℠ Trays Testing of GT-DWC℠ Internal Liquid Split Distributer
Summary
- Advanced distillation applications are an overlooked
means to reduce refinery energy consumption – GT-DWC reduces 20–30% OPEX through energy savings – GT-DWC reduces 20–30% CAPEX by requiring a single column for multi-component separation
- GT-HIDS can make significant energy reduction
and/or capacity enhancement with simpler modifications.
29