Oregon NFIP Biological Opinion Implementation Planning Partner - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

oregon nfip biological opinion implementation planning
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Oregon NFIP Biological Opinion Implementation Planning Partner - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oregon NFIP Biological Opinion Implementation Planning Partner Webinar March 20, 2020 WELCOME! Erin Cooper , CFM Bonnie Shorin NFIP-ESA Specialist NOAA Fisheries FEMA Region 10 bonnie.shorin@noaa.gov Erin.cooper@fema.dhs.gov Celinda


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Partner Webinar March 20, 2020

Oregon NFIP Biological Opinion Implementation Planning

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Erin Cooper, CFM NFIP-ESA Specialist FEMA Region 10 Erin.cooper@fema.dhs.gov

WELCOME!

Celinda Adair NFIP Coordinator Department of Land Conservation and Development Celinda.adair@state.or.us Bonnie Shorin NOAA Fisheries bonnie.shorin@noaa.gov Sara O’Brien Executive Director Willamette Partnership Obrien@willamettepartnership.org Emily Irish Partner, Communications Willamette Partnership irish@willamettepartnership.org

slide-3
SLIDE 3

INTENTION

  • Update folks on progress in FEMA

implementation plan

  • Create a space f0r agencies to hear frank

feedback and advice from partners

  • Outline intended next steps and opportunities for

additional input

Photo provided by The Wetlands Conservancy

slide-4
SLIDE 4

AGENDA

10:00 – 10:15 AM Welcome! & Agenda 10:15 – 10:45 AM Agency team presentation 10:45 – 11:05 AM Break-out groups 11:05 – 11:25 AM Discussion/Q&A 11:25 – 11:30 AM Next steps

Photo provided by Clean Water Services

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RESULTS

  • Shared understanding of implementation

planning process – past, present, future

  • Partner guidance for agency team as they

map out implementation options

slide-6
SLIDE 6

LOGISTICS

  • Please remain on mute throughout the

webinar main session

  • If you have a question, please write it the

chat and we will add it for the Q&A session at the end

  • If you need help with technical issues,

“raise your hand” and notify us via chat

  • We will be recording the main session, but

not the breakout groups

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Raise your hand during the

session and we’ll unmute you to ask the group, or ask in the Chat function.

LOGISTICS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

BIOP IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING

  • What is the goal?
  • Why?
  • What already happened?
  • What’s next?
slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • What is the goal?
  • Why?
  • What already happened?
  • What’s next?

BIOP IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING

slide-10
SLIDE 10

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

  • voluntary program
  • allows for flood insurance to be purchased in a

participating community…

  • if they practice good floodplain management

(NFIP minimum performance standards)

BACKGROUND

Photo provided by The Wetlands Conservancy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Current implementation of the NFIP creates “jeopardy” for listed native fish and harms their critical habitat. So, FEMA needs to change the way we implement this program.

BACKGROUND

slide-12
SLIDE 12

WHAT IS THE GOAL?

Find a way for FEMA to manage the NFIP that:

  • Reduces flood hazards to people and

property

  • Maintains or improves the natural benefits
  • f functioning floodplains
  • Flood storage
  • Water quality
  • Fish and wildlife habitat
  • Works with the policy and pragmatic

realities of Oregon’s local governments

slide-13
SLIDE 13

How?

  • Build on existing successes and input
  • Offer a menu of options rather than a one-

size-fits-all solution

  • Provide support to local governments –

templates, guidance, models, mapping and technical support, etc.

WHAT IS THE GOAL?

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • What is the goal?
  • Why?
  • What already happened?
  • What’s next?

BIOP IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING

slide-15
SLIDE 15

WHY?

The way we use floodplains affects both public safety and fish populations.

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

There are parts of the floodplain where people and development are at much higher risk.

WHY?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

There are parts of the floodplain where people and development are at much higher risk. New development in these areas is often the most harmful to native fish populations, including threatened salmon species.

WHY?

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 1. People and fish compete for space in floods

– humans have built in areas that salmon would historically have used to hide out during flood events

  • 2. The way people use land in floodplains can

harm water quality and degrade habitat in rivers and streams

WHY?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Rationale for Jeopardy / Adverse Modification Determinations

Photo from “Ephemeral floodplain habitats provide best growth conditions for juvenile Chinook salmon in a California river” Jeffres et al 2008

WHY?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The NFIP is an important program. We need to figure out how to make it work in a way that supports the needs of both people and fish.

WHY?

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • What is the goal?
  • Why?
  • What already happened?
  • What’s next?

BIOP IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Initial Oregon litigation FEMA agrees to consult with NOAA Fisheries 2009 FEMA requests consultation 2011 NOAA provides draft BiOp 2013 2010 Final BiOp released April 2016 DLCD work groups 2016 – 2017 Disaster Recovery Reform Act delays implementation for 3 years 2018

A History of Oregon NFIP BiOp

slide-24
SLIDE 24

WHAT ALREADY HAPPENED?

Learning from DLCD workgroups…

Photo provided by Clean Water Services

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Stakeholders helped identify:

  • Technical challenges
  • e.g., mapping 10-year floodplain

SUMMARY RESULTS OF DLCD WORKGROUPS

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Stakeholders helped identify:

  • Technical challenges
  • Pragmatic challenges
  • e.g., finding space for flood storage mitigation

SUMMARY RESULTS OF DLCD WORKGROUPS

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Stakeholders helped identify:

  • Technical challenges
  • Pragmatic challenges
  • Conflicts with existing policy
  • e.g., Measure 37/49

SUMMARY RESULTS OF DLCD WORKGROUPS

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Stakeholders helped identify:

  • Technical challenges
  • Pragmatic challenges
  • Conflicts with existing policy
  • Process and timeline challenges
  • e.g., proposed interim measures

SUMMARY RESULTS OF DLCD WORKGROUPS

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Stakeholders helped identify:

  • Technical challenges
  • Pragmatic challenges
  • Conflicts with existing policy
  • Process and timeline challenges
  • Existing resources to draw on
  • e.g., stormwater models & guidance

SUMMARY RESULTS OF DLCD WORKGROUPS

slide-30
SLIDE 30

WHERE DID ALL THAT GO?

  • 1. NOAA Fisheries clarified several areas of

concern (e.g., ag and forestry practices)

  • 2. Agencies’ better understanding of local

and state context and challenges

  • 3. Strong starting point for 2020

implementation planning effort

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • What is the goal?
  • Why?
  • What already happened?
  • What’s next?

BIOP IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Who?

  • Three agencies (FEMA,

NOAA Fisheries, DLCD) working as a team

  • Salus Resources and

Willamette Partnership providing facilitation, technical, and writing support

WHAT’S NEXT?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

How?

  • Meeting ~ monthly to build existing materials

into a menu of options

  • 2-3 partner workshops throughout 2020 –

review and feedback

WHAT’S NEXT?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

What?

  • Aim to finish the year

with a clear set of implementation

  • ptions and resources

to help communities work with them

WHAT’S NEXT?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

2020 Implementation Planning Timeline (dates are approximate):

  • January: Agency team convenes
  • February: Partner workshop*
  • March-April: Draft outline of potential

implementation options

  • May: Second partner workshop
  • June-July: Draft menu of options, list of guidance

documents, templates, etc.

  • August: Third partner workshop
  • September-December: Draft implementation

documents

*In-person stakeholder workshops will be followed by webinar versions for remote participation

WHAT’S NEXT?

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Then… NEPA review process. Once completed, anticipate at least 18 months for communities to take any needed action.

WHAT’S NEXT?

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Questions?

BIOP IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Time to break out!!!

BIOP IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • We’ll randomly place you in a break out group
  • Introduce yourselves
  • Open an email, subject line “NFIP Webinar” to

take notes in and send to FEMA-R10-ESAcomments@fema.dhs.gov

  • You will have 15-20 minutes to discuss
  • Facilitators may join to check in
  • We will give a “5-minutes left” message
  • When ready to rejoin the larger session we will

give you a 1-minute notice to wrap up

BREAKOUT GROUPS

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Have a question? Ask and a facilitator will join your breakout group

BREAKOUT GROUPS

Done and want to rejoin the larger session early? Leave Breakout Room

slide-41
SLIDE 41

BREAKOUT GROUPS

What advice would you like to give the team of agencies as they contemplate new NFIP guidance (including both process and content suggestions)? Please email individual notes to FEMA-R10-ESAcomments@fema.dhs.gov Subject line “NFIP Webinar”

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Welcome back!

BREAKOUT GROUPS

slide-43
SLIDE 43

What do you most want this team to know?

“Raise your hand” if you want to

  • comment. We will

unmute one person at a time.

Discussion

Photo provided by USFWS

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Final questions?

Type question in chat

  • r “raise your hand” if

you want to

  • comment. We will

unmute one person at a time.

Discussion

Photo provided by USFWS

slide-45
SLIDE 45

CLOSING

  • Thank you for joining us and sharing your

perspectives

  • Everything we collected today and in past

conversations will be used

  • We’ll provide draft materials prior to future

workshops – please be willing to do a little homework and come ready to dive in!

slide-46
SLIDE 46

THANK YOU!

Watch for email outreach from FEMA with meeting notes, feedback, and updates on this work.

  • regonnfip.org