OR62 Vila s Roa d I nte rc ha ng e Are a Ma na g e me nt Pla n - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OR62 – Vila s Roa d I nte rc ha ng e Are a Ma na g e me nt Pla n (I AMP) T AC Me e ting Pre se nte d b y: K a tie Bro wn July 17, 2018

Background Analysis Results Conclusions 2

Ba c kg ro und OR62 & Vila s Ro a d I nte rc ha ng e 3

4

5

JTA Build Full Build 6

Sc e na rio De finitions • No Build/ No -mitig a tio n (NBNM) • Ba se Co nditio ns • No I nte rc ha ng e • JT A Build, 2-la ne Vila s Rd • T ie r 1 Pro je c ts inc lude d 7

No- build/ No- mitig a tion 8

Sc e na rio De finitions • No Build Mitig a te d (S0T 1) • NBNM with mitig a tio ns a tte mpting to me e t v/ c , L OS, a nd MML OS sta nda rds • Sig na ls a dde d whe n PSW me t • No Build Mitig a te d with T ie r 2 pro je c ts (S0T 2) • S0T 1 with T ie r 2 Pro je c ts 9

CL H a nd CL A No Mitig a tio ns Mitig a te d 10

T a ble Roc k Roa d & Vila s Roa d No Mitig a tio ns Mitig a te d 11

Biddle Roa d & Ha mric k Roa d No Mitig a tio ns Mitig a te d 12

RVMPO RT P T ie r 2 Pro je c ts Within Study Are a Project No. Location Project Type Proposed Project Description Upgrade to minor collector standard including Peace Ln – Vilas Rd Urban one lane in each direction, bike lanes, and 626 to City Limits Upgrade sidewalks Construct new minor collector roadway Lear Way - Vilas Rd New (includes one lane each 628 to northern city Roadway direction, bike lane, and sidewalk) limits Widen to major arterial standard including two- Vilas Rd – Table lanes in each direction, center turn-lane, bike 632 Rock to eastern Widening lanes, and sidewalks UGB Re-align Crater Lake Ave to the east and install Crater Lake Ave & I39 Intersection traffic signal Vilas Rd Monitor needs after construction of Crater Lake Crater Lake Highway I40 Intersection Highway Bypass & Vilas Rd Install traffic signal or roundabout when I44 Vilas Rd & Lear Way Intersection warranted Vilas Rd & Industry Install traffic signal or roundabout when I43 Intersection 13 Dr warranted

RVMPO RT P T ie r 2 Pro je c ts in Mo de l Runs Outside Dire c t Study Are a Project Location Project Type Proposed Project Description No. Construct new major arterial International Wy – Vilas to New 629 roadway (includes center turn-lane, Coker Butte Roadway bike lane, and sidewalk) Construct new major collector Springbrook Rd - Coker New roadway (includes center turn-lane, 630 Butte to Vilas Rd Roadway bike lane, and sidewalk) Construct new minor collector East-West collector- CLH to New roadway (includes one lane each 631 Eastern UGB between Coker direction, bike lane, and sidewalk) Roadway Butte and Vilas Rd 14

Inc lude d in a ll sc e na rios be yond NBNM Current Geometry Lear Way Crater Lake Hwy Crater Lake Ave Analyzed Geometry 15

Inc lude d in a ll sc e na rios be yond NBNM Current Geometry Analyzed Geometry 16

Pe a c e L a ne a nd Airwa y Drive F unc tio na l Are a Ana lysis Ac c o mmo da te Ne c e ssa ry E le me nts? 17

F unc tiona l Ar e a E le me nts Upstre a m 18

F unc tiona l Ar e a E le me nts Do wnstre a m 19

F unc tiona l Ar e a Ana lysis I nput Re sults • F o ur la ne Vila s Ro a d sc e na rio s no t fe a sib le • T wo la ne Vila s Ro a d sc e na rio s o nly fe a sib le fo r “fa milia r drive rs” whe re re a c tio n dista nc e = 0 fe e t. T HE RE F ORE 400 fe e t is NOT suffic ie nt to a c c o mmo da te ne c e ssa ry • Ac c e le ra tio n • Re a c tio n dista nc e • L e g a l turn sig na l dista nc e o f 100’ re q uire d b y the OR Ve hic le Co de • De c e le ra tio n 20

Sc e na rio De finitions • JT A Build o r F ull Build with o r witho ut T ie r 2 Pro je c ts a nd: • T wo o r fo ur thro ug h-la ne Vila s Ro a d • T ig ht Dia mo nd o r Ro unda b o ut 21

T ig ht Dia mond Inte rc ha ng e Crater Lake Highway Inset of Interchange Lear Way 22

Rounda bout Inte rc ha ng e 23

RVMPO v4.2 T ra ve l De ma nd Mode l 2040 Vo lume De ve lo pme nt 24

2015 Design Hour Volumes NORTH 3 NO SCALE 3 126 237 404 141 106 222 379 409 35 253 66 268 1 2 116 646 167 51 141 424 389 15 288 40 419 303 2 631 500 1 61 35 10 318 15 10 101 45 10 5 TPAU OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT File : OR62-Vilas Prepared By: Katie Brown OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 2015 Design Hour Volumes (DHV) FIGURE 4 Date : 6/5/17 Reviewed By: , P.E.

10 9 NORTH NO SCALE 11 15 10 22 26 25 33 50 10 9 4 4 278 71 2015 Design Hour Volumes 293 25 1035 116 141 227 1217 66 86 217 TPAU OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT File : OR62-Vilas Prepared By: Katie Brown OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 2015 Design Hour Volumes (DHV) FIGURE 4 Date : 6/5/17 Reviewed By: , P.E.

Scenario 0: 2040 No Interchange, Mitigated NORTH NO SCALE 3 10 3 315 130 175 645 205 300 515 610 <5 545 10 90 10 495 95 45 <5 60 1020 755 85 2 <5 105 825 140 140 200 470 30 125 755 1 970 255 345 90 45 245 <5 585 340 <5 210 420 735 240 <5 545 2 105 1 <5 TPAU OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT File : OR62-Vilas Prepared By: Katie Brown OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 2040 Design Hour Volumes (DHV) FIGURE 1 Date : 2/5/18 Reviewed By: , P.E.

Scenario 0: 2040 No Interchange, Mitigated Scenario 0: 2040 No Interchange NORTH 4 430 45 NO SCALE 360 50 930 320 295 760 245 180 210 260 12 13 4 12 935 13 845 <5 50 30 140 20 15 115 165 80 325 270 90 285 110 100 170 TPAU OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT File : OR62-Vilas Prepared By: Katie Brown OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 2040 Design Hour Volumes (DHV) FIGURE 2 Date : 2/5/18 Reviewed By: , P.E.

Ana lysis Re sults Ca pa c ity Que uing Cra sh Multimo da l L OS Ove ra ll Simula tio n MOE 29

Sta nda rds/ T a rg e ts for v/ c by Inte rse c tion Standard/Target Intersection ODOT (V/C Ratio) Local OHP HDM V/C Ratio LOS OR62 0.85 0.75 NA NA Vilas Rd & Table Rock Rd NA NA 0.90/0.95 D Vilas Rd & NA NA 0.95 D Airway Dr/Peace Ln Vilas Rd & Lear Wy NA NA 0.95 D Vilas Rd & Crater Lake Hwy 0.85 0.75 NA D Vilas Rd & Crater Lake Ave NA NA 0.95 D Table Rock Rd & Biddle Rd NA NA 0.90/0.95 D Biddle Rd & Hamrick Rd NA NA 0.90 D 30

Ana lysis Re sults Ca pa c ity • All ma inline fre e -flo w se g me nts, ra mps, & me rg e / dive rg e se c tio ns me e t HDM v/ c sta nda rds • OR62 NB no rth o f inte rc ha ng e slig htly e xc e e ds sta nda rds o JT A Build, 2-L a ne Vila s Rd, T ie r 1 o JT A Build, 4-L a ne Vila s Rd, T ie r 1 31

Ana lysis Re sults Ca pa c ity • I nte rse c tio ns c o nsiste ntly o ve r c a pa c ity: • Ha mric k Rd & T a b le Ro c k Rd with Biddle Rd • Build sc e na rio s lo we r v/ c & L OS b ut still do NOT me e t sta nda rds • T a b le Ro c k Rd & Vila s Rd 32

Ana lysis Re sults Ca pa c ity No- Build/ No- Mitigation Sc e nar io: • AL L unsig na lize d inte rse c tio ns o ve r c a pa c ity with L OS F 33

Ana lysis Re sults Ca pa c ity - Ro unda b o uts Scenario v/c LOS Critical Movement Major / Minor NB Ramps S1T1R 0.87 / 0.44 E / C WB / NB S2T1R 1.51 / 0.62 F / D WB / NB S3T1R 0.87 / 0.50 D / D EB / NB S4T1R 1.11 / 0.71 F / E WB / NB S1T2R 0.80 / 0.79 C / F EB / NB S2T2R 0.98 / 0.94 E / F EB / NB S3T2R 0.77 / 0.53 C / D EB / NB S5T2R 0.94 / 0.69 F / E WB / NB SB Ramps S1T1R 1.06 / 1.66 F / F EB / SB S2T1R 1.27 / >2.0 F / F EB / SB S3T1R 0.89 / 1.43 D / F EB / SB S4T1R 1.10 / >2.0 F / F EB / SB S1T2R 0.98 / 1.63 F / F EB / SB S2T2R 1.16 / >2.0 F / F EB / SB S3T2R 0.81 / 1.01 C / F EB / SB S5T2R 0.99 / 1.48 F / F EB / SB 34

Ana lysis Re sults 425’ NORTH Queuing 3 NO SCALE 550’ Scenario 0: No Build No Mitigations 275’ 725’ 625’ 1575’ 1425’ 2 3575’ 1 Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection 775’ 350’ 3050’ TPAU OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT File : OR62-Vilas Prepared By: Katie Brown OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95 th Percentile Queue Lengths FIGURE J-1 Scenario 0: No Build No Mitigations Date : 5/9/18 Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 0: No Build No Mitigations >825’ NORTH NO SCALE 450’ 525’ 5700’ 700’ 10 11 >3025’ 12 13 4 25’ 75’ 50’ 1275’ 100’ 600’ 2600’ >1000’ Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection >4550’ TPAU OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT File : OR62-Vilas Prepared By: Katie Brown OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95 th Percentile Queue Lengths FIGURE J-2 Scenario 0: No Build No Mitigations Date : 5/9/18 Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.