OR62 Vila s Roa d I nte rc ha ng e Are a Ma na g e me nt Pla n - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OR62 – Vila s Roa d

I nte rc ha ng e Are a Ma na g e me nt Pla n (I AMP) T AC Me e ting Pre se nte d b y: K a tie Bro wn July 17, 2018

Background Analysis Results Conclusions

2

OR62 & Vila s Ro a d I nte rc ha ng e

Ba c kg ro und

3

4

5

6

JTA Build Full Build

Sc e na rio De finitions

• No Build/ No -mitig a tio n (NBNM)
• Ba se Co nditio ns
• No I

nte rc ha ng e

• JT

A Build, 2-la ne Vila s Rd

• T

ie r 1 Pro je c ts inc lude d

7

No- build/ No- mitig a tion

8

Sc e na rio De finitions

• No Build Mitig a te d (S0T

1)

• NBNM with mitig a tio ns a tte mpting to me e t v/ c ,

L OS, a nd MML OS sta nda rds

• Sig na ls a dde d whe n PSW me t
• No Build Mitig a te d with T

ie r 2 pro je c ts (S0T 2)

• S0T

1 with T ie r 2 Pro je c ts

9

CL H a nd CL A

No Mitig a tio ns

10

Mitig a te d

T a ble Roc k Roa d & Vila s Roa d

No Mitig a tio ns

11

Mitig a te d

Biddle Roa d & Ha mric k Roa d

12

Mitig a te d No Mitig a tio ns

RVMPO RT P T ie r 2 Pro je c ts Within Study Are a

13

Project No. Location Project Type Proposed Project Description 626 Peace Ln – Vilas Rd to City Limits Urban Upgrade Upgrade to minor collector standard including

• ne lane in each direction, bike lanes, and

sidewalks 628 Lear Way - Vilas Rd to northern city limits New Roadway Construct new minor collector roadway (includes one lane each direction, bike lane, and sidewalk) 632 Vilas Rd – Table Rock to eastern UGB Widening Widen to major arterial standard including two- lanes in each direction, center turn-lane, bike lanes, and sidewalks I39 Crater Lake Ave & Vilas Rd Intersection Re-align Crater Lake Ave to the east and install traffic signal I40 Crater Lake Highway & Vilas Rd Intersection Monitor needs after construction of Crater Lake Highway Bypass I44 Vilas Rd & Lear Way Intersection Install traffic signal or roundabout when warranted I43 Vilas Rd & Industry Dr Intersection Install traffic signal or roundabout when warranted

RVMPO RT P T ie r 2 Pro je c ts in Mo de l Runs Outside Dire c t Study Are a

14

Project No. Location Project Type Proposed Project Description 629 International Wy – Vilas to Coker Butte New Roadway Construct new major arterial roadway (includes center turn-lane, bike lane, and sidewalk) 630 Springbrook Rd - Coker Butte to Vilas Rd New Roadway Construct new major collector roadway (includes center turn-lane, bike lane, and sidewalk) 631 East-West collector- CLH to Eastern UGB between Coker Butte and Vilas Rd New Roadway Construct new minor collector roadway (includes one lane each direction, bike lane, and sidewalk)

15

Inc lude d in a ll sc e na rios be yond NBNM

Crater Lake Ave Crater Lake Hwy Lear Way Current Geometry Analyzed Geometry

16

Analyzed Geometry Current Geometry Inc lude d in a ll sc e na rios be yond NBNM

17

Pe a c e L a ne a nd Airwa y Drive

F unc tio na l Are a Ana lysis Ac c o mmo da te Ne c e ssa ry E le me nts?

F unc tiona l Ar e a E le me nts

Upstre a m

18

F unc tiona l Ar e a E le me nts

Do wnstre a m

19

F unc tiona l Ar e a Ana lysis

I nput

20

• F
• ur la ne Vila s Ro a d sc e na rio s no t fe a sib le
• T

wo la ne Vila s Ro a d sc e na rio s o nly fe a sib le fo r “fa milia r drive rs” whe re re a c tio n dista nc e = 0 fe e t.

T HE RE F ORE

400 fe e t is NOT suffic ie nt to a c c o mmo da te ne c e ssa ry

• Ac c e le ra tio n
• Re a c tio n dista nc e
• L

e g a l turn sig na l dista nc e o f 100’ re q uire d b y the OR Ve hic le Co de

• De c e le ra tio n

Re sults

Sc e na rio De finitions

• JT

A Build o r F ull Build with o r witho ut T ie r 2 Pro je c ts a nd:

• T

wo o r fo ur thro ug h-la ne Vila s Ro a d

• T

ig ht Dia mo nd o r Ro unda b o ut

21

T ig ht Dia mond Inte rc ha ng e

22

Lear Way Crater Lake Highway

Inset of Interchange

Rounda bout Inte rc ha ng e

23

RVMPO v4.2 T ra ve l De ma nd Mode l

2040 Vo lume De ve lo pme nt

24

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

1 2 3

NORTH NO SCALE

2 51 10 15 40 631 10 15 646 45 424 419 35 3 126 106 253 237 404 379 409 268 66 141 222 35 1 288 318 101 10 500 167 389 116 5 303 61 141

File : OR62-Vilas

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 2015 Design Hour Volumes (DHV)

Date : 6/5/17

FIGURE 4

Reviewed By: , P.E. Prepared By: Katie Brown

2015 Design Hour Volumes

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 6/5/17

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE 4

Prepared By: Katie Brown Reviewed By: , P.E.

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 2015 Design Hour Volumes (DHV)

4

NORTH NO SCALE

4 71 141 25 1035 278 227 66 1217 86 217 293 116 10 26 11 25 15 9 10 9 33 50 22 10

2015 Design Hour Volumes

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 2/5/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE 1

Prepared By: Katie Brown Reviewed By: , P.E.

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 2040 Design Hour Volumes (DHV)

1 2 3

NORTH NO SCALE

Scenario 0: 2040 No Interchange, Mitigated

2 140 <5 45 125 970 <5 30 825 210 470 755 90 3 130 205 545 315 645 515 610 495 10 300 <5 1 340 545 105 <5 735 245 345 255 420 240 585 <5 10 175 10 140 200 85 90 755 105 95 <5 45 1020 <5 60

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 2/5/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE 2

Prepared By: Katie Brown Reviewed By: , P.E.

4

NORTH NO SCALE

Scenario 0: 2040 No Interchange 12 165 50 80 140 12 13 4 45 295 50 930 430 245 180 210 260 360 320 13 <5 325 15 115 30 285 110 100 170 20 270 845 935 760 90

Scenario 0: 2040 No Interchange, Mitigated

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 2040 Design Hour Volumes (DHV)

Ana lysis Re sults

29

Ca pa c ity Que uing Cra sh Multimo da l L OS Ove ra ll Simula tio n MOE

Sta nda rds/ T a rg e ts for v/ c by Inte rse c tion

30

Intersection Standard/Target ODOT (V/C Ratio) Local OHP HDM V/C Ratio LOS OR62 0.85 0.75 NA NA Vilas Rd & Table Rock Rd NA NA 0.90/0.95 D Vilas Rd & Airway Dr/Peace Ln NA NA 0.95 D Vilas Rd & Lear Wy NA NA 0.95 D Vilas Rd & Crater Lake Hwy 0.85 0.75 NA D Vilas Rd & Crater Lake Ave NA NA 0.95 D Table Rock Rd & Biddle Rd NA NA 0.90/0.95 D Biddle Rd & Hamrick Rd NA NA 0.90 D

Ana lysis Re sults

Ca pa c ity

31

• All ma inline fre e -flo w se g me nts,

ra mps, & me rg e / dive rg e se c tio ns me e t HDM v/ c sta nda rds

• OR62 NB no rth o f inte rc ha ng e slig htly

e xc e e ds sta nda rds

• JT

A Build, 2-L a ne Vila s Rd, T ie r 1

• JT

A Build, 4-L a ne Vila s Rd, T ie r 1

Ana lysis Re sults

Ca pa c ity

32

• I

nte rse c tio ns c o nsiste ntly o ve r c a pa c ity:

• Ha mric k Rd & T

a b le Ro c k Rd with Biddle Rd

• Build sc e na rio s lo we r v/ c &

L OS b ut still do NOT me e t sta nda rds

• T

a b le Ro c k Rd & Vila s Rd

Ana lysis Re sults

Ca pa c ity

33

No- Build/ No- Mitigation Sc e nar io:

• AL

L unsig na lize d inte rse c tio ns o ve r c a pa c ity with L OS F

Ana lysis Re sults

Ca pa c ity - Ro unda b o uts

34

Scenario v/c LOS Critical Movement Major / Minor NB Ramps S1T1R 0.87 / 0.44 E / C WB / NB S2T1R 1.51 / 0.62 F / D WB / NB S3T1R 0.87 / 0.50 D / D EB / NB S4T1R 1.11 / 0.71 F / E WB / NB S1T2R 0.80 / 0.79 C / F EB / NB S2T2R 0.98 / 0.94 E / F EB / NB S3T2R 0.77 / 0.53 C / D EB / NB S5T2R 0.94 / 0.69 F / E WB / NB SB Ramps S1T1R 1.06 / 1.66 F / F EB / SB S2T1R 1.27 / >2.0 F / F EB / SB S3T1R 0.89 / 1.43 D / F EB / SB S4T1R 1.10 / >2.0 F / F EB / SB S1T2R 0.98 / 1.63 F / F EB / SB S2T2R 1.16 / >2.0 F / F EB / SB S3T2R 0.81 / 1.01 C / F EB / SB S5T2R 0.99 / 1.48 F / F EB / SB

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/9/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-1

Prepared By: Katie Brown

1 2 3

NORTH NO SCALE

625’ 3575’ 350’ 725’ 550’ 275’ 425’ 775’ 1425’ 3050’ 1575’

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 0: No Build No Mitigations

Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Ana lysis Re sults

Queuing Scenario 0: No Build No Mitigations

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/9/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-2

Prepared By: Katie Brown

4

NORTH NO SCALE

1275’ >3025’ 600’ 525’ 12 13 11 10 700’ 25’ >1000’ 75’ 5700’ >825’ 50’ 2600’ 450’ >4550’

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 0: No Build No Mitigations

Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 0: No Build No Mitigations

100’

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/9/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-6

Prepared By: Katie Brown

4

NORTH NO SCALE

775’ 325’ 850’ 300’ 10 12 13 1375’ 175’ 550’ 200’ 275’ 7050’ 200’ 50’ 100’ 200’ 125’

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 0 – Tier 2: No Build, Mitigated

Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 0 – Tier 2: No Build, Mitigated

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/7/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-7

Prepared By: Katie Brown

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 1: 2040 JTA Build +2 Lanes on Vilas Rd

1 2 3

NORTH NO SCALE

400’ 2225’ 350’ 925’ 9950’ 1050’ 1025’ 4575’ 450 ’ 675’ 275’ 1350’ From Peace/ Airway Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 1: 2040 JTA Build +2 Lanes on Vilas Rd

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/8/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-9

Prepared By: Katie Brown

1 2 3

NORTH NO SCALE

700’ 2125’ 2600’ 4000’ 8625’ 1075’ 4525’ 1900’ 475’ 325’ 1250’ From Peace/ Airway

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 2: 2040 JTA Build +4 Lanes on Vilas Rd

Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 2: 2040 JTA Build +4 Lanes on Vilas Rd

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/8/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-13

Prepared By: Katie Brown

1 2 3

NORTH NO SCALE

475’ 3225’ 350’ 2525’ 175’ 425’ 425’ 300’ 300’ 1350’

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 5: 2040 Full Build +4 Lanes on Vilas Rd

Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 5: 2040 Full Build +4 Lanes on Vilas Rd

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/8/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-14

Prepared By: Katie Brown

4

NORTH NO SCALE

6 5 8 7 350’ 350’ 475’ 1050’ 700’ 75’ 1525’ 775’ 10 12 13 625’ 3750’ 175’ 150’ 350’ 200’ 175’ 400’ 350’ 275’ 175’

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 5: 2040 Full Build +4 Lanes on Vilas Rd

Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 5: 2040 Full Build +4 Lanes on Vilas Rd

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/7/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-7

Prepared By: Katie Brown

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 1: 2040 JTA Build +2 Lanes on Vilas Rd

1 2 3

NORTH NO SCALE

400’ 2225’ 350’ 925’ 9950’ 1050’ 1025’ 4575’ 450’ 675’ 275’ 1350’ From Peace/ Airway Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 1: 2040 JTA Build +2 Lanes on Vilas Rd

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/8/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-15

Prepared By: Katie Brown

1 2 3

NORTH NO SCALE

475’ 775’ 300’ 1000’ 3400’ 1050’ 700’ 4300’ 1650’ 575’ 275’ 1300’

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 1- Tier 2: 2040 JTA Build +2 Lanes on Vilas Rd

Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 1-Tier 2: 2040 JTA Build +2 Lanes on Vilas Rd

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/7/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-8

Prepared By: Katie Brown

4

NORTH NO SCALE

6 5 8 7 375’ 400 ’ 1150’ 625’ 25’ 10 1275’ >1025’ 12 13 125’ 25’ 175’ 90’ 150’ 4600’ 2500’ >1175’

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 1: 2040 JTA Build +2 Lanes on Vilas Rd

Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 1: 2040 JTA Build +2 Lanes on Vilas Rd

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

File : OR62-Vilas Date : 5/8/18

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ANALYSIS UNIT

TPAU

FIGURE J-16

Prepared By: Katie Brown

4

NORTH NO SCALE

6 5 8 7 200’ 125 ’ 275’ 325’ 1000’ 2675’ 75’ 10 1625’ 300’ 12 13 100’ 400’ 25’ 50’ 125’ 825’ 425’ 150’ 1200’

OR62 & Vilas Rd IAMP 95th Percentile Queue Lengths Scenario 1- Tier 2: 2040 JTA Build +2 Lanes on Vilas Rd

Queue Length Queue Blocks Upstream Intersection

Reviewed By: P. Schuytema, P.E.

Scenario 1-Tier 2: 2040 JTA Build +2 Lanes on Vilas Rd

Ana lysis Re sults

Cra sh F re q ue nc y

46

• No -Mitig a tio n ha s hig he st c ra sh fre q ue nc y o f No -Build sc e na rio s
• F

ull Build, 2-la ne Vila s Rd, T ie r 2, Ro unda b o ut ha s lo we st c ra sh fre q ue nc y

• f Build sc e na rio s
• +T

ie r 2 Pro je c ts JT A Build c ra she s slig htly de c re a se F ull Build c ra she s de c re a se

Ana lysis Re sults

47

Side wa lk impro ve s pe de stria n L OS to C o r b e tte r e ve rywhe re E XCE PT

• Pine Stre e t/ Biddle Rd
• T

a b le Ro c k Rd

• Cra te r L

a ke Hig hwa y

• Vila s Rd (in Build sc e na rio s)

Se pa ra te d Multi-Use Pa ths a re re c o mme nde d

Multimo da l L e ve l o f Se rvic e (MML OS)

Ana lysis Re sults

48

Ove ra ll Simula tio n Me a sure s o f E ffe c tive ne ss (MOE )

No Build Tight Diamond Roundabout Measure Best Worst Best Worst Best Worst Overall average network speed (mph) S0T2 NBNM S5T2 S2T1/2 S5T2R S3T1R Overall network travel time (hr) S0T2 NBNM S5T2 S2T1 S5T2R S3T1R Overall delay (vehicle-hours) S0T2 NBNM S5T2 S5T1 S5T2R S3T1R Overall number of stops NBNM S0T2 S5T2 S3T1 S5T2R S2T2R

S0T2: No Build Tier 2 S5T2: Tight Diamond, Full Build, 4 Lane Vilas Rd, Tier 2 S5T2R: Roundabout, Full Build, 4 Lane Vilas Rd, Tier 2

Conc lusions

49

Ove ra ll No Build Sc e na rio s Co mpa riso n

Measure NBNM S0T1 S0T2 Number of locations over standards2 8 4 3 Number of locations over capacity3 8 1 2 Number of turn storage bays blocked more than 50% of the peak hour 12 5 6 Number of intersections blocked by queues 2 Overall average network speed (mph) 14 19 21 Overall network travel time (hr) 1,600 1,200 1,100 Overall delay (vehicle-hours) 1,000 600 500 Overall number of stops 20,200 21,400 22,500 Number of predicted crashes4 83.7 70.3 68.5 Number of segments with MMLOS worse than D 54 14 14

Conc lusions

50

Via b le Sc e na rio s

Measure S0T1 S0T2 S2T1 S5T1 S1T2 S2T2 S3T2 S5T2 Total number of Worst 8 1 1 3 Total number of 2nd Worst 2 1 2 2 3 4 3 1 Total number of 2nd Best 2 4 2 1 2 2 Total number of Best 4 5 1 1 5 Overall Score: 4 8

• 10
• 3
• 6
• 1

6

POSITIVE OVERALL SCORES (high to low) 1st S0T2: No-Build, Tier 2 Projects 2nd S5T2: Full Build, 4-lane Vilas Road, Tier 2 Projects 3rd S0T1: No-Build, Tier 1 Projects 4th S5T1: Full Build, 4-lane Vilas Road, Tier 1 Projects

Conc lusions

51

Summa ry

• No mitigation = extensive queueing and congestion throughout the network
• Roundabout and 2-Lane Vilas Rd Scenarios are NOT VIABLE
• No Build – JTA Build, 2-lane Vilas Rd, Tier 2 Projects
• Lowest crash frequency
• Shortest overall network travel time
• Low intersection and turning bay blocking
• Build – Full Build, 4-lane Vilas Rd, Tier 2 Projects

Assume completion of intersection mitigations used in analysis

T ha nk you

Que stio ns?

52