Optimierung von Kunststoffbauteilen im Crash: Status und Ausblick - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

optimierung von kunststoffbauteilen im crash status und
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Optimierung von Kunststoffbauteilen im Crash: Status und Ausblick - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Optimierung von Kunststoffbauteilen im Crash: Status und Ausblick Torsten Hensel BASF SE Dr. Steffen Frik, Opel AG Andreas Wst, BASF SE Dr. Stefan Glaser, BASF SE Content Motivation Material modelling of Short fibre reinforced


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Optimierung von Kunststoffbauteilen im Crash: Status und Ausblick

Torsten Hensel – BASF SE

  • Dr. Steffen Frik, Opel AG

Andreas Wüst, BASF SE

  • Dr. Stefan Glaser, BASF SE
slide-2
SLIDE 2

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Content

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser 2

 Motivation  Material modelling of Short fibre reinforced thermoplastics for Crash  ULTRASIM™ examples and applications at OPEL  Modelling Energy absorbing structures out of glass-filled thermoplastic materials  Vision  Integrative Approach  Summary

slide-3
SLIDE 3

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Motivation Application of Polymers

3

  • More and more structural components are made of polymers

(e.g. short fiber reinforced polymers)

  • These materials show significant anisotropy due to fiber
  • rientation caused by injection molding
  • In order to predict component behavior, kinematics and

structural response with required accuracy, anisotropy must be captured

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Development targets:

  • Optimized, ribbed plastic structure to provide

sufficient support for lower leg during the impact

  • Needs to fail in a controlled manner during

RCAR impacts in order not to damage other components

  • Low weight at reasonable costs

Lower Bumper Support

4 Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-5
SLIDE 5

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Without Lower Bumper Support With Lower Bumper Support No support of lower leg Support lower leg, reduce knee bending angle

Lower Leg Impact Kinematics

5 Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-6
SLIDE 6

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Lower Leg Impact (Full Model)

6 Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-7
SLIDE 7

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Simulation Results

Impact on stiffness and rupture

7

Normalized acceleration

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-8
SLIDE 8

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Integrative Simulation ULTRASIM™

for fiber reinforced thermoplastics

8

Measurement Process BASF Material model Part

  • Anisotropic
  • Nonlinear
  • Strain-rate sensitive
  • Tension-compression

asymmetric

  • Failure modelling
  • Temperature dependent

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Integrative Simulation ULTRASIM™ Fiber orientation and material behaviour

9

Local true stress strain at a fiber orientations of 0.5 Stress

Fiber orientation of 0,5

Fiber orientation of 0,7

Local true stress strain at a fiber orientations of 0.7 and 0.3 Local true stress strain at a fiber orientations of 0.9 and 0.1

Fiber orientation of 0,9

Strain Stress Strain Stress Strain Orientation of fibers

Calculated glass fiber orientation based

  • n optimum processing conditions

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-10
SLIDE 10

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Integrative Simulation ULTRASIM™

Data flow structure

10

ABAQUS, LS-Dyna, PAM, RADIOSS, NASTRAN MOLDFLOW MOLDEX

FIBER

 

p 

Filling- simulation Finite Element Simulation

Material- parameter Geometry, Boundary Cond.

homogenization of

  • rientation

anisotropic material model homogenization of fibers and polymer

Material- parameter

Material model for fibers

  • elastic
  • brittle

Material model for polymer

  • elastic
  • lastic-plastic
  • viscoplastic

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

2006 2008 2009 2010

LBS Implementations

11 Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-12
SLIDE 12

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Additional Applications

12

 Engine Mounts (e.g. Insignia)  Special Seats (e.g. Insignia OPC)

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-13
SLIDE 13

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Stress-Strain behaviour Tension-Compression Asymmetry

13

20 40 60 80 100 120 2 4 6 8

Strain [%]

Tension Tension

Stress [MPa]

Injection moulded plate

influence: fiber orientation and hydrostatic stress state Compression Compression

9 10

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-14
SLIDE 14

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Example for an Energy absorbing plastics structure – BASF Test Specimen for compression load Needed for Calibrating Failure Simulation Parameters

14

Specimen is designed for controlled collapse Material: B3WG6 CR (PA6 GF30%) sliding barrier

60 mm 60 mm

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-15
SLIDE 15

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Plastic specimen under compression load

Simulation and Experiment

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-16
SLIDE 16

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt 16

Test-specimen under compression load

Simulation and Experiment

60 mm

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-17
SLIDE 17

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt 17

Lower Loadpath

Traditional Metal Crashbox: Loadpath 1

New Loadpath 2

Space for additional Absorber

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-18
SLIDE 18

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Videocomparison Absorber

 enhanced ULTRASIM™ failure modelling ULTRASIM™

Integrative Simulation Math. Optimierung

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Dynamic Test Video

Drop mass: 60 kg Drop height: 2.5 m Drop Energy: 1.47 kJ Duration:  25 msec Displacement:  75 mm Part weight: ~130gr

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-20
SLIDE 20

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Parameter Optimization in CAE

Iterative process based on mathematical optimization methods

Mathematical Optimization Methods FE-Solver

Design Variables System responses

Design parameters

  • Wallthickness
  • Contours
  • Rib heights

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-21
SLIDE 21

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Shape Optimization using Morphing

Morphing parameter 2 Morphing parameter 1

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-22
SLIDE 22

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Vision – Integrative Optimization

Standard Optimization and Integrative Approach

22

Product in use

  • Crash
  • Static Loads
  • NVH
  • Warpage

BASF ULTRASIM

Plastics granulate with glass fibers Injection molding process Assembly Part Standard Approach

Integrative Optimization Approach

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-23
SLIDE 23

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Workflow for Standard Optimization Approach

23

Mathematical Optimizer

Vector of Design Variables

         

3 2 1

x x x

System parameters e.g. wallthicknesses

FE-Solver

ABAQUS, LS-Dyna, PAM

Modified FE-Inputfile FE-Results

vector of Responses

         

3 2 1

r r r

Response Extraction

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-24
SLIDE 24

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Workflow for Integrative Optimization Approach

Single disciplinary (without morphing)

24

Mathematical Optimizer

Vector of Design Variables

         

3 2 1

x x x

General system parameters

vector of Responses

         

3 2 1

r r r

Discipline 1: Mechanical FE Simulation Discipline „0“: Process Simulation

Manufacturing Wallthickness, Injection time and location, temperatures, gate delay times, … Wallthickness, … BASF ULTRASIM™ Fiber Orientation Mapping Intermediate Mesh for mapping Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-25
SLIDE 25

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt 25

Workflow for Integrative Optimization Approach

Multi disciplinary (with morphing) Mathematical Optimizer

Vector of Design Variables

         

3 2 1

x x x

General system parameters Discipline 1

vector of Responses

         

3 2 1

r r r

Discipline 2 Discipline n … Process Simulation

Manufacturing

Discipline „0“

Wallthickness, Injection time and location, temperatures, gate delay times, … BASF ULTRASIM™ Fiber Orientation Mapping

Intermediate Mesh Intermediate Mesh Intermediate Mesh

Morphing

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-26
SLIDE 26

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Integrative Optimization Example

Filling, Warpage, Impact, Static Load, Shape Optimization by Morphing LS-OPT, MOLDFLOW, LS-Dyna, ANSA, ABAQUS

Filling Warpage Impact

Morphing

Integrative Optimization Static Load

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser

slide-27
SLIDE 27

LS-DYNA Forum 2011 - Filderstadt

Summary

27

 More and more structural vehicle parts are made of anisotropic polymers  Injection molding process determines fiber orientation and thus local mechanical properties  ULTRASIMTM approach has been applied for numerous applications  Initially: Lower bumper support for pedestrian protection  Extended to engine mounts and seats  Simulation results show excellent correlation with physical tests  Extended ULTRASIM™ failure model is crucial for the accurate design

  • f energy absorbing structures

 Integrative Optimization Approach allows simultaneous optimization

  • f process and mechanical characteristics

Wüst, Frik, Hensel, Glaser