optimal transport for structured data with application on
play

Optimal Transport for structured data with application on graphs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Optimal Transport for structured data with application on graphs Titouan Vayer Joint work with Laetitia Chapel, Remi Flamary, Romain Tavenard and Nicolas Courty A novel distance between labeled graphs based on optimal transport Contributions:


  1. Optimal Transport for structured data with application on graphs Titouan Vayer Joint work with Laetitia Chapel, Remi Flamary, Romain Tavenard and Nicolas Courty A novel distance between labeled graphs based on optimal transport

  2. Contributions: • Di ff erentiable distance between labeled graphs. Jointly considers the features and the structures

  3. Contributions: • Di ff erentiable distance between labeled graphs. Jointly considers the features and the structures Optimal transport : soft assignment between the nodes Distance = 1.41

  4. Contributions: • Di ff erentiable distance between labeled graphs. Jointly considers the features and the structures Computing average 1 2 ( + ) = of labeled graphs

  5. Structured data as probability distribution

  6. Structured data as probability distribution Features ( a i ) i

  7. Structured data as probability distribution Features ( a i ) i nodes in the metric ( x i ) i space of the graph

  8. Structured data as probability distribution Features ( a i ) i nodes in the metric ( x i ) i space of the graph weighted by their masses ( h i ) i

  9. Optimal transport in a nutshell Compare two probability distributions by transporting one onto another ν Y μ A ν B μ X d ( a i , b j ) Gromov-Wasserstein distance Wasserstein distance

  10. Optimal transport in a nutshell Compare two probability distributions by transporting one onto another ν Y μ A ν B μ X d ( a i , b j ) Gromov-Wasserstein distance Wasserstein distance

  11. Optimal transport in a nutshell Compare two probability distributions by transporting one onto another ν Y μ A ν B μ X d ( a i , b j ) Gromov-Wasserstein distance Wasserstein distance

  12. Fused Gromov-Wasserstein distance ( (1 − α ) d ( a i , b j ) q + α | C 1 ( i , k ) − C 2 ( j , l ) | q ) π i , j π k , l π ∈Π ( μ , ν ) ∑ FGW q , α ( μ , ν ) = min i , j , k , l where is the soft assignment matrix π α is a trade-off features/structures

  13. Fused Gromov-Wasserstein distance Properties Interpolate between Wasserstein distance on features and Gromov-Wasserstein distance on the structures • Distance on labeled graph : vanishes iff graphs have same labels and weights at the same place up to a permutation • Optimization problem Non convex Quadratic Program: hard ! • Conditional Gradient Descent (aka Frank Wolfe) • Suitable for entropic regularization + Sinkhorn iteraterations •

  14. Applications Classification Graph Barycenter + k-means clustering of graphs Noiseless graph Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Sample 6 Bary n= 15 Bary n= 7

  15. Check out our poster at Pacific Ballroom #133!!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend