open quantum dynamics
play

Open quantum dynamics Dariusz Chru sci nski Institute of Physics, - PDF document

Open quantum dynamics Dariusz Chru sci nski Institute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics Nicolaus Copernicus University Grudziadzka 5, 87100 Torun, Poland 1 Introduction: closed systems vs. open systems 1.1


  1. Open quantum dynamics Dariusz Chru´ sci´ nski Institute of Physics, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics Nicolaus Copernicus University Grudziadzka 5, 87–100 Torun, Poland 1 Introduction: closed systems vs. open systems 1.1 Closed systems Consider a quantum system S and let H be the corresponding system’s Hilbert space. The evolution of the closed system is fully governed by the system Hamiltonian H via the Schr¨ odinger equation i ˙ ψ t = Hψ t , ( � = 1) , (1) and hence ψ − → ψ t = U t ψ, (2) where the unitary operator U t is defined by U t = e − iHt , (3) and ψ ∈ H is an initial ( t = 0) state. Mixed states represented by density operators evolve according to von Neumann equation ρ t = − i [ H, ρ t ] . ˙ (4) 1. pure state evolves into pure state 2. mixed state ρ evolves → ρ t = U t ( ρ ) := U t ρU † ρ − t , (5) 3. entropy S ( ρ ) = − Tr( ρ log ρ ) satisfies S ( ρ t ) = S ( ρ ) , (6) 4. purity Tr ρ 2 t is constant, 5. the evolution U t is reversible , that is, U − 1 = U − t . t 1

  2. 1.2 Open systems Consider now a quantum system S interacting with another system E – environment – and let H = H S ⊗ H E be the corresponding ‘ S + E ’ Hilbert space. The Hamiltonian of the total closed ‘ S + E ’ system reads H = H 0 + H int = H S ⊗ 1 l E + 1 l S ⊗ H E + H int . (7) Note, that the splitting is not unique. Let the initial state of ‘ E + S ’ be as follows ρ SE = ρ ⊗ ρ E , (8) that is, initially (at t = 0) S and E are not correlated. Since ‘ S + E ’ is a closed system its evolution reads as follows ρ ⊗ ρ E U SE † → ρ SE ( t ) := U SE ρ SE − , (9) t t where U SE = e − iHt . t Question : what is the evolution of the system S itself? The state of the system S evolves according to ρ t := Tr E ρ SE ( t ) (10) and it is called reduced evolution of the system S . The map � � ρ ⊗ ρ E U SE † U SE ρ → Λ t ( ρ ) := Tr E (11) t t enjoys the following properties: • completely positive (CP) • trace-preserving (TP) • Λ t =0 = id. Λ t is called a dynamical map . 1.3 Positive and completely positive maps Let L ( H ) be a space of linear operators in H (in this notes I assume that dim H = d < ∞ ). 2

  3. Definition 1 A linear map (super-operator) Φ : L ( H ) → L ( H ) is called • positive iff X ≥ 0 = ⇒ Φ( X ) ≥ 0 . • n -positive if id n ⊗ Φ : M n ( C ) ⊗ L ( H ) → M n ( C ) ⊗ L ( H ) is positive • completely positive if it is n -positive for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . . A linear map Φ : L ( H ) → L ( H ) is • trace-preserving if TrΦ( X ) = Tr X for all X ∈ L ( H ) • unital if Φ(1 l) = 1 l. Note, that fixing an othonormal basis | k � in H one may define a matrix T ij := Tr( P i Φ( P j )) (12) If Φ is positive and trace-preserving, then T ij is stochastic. Frobenius-Perron theorem — some remarks (classical vs. quantum). Let T be a stochastic matrix. Consider T x = λ x . There exists a leading eigenvalue λ 1 = 1 and the corresponding eigenvector (after appropriate normalization) corresponds to probability distribution. All other eigenvalues belong to the unit disc in the complex plane, that is, λ k | ≤ 1. Similar result hold for positive trace-preserving map Φ: Φ( X ) = λX. There exists a leading eigenvalue λ 1 = 1 and the corresponding eigenvector (after appropriate normalization) corresponds to density operator. All other eigenvalues belong to the unit disc in the complex plane, that is, λ k | ≤ 1. Let E ij be a matrix unit in M n ( C ). Any operator X ∈ M n ( C ) ⊗ L ( H ) has a following form n � X = E ij ⊗ X ij , X ij ∈ L ( H ) . i,j =1 One has 3

  4. n � (id n ⊗ Φ)( X ) := E ij ⊗ Φ( X ij ) . (13) i,j =1 Proposition 1 Φ is CP iff it is d -positive. Corollary 1 One has CP = P d ⊂ P d − 1 ⊂ . . . ⊂ P 1 = Positive . (14) Theorem 1 (Stinespring, 1955) Φ : A → L ( H ) is CP ( A is a C ∗ -algebra) iff there exist • a Hilbert space K • a ∗ -homomorphism π : A → B ( K ) • a linear operator V : K → H such that Φ( a ) = V π ( a ) V † . (15) for all a ∈ A . Theorem 2 Φ is CP iff the Choi matrix d � C Φ := E ij ⊗ Φ( E ij ) ≥ 0 . (16) i,j =1 Theorem 3 (Stinespring,Sudarshan,Kraus) A map Φ is CP if and only if � K i XK † Φ( X ) = (17) i i where K i ∈ L ( H ) are called Kraus operators . The map Φ represented in (17) is • trace-preserving if � K † i K i = 1 l . (18) i • unital if � K i K † i = 1 l . (19) i 4

  5. Example 1 Some examples of positive but not CP maps – they are important in entanglement theory! Basic properties of quantum channels: E : L ( H ) → L ( H ) • �E ( X ) � 1 ≤ � X � 1 • S ( E ( ρ ) ||E ( σ )) ≤ S ( ρ || σ ) • F ( E ( ρ ) , E ( σ )) ≥ F ( ρ, σ ) � Tr[ ρ (log ρ − log σ ]) , if supp ρ ⊆ supp σ D ( ρ || σ ) = . (20) + ∞ , otherwise and � √ ρ σ √ ρ � � 2 F ( ρ, σ ) = Tr . (21) Example 2 (Pure decoherence) Consider d -level system S coupled to the environment � H = H S ⊗ 1 l E + 1 l S ⊗ H E + P k ⊗ B k (22) k where � H S = E k P k . (23) k One has � H = P k ⊗ Z k ; Z k = E k 1 l S + H E + B k . (24) k One finds � U t = e − iHt = P k ⊗ e − iZ k t , (25) k and hence � Λ t ( ρ ) = C kl ( t ) P k ρP l (26) k,l with � e − iZ k t ρ E e iZ l t � C kl ( t ) = Tr (27) . The evolution of the density operator is very simple: 5

  6. ρ kl − → C kl ( t ) ρ kl , that is, it is defined by the Hadamard product of C ( t ) and ρ . Recall, that ( A ◦ B ) kl := A kl B kl . (28) The map Φ C ( X ) := C ◦ X (29) is CP if and only if C ≥ 0 . 2 Markovian semigroup The simplest evolution is provided by the following master equation ρ t = L ( ρ t ) , ˙ (30) which generalizes von Neumann equation ρ t = − i [ H, ρ t ] =: L H ( ρ t ) , ˙ (31) that is, the super-operator L H : L ( H ) → L ( H ) is defined by L H ( ρ ) := − i [ H, ρ ] . (32) The solution to (30) has the following form Λ t = e t L . (33) Theorem 4 (Gorini,Kossakowski,Sudarshan,Lindblad) A linear map L : L ( H ) → L ( H ) generates legitimate dynamical map if and only if � � � k − 1 V k ρV † 2 { V † L ( ρ ) = − i [ H, ρ ] + γ k k V k , ρ } (34) k where { A, B } = AB + BA , and γ k > 0 . 2.1 Examples of Markovian semigroups Example 3 (Qubit decoherence) L ( ρ ) = γ 2( σ z ρσ z − ρ ); γ > 0 . (35) Note that 6

  7. L ( E 11 ) = 0 L ( E 22 ) = 0 L ( E 12 ) = − γE 12 L ( E 21 ) = − γE 21 and hence Λ t ( E 11 ) = E 11 Λ t ( E 22 ) = E 22 e − γt E 12 Λ t ( E 12 ) = e − γt E 21 Λ t ( E 21 ) = Now finds the following Kraus representation Λ t ( ρ ) = 1 + e − γt ρ + 1 − e − γt σ z ρσ z . (36) 2 2 Another way is a direct computation of e L t . Example 4 (Qubit dissipation) Let us consider � � Φ( ρ ) = 1 γ + L + + γ − L − (37) 2 where where L 1 ( ρ ) = [ σ + , ρσ − ] + [ σ + ρ, σ − ] , L 2 ( ρ ) = [ σ − , ρσ + ] + [ σ − ρ, σ + ] , (38) L + corresponds to pumping (heating) process, L − corresponds to relaxation (cooling). To solve the master equation ˙ ρ t = Lρ t let us parameterize ρ t as follows ρ t = p 1 ( t ) P 1 + p 2 ( t ) P 2 + α ( t ) σ + + α ( t ) σ − , (39) with P k = | k �� k | . Using the following relations L ( P 1 ) = − γ + σ 3 , L ( P 2 ) = γ − σ 3 , L ( σ + ) = γ σ + , L ( σ − ) = γ σ − , where γ = γ + + γ − . 2 7

  8. one finds the following Pauli master equations for the probability distribution ( p 1 ( t ) , p 2 ( t )) p 1 ( t ) ˙ = − γ + p 1 ( t ) + γ − p 2 ( t ) , (40) p 2 ( t ) ˙ = γ + p 1 ( t ) − γ − p 2 ( t ) , (41) together with α ( t ) = e − γt α (0) . The corresponding solution reads � 1 − e − ( γ + + γ − ) t � p 1 (0) e − ( γ + + γ − ) t + p ∗ p 1 ( t ) = , (42) 1 � 1 − e − ( γ + + γ − ) t � p 2 (0) e − ( γ + + γ − ) t + p ∗ p 2 ( t ) = (43) , 2 where we introduced γ + γ + p ∗ p ∗ 1 = 2 = (44) , . γ + + γ − γ + + γ − Hence, we have purely classical evolution of probability vector ( p 1 ( t ) , p 2 ( t )) on the diagonal of ρ t and very simple evolution of the off-diagonal element α ( t ) . Note, that asymptotically one obtains completely decohered density operator � p ∗ � 0 1 − → ρ t . p ∗ 0 2 In particular if γ + = γ − a state ρ t relaxes to maximally mixed state (a state becomes completely depolarized). 3 Beyond Markovian semigroup – non-Markovian evolution Consider now ˙ Λ t = L t Λ t , Λ 0 = id , (45) with time dependent generator L t . The formal solution reads �� t � � t � t � t 2 Λ t = T exp L u du = id + L u du + dt 1 L t 2 L t 1 + . . . . (46) dt 2 0 0 0 0 If [ L t , L u ] = 0, then �� t � �� t � 2 � t L u du + 1 Λ t = exp L u du = id + L u du + . . . . (47) 2 0 0 0 Evolution Λ t is called divisible if Λ t = V t,s Λ s ; t ≥ s. (48) It is called • P-divisible if V t,s is PTP • CP-divisible if V t,s is CPTP 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend