Ontology-based Diagnostic Decision Support for Radiology Charles E. - - PDF document

ontology based diagnostic decision support for radiology
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ontology-based Diagnostic Decision Support for Radiology Charles E. - - PDF document

MIE 2014 Ontology-based Diagnostic Decision Support for Radiology Charles E. Kahn, Jr., MD, MS Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA Goals Apply an ontology of disorders and associated imaging findings for differential


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ontology-based Diagnostic Decision Support for Radiology

Charles E. Kahn, Jr., MD, MS

Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

MIE 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Goals

  • Apply an ontology of disorders and associated

imaging findings for differential diagnosis

  • Develop user interface and web service API for

knowledge query

  • Demonstrate valid application of the ontology’s

knowledge

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Radiology Gamuts Ontology (RGO)

  • Large and growing knowledge model

▫ Diseases ▫ Imaging observations

  • Constructed from several differential diagnosis

references

  • Serves as a form of "computable knowledge" to

aid in radiological diagnosis

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ontology Structure

  • Entity

▫ disorder chronic hepatitis ▫ intervention steroid therapy ▫ observation misty mesentery

  • Relation

▫ subsumption (“is a”) ▫ causality (“may cause”)

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Radiology Gamuts Ontology

  • Standardized knowledge representation

▫ Normalized entity names + synonyms ▫ Ability to reason over domain

  • Interoperability / knowledge integration

▫ Mappings to other ontologies ▫ Knowledge-based applications

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Gamuts Ontology

  • Content

▫ 16,822 terms ▫ 1,755 subsumption relations ▫ 53,638 causal relations

  • User interface

▫ Web site (www.gamuts.net) ▫ RESTful web service / JSON

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Imaging findings and diseases Causal relationships

gamuts.net

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Differential Diagnosis (“DDx”)

  • Identify the cause(s) of a set of findings

▫ Each diagnosis explains all imaging findings that have been asserted

  • “Discriminators”

▫ Union of findings of each listed diagnosis

  • exclude asserted findings
  • exclude findings common to all listed diagnoses

▫ Additional findings that can reduce the DDx list

slide-13
SLIDE 13

DDx Example

  • Finding

▫ hypertelorism

  • Diagnosis

▫ 151 diagnoses ▫ “Aarskog syndrome” to “XXXY syndrome”

  • Discriminators

▫ 976 discriminators ▫ including acro-osteolysis, abnormal sternum, clubfoot, tracheomalacia, Wormian bones

slide-14
SLIDE 14

DDx Example: 2nd finding

  • Findings

▫ hypertelorism ▫ abnormal sternum

  • Diagnosis (disorders that cause both findings)
  • Discriminators

▫ Brachmann-de Lange syndrome ▫ cleidocranial dysostosis ▫ Noonan syndrome ▫ Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome ▫ Seckel syndrome ▫ XXXXY syndrome

slide-15
SLIDE 15

DDx Example: 3rd finding

  • Findings

▫ hypertelorism ▫ abnormal sternum ▫ Wormian bones

  • Diagnosis (disorders that cause all 3 findings)

▫ cleidocranial dysostosis

  • Discriminators

▫ (none)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Gamuts DDx

  • User interfaces

▫ Web site (gamuts.net/ddx) ▫ Web service (see gamuts.net/dev)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

gamuts.net/ddx

slide-18
SLIDE 18

gamuts.net/ddx

slide-19
SLIDE 19

"finding": [ "hypertelorism", "Wormian bones" ], "diagnosis": [ "aminopterin fetopathy", "cleidocranial dysostosis", "metaphyseal chondrodysplasia Jansen type", "normal variant", "Ritscher-Shinzel syndrome", "Schinzel-Giedion syndrome", "sclerosteosis" ], "discriminator": [ { "name": "abnormal fibula", "n": "1" }, { "name": "widespread predominantly medullary

  • steosclerosis",

"n": "1" }

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Mappings

  • RadLex
  • SNOMED CT
  • OrphaNet Rare Disease Ontology (ORDO)
  • Bone Dysplasia Ontology (BDO)
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conclusions

  • Working system for differential diagnosis
  • Valid application of diagnostic knowledge
  • Requires diagnoses to cause all asserted findings
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Future Work

  • Test on clinical cases
  • Apply “transitive closure” over ontology
  • Integrate with NLP tools
  • Incorporate probabilistic knowledge + reasoning
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Thank you !