+ Online and Offline Experiences of Aggression and Bullying: Views - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

online and offline experiences of aggression and bullying
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

+ Online and Offline Experiences of Aggression and Bullying: Views - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

+ Online and Offline Experiences of Aggression and Bullying: Views from Adolescents in the UK and South Africa Dr. Maa Popovac Presented at the World Anti-Bullying Forum, 2017 Stockholm, Sweden + Definitions Cyberaggression vs.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

+

Online and Offline Experiences of Aggression and Bullying: Views from Adolescents in the UK and South Africa

  • Dr. Maša Popovac

Presented at the World Anti-Bullying Forum, 2017 Stockholm, Sweden

slide-2
SLIDE 2

+ Definitions

Cyberaggression vs. Cyberbullying Cyberharassment Cyberbullying Cyberstalking Trolling, etc.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

+ Definitions

Cyberaggression vs. Cyberbullying Cyberharassment Cyberbullying Cyberstalking Trolling, etc.

  • Repeated
  • Intentional
  • Power Imbalance
slide-4
SLIDE 4

+ Cyberaggression vs. Cyberbullying

(1) bothering someone online; (2) teasing in a mean way; (3) calling someone hurtful names; (4) intentionally leaving someone out of something; (5) threatening someone; and (6) saying unwanted sexually-related things to someone

(Patchin & Hinduja, 2006)

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Text messages
  • Pictures/Video

clips via mobile phones

  • Phone calls
  • E-mails
  • Chat rooms
  • Instant messages
  • Websites and

blogs

  • Social networking

sites

  • Internet gaming
  • Meta-analysis: 20-40%

cyberbullying globally (Tokunaga,

2010)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

+ Effects

 Psychological distress and poor psychosocial adjustment

Suicide attempts Eating disorders Depression, sadness, hopelessness Anxiety Fear, anger, frustration Lower self-esteem Substance abuse Inability to concentrate, poor grades School drop-out/absenteeism Low school commitment

(Dempsey, Sulkowski, Nichols, & Storch, 2009; Mesch & Talmud, 2010; Olweus, 1993, Patchin & Hinduja, 2010)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

+ Gaps and Questions

 Prevalence and impact on adolescents – online and offline  Little research in developing countries

 How do their experiences compare?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

+ Research Methods

 Study 1: Experiences of online aggression and

bullying (ever) among adolescents (12-18 years) in the UK and SA

 n = 993, 12-18 years  SA: n = 673, 3 schools  UK: n = 320, 2 schools

 Study 2: Experiences of both online and offline

aggression and bullying (past 12 months) among adolescents (12-18 years) in the UK and SA

 n = 424, 12-18 years  SA: n = 277, 1 school  UK: n = 146, 1 school

What are adolescents’ online experiences? (SA and UK) Where does the problem fit more broadly? (SA and UK)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

+

Cyberaggression and Cyberbullying (ever)

79.5 34.4 68.8 43 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Cyberaggression Cyberbullying

SA UK

*** *

* = p < .05; ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001

Study 1: Results

slide-10
SLIDE 10

+ Cyber Victimisation

24 27.1 30.6 37.9 45.6 44.3 26.3 71.2 17.8 31.4 33.5 34.9 43.5 47.8 53.6 69.9 20 40 60 80

Been impersonated through a fake profile or through someone gaining access to my account without my permission Had private messages forwarded, shared or posted so others could see them Had comments or questions posted about me online to hurt

  • r embarrass me

Been threatened via email, text, messages or calls Received messages as if they were coming from one person but later found out they were written by someone else Had rumours or gossip spread about me online Had a picture posted online to embarrass me Called a hurtful name or received a hurtful or rude comment, message, email etc.

UK SA

*** *

* = p < .05; ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001

slide-11
SLIDE 11

+ Cyber Perpetration

12.2 9.1 11.1 21.8 31.2 12.8 15.3 58.8 7.6 7.7 9.1 17.8 19.2 19.8 21.8 41.1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Impersonated someone through a fake profile or by accessing their account without their permission Posted comments or questions to hurt or embarrass someone Threatened someone via email, texts, messages, calls etc. Spread rumours or gossip about someone online Sent messages as if they were coming from another person Forwarded, shared or posted private messages from others so

  • thers could see them

Put up a picture to embarrass someone online Called someone a hurtful name or sent a hurtful or rude comment, message, email etc.

UK SA

*** ** * ***

* = p < .05; ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001

slide-12
SLIDE 12

+ Role in Cyberaggression

63.5 20.2 7.3 9 44.7 23.4 2.8 29.1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Both victim and perpetrator Victim only Perpetrator only No experience

SA UK

slide-13
SLIDE 13

+ Gender and Age differences?

 Females experienced more

cyberaggression and cyberbullying.

 No gender differences in

cyberaggression or cyberbullying. BOTH

  • Increased with age, peaking at middle

adolescence.

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

+ Emotional Effects

22.7 33.6 37 27.7 31.9 41.3 10 20 30 40 50

Did not want to go to school on some days due to something said or done online Been scared or worried about something that was said or done online Been hurt or made to feel sad about something that was said or done online

UK SA

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Sadness and Depression “I was crying every day because of what they said and they were in my class” “I wanted to die, I cried and cried and cried” Low self-esteem “It made me feel less than what I am, useless, ugly, unwanted, unloved, hated, stupid, angry, like I was nothing” “It made me feel bad about myself and worthless” Rejection and isolation “It makes you feel hopeless and alone” “It made me feel as though I did not belong in the world anymore” Thoughts of suicide and self-harm behaviours “I felt like cutting myself, lying in the middle of the road and dying” “It made me feel like I should do what they told me to do and kill myself” “It made me think I did not deserve or want to live life anymore”

slide-17
SLIDE 17

+

Key Findings Implications

 Cyberaggression and

cyberbullying rates are high, with serious emotional effects.

 Important issue and important to

intervene early (mental health and well-being).

 Links between online victimisation

and perpetration.

 Need to intervene at multiple

roles.

 Peak at middle adolescence (14-

15 years).

 Particular focus for intervention

efforts?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

+

Online and Offline Aggression and Bullying (past 12 months)

73.6 72.4 25.1 42.5 50.8 43.2 26 39.4 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Online Offline Online Offline Aggression Bullying SA UK

*** **

* = p < .05; ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001

Study 2: Results

slide-19
SLIDE 19

+

Online and Offline Aggression and Bullying (past 12 months)

73.6 72.4 25.1 42.5 50.8 43.2 26 39.4 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Online Offline Online Offline Aggression Bullying SA UK

*** **

* = p < .05; ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001

Perpetration

55.7 24.6 57.5 19.5

slide-20
SLIDE 20

+ Offline Victimisation

27.8 29.2 33.8 43.7 51.4 54.9 27.4 19.9 27.7 50.7 48.5 52 10 20 30 40 50 60

Been hit, kicked, punched, slapped or pushed Belongings been damaged or had something taken away Threatened to be hurt in any way Been lied about, had someone spread rumours or gossip about them or had someone try to make others dislike you Been left out of things on purpose, been excluded from a group or ignored on purpose Called a hurtful name, been made fun of or teased in a mean way face to face

SA UK

* = p < .05; ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001

slide-21
SLIDE 21

+ Offline Perpetration

7.1 7 11.3 12.7 18.6 26.8 7 16 18.5 19.6 28.3 44.2 10 20 30 40 50

Damaged someone's belongings or taken something away from someone Told lies about someone, spread rumours or gossip about someone, or tried to make others dislike someone Threatened to hurt someone in any way Hit, kicked, punched, slapped or pushed someone Left someone out of things on purpose, excluded someone from a group or ignored someone on purpose Called someone a hurtful name, made fun of someone, or teased someone in a mean way face to face

SA UK

*

* = p < .05; ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001

slide-22
SLIDE 22

+ Bullying Experiences

(in the past 12 months)

 Same pattern also found in other studies (e.g. Ortega et al., 2009; Mishna et al., 2015)

47.9% of adolescents experienced some form of bullying in the past year 47.1% offline only 35.3% both online and

  • ffline

17.6% online only

(Popovac & Fine, in prep.)

47.5% of adolescents experienced some form of bullying in the past year 47.7% offline only 40.7% both online and

  • ffline

11.6% online only

slide-23
SLIDE 23

+ Key Findings

 Links between online and offline aggression and bullying  Very similar types of experiences in SA and the UK, despite

differences in technological infrastructure BUT very different importance placed on issues in the two countries!

“This [cyberbullying] is a problem in affluent schools. Our social problems with

  • ur students are way bigger than this.

We’re concerned with drug use, physical violence and weapons being brought to school and teenage pregnancy. Not this.” (Teacher, SA)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

+ Implications

 Children in developing contexts may be more vulnerable

due to technology developing faster than knowledge, policy, and laws to address them

 Lower importance in relation to other social problems faced  Little research to extend knowledge and strategies

 Importance of online aggression and bullying forming part of

broader anti-bullying strategies aimed at creating positive school social climate

 How to implement these on a large scale, especially in

developing contexts where little work is currently undertaken

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Figure by: Johnson & Puplampu (2008), Johnson (2010a, 2010b, 2010c, 2011). Reproduced with permission from the authors.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

+ Way Forward

 Whole-school approach to online safety

 Adolescents, parents, schools, policy and laws, media campaigns  Intervention piloted in SA – goal of testing out on larger-scale in

UK and SA

 Further research – moving beyond prevalence rates

 Understanding the complexity of links between experiences  Coping and resilience

slide-27
SLIDE 27

+ Thank you!

  • Dr. Maša Popovac

masa.popovac@buckingham.ac.uk @Masa_Pop_

slide-28
SLIDE 28

+

slide-29
SLIDE 29

+ Online Victimisation

* = p < .05; ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001

12.7 26.2 27.8 27.8 31.2 31.2 38 62.5 14.6 24.8 18 37.6 19.9 29.9 25.4 54.4 20 40 60 80 Been impersonated through a fake profile or through someone gaining access to my account without my permission Been threatened via email, text, messages or calls Had comments or questions posted about me online to hurt or embarrass me Received messages as if they were coming from one person but later found out they were written by someone else Had private messages forwarded, shared or posted so others could see them Had rumours or gossip spread about me online Had a picture posted online to embarrass me Called a hurtful name or received a hurtful or rude comment, message, email etc. SA UK

slide-30
SLIDE 30

+

slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32

+ Offline Victimisation (gender)

Face-to-face Victimisation Experiences (past 12 months) SA 𝒚𝟑 UK 𝒚𝟑 Male Female Male Female Called hurtful name, been made fun of you

  • r teased in a mean way face to face

50.0% (n = 41) 53.4% (n = 62) 0.23 53.6% (n = 15) 55.8% (n = 24) 0.03 Threatened to be hurt in any way 33.3% (n = 27) 24.8% (n = 29) 1.72 39.3% (n = 11) 30.2% (n = 13) 0.62 Been left out of things on purpose, been excluded from a group or ignored on purpose 33.8% (n = 27) 60.3% (n = 70) 13.40*** 32.1% (n = 9) 63.6% (n = 28) 6.79** Been lied about, had rumours/gossip spread about you or someone tried to make

  • thers dislike you

43.2% (n = 35) 56.9% (n = 66) 3.58 44.4% (n = 12) 43.2% (n = 19) 0.01 Been hit, kicked, punched, slapped or pushed 40.7% (n = 33) 19.0% (n = 22) 11.24** 32.1% (n = 9) 25.0% (n = 11) 0.44 Belongings been damaged or had something taken away 23.5% (n = 19) 18.1% (n = 21) 0.85 35.7% (n = 10) 25.0% (n = 11) 0.95 (Note: * = < .05, ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001; † - medium effect, †† = large effect)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

+ Offline Perpetration (gender)

Face-to-face Perpetration (past 12 months) SA 𝒚𝟑 UK 𝒚𝟑 Male Female Male Female Called someone a hurtful name, made fun of someone, or teased someone in a mean way face to face 40.5% (n = 32) 47.4% (n = 55) 0.91 18.5% (n = 5) 31.8% (n = 14) 1.51 Threatened to hurt someone in any way 26.2% (n = 21) 12.9% (n = 15) 5.60* 11.1% (n = 3) 11.4% (n = 5) 0.001 Left someone out of things on purpose, excluded someone from a group or ignored someone on purpose 24.1% (n = 19) 30.4% (n = 35) 0.95 7.4% (n = 2) 25.6% (n = 11) 3.62 Told lies about someone, spread rumours or gossip about someone, or tried to make others dislike someone 15.0% (n = 12) 17.2% (n = 20) 0.17 7.4% (n = 2) 6.8% (n = 3) 0.01 Hit, kicked, punched, slapped or pushed someone 29.1% (n = 23) 12.9% (n = 15) 7.84** 7.4% (n = 2) 15.9% (n = 7) 1.09 Damaged someone’s belongings or taken something away from someone 8.8% (n = 7) 6.0% (n = 7) 0.53 7.4% (n = 2) 6.8% (n = 3) 0.01 (Note: * = < .05, ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001; † - medium effect, †† = large effect)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

+

Who was told about cyberbullying?

9.7 52.9 23.4 11.4 2.6 15.9 49 22.1 5.5 7.6 10 20 30 40 50 60

Nobody Friend Parent Other family member School personnel

SA UK