One-Way Shared Vehicles San Francisco Municipal Transportation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

one way shared vehicles
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

One-Way Shared Vehicles San Francisco Municipal Transportation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

One-Way Shared Vehicles San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors Policy and Governance Committee July 21, 2017 1 Two Types of Vehicle Sharing One-way (free-floating) Round-trip Vehicle parked in any legal Vehicle


slide-1
SLIDE 1

One-Way Shared Vehicles

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors Policy and Governance Committee July 21, 2017

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Round-trip Vehicle returned to the same designated on-street

  • r off-street space

One-way (free-floating) Vehicle parked in any legal parking spot within “home zone”

2

Existing on-street vehicle share pilot Oakland’s Gig one-way vehicle share program

Two Types of Vehicle Sharing

slide-3
SLIDE 3

One-Way Vehicle Sharing in North America

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

City Policies

SFMTA Strategic Plan: FY 2013-FY2018

  • Make transit, walking,

bicycling, taxi, ridesharing & carsharing the preferred means of travel.

Transit-First Policy

  • The City and County shall

encourage innovative solutions to meet public transportation needs.

Vision Zero Policy

  • Reduce severe and fatal

injury inequities across neighborhoods, transportation modes, and populations.

Emerging Transportation Services Guiding Principles (draft)

  • Safety
  • Transit
  • Equity
  • Disabled Access
  • Clean Air/Sustainability
  • Congestion
  • Data Transparency
  • Labor and Consumers
  • Financial Impact

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Potential Benefits and Concerns

5

Potential Benefits Potential Concerns

  • Added mobility
  • First/last mile solution
  • Fewer vehicles on the road
  • Members sell cars
  • Members don’t buy cars
  • Economical
  • Low cost per ride
  • Pay-as-you-go
  • Potentially adding vehicles to

streets

  • Competition with transit and
  • ther modes
  • Community sensitivity
  • Clustering
  • Dwell time
  • RPP and meter exemptions
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Academic Research

  • Martin & Shaheen (2016): Analysis of
  • ne-way vehicle share in:
  • Calgary
  • San Diego
  • Seattle
  • Vancouver
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Found that one-way car sharing led to:
  • Decrease in vehicle ownership
  • Decrease in vehicle miles traveled (with some

questions about the conclusions)

  • Fewer GHG emissions

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Academic Research

7

5% 7% 32% 17% 7% 9% 26% 14% 10% 5% 46% 30% 86% 67% 54% 73% 93% 52% 64% Urban Rail Bus Drive Overall Walk Bicycle Taxi TNCs

Mode Change Attributed to car2go in Washington, DC and Seattle

Increased Frequency Decreased Frequency No Change

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Case Study: Gig in Oakland

  • Fleet of 250 cars; service

started April 30

  • “Free-Floating Zone

Parking” Permit (FFZP)

  • “Master Residential

Parking” Permit (MRPP)

  • Spatial equity and curb

access

  • Clustering

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Points to Consider

9

  • Possibility to reduce number of vehicles
  • Increased transportation options or adding

unnecessary capacity?

  • Potential test of cordon/congestion pricing
  • Potential geo-fencing to address clustering
  • Neighborhood equity
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Thank You

Parking Policy Team Sustainable Streets Division | Parking San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

10