SLIDE 1 On the Sources of the Great Moderation
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti May 2008
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 1 / 11
SLIDE 2 The Great Moderation
Basic Evidence (Table 1) Two Broad Hypotheses (i) good luck (ii) structural change (policy or non-policy related) ) di¤erent implications for second moments Our paper (i) evidence on changes in second moments of output, hours and labor productivity around the time of the volatility break (ii) identi…cation of the sources of those changes using time-varying SVAR ) time-varying conditional second moments and IRFs Such evidence may shed light on the merits of alternative explanations for the Great Moderation
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 2 / 11
SLIDE 3 U.S. GDP Growth
1948 1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003
1 2 3 4
Figure 1
SLIDE 4
SLIDE 5 The Great Moderation
Basic Evidence (Table 1) Two Broad Hypotheses (i) good luck (ii) structural change (policy or non-policy related) ) di¤erent implications for second moments Our paper (i) evidence on changes in second moments of output, hours and labor productivity around the time of the volatility break (ii) identi…cation of the sources of those changes using time-varying SVAR ) time-varying conditional second moments and IRFs Such evidence may shed light on the merits of alternative explanations for the Great Moderation
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 2 / 11
SLIDE 6 Our Approach
Focus on output, hours and labor productivity Changes in unconditional second moments Identi…cation and estimation of conditional second moments and their changes over time Main tool: Time-varying VAR with stochastic volatility
- Cogley-Sargent, Primiceri, Gambetti, Benati-Mumtaz
- identi…cation based on Galí AER 99
technology and non-technology shocks technology shocks only source of unit root in labor productivity
- extension to Fisher’s JPE 05 two technology shock model
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 3 / 11
SLIDE 7 Main Findings
Increase in the volatility of hours and labor productivity relative to that of output. Decline in the cyclicality of labor productivity (relative to both hours and output) Main source of output volatility decline: fall in contribution of non-technology shocks Large decline in the correlation of labor productivity with both output and hours conditional on non-technology shocks, accelerating in the 1990s. Large negative correlation of hours with both output and labor productivity conditional on technology shocks. Exception: the second half of the 1970s (oil shocks) and 1990s (the dotcom boom period). ) Picture more complex picture than suggested by good luck hypothesis ) Structural changes in labor market, timing close to GM. Causality?
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 4 / 11
SLIDE 8 The Labor Market and the Great Moderation
Focus on output, hours and labor productivity Quarterly U.S. data Nonfarm business sector Sample period: 1948:I-2005:IV Changes in Unconditional Volatilities (Table 2) Changes in Unconditional Comovements (Table 3)
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 5 / 11
SLIDE 9
SLIDE 10
SLIDE 11 A Time-Varying Structural VAR
Let xt [∆(yt nt), nt] xt = A0,t + A1,t xt1 + A2,t xt2 + ... + Ap,t xtp + ut (1) where Etfutu0
tg = Σt.and Etfutx0 tkg = Etfutu0 tkg = 0 for
k = 1, 2, 3, ... Let At [A0,t, A1,t..., Ap,t] and θt vec(A0
t), we assume
θt = θt1 + ωt (2) where ωt N(0, Ω) is serially uncorrelated and independent of futg.
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 6 / 11
SLIDE 12 Let Σt FtDtF 0
t
where Ft is lower triangular with ones on the diagonal and Dt is a diagonal matrix. De…ne γt = vec(F 1
t
) and σt = vec(Dt). We assume γt = γt1 + ζt log σt = log σt1 + ξt where ζt N(0, Ψ) and ξt N(0, Ξ) are serially and mutually uncorrelated.
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 7 / 11
SLIDE 13 Identi…cation Structural shocks: εt [εa
t , εd t ]0, satisfying Efεtε0 tg = I
εa
t : technology shock
εd
t : non-technology shock
Assumption: ut = Kt εt for all t, for some non-singular matrix Kt satisfying KtK 0
t = Σt.
Identifying restriction: only technology shocks have a long-run e¤ect on labor productivity Resulting decomposition: xi,t = µi
t + ∞
∑
k=0
C ia
t,k εa tk + ∞
∑
k=0
C id
t,k εd tk
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 8 / 11
SLIDE 14 Changing Labor Market Dynamics and the Great Moderation
Unconditional Second Moments (F2-3) Conditional Volatilities: What are the Forces behind the Great Moderation? (F4, T4) var(∆yt) = var(∆ya
t ) + var(∆yd t )
Conditional Correlations and Structural Change (F5, T5) corr(xt, zt) = λa corra(xt, zt) + λd corrd(xt, zt) where λi σi (xt)
σ(xt) σi (zt) σ(zt) .
Time-Varying Impulse Responses (F6-8) Extension: Fisher Three-Variable Model
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 9 / 11
SLIDE 15
Figure 2a Time-Varying Standard Deviations
Output Hours Productivity
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
SLIDE 16
Figure 2b Time-Varying Relative Standard Deviations
Hours Productivity
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9
SLIDE 17 Figure 3 Time-Varying Unconditional Correlations
(n,y) (y-n,y) (y-n,n) s.d.(y)
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
0.5 1 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 0.5 1 1.5 2
SLIDE 18 Changing Labor Market Dynamics and the Great Moderation
Unconditional Second Moments (F2-3) Conditional Volatilities: What are the Forces behind the Great Moderation? (F4, T4) var(∆yt) = var(∆ya
t ) + var(∆yd t )
Conditional Correlations and Structural Change (F5, T5) corr(xt, zt) = λa corra(xt, zt) + λd corrd(xt, zt) where λi σi (xt)
σ(xt) σi (zt) σ(zt) .
Time-Varying Impulse Responses (F6-8) Extension: Fisher Three-Variable Model
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 9 / 11
SLIDE 19
Figure 4a Conditional Standard Deviations: Output
Technology Non-Technology Unconditional
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
SLIDE 20
Figure 4b Conditional Standard Deviations: Hours
Technology Non-Technology Unconditional
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1
SLIDE 21
Figure 4c Conditional Standard Deviations: Labor Productivity
Technology Non-Technology Unconditional
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
SLIDE 22
SLIDE 23 Changing Labor Market Dynamics and the Great Moderation
Unconditional Second Moments (F2-3) Conditional Volatilities: What are the Forces behind the Great Moderation? (F4, T4) var(∆yt) = var(∆ya
t ) + var(∆yd t )
Conditional Correlations and Structural Change (F5, T5) corr(xt, zt) = λa corra(xt, zt) + λd corrd(xt, zt) where λi σi (xt)
σ(xt) σi (zt) σ(zt) .
Time-Varying Impulse Responses (F6-8) Extension: Fisher Three-Variable Model
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 9 / 11
SLIDE 24 Figure 5a Conditional Correlations: Hours - Output
Technology Non-Technology Unconditional
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
SLIDE 25 Figure 5b Conditional Correlations: Labor Productivity - Hours
Technology Non-Technology Unconditional
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
SLIDE 26 Figure 5c Conditional Correlations: Labor Productivity - Output
Technology Non-Technology Unconditional
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
SLIDE 27
SLIDE 28 Changing Labor Market Dynamics and the Great Moderation
Unconditional Second Moments (F2-3) Conditional Volatilities: What are the Forces behind the Great Moderation? (F4, T4) var(∆yt) = var(∆ya
t ) + var(∆yd t )
Conditional Correlations and Structural Change (F5, T5) corr(xt, zt) = λa corra(xt, zt) + λd corrd(xt, zt) where λi σi (xt)
σ(xt) σi (zt) σ(zt) .
Time-Varying Impulse Responses (F6-8) Extension: Fisher Three-Variable Model
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 9 / 11
SLIDE 29
Figure 6a Non-Technology Shocks: Output Response
SLIDE 30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Figure 6b Pre-84 Post-84 Figure 6c
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0.2
Post-84 minus Pre-84
SLIDE 31
Figure 7a Non-Technology Shocks: Labor Productivity Response
SLIDE 32 Figure 7b Pre-84 Post-84
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0.1 0.2 0.3
Figure 7c
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
- 0.8
- 0.7
- 0.6
- 0.5
- 0.4
- 0.3
- 0.2
- 0.1
0.1 0.2
Post-84 minus Pre-84
SLIDE 33
Figure 8a Technology Shocks: Hours Response
SLIDE 34 Figure 8b Figure 8c Pre-84 Post-84
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
- 0.3
- 0.25
- 0.2
- 0.15
- 0.1
- 0.05
Post-84 minus Pre-84
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
SLIDE 35 Changing Labor Market Dynamics and the Great Moderation
Unconditional Second Moments (F2-3) Conditional Volatilities: What are the Forces behind the Great Moderation? (F4, T4) var(∆yt) = var(∆ya
t ) + var(∆yd t )
Conditional Correlations and Structural Change (F5, T5) corr(xt, zt) = λa corra(xt, zt) + λd corrd(xt, zt) where λi σi (xt)
σ(xt) σi (zt) σ(zt) .
Time-Varying Impulse Responses (F6-8) Extension: Fisher Three-Variable Model
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 9 / 11
SLIDE 36
Figure 9 Augmented Model: Conditional Output Volatilities
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
N-Shocks I-Shocks Non-Technology Unconditional
SLIDE 37 Figure 10 Augmented Model: Conditional Hours-Labor Productivity Correlations
N-Shocks I-Shocks Non-Technology Unconditional
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
SLIDE 38 Main Findings and Some Implications
Main source of the Great Moderation: smaller contribution of non-technology shocks
- no RBC explanation (contrary to Arias-Hansen-Ohanian hypothesis)
- what role for good luck (smaller shocks)? what role for policy?
Change in the response of labor productivity to a demand shock
- main source of change in labor productivity-hours correlations
Substantial evidence against "good luck" hypothesis Evidence consistent (but not a proof) of more stabilizing (less destabilizing) policies. Caveat: Imperfect accommodation of technology shocks? Structural change in the labor market? Causal role as a source of volatility decline?
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 10 / 11
SLIDE 39 A Hypothesis: The End of SRIRL?
Technology yt = at + (1 α) n
t + ξt
where n
t = nt + et
nt : measured (log) labor input et : (log) e¤ort Assumption: et = γ n
t
γ : index of labor hoarding Measured Labor Productivity: yt nt = at + γ α 1 γ
Greater labor market ‡exibility? Also consistent with changes in relative volatilities. Causal role? Mechanism? Further work needed...
Jordi Galí and Luca Gambetti () Great Moderation May 2008 11 / 11