On the Semantic Basis of Heraldic Propaganda or What do Arms Mean, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on the semantic basis of heraldic propaganda
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On the Semantic Basis of Heraldic Propaganda or What do Arms Mean, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On the Semantic Basis of Heraldic Propaganda or What do Arms Mean, and How? St. Andrews, August 2006 Antti Leino antti.leino@cs.helsinki.fi University of Helsinki Heraldry Society of Finland Introduction Antti Leino: Semantics in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

On the Semantic Basis of Heraldic Propaganda

  • r

What do Arms Mean, and How?

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

Antti Leino antti.leino@cs.helsinki.fi University of Helsinki Heraldry Society of Finland

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

2(17)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

Flag of the Carelia Air Command since 1958

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

2(17)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

Flag of the Carelia Air Command since 1958 Swastika adopted by

◮ Finnish air force in 1918 ◮ NSDAP in 1920 Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

2(17)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction

Flag of the Carelia Air Command since 1958 Swastika adopted by

◮ Finnish air force in 1918 ◮ NSDAP in 1920

How do these associations work?

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

2(17)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction

Compare to names Where’s Washington

◮ State in North-Western USA? ◮ Capital of the USA? Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

3(17)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction

Compare to names Where’s Washington

◮ State in North-Western USA? ◮ Capital of the USA? ◮ Town in North-Eastern England, near Durham

– Sir William de Wessyngton c. 1180 . . . – George Washington 1789

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

3(17)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction

Similarities between names and arms Common perception

◮ Names-and-arms clauses in wills ◮ Cases of surname usurpation in Court of

Chivalry

◮ etc. all over Europe

Linguistic viewpoint

◮ Primarily used for identification ◮ Further semantic content not necessary ◮ Often some vestige remains Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

4(17)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cognitive Linguistics

Introduction

Linguistic movement since around 1980 Basic claims

◮ Language is cognition ◮ Grammar comes from conceptualisation ◮ Knowledge of language comes from language

use

Viable theoretical framework for describing place names How about arms?

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

5(17)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Cognitive Linguistics

Basic concepts: construction

Basic unit for language: construction Coupling of form and meaning Usually composed of smaller elements All elements not necessarily fully specified Idiomaticity: overall meaning not necessarily sum of elements

coat of arms Cat N Sem ’armorial bearings’ coat Cat N Sem ’type of garment’

  • f

Cat Prep Sem ’associated with’ arms Cat N Num Pl Sem ’weapons’

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

6(17)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Cognitive Heraldry

Arms as constructions

Arms of Henry IV Schematic construction: quartered arms Specific instantiation:

◮ France and England as

the quarters

◮ Claim to the French

throne

B B A A A and B England and France England France

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

7(17)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Cognitive Linguistics

Basic concepts: entrenchment

A new construction is hard to understand Once it has been heard lots of times, it is easy In other words, it has been entrenched as a part

  • f the language

The same applies to meanings The more often something is used with a particular meaning, the more entrenched this meaning becomes

◮ Washington: state in the USA vs. town near

Durham

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

8(17)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Cognitive Heraldry

Entrenchment of heraldic charges

Carelia Air Command Carelia Finnish Air Force unknown Nazi flag Nazi ? ?

The swastika is entrenched as a Nazi symbol

◮ Kipling abandoned his swastika badge in 1930’s

This is easily interpreted as a Nazi flag

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

9(17)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cognitive Linguistics

Conceptual integration

New expressions are created from existing concepts

◮ Schematic constructions filled in with specific

elements

◮ New innovations from analogy and metaphor ◮ These are all applications of the same mental

process

Conceptual integration or blending

◮ Concepts from several input domains or spaces

projected to a new one

◮ For instance, canting arms integrates the

concept of speaking with the concept of arms — the arms »speak» the name of their bearer

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

10(17)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Cognitive Heraldry

Conceptual integration in propaganda

Case: the arms of Finland Designed in the late 1570’s Johan III, King of Sweden, assumed the title Grand Duke of Finland The title matches that of Ivan IV, Tsar of Russia and Grand Duke of Muscovy The arms of the new Grand Duchy go further Blend of three conceptual spaces

◮ Heraldry ◮ Geography ◮ Battle Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

11(17)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Cognitive Heraldry

Conceptual integration in propaganda

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

12(17)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Cognitive Heraldry

Conceptual integration in propaganda

Case: the Flodden augmentation Thomas Howard, Earl of Surrey, commanded the English army at Flodden James IV, King of Scotland, died in the battle The augmented Howard arms can be seen as a blend of three conceptual spaces

◮ Heraldry ◮ Individual persons ◮ Death Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

13(17)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cognitive Heraldry

Conceptual integration in propaganda

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

14(17)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions

Heraldry is a system for identification

◮ It has some grammar-like structure ◮ This structure does not cover everything

Cognitive linguistics allows such lack of completeness

◮ Concentrate on the structures that exist ◮ Acknowledge the existence of the rest

Describe

◮ Regularities as constructions ◮ Semantic content in terms of conceptual

integration

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

15(17)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

What Next?

The current work applied linguistic methods to heraldry Blazon is language and heraldry What is the relationship between the »grammars» of

◮ armorial composition ◮ blazon?

Is this relationship apparent in blazon as a linguistic genre?

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

16(17)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Thank you

antti.leino@cs.helsinki.fi http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/leino/index.en.html

Antti Leino: Semantics in Heraldry

  • St. Andrews, August 2006

17(17)