On the L p L q maximal regularity for linear thermoelastic plate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on the l p l q maximal regularity for linear
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On the L p L q maximal regularity for linear thermoelastic plate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On the L p L q maximal regularity for linear thermoelastic plate equation in a bounded domain Yuka Naito (Sato) Waseda University 25/08/2009 Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 1 / 38


slide-1
SLIDE 1

On the Lp–Lq maximal regularity for linear thermoelastic plate equation in a bounded domain

Yuka Naito (Sato)

Waseda University

25/08/2009

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 1 / 38

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Thermoelastic plate equation ∂2

t u + ∆2u + ∆θ = f1

in R+ × Ω,

∂tθ − ∆θ − ∆∂tu = f2

in R+ × Ω, u = ∂νu = θ = 0

  • n R+ × ∂Ω,

u(0, x) = u0(x), ∂tu(0, x) = u1(x), θ(0, x) = θ0(x) in Ω. u(t, x) : the vertical displacement of the plate,

θ(t, x) : the absolute temperature Ω ⊂ Rn(n ≥ 2) : a bounded domain ∂Ω : a C4 hypersurface ν : the unit outer normal vector to ∂Ω

u0, u1, θ0 : the initial value.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 2 / 38

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The reason of the appearance of ∆2 Elasticity

displacement : u = X(t, x) − x X(t, x): position vector.

The case of the plate

Considering the displacement of the center of the plate first, I measure the distance from the center of the plate.

Necessary assumptions

1

The center of the plate is always center.

2

The vertical segment of the center of the plate keeps vertical.

3

The thickness of x3 is so small.

4

The curve of the plate is so small.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 3 / 38

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The displacement of the plate in the 3 dimension case.

The displacement of the center of the plate: u1(x1, x2), u2(x1, x2), u3(x1, x2). The displacement of the plate U1(x1, x2, x3) = u1(x1, x2) − x3

∂u3 ∂x1 ,

U2(x1, x2, x3) = u2(x1, x2) − x3

∂u3 ∂x2 ,

U3(x1, x2, x3) = u3(x1, x2) + x3.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 4 / 38

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The type of equations

I shall consider type of equations.

Thermoelastic plate equation ∂2

t u + ∆2u + ∆θ = f1

Dispersive type

∂tθ − ∆θ − ∆∂tu = f2

Parabolic type Thermoelastic plate equation is the couple of these two type. I consider type of the whole equation.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 5 / 38

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The classification of equations by the characteristic root in a Cauchy problem Parabolic type

Heat eqauton: ∂tτ − ∆τ = 0. −

→ −|ξ|2. Dispersive type

Plate equation: ∂2

t u + ∆2u = 0. −

→ ±i|ξ|2. The couple of these two type

Thermoelastic plate equation

{ ∂2

t u + ∆2u + ∆θ = 0,

∂tθ − ∆θ − ∆∂tu = 0. − → −α|ξ|2, −β|ξ|2, −¯ β|ξ|2 (α : A positive real number, Reβ > 0.)

Therefore I know thermoelastic plate equation is parabolic type. But when I consider a initial boundary problem, the classification of equations is not so obvious.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 6 / 38

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What is the parabolicity

I shall consider a general initial value problem.

A initial value problem { ∂tu(t) = Au(t)

u|t=0 = u0 A : a general operator, u0 : a initial value.

The definition of parabolic type

u0 ∈ X =

⇒ u(t) ∈ D(Am) (∀m ≥ 1), t > 0

D(A) : a domain of A.

⇐ = Resolvent estimate ∃λ0 ∈ R Reλ ≥ λ0 = ⇒ |λ| ∥(λ − A)−1∥ ≤ C.

In general if it holds resolvent estimate, then it is parabolic.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 7 / 38

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The definition of maximal regularity

X : Banach space, E : A dense subspace of X, A : E → X ; A closed linear operator.

A Cauchy problem. ∂tu = Au + f (0 < t < T),

u|t=0 = a

(∗)

If (∗) admits a solution u ∈ Lp((0, T), E) ∩ W1

p((0, T), X) = Mp((0, T) : A),

then a ∈ [X, E]1−1/p,p : the trace class of Mp((0, T) : A) of t = 0, f ∈ Lp((0, T), X). A has the Lp-maximal regularity ⇐

⇒ if a ∈ [X, E]1−1/p,p and

f ∈ Lp((0, T), X), then (∗) admits a unique solution u ∈ Mp((0, T) : A) A has the Lp-maximal regularity. =

⇒ A is parabolic type.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 8 / 38

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The known results about thermoelastic plate equation By Kim, Rivera-Racke, Liu-Zeng, Avalos-Lasiecka, Lasiecka-Triggiani, Shibata

A bounded domain · · · The exponatial decay with the several boundary conditions

By Liu-Renardy, Lasiecka-Triggiani

Thermoelastic plate equation is analytic in the Hilbert space setting. In the Hilbert space maximal regularity is generation of analytic semigroup is eqivalent.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 9 / 38

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Purpose of my talk

To show Lp − Lq maximal regularity. We know Lp − Lq maximal regularity implies the generation of analytic semigroup. But it is not clear the opsite direction in the Banach space case. In fact, Kalton-Lancien proved that if every generator of an analytic on Banach space X has Lp maximal regularity, then X must be a Hilbert space.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 10 / 38

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Setting function spaces.

I rewrite thermoelastic plate equation the following: Ut − AqU = F U|t=0 = U0, where I have set

Aq =          

1

−∆2 −∆ ∆ ∆           ,

U =

         

u

∂tu θ           ,

F =

         

f1 f2

          ,

U0 =

         

u0 u1

θ0          

X = {F = (˜ f, f1, f2)|˜ f ∈ W2

q,D(Ω), f1 ∈ Lq(Ω), f2 ∈ Lq(Ω)},

E = {U = (u, v, θ)|u ∈ W4

q,D(Ω), v ∈ W2 q,D(Ω), θ ∈ W2 q,0(Ω)},

W2

q,0(Ω) = {u ∈ W2 q(Ω) | u|∂Ω = 0},

Wm

q,D(Ω) = {u ∈ Wm q (Ω) | u|∂Ω = ∂νu|∂Ω = 0}.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 11 / 38

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The main theorem Ω: a bounded domain. ∂Ω:C4-hypersurface.

Let 1 < p, q < ∞. I assume there exist a γ0 > 0 such that U0, F satsify the following U0 ∈ [X, E]1−1/p,p, eγtF ∈ Lp(R+, Lq(Ω)), (γ ∈ [0, γ0]), Then there exists a unique solution: U ∈ Mp((0, ∞) : A) = Lp((0, T), E) ∩ W1

p((0, T), X)

satisfying the following estimates

∥eγt U∥Lp(R+,E) + ∥eγt Ut∥Lp(R+,X) ≦ Cp,q { ∥eγt F∥Lp(R+,Lq(Ω)) + ∥ U0∥[X,E]1−1/p,p } .

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 12 / 38

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Outline of proof

To prove the theorem, I study two cases. One is the problem with zero right members and initial value.

∂2

t u + ∆2u + ∆θ = 0

in R+ × Ω,

∂tθ − ∆θ − ∆∂tu = 0

in R+ × Ω, u = ∂νu = θ = 0

  • n R+ × ∂Ω

u(0, x) = u0(x), ∂tu(0, x) = u1(x), θ(0, x) = θ0(x) in Ω This case can be studied by analytic semigroup theory and interpolaion theory.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 13 / 38

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Outline of proof

Another is the problem with non-zero right members and zero initial value. This case is the essential part in my proof.

∂2

t u + ∆2u + ∆θ = f1

in R+ × Ω,

∂tθ − ∆θ − ∆∂tu = f2

in R+ × Ω, u = ∂νu = θ = 0

  • n R+ × ∂Ω,

u(0, x) = ∂tu(0, x) = θ(0, x) = 0 in Ω. In a Hilbert space case I know an elegant theory due to Lasiecka-Triggiani. But this theory can not be applied in the Banach space case. And I have to use exact solution formula in a whole and a half space, to get a priori estimate of the solution. Finally by the decomposition of unity, I localize the problem. Then I apply a whole and a half space case .

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 14 / 38

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The generation of the analytic semigroup and its estimates A half space (N.-Shibata)

1 < q < ∞.

Aq generates the analytic semigroup : {Tq(t)}t≥0 on X. A bounded domain (Denk-Racke-Shibata ’08) Ω: a bounded domain, ∂Ω: C4-hypersurface. Let 1 < q < ∞. Aq generates the analytic semigroup : {Tq(t)}t≥0 on X and {Tq(t)}t≥0

satisfys the following estimates:

∃σ > 0, ∀t > 0, ∀G ∈ X(Ω), ∥Tq(t)G∥X ≤ Ce−σt∥G∥X.

where C is independent of t and F.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 15 / 38

slide-16
SLIDE 16

A model problem ~a half space~ ∂2

t u + ∆2u + ∆θ = f1

in R × Rn

+,

∂tθ − ∆θ − ∆∂tu = f2

in R × Rn

+,

u = ∂xnu = θ = 0

  • n R × ∂Rn

+,

u = ∂tu = θ = 0 in Rn

+.

By technical reason instead of this problem I consider the following problem which I shift with repect to time variable.

(∂t + 1)2u + ∆2u + ∆θ = f1

in R × Rn

+,

(∂t + 1)θ − ∆θ − (∂t + 1)∆u = f2

in R × Rn

+,

u = ∂xnu = θ = 0

  • n R × ∂Rn

+,

u = ∂tu = θ = 0 in Rn

+.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 16 / 38

slide-17
SLIDE 17

A model problem ~a half space~ (∂t + 1)2u + ∆2u + ∆θ = f1 + 2∂tu + u, (∂t + 1)θ − ∆θ − (∂t + 1)∆u = f2 + θ − ∆u

Lower order terms appear. When I consider the lower order terms, I use the estimates of the semigroup. Therefore I can consider this problem.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 17 / 38

slide-18
SLIDE 18

To get the exact solution formula. The odd extension of (f1, f2), x = (x′, xn) x′ = (x1, x2, · · · , xn−1).

fo(t, x) =

      

f(t, x) xn > 0

−f(t, x′, −xn)

xn < 0 . I use the odd extension and it becomes a whole space problem.

(∂t + 1)2uw + ∆2uw + ∆θw = fo

1

in Rn+1,

(∂t + 1)θw − ∆θw − (∂t + 1)∆uw = fo

2

in Rn+1, I can estimate uw, θw by using the estimate of a whole space problem .

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 18 / 38

slide-19
SLIDE 19

To get the exact solution formula.

Setting u = uw + w, θ = θw + τ, I consider this problem. Thank for uw, θw, right members become zero.

u = uw + w, θ = θw + τ. (∂t + 1)2w + ∆2w + ∆τ = 0

in R × Rn

+,

(∂t + 1)τ − ∆τ − (∂t + 1)∆w = 0

in R × Rn

+,

w = τ = 0, ∂xnw = M

  • n R × ∂Rn

+,

Where I have set M = −∂xnuw.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 19 / 38

slide-20
SLIDE 20

To get the exact solution formula. The partial Fourier-Laplace transform Lg(λ, ξ′, xn) =

  • Rn e−λt−ix′·ξ′ g(t, x′, xn) dx′dt = ˆ

g,

L−1h(t, x′, xn) =

1

(2π)n

  • Rn eλt+ix′·ξ′h(λ, ξ′, xn) dξ′dτ

λ = γ + iτ, x′ = (x1, x2, · · · , xn−1), ξ′ = (ξ1, ξ2, · · · , ξn−1) It becomes the ordinary equation with respect to xn. (λ + 1)2 ˆ

w(λ, ξ) + (∂2

xn − |ξ′|2)2 ˆ

w(λ, ξ) + (∂2

xn − |ξ′|2)ˆ

τ(λ, ξ) = 0, (λ + 1)ˆ τ(λ, ξ) − (∂2

xn − |ξ′|2)ˆ

τ(λ, ξ) − (λ + 1)(∂2

xn − |ξ′|2)ˆ

w(λ, ξ) = 0,

ˆ

w(λ, ξ′, 0) = ˆ

τ(λ, ξ′, 0) = 0, ∂xn ˆ

w(λ, ξ′, 0) = ˆ M(λ, ξ′, 0).

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 20 / 38

slide-21
SLIDE 21

To get the exact solution formula.

Solving the ordinary equation, I have exact solution formula.

The displacement:u = uw + w, The temperature:θ = θw + τ.

w(t, x) =

3

j=1

L−1 [ σj

det ∆(λ, ξ′) e−Aj(λ,ξ′)xn ˆ M(λ, ξ′, 0)

] (t, x′), τ(t, x) = −

3

j=1

L−1           (λ + 1)(γ2

j + 2)σj

det ∆(λ, ξ′) e−Aj(λ,ξ′)xn ˆ M(λ, ξ′, 0)

          (t, x′).

Aj =

√ (γj)−1(λ + 1) + |ξ′|2 (j = 1, 2, 3). :

The characteristic roots of the ordinary equation with respect to xn.

γ1 = α, γ2 = β, γ3 = ¯ β :

The characteristic roots of the ordinary equation with respect to t.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 21 / 38

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The displacement:u = uw + w,the temperature:θ = θw + τ.

w(t, x) =

3

j=1

L−1 [ σj

det ∆(λ, ξ′) e−Aj(λ,ξ′)xn ˆ M(λ, ξ′, 0)

] (t, x′), τ(t, x) = −

3

j=1

L−1           (λ + 1)(γ2

j + 2)σj

det ∆(λ, ξ′) e−Aj(λ,ξ′)xn ˆ M(λ, ξ′, 0)

          (t, x′). σ1 + σ2 + σ3 = 0. Lopatinski determinant

det ∆(λ, ξ′) = −[(γ2

2 − γ2 3)A1 + (γ2 3 − γ2 1)A2 + (γ2 1 − γ2 2)A3].

Aj =

√ (γj)−1(λ + 1) + |ξ′|2.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 22 / 38

slide-23
SLIDE 23

A theorem due to Shibata-Shimizu

1 < p, q < ∞. We assume m(ξ′, λ) satisfies the multiplier condition that means the following:

|∂α′

ξ′ (τk∂k τ m(ξ′, λ))| ≦ Cα′(|λ|1/2 + |ξ′| + 1)−|α′|.

where we set α′ : multi-index, λ = γ + iτ with γ ≧ 0, ξ′ ∈ Rn−1 \ {0}, k = 0, 1. Then we set

[Kjg](t, x) = ∫ ∞ L−1 [

m(λ, ξ′)|ξ′|2 e−Aj(λ,ξ′)(xn+yn) − e−|ξ′|(xn+yn) Aj − |ξ′|

ˆ

g(λ, ξ′, yn)

]

dyn Kjg satisfies the following:

∥e−γtKjg∥Lp(R,Lq(Rn

+)) ≦ Cp,q∥g∥Lp(R,Lq(Rn +)), j = 1, 2, 3. Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 23 / 38

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The estimate of Lopatinski determinant.

To use the theorem due to Shibata-Shimizu, I have to estimate Lopatinski determinant.

Lopatinski determinant

det ∆(λ, ξ′) = −[(γ2

2 − γ2 3)A1 + (γ2 3 − γ2 1)A2 + (γ2 1 − γ2 2)A3].

To estimate the Lopatinski determinant, I divide the domain into two parts like these.

  • 1

det ∆(λ, ξ′)

  • ≤ C

1

|λ|

1 2 + |ξ′| + 1

when|λ + 1|

|ξ′|2 ≥ r/2,

  • 1

det ∆(λ, ξ′)

  • ≤ C

|ξ′| |λ + 1|

when|λ + 1|

|ξ′|2 ≤ r.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 24 / 38

slide-25
SLIDE 25

The displacement:u = uw + w,the temperature:θ = θw + τ.

w(t, x) =

3

j=1

L−1 [ σj

det ∆(λ, ξ′) e−Aj(λ,ξ′)xn ˆ M(λ, ξ′, 0)

] (t, x′), τ(t, x) = −

3

j=1

L−1           (λ + 1)(γ2

j + 2)σj

det ∆(λ, ξ′) e−Aj(λ,ξ′)xn ˆ M(λ, ξ′, 0)

          (t, x′).

When I estimate ∂4

nw for |λ + 1|

|ξ′|2 ≤ r,

the property that σ1 + σ2 + σ3 = 0 is a keypoint. Estimating othemr parts, I can estimate of w, τ. Moreover estimating uw, θw, I can get the maximal regularity in a half space.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 25 / 38

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The maximal regularity in a half space.

Let 1 < p, q < ∞, F ∈ Lp,c(R, Lq(Rn

+)) = {u ∈ Lp(R, Lq(Rn +)) | u = 0 for t < 0}.

. Then there exists a unique solution : U ∈ Lp,c(R, E) ∩ W1

p,c(R, X)

satisfying the following estimates

∥U∥Lp(R,E) + ∥Ut∥Lp(R,X) ≦ Cp,q∥F∥Lp(R,Lq(Rn

+)). Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 26 / 38

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Interior estimate

About the interior estimate I use a cutoff function, and it becomes a whole space problem.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 27 / 38

slide-28
SLIDE 28

A priori estimate near boundary.

Let x0 be a point on the boundary. The neighborfood of x0

= ⇒

a bent half space

= ⇒

a half space

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 28 / 38

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Reduction to a half space problem. The definition of a bent half space

Hω = {y = (y1, . . . , yn) ∈ Rn | yn > ω(y′), y′ ∈ Rn−1},

∂Hω = {y = (y1, . . . , yn) ∈ Rn | yn = ω(y′), y′ ∈ Rn−1}.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 29 / 38

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Reduction to a half space problem.

I pick up x0 from the boundary of the domain. And I consider the innner normal vector to boundary at x0. Let vectors be B1 = t(B1

1, B1 2, · · · , B1 n), · · · , Bn−1 = t(Bn−1 1

, Bn−1

2

, · · · , Bn−1

n

)

such that they satisfy Bj · Bk = δjk, (j, k = 1, 2, · · · n). Set B = (B1, B2, · · · , Bn) ,B is an orthogonal matrix.

The first change of the variable

y = TB(x − x0)

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 30 / 38

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Reduction to a half space problem. The unit outer vector of the origin after the change of the variable ˜ ν(0, · · · , 0) = T(0, . . . , 0, −1)

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 31 / 38

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Reduction to a whole space problem.

By this change of the variable it becomes the following half space problem.

(∂t + 1)2z + ∆2z + ∆χ = H + R1

in R × Rn

+,

(∂t + 1)χ − ∆χ − (∂t + 1)∆z = I + R2

in R × Rn

+,

z = ∂nz = χ = 0

  • n R × Rn

0,

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 32 / 38

slide-33
SLIDE 33

The proof of the maximal regularity in a half space. The decomposition of w:w = w∞ + w0.

w∞(t, x) =

3

j=1

L−1 [σje−Aj(λ,ξ′)xnψ∞(|λ+1|

|ξ′|2 )

det ∆(λ, ξ′)

ˆ

M(λ, ξ′, 0)

] (t, x′),

w0(t, x) =

3

j=1

L−1 [σj(e−Aj(λ,ξ′)xn − e−|ξ′|xn)ψ0(|λ+1|

|ξ′|2 )

det ∆(λ, ξ′)

ˆ

M(λ, ξ′, 0)

] (t, x′).

Since σ1 + σ2 + σ3 = 0, I can add e−|ξ′|xn. In this talk I explain only w0(t, x).

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 33 / 38

slide-34
SLIDE 34

The proof of the maximal regularity in a half space.

w0(t, x)

=

3

j=1

L−1 [σj(e−Ajxn − e−|ξ′|xn)ψ0( |λ+1|

|ξ′|2 )

det ∆(λ, ξ′)

ˆ

M(λ, ξ′, 0)

] (t, x′), =

3

j=1

∫ ∞ ∂ ∂yn L−1 [σj(e−Aj(λ,ξ′)(xn+yn) − e−|ξ′|(xn+yn))ψ0

det ∆(λ, ξ′)

ˆ

M(λ, ξ′, yn)

]

dyn,

=

3

j=1

∫ ∞ L−1 [σj(e−Aj(λ,ξ′)(xn+yn) − e−|ξ′|(xn+yn))ψ0

det ∆(λ, ξ′)

∂n ˆ

M(λ, ξ′, yn)

]

dyn

+

3

j=1

∫ ∞ L−1 [σj(−Aje−Aj(xn+yn) + |ξ′|e−|ξ′|(xn+yn))ψ0

det ∆(λ, ξ′)

ˆ

M(λ, ξ′, yn)

]

dyn

= w0

0(t, x) + w1 0(t, x).

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 34 / 38

slide-35
SLIDE 35

The proof of the maximal regularity in a half space.

In this talk I estimate only ∂4

xnw0 0(t, x).

∂4

xnw0 0(t, x)

=

3

j=1

∂4

xn

∫ ∞ L−1 [σje−Aj(λ,ξ′)(xn+yn) − e−|ξ′|(xn+yn)ψ0

det ∆(λ, ξ′)

∂n ˆ

M(λ, ξ′, yn))

]

dyn

=

3

j=1

∫ ∞ L−1 [σj(A4

j − |ξ′|4)e−Aj(xn+yn)ψ0

det ∆

∂n ˆ

M(λ, ξ′, yn)

]

dyn

+

3

j=1

∫ ∞ L−1 [σj|ξ′|4(e−Aj(λ,ξ′)(xn+yn) − e−|ξ′|(xn+yn))ψ0

det ∆

∂n ˆ

M(λ, ξ′, yn)

]

dyn,

= w0,a + w0,b

0 .

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 35 / 38

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The proof of the maximal regularity in a half space. λ + 1 = (Aj − |ξ′|)(Aj + |ξ′|)γj,

Aj =

√ (γj)−1(λ + 1) + |ξ′|2.

w0,b

0 (t, x)

=

3

j=1

∫ ∞ L−1 [σj|ξ′|4(e−Aj(λ,ξ′)(xn+yn) − e−|ξ′|(xn+yn))ψ0

det ∆

∂n ˆ

M(λ, ξ′, yn)

]

dyn

=

3

j=1

∫ ∞ L−1 [ σj(λ + 1)|ξ′|4ψ0 γj(Aj + |ξ′|) det ∆

e−Aj(λ,ξ′)(xn+yn) − e−|ξ′|(xn+yn) Aj − |ξ′|

∂n ˆ

M

]

dyn,

=

3

j=1

∫ ∞ L−1 [

m(λ, ξ′)|ξ′|2 e−Aj(λ,ξ′)(xn+yn) − e−|ξ′|(xn+yn) Aj − |ξ′|

|ξ′|2∂n ˆ

M

]

dyn where I set m(λ, ξ′) =

(λ+1)ψ0( |λ+1|

|ξ′|2 )

γj((Aj+|ξ′|) det ∆.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 36 / 38

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The proof of the maximal regularity in a half space.

  • ∂α′

ξ′ m(ξ′, λ)

  • =

α′

1+α′ 2+α′ 3=α′

(λ + 1) { ∂α′

1ψ0

(|λ + 1| |ξ′|2 )}{ ∂α′

2

1

γj((Aj + |ξ′|) }{ ∂α′

3

1 det ∆

}

  • ,

≤ ∑

α′

1+α′ 2+α′ 3=α′

|λ + 1|

1

(|λ|1/2 + |ξ′| + 1)|α′

1|

1

|ξ′|1+|α′

2|

|ξ′|1 |λ + 1||ξ′||α′

2| ,

≤ Cα′

1

(|λ|1/2 + |ξ′| + 1)|α′| .

Aj =

√ (γj)−1(λ + 1) + |ξ′|2,

  • 1

det ∆(λ, ξ′)

  • ≤ C

|ξ′| |λ + 1|

.

Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 37 / 38

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The proof of the maximal regularity in a half space. ∥w0,b

0 ∥Lp(R,Lq(Rn

+)) ≤ Cp,q∥M∥ Lp(R,W3 q(Rn +))

≤ Cp,q∥uw∥

Lp(R,W4 q(Rn +))

≤ Cp,q∥(f1, f2)∥Lp(R,Lq(Rn

+))

M = −∂xnuw, uw : The soluion of a whole space problem.

The decomposition of the displacement : u

u = uw + w = uw + (w∞ + w0) = uw + w∞ + (w0

0 + w1 0).

∂4

xnw0 0 = w0,a

+ w0,b

0 .

∥∂4

xnu∥Lp(R,Lq(Rn

+)) ≤ Cp,q∥(f1, f2)∥Lp(R,Lq(Rn +)). Yuka Naito (Sato) (Waseda University) thermoelastic plate equation 25/08/2009 38 / 38