on the input energy for state reachability of linear
play

On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with packet losses A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphal Jungers ICTEAM, Mathematical Engineering, UC Louvain, Belgium Reachability Problems 2017, September 8, 2017 A.


  1. On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with packet losses A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers ICTEAM, Mathematical Engineering, UC Louvain, Belgium Reachability Problems 2017, September 8, 2017 A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  2. Contents Introduction Problem statement The Controllability Gramian and reachability metrics Computation and main results Examples Conclusion and future work A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  3. Introduction Figure : Cyber Physical Systems A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  4. Introduction Figure : Cyber Physical Systems A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  5. Introduction Figure : Cyber Physical Systems Packet loss in wireless communication: a common non-ideality. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  6. Introduction Figure : Cyber Physical Systems Packet loss in wireless communication: a common non-ideality. Greatly influences controllability, observability, required control energy etc. [Jungers, Kundu and Heemels] : controllability and observability are decidable. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  7. Model for discrete linear systems with packet dropouts Discrete linear systems subject to data losses : x ( t + 1 ) = Ax ( t ) + B σ ( t ) u ( t ) where hybrid systems [Jungers, Kundu and Heemels] � Ax ( t ) + Bu ( t ) , if σ ( t ) = 1 x ( t + 1 ) = (1) Ax ( t ) , if σ ( t ) = 0 . σ is a signal which models the packet loss. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  8. Model for discrete linear systems with packet dropouts Discrete linear systems subject to data losses : x ( t + 1 ) = Ax ( t ) + B σ ( t ) u ( t ) where hybrid systems [Jungers, Kundu and Heemels] � Ax ( t ) + Bu ( t ) , if σ ( t ) = 1 x ( t + 1 ) = (1) Ax ( t ) , if σ ( t ) = 0 . σ is a signal which models the packet loss. We say that a signal σ is admissible if it is allowed by some automaton. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  9. Controllability/Reachability Definition ( [Jungers, Kundu and Heemels]) We say that the hybrid system is controllable, if for all admissible signals σ : N → { 0 , 1 } , any initial state x 0 ∈ R n and any final state x f ∈ R n , there is an input signal u such that x x 0 ,σ, u ( T ) = x f for some T ∈ N . If x 0 = 0, we say that the system is reachable. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  10. Controllability/Reachability Definition ( [Jungers, Kundu and Heemels]) We say that the hybrid system is controllable, if for all admissible signals σ : N → { 0 , 1 } , any initial state x 0 ∈ R n and any final state x f ∈ R n , there is an input signal u such that x x 0 ,σ, u ( T ) = x f for some T ∈ N . If x 0 = 0, we say that the system is reachable. We want to study how the energy for reachability is affected when there are packet dropouts. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  11. Controllability Gramian for linear systems The Controllability Gramian for discrete linear system t � A i BB T ( A T ) i . (2) W t ( A , B ) := i = 0 A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  12. Controllability Gramian for linear systems The Controllability Gramian for discrete linear system t � A i BB T ( A T ) i . (2) W t ( A , B ) := i = 0 If A is stable, then ∞ � A i BB T ( A T ) i . W ( A , B ) := (3) i = 0 A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  13. Controllability Gramian for linear systems The Controllability Gramian for discrete linear system t � A i BB T ( A T ) i . (2) W t ( A , B ) := i = 0 If A is stable, then ∞ � A i BB T ( A T ) i . W ( A , B ) := (3) i = 0 The least input energy required to drive the state from x ( 0 ) = x 0 to x ( t + 1 ) = x f E ( x 0 , x f , t ) = ( x f − A t x 0 ) T W t ( A , B ) − 1 ( x f − A t x 0 ) . (4) A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  14. Metrics on reachability 1 The minimum eigenvalue of the controllability Gramian: λ min ( W t ( A , B )) . 2 The trace of the inverse of the controllability Gramian: tr ( W t ( A , B )) − 1 . 3 The determinant of the controllability Gramian: det ( W t ( A , B )) . λ min ( W t ( A , B )) ↔ maximum energy for reachability on the unit sphere. tr ( W t ( A , B )) − 1 ↔ average energy for reachability on the unit sphere. det ( W t ( A , B )) ↔ volume of the ellipsoid that can be reached with the unit energy input from the origin. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  15. Relevant work Figure : Complex networks [Summers et al.] , [Pasqualetti et al.] Problem: optimal actuator placements in complex networks. To choose k number of actuators from a given set to maximize a controllability metric. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  16. Relevant work Figure : Complex networks [Summers et al.] , [Pasqualetti et al.] Problem: optimal actuator placements in complex networks. To choose k number of actuators from a given set to maximize a controllability metric. [Summers et al.] : Greedy algorithm and the sub-modularity properties of controllability metrics except the minimum eigenvalue of the Controllability Gramian were used to solve this combinatorial problem. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  17. Relevant work Figure : Complex networks [Summers et al.] , [Pasqualetti et al.] Problem: optimal actuator placements in complex networks. To choose k number of actuators from a given set to maximize a controllability metric. [Summers et al.] : Greedy algorithm and the sub-modularity properties of controllability metrics except the minimum eigenvalue of the Controllability Gramian were used to solve this combinatorial problem. [Pasqualetti et al.] obtained upper bounds on the minimum eigenvalue in terms of the number of actuators and the number of stable eigenvalues. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  18. Relevant work Trade-offs between the input energy and the number of actuators were obtained for large scale networks. In specific, lower bounds on the number of actuators was obtained in terms of the fixed input enegy [Pasqualetti et al.] . A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  19. Relevant work Trade-offs between the input energy and the number of actuators were obtained for large scale networks. In specific, lower bounds on the number of actuators was obtained in terms of the fixed input enegy [Pasqualetti et al.] . [Olshevsky] obtained upper bounds on the minimum eigenvalue of the Controllability Gramian for linear time invariant systems using tools from potential theory. It was shown that if eigenvalues of A are clustered together, it requires more energy to control. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  20. Relevant work Trade-offs between the input energy and the number of actuators were obtained for large scale networks. In specific, lower bounds on the number of actuators was obtained in terms of the fixed input enegy [Pasqualetti et al.] . [Olshevsky] obtained upper bounds on the minimum eigenvalue of the Controllability Gramian for linear time invariant systems using tools from potential theory. It was shown that if eigenvalues of A are clustered together, it requires more energy to control. Our combinatorial problem is different than the one considered in these references and the techniques used therein are not applicable to our case. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

  21. Problem statement Given a fixed amount of energy or average energy, decide if the reachability problem is feasible for all admissible switching signals; and identify switching signals for which it is infeasible. A. Sanand Dilip, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, Raphaël Jungers On the input energy for state reachability of linear systems with pack

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend