on testing conditional qualitative treatment effects
play

On Testing Conditional Qualitative Treatment Effects Chengchun Shi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On Testing Conditional Qualitative Treatment Effects Chengchun Shi Department of Statistics North Carolina State University Joint work with Wenbin Lu and Rui Song July 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


  1. On Testing Conditional Qualitative Treatment Effects Chengchun Shi Department of Statistics North Carolina State University Joint work with Wenbin Lu and Rui Song July 30, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 1 / 20

  2. A few words on causal inference Data A : Treatment (0 or 1) X : Covariates Y : Observed outcome (usually the larger the better) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 2 / 20

  3. A few words on causal inference Data A : Treatment (0 or 1) X : Covariates Y : Observed outcome (usually the larger the better) Y ∗ ( a ): Potential outcome a = 0 , 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 2 / 20

  4. A few words on causal inference Data A : Treatment (0 or 1) X : Covariates Y : Observed outcome (usually the larger the better) Y ∗ ( a ): Potential outcome a = 0 , 1 Objective Identify the optimal regime d opt to reach the best clinical outcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 2 / 20

  5. A few words on causal inference Data A : Treatment (0 or 1) X : Covariates Y : Observed outcome (usually the larger the better) Y ∗ ( a ): Potential outcome a = 0 , 1 Objective Identify the optimal regime d opt to reach the best clinical outcome Maximize E Y ∗ ( d ) = E[ d ( X ) Y ∗ (1) + { 1 − d ( X ) } Y ∗ (0)] d : X → { 0 , 1 } . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 2 / 20

  6. Q, Contrast and Value function Q ( x , a ) = E[ Y | X = x , A = a ], . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 3 / 20

  7. Q, Contrast and Value function Q ( x , a ) = E[ Y | X = x , A = a ], τ 0 ( x ) = Q ( x , 1) − Q ( x , 0), . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 3 / 20

  8. Q, Contrast and Value function Q ( x , a ) = E[ Y | X = x , A = a ], τ 0 ( x ) = Q ( x , 1) − Q ( x , 0), V ( d ) = E Y ∗ ( d ) = E[ d ( X ) Y ∗ (1) + { 1 − d ( X ) } Y ∗ (0)]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 3 / 20

  9. Q, Contrast and Value function Q ( x , a ) = E[ Y | X = x , A = a ], τ 0 ( x ) = Q ( x , 1) − Q ( x , 0), V ( d ) = E Y ∗ ( d ) = E[ d ( X ) Y ∗ (1) + { 1 − d ( X ) } Y ∗ (0)]. Optimal treatment regime SUTVA, no unmeasured confounders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 3 / 20

  10. Q, Contrast and Value function Q ( x , a ) = E[ Y | X = x , A = a ], τ 0 ( x ) = Q ( x , 1) − Q ( x , 0), V ( d ) = E Y ∗ ( d ) = E[ d ( X ) Y ∗ (1) + { 1 − d ( X ) } Y ∗ (0)]. Optimal treatment regime SUTVA, no unmeasured confounders optimal treatment regime d opt ( x ) = I ( τ 0 ( x ) ≥ 0) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 3 / 20

  11. There are two types of clinically “important” variables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 4 / 20

  12. There are two types of clinically “important” variables. Predictive variables are those involved in τ 0 ( x ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 4 / 20

  13. There are two types of clinically “important” variables. Predictive variables are those involved in τ 0 ( x ). Prescriptive variables are those involved in d opt ( x ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 4 / 20

  14. There are two types of clinically “important” variables. Predictive variables are those involved in τ 0 ( x ). Prescriptive variables are those involved in d opt ( x ). Predictive variables have interactions with the treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 4 / 20

  15. There are two types of clinically “important” variables. Predictive variables are those involved in τ 0 ( x ). Prescriptive variables are those involved in d opt ( x ). Predictive variables have interactions with the treatment. Prescriptive variables have qualitative interactions with the treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 4 / 20

  16. There are two types of clinically “important” variables. Predictive variables are those involved in τ 0 ( x ). Prescriptive variables are those involved in d opt ( x ). Predictive variables have interactions with the treatment. Prescriptive variables have qualitative interactions with the treatment. Prescriptive variables ⊆ predictive variables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 4 / 20

  17. There are two types of clinically “important” variables. Predictive variables are those involved in τ 0 ( x ). Prescriptive variables are those involved in d opt ( x ). Predictive variables have interactions with the treatment. Prescriptive variables have qualitative interactions with the treatment. Prescriptive variables ⊆ predictive variables. Predictive variables ̸⊆ prescriptive variables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 4 / 20

  18. A tiny example: τ 0 ( x ) = exp( − x 1 ) x 2 , for { x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x p } ∈ [ − 1 , 1] p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 5 / 20

  19. A tiny example: τ 0 ( x ) = exp( − x 1 ) x 2 , for { x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x p } ∈ [ − 1 , 1] p . d opt ( x ) = I { exp( − x 1 ) x 2 ≥ 0 } = I ( x 2 ≥ 0). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 5 / 20

  20. A tiny example: τ 0 ( x ) = exp( − x 1 ) x 2 , for { x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x p } ∈ [ − 1 , 1] p . d opt ( x ) = I { exp( − x 1 ) x 2 ≥ 0 } = I ( x 2 ≥ 0). x 1 and x 2 are the predictive variables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 5 / 20

  21. A tiny example: τ 0 ( x ) = exp( − x 1 ) x 2 , for { x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x p } ∈ [ − 1 , 1] p . d opt ( x ) = I { exp( − x 1 ) x 2 ≥ 0 } = I ( x 2 ≥ 0). x 1 and x 2 are the predictive variables. x 2 is the prescriptive variable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 5 / 20

  22. A tiny example: τ 0 ( x ) = exp( − x 1 ) x 2 , for { x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x p } ∈ [ − 1 , 1] p . d opt ( x ) = I { exp( − x 1 ) x 2 ≥ 0 } = I ( x 2 ≥ 0). x 1 and x 2 are the predictive variables. x 2 is the prescriptive variable. x 1 and x 2 have interactions with the treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 5 / 20

  23. A tiny example: τ 0 ( x ) = exp( − x 1 ) x 2 , for { x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x p } ∈ [ − 1 , 1] p . d opt ( x ) = I { exp( − x 1 ) x 2 ≥ 0 } = I ( x 2 ≥ 0). x 1 and x 2 are the predictive variables. x 2 is the prescriptive variable. x 1 and x 2 have interactions with the treatment. x 2 has qualitative interaction with the treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 5 / 20

  24. Gunter et al. (2011) proposed an S -score method for quantifying the magnitude of the qualitative treatment effects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chengchun Shi (NCSU) CQTE July 30, 2017 6 / 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend