On-site wastewater management (GD06)
Community of Practice: feedback and next steps
Auckland Council Engineering & Technical Services and Heathy Waters
On-site wastewater management (GD06) Community of Practice: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
On-site wastewater management (GD06) Community of Practice: feedback and next steps Auckland Council Engineering & Technical Services and Heathy Waters Agenda Morning tea available prior to meeting 9:00am 9:30am Introduction and
On-site wastewater management (GD06)
Community of Practice: feedback and next steps
Auckland Council Engineering & Technical Services and Heathy Waters
Agenda
Morning tea available prior to meeting 9:00am – 9:30am Introduction and welcome 9:30am –9:45am Details of on-site management in Auckland:
programme 9:45am – 10:45am Break out session: 10:45am – 11:30am Regroup and summary: 11:30am – 12:00pm
First things first…
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
The team of authors & contributors
Justine Bennet, Graham Boyle, Patricia Burford, Zhou Chen, Andrew Dakers, Simonne Elliot, Peter Gearing, Ian Gunn, Jack Feltam, Grant Fleming, Robyn Floyd, Kristina Healy, Anthony Kirk, Terry Long, Alan Moore, Sandy Ormiston, Noel Roberts, Ross Roberts, Gretel Silyn Roberts, Robyn Simcock, Karamjeet Singh Siani, Anna Tyrrell, Branko Veljanovski, Nick Walmsley, Dylan Walton, Robert Watson, John Whitmore, Sam Wiess, the Land Treatment Collective and WaterNZ
Our mana whenua representatives
Ngāti Manuhiri, Fiona McKenzie, Ngāti Maru, Geoff Cook, Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki, Jeff Lee, Ngāti Tamaoho, Hero Potini & Lucille Rutherfurd, Ngāti te Ata Waiohua, Berenize Peita, Ngāti Wai, Dane Karapu, Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei, Moana Waa, Te Ahiwaru Waiohua, Kowhai Olsen, Te Ākitai Waiohua, Adrian Pettit, Te Kawerau a Maki, Scott Lomas, Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua, Tame Te Rangi, Te Uri o Hau, Tina Latimer
All our Community of Practice participants All those who will provide us valuable feedback in the coming months
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Send us your feedback Access the document
Document structure
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Summary of key changes
Item GD06 change Site and soil evaluation A revised chapter: both theory and technical guidance. Importance of functional soils, guidance on sample collection, testing, and analysis. Soil classification Seven soil categories changed to six: to align with those of AS/NZS 1547:2012 Slopes and setbacks Methods for managing wastewater on slopes and limits for steep slopes. Adjusted setback distances for different types of infrastructure and receiving environments. Design loading rates Revised design loading rates for different soil categories. Construction and
maintenance Details of how on-site wastewater systems should be constructed and how they should be operated and maintained. Risk management New chapter: hazard identification and risk management with examples
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Site and subsurface evaluation
assessments?
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
GD06 soil categories
Soil category Soil texture [Note 1] Soil structure [Note 2] Typical clay content Indicative permeability (Ksat) (m/d) [Note 3] 1 Gravel, coarse/medium sand Granular, structureless or weakly structured <5% >3.0 2 Loamy sand, sandy loam Weakly structured 5 – 10% >3.0 Massive 10 – 20% 1.4 – 3.0 3 Fine sandy loam, loam, silt loam High/moderate structured 10 – 20% 1.5 – 3.0 Weakly structured or massive 10 – 25% 0.5 – 1.5 4 Sandy clay loam, fine sandy clay, clay loam, silty clay loam High/moderate structure 20 – 30% 0.5 – 1.5 Weakly structured 20 – 30% 0.12 – 0.5 Massive 25 – 35% 0.06 – 0.12 5 Sandy clay, light clay, silty clay Strongly structured 35 – 45% 0.12 – 0.5 Moderately structured 35 – 40% 0.06 – 0.12 Weakly structured or massive 40 – 50% < 0.06 6 Clays (including swelling and grey) and hard pan Strongly structured 40 – 55% 0.06 – 0.5 Moderately structured >50% < 0.06 Weakly structured or massive >50% < 0.06
Soil classification – refer to page 3
categories
six soil categories used nationally
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Soil categories – refer to page 4
(Prepared by A Dakers)
TP58
Slopes – refer to page 5
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback Land application system Slope gradient limitations* Notes Surface irrigation (spray, drip and low-pressure effluent distribution irrigation) <5.7° (10%)
Subsurface drip irrigation (i.e. pressure compensating drip irrigation) <16.7° (30%)
lines may run through contour lines in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications.
design for approval. Subsurface low-pressure effluent distribution or low- pressure pipe <8.5° (15%)
contour. Evapotranspiration beds <5.7° (10%)
construction on steeper slopes. Trenches and beds, including discharge control trenches and beds <8.5° (15%)
construction on steeper slopes. Mounds <8.5° (15%)
construction on steeper slopes.
Table 17 in GD06
Setbacks – refer to pages 6 - 9
to ensure steeper slopes have more conservative setbacks
categories
(with maximum slopes of 18°)
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Table 19 of GD06
Reserve areas – refer to page 10
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback Land application method Minimum reserve area allocation Subsurface drip irrigation (pressure compensating) (Where non-conservative design flow based on less than 145 L/p/d) 33% - 100% (67% - 100%) Surface drip irrigation (pressure compensating) (Where non-conservative design flow based on less than 145 L/p/d) 50% - 100% (80% - 100%) Shallow trenches (with primary treated effluent) 100% Standard/deep trenches (with primary treated effluent) 100% Evapotranspiration seepage beds 100% Shallow trenches (with secondary treated effluent) 50% - 100% Mound systems 100%
Table 20: Reserve application area requirements
Design loading rates – refer pages 10-12
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
AS/NZS and Auckland soils
(e.g. discrete values as minimums)
1 (sands)
Construction, operation & maintenance
certification)
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Risk management
designed
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Likelihood
5 Risk = Likelihood x consequence 4 Low risk 3 Moderate risk 2 High risk 1 1 2 3 4 5
Consequence
Regulatory context
regulatory context for the Air, Land and Water Plan for Auckland Regional Council
regulatory context; this will need to be transposed into the Auckland Unitary Plan.
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Next steps
2018 GD06 draft published Final released 2019 Deadline for feedback: Oct 13 Adopted into AUP through Plan Change Jan Jun Fully replaces TP58 Dec Jan Jun Dec
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Other parallel workstreams
Unitary Plan Change
Bylaw update
Region-wide wastewater compliance monitoring programme
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Unitary Plan revision of Chapter E5
Sorcha Peren - Plans and Places
Unitary Plan change
Current status
regulatory content Proposed change
instead of TP58
TP58 transposed into AUP
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Legacy bylaws
Maclean Grindell – Social Policy
Review of legacy on-site wastewater bylaws
Findings
the unitary plan
than the legacy bylaws
not needed to address this issue
Recommendation: revoke the legacy on- site wastewater bylaws and rely on the unitary plan Consultation Open Until August 31st
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Roll out of On-site Wastewater Compliance Monitoring Programme
Water Quality Targeted Rate Janet Kidd – Healthy Waters
What
wastewater systems issue across the region.
majority permitted activities / existing use.
monitoring - request owners for inspection and maintenance records
When
Requires numerous tasks to develop “infrastructure:”
Rolled out in stages – existing schemes / high risk areas first, then remainder of region. Provisionally take 2-3 years for whole region
Feedback Sought
Standardised inspection and maintenance checklists
Definition of Suitably Qualified and Experience Personnel
hazardous Waste Operators, others Sharing of existing information for regional database Interest in setting up regional industry forum or work with national forums
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Facilitated feedback sessions 15 minutes each – choose three
Table Facilitator Subject matter expertise Table 1 Gretel Technical detail Table 2 Janet Operation & Maintenance Table 3 Alan Consents Table 4 Sorcha & Maclean Auckland Unitary Plan changes
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Questions for your session (15 min each):
What do you like?
What don’t you like?
Try to be specific – the more details the better
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
What technical information would you like training
in?
How would you like to receive training?
Try to be specific – the more details the better
Introduction GD 06 Overview Next steps Feedback
And lastly…