ombudsman ombudsman General Area IETF 59 Avri Doria basic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ombudsman ombudsman
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ombudsman ombudsman General Area IETF 59 Avri Doria basic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ombudsman ombudsman General Area IETF 59 Avri Doria basic definition basic definition Proposed position within the IETF Starting Point: Ombudsman is person responsible for reviewing public record on IETF and its constituent bodes


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • mbudsman
  • mbudsman

General Area IETF 59 Avri Doria

slide-2
SLIDE 2

basic definition basic definition

Proposed position within the IETF

  • Starting Point: Ombudsman is …
  • person responsible for reviewing public record
  • n IETF and its constituent bodes in response

to complaints made by individual participants

  • person responsible for helping a participant

with a complaint to understand the appeals process

Based on Section 10 of draft-iesg-hardie-outline-01.txt

slide-3
SLIDE 3

why this is needed why this is needed

  • Not all complaints that warrant a resolution

require an appeal

  • Better to resolve an issue prior to it escalating to the

level of appeal

  • Sometimes improved communication may be solution

enough.

  • For any number for reasons communications with

responsible parties may be difficult

  • With possible increase in the scope of

responsibility of AD and WG chairs,

  • Increased chance of miscommunication
  • Increase chance of perceived abuse
  • Possible increase chance of abuse
slide-4
SLIDE 4

how selected how selected

  • Public Nomination solicited by Nomcom
  • Nomcom selects candidate 2 weeks prior to Fall

meeting

  • Approval by 50% joint IAB/IESG vote during fall

meeting

  • If not approved Nomcom must select another

candidate.

  • Incumbent remains in place until a new selection

is made

Based on Section 10 of draft-iesg-hardie-outline-01.txt

slide-5
SLIDE 5

scope of responsibility scope of responsibility

  • Reviews public record of a Working Group, Area

Board, IETF, or IESG decision to determine whether the IETF processes functioned correctly.

  • No power of investigation
  • May request agenda slot of any body (except

Nomcom) in order to put forward concerns raised

  • Assists participant with the complaint in

understanding appeals process if this is wanted.

Based on Section 10 of draft-iesg-hardie-outline-01.txt

slide-6
SLIDE 6

issues issues

  • Scope:
  • mediator, arbiter or adjudicator
  • review of public record vs. investigation
  • does Ombudsman create a public record report on

complaints

  • What does it mean to determine correctness
  • degrees of confidentiality
  • Selection:
  • term limit - is there a need to avoid entrenchment and

institutionalization of ombudsman

slide-7
SLIDE 7

proposal proposal

  • Make drafting of full rough consensus

proposal a general area work item

  • Create 2 year experiment based on full

proposal