Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

oil shale formation evaluation by well logs and core
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oil Shale Formation Evaluation by Well Logs and Core Measurements Robert Kleinberg Schlumberger-Doll Research Cambridge, Massachuse:s AMSO: Alan Burnham, Roger Day TOTAL: Pierre Allix


slide-1
SLIDE 1

AMSO: Alan Burnham, Roger Day TOTAL: Pierre Allix Schlumberger: Malka Machlus, Michael Herron, James Grau Nikita Seleznev, Gabriela Leu, Peter Hook

Oil Shale Formation Evaluation ¡ by Well Logs and Core Measurements ¡

¡

Robert ¡Kleinberg ¡ Schlumberger-­‑Doll ¡Research ¡ Cambridge, ¡Massachuse:s ¡ ¡

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Volumetrics – Density Porosity, Resistivity, Magnetic Resonance

total mineral matter water kerogen

Composition – Capture Spectroscopy

common inorganic minerals (quartz, calcite, illite . . .) unusual inorganic minerals (dawsonite, nahcolite . . .) total organic carbon

Geology - Microimager

fractures vugs slumps

Objectives of Oil Shale Well Logging ¡

slide-3
SLIDE 3

50 ft

black=albite

Oil Shale Well Log Montage ¡

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Volumetrics – Density Porosity, Resistivity, Magnetic Resonance

total mineral matter water (& salinity) kerogen

Composition – Capture Spectroscopy

common inorganic minerals (quartz, calcite, illite . . .) unusual inorganic minerals (dawsonite, nahcolite . . .) total organic carbon

Geology - Microimager

fractures vugs slumps

Objectives of Oil Shale Well Logging ¡

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ma b D w k ma f

ρ −ρ φ = = φ + φ ρ −ρ

Density Porosity

ma

ρ

= matrix (grain) density (~ 2.7 g/cc) b

ρ = bulk (measured) density

f

ρ = “fluid” (water+kerogen) density (~1 g/cc)

D

φ

w

φ

k

φ

= porosity measured by density tool = volume fraction kerogen = volume fraction water

Gamma-Gamma Density Log ¡ Measures Sum of Water + Kerogen ¡

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Magnetic Resonance Signal Measurement Time Measurement Dead Time water kerogen

200 µs 2 s

Kerogen is Invisible to Magnetic Resonance ¡

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ma b D w k ma f

ρ −ρ φ = = φ + φ ρ −ρ

Density Porosity

ma

ρ

= matrix (grain) density (~ 2.7 g/cc) b

ρ = bulk (measured) density

f

ρ = “fluid” (water+kerogen) density (~1 g/cc)

Magnetic Resonance Porosity

MR w

φ = φ

k D MR

φ = φ − φ

D

φ

w

φ

k

φ

= porosity measured by density tool = volume fraction kerogen = volume fraction water

Density Magnetic Resonance (DMR) Method

Kerogen Volume from Density & Magnetic Resonance Logs ¡

slide-8
SLIDE 8

xx00 xx20 xx40 xx60 xx80 x100 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120

Density Porosity & Magnetic Resonance Porosity

Porosity Depth (ft)

100108-03b

bad hole masked

Density Porosity NMR Porosity Kerogen

Porosity

0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

100 feet

slide-9
SLIDE 9

20 40 60 80 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 Well Log Kerogen Volume Core Measured Fischer Assay Well Log Kerogen Volume (gal/ton) Depth (ft)

100829-11b

Core Fischer Assay (gal/ton)

xx00 xx50 x100 x150 x200

Depth (ft) Well Log Kerogen Volume (gal/ton) Core Fischer Assay (gal/ton) xx00 xx50 x100 x150 x200 80 60 40 20

Well Log Kerogen Volume vs Core Fischer Assay ¡

slide-10
SLIDE 10

[ ]

FA TOM 0.019 199 = −

k D MR b

TOM ( ) ρ = φ − φ ρ Total ¡Organic ¡Ma:er ¡ as ¡frac>on ¡of ¡ore ¡weight ¡ gallons ¡of ¡oil ¡per ¡ton ¡of ¡ore ¡

Synthe'c ¡Fuels ¡Data ¡Handbook ¡ Cameron ¡Engineers, ¡1975 ¡ Figure ¡29. ¡Organic ¡Ma:er ¡Content ¡

  • f ¡Green ¡River ¡Oil ¡Shales-­‑ ¡

Total ¡Organic ¡Ma:er ¡ ¡ ¡ Modified ¡Fischer ¡Assay ¡(gal/ton) ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡

0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 20 40 60

slide-11
SLIDE 11

20 40 60 80 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 Well Log Fischer Assay Estimate Core Measured Fischer Assay Core Fischer Assay (gal/ton) Depth (ft)

100829-12b

Well Log Fischer Assay Estimate (gal/ton)

xx00 xx50 x100 x150 x200 Depth (ft) Fischer Assay (gal/ton) 80 60 40 20

Fischer Assay: Well Log vs Core ¡

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Schlumberger Log Interpretation Chart Gen-6 (2009)

m n w D w t

1 R S R a = φ

( a ~ 1, m ~ n ~ 2 )

MR w D

S φ = φ

MR

2

w t

R R = φ

@ reservoir temperature T

( 1.1192) w

T 21.5 C salinity(ppk) 7.976 R (T)10 C 21.5 C

+ ° ⎡ ⎤ = ⋅ ⎢ ⎥ ° + ° ⎣ ⎦

[Rw] = ohm-meters fraction of pore = space that is water filled Archie’ Law =

Water Salinity from Resistivity & Magnetic Resonance ¡

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Assume all NaCl is in Pore Water

3 3 3 3 3

g(NaCl) g(dry ore) cm (dry ore) cm (rock) g(NaCl) Salinity g(dry ore) g(water) cm (dry ore) cm (rock) cm (water) = =

( )

1 FSAL DWNACL RHGA 1 PIGE WKER PIGE = ⋅ − −

Water Salinity Estimate from Geochemical Logging ¡

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Low porosity – low resistivity spike

Mud filtrate salinity = 8 ppk

1400 feet

100108-01

Low porosity – low resistivity spike

80 60 40 20 100

Green River Formation ¡Salinity Log ¡

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Low porosity – low resistivity spike

1400 feet

100108-01

Green River Formation Salinity Log 80 60 40 20 100

Mud filtrate salinity = 8 ppk

No Communication Between Fresh & Saline Aquifers ¡

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Important information about oil shale deposits can be obtained from the same tools used in conventional oil and gas reservoirs. These include measurements of formation density, magnetic resonance response, electrical resistivity, and capture spectroscopy. Kerogen responds as part of the pore space to density porosity tools, but is invisible to borehole magnetic resonance. Simple processing gives kerogen volume and an accurate, depth-continuous estimate

  • f Fischer Assay.

A salinity log results from comparing magnetic resonance to formation

  • resistivity. Agreement with a capture spectroscopy estimate is fair.

Summary ¡

slide-17
SLIDE 17

( 1.1192) w

T 21.5 C salinity(ppk) 7.976 R (T)10 C 21.5 C

+ ° ⎡ ⎤ = ⋅ ⎢ ⎥ ° + ° ⎣ ⎦

[Rw] = ohm-meters

Schlumberger Log Interpretation Chart Gen-6 (2009)