of your campus John Smith March 06, 2016 LED lighting Energy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

of your campus
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

of your campus John Smith March 06, 2016 LED lighting Energy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Are LED lights in the future of your campus John Smith March 06, 2016 LED lighting Energy efficient Long life Effective Illumination Cold environments Small size LumiLEDs Luxeon Emitter Easily controlled Instant on


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Are LED lights in the future

  • f your campus

John Smith

March 06, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

LED lighting

2

  • Energy efficient
  • Long life
  • Cold environments
  • Small size
  • Easily controlled
  • Instant on
  • No mercury
  • No UV or IR (virtually)
  • Attractive ROI – Lower

maintenance, Rebates, Less inventory

Economical Operation Environmentally Responsible Effective Illumination LumiLEDs Luxeon Emitter

slide-3
SLIDE 3

LED upgrade: Lamp replacement to LED

3

Existing System

(3) F32T8/741 lamps (2) .88 Electronic ballasts 3 x 2700 lumens = 8100 lumens .88 BF = 7128 lumens

.70 efficiency = 4990 lumens 90 system watts

T-LED Upgrade

(3) LED T8 lamps (2) Electronic ballasts 3 x 1600 lumens = 4800 lumens Ballast delivers rated lumens

.85 efficiency = 4080 lumens 44 system watts Input power: 49% savings Initial lumen output: 18% decrease Lighting quality: similar

20% higher luminaire efficiency because all lamp light output is emitted downwards

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LED upgrade: Luminaire upgrade to LED

Differences in function and fashion

4

Sharp Cut Off Dark upper walls Direct view of lamps 1970’s style Soft Lighting Bright walls Fully shielded Contemporary

Input power: 53% savings Initial lumen output: 12% reduction Light quality: improved

Existing Parabolic 4990 lumens 87 watts LED Luminaire 4380 lumens 41 watts

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Expanding on your LED system

John Smith

March 06, 2016

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Connected systems and controls

6

  • Different controls for classrooms

– Occupancy sensor – Daylight harvesting – Programmable controls – Corridor systems – Dimming

  • Why controls are important
  • Different types on controls
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Use of color to make buildings stand out

7

  • Can color make campus stand out

at night

  • What can using color do:

– Wins – Support of cancer week – Signify weather – Campus emergency

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Safety of students

8

  • Pathway lighting
  • Parking lots
  • Roadway lighting
  • Parking garages
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Taking control of the LED upgrade process

John Smith

March 06, 2016

slide-10
SLIDE 10

How do you go about doing an LED upgrade

10

  • 2 vector strategy

– Is this the right building for LED? (New Construction)

  • No brainer, cheaper more

efficient – Is this the right project for an LED upgrade? (R&R)

  • Level of renovation,

Complexity , ROI etc…

slide-11
SLIDE 11

…if the answer is “YES”, here is a recommended process

11

Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 1

Conduct campus wide lighting audit Breakdown campus into smaller chunks of lighting application based on highest energy users Compare current lighting scheme (lighting drawings) with proposed schematics Decide how to execute: turn key, self install or combination Schedule implementation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conduct campus wide lighting audit

12

  • Determine number of buildings

that need to be walked

  • Collect all lighting designs for

use during audit – Count luminaires and note type of luminaire

  • Drive / walk campus at night to

assess current roadway and pathway lighting

  • Gather all energy bills to

understand costs per kWH

  • Educated guess for burn hours
  • Understand how much annual

maintenance costs

  • Any costs for carrying inventory

for maintenance?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Breakdown campus into smaller projects

13

  • Prioritize your campus

– Highest energy using buildings – Age of lighting – Most difficult / expensive to maintain

  • Common breakdown

– Parking garages – Gymnasiums – Buildings – classrooms – Buildings – corridors – Pathway / roadway lighting – Highest energy users

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Compare current lighting scheme (lighting drawings) with proposed schematics

14

  • Begin to make decisions about

the following – Retrofit or Relamp – Fixture types

  • Current airflow
  • Disturb plenum?
  • 1:1 or can fixtures be

eliminated – Lumen and Light levels as recommended by I.E.S

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Decide how to execute – turn key, self install or combination

15

Turnkey Company assigns project manager and manages entire project Self install Institution uses current staff to pull down old, install new and dispose

  • f old

Combination Depending on expertise level of staff, some buildings can be turnkey and some can be self install

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Schedule implementation

16

  • Based on school

schedule and scope

  • f work, determine when to

install new project

  • Train staff on new controls if

installed

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Game of renovations – never catch up

17

  • Renovations and new builds

will never allow to completely LEDify a campus therefore never realize savings or energy goals

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Appendix

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Life expectancy for LED systems

19

  • Products are a component

“chain” – LED – Driver – Optics – Mechanical assembly – Electrical connections

  • Lamps should be rated as

products

  • Luminaires with replaceable

components

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Lumen maintenance projection

20

* IES TM-21-11 only allows lumen maintenance projections up to 6 times the test duration (in hours) of LM-8—08 measured data.

6,000 Test 36,000 TM-21

Lumen maintenance Projection:

  • TM-21-11: L85 (6K) >36,000 hours*
  • L80 > 60,000 hours
  • Typical driver: B90 @ 50,000 hours
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Life and reliability

21

Linear Fluorescent Lamps

Affected by starting frequency and method Metric: 50% survivorship 20,000–80,000 hours 20,000hours 50,000hours 80,000hours

LED Array in General Area Luminaires

Affected by ambient heat and thermal design Metric: Lumen maintenance (L70 and higher) 50,000–80,000 hours

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Lumen maintenance at NGL

22

General Area Recessed and Pendant Luminaires Recognized by NGL 2014–15

17%

.70–.80 at 50,000 hrs

24%

.80–.88 at 50,000 hrs

12%

Over .95 at 50,000 hrs

47%

.88–.95 at 50,000 hrs

slide-23
SLIDE 23