Odd frequency pairing in spin-triplet superconductor junctions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

odd frequency pairing in spin triplet superconductor
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Odd frequency pairing in spin-triplet superconductor junctions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Odd frequency pairing in spin-triplet superconductor junctions Yukio Tanaka Nagoya University International Symposium on Physics of New Quantum phases in Superclean Materials March 12 2010 Main Collaborators A.A. Golubov Twente


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Yukio Tanaka Nagoya University

March 12 2010

Odd frequency pairing in spin-triplet superconductor junctions

International Symposium on Physics of New Quantum phases in Superclean Materials

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Main Collaborators

A.A. Golubov Twente University

  • Y. Asano Hokkaido University
  • S. Kashiwaya AIST (Tsukuba)
  • M. Ueda University of Tokyo
  • T. Yokoyama

Tokyo Institute of Technology Y.V. Nazarov Delft University

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Impurity scattering effect

Tanaka and Golubov, PRL. 98, 037003 (2007)

Ballistic Normal metal Superconductor Diffusive Normal metal (DN) Superconductor

Impurity scattering (isotropic)

Only s-wave pair amplitude exists in DN

(1)ESE (2)OTE

ESE (Even-frequency spin-singlet even-parity) OTE (Odd-frequency spin-triplet even-parity)

Proximity effect in aerogel, Higashitani, Nagato, and Nagai, (2009)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

(1) (2) (3) (4)

  • ESE (Even-frequency spin-singlet even-parity)
  • ETO (Even-frequency spin-triplet odd-parity)
  • OTE (Odd-frequency spin-triplet even-parity)
  • OSO (Odd-frequency spin-singlet odd-parity)

Proximity into DN (Diffusive normal metal) even-parity (s-wave)○ Odd-parity ×

Bulk state

ESE(s,dx2-y2 -wave) ESE (dxy-wave) ETO (px-wave) ETO (py-wave)

Sign change

No Yes

Interface-induced state (subdominant) Proximity into DN

Yes No

ESE + (OSO) OSO +(ESE) OTE + (ETO) ETO + (OTE) ESE No No

Summary of proximity effect (No spin flip)

  • Y. Tanaka, et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 037005 (2007)

OTE

  • Y. Tanaka and Golubov, PRL. 98, 037003 (2007)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mid gap Andreev resonant (bound) state (MARS)

Interface (surface)

+ ー

–1 1 2 4 Normalized DOS 

(Sign change of the pair potential at the interface) + ー ー +

Odd-frequency Cooper pair

slide-6
SLIDE 6

(1) (2) (3) (4)

  • ESE (Even-frequency spin-singlet even-parity)
  • ETO (Even-frequency spin-triplet odd-parity)
  • OTE (Odd-frequency spin-triplet even-parity)
  • OSO (Odd-frequency spin-singlet odd-parity)

Proximity into DN (Diffusive normal metal) even-parity (s-wave)○ Odd-parity ×

Bulk state

ESE(s,dx2-y2 -wave) ESE (dxy-wave) ETO (px-wave) ETO (py-wave)

Sign change

No Yes

Interface-induced state (subdominant) Proximity into DN

Yes No

ESE + (OSO) OSO +(ESE) OTE + (ETO) ETO + (OTE) ESE No No

Summary of proximity effect (No spin flip)

  • Y. Tanaka, et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 037005 (2007)

OTE

  • Y. Tanaka and Golubov, PRL. 98, 037003 (2007)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Usadel equation

Available for diffusive limit

Angular average

Diffusive limit

Diffusive normal metal region attached to superconductor Boundary condition available for unconventional superconductors

Tanaka et al, PRL 90 167003 (2003), PRB 70 012507 (2004)

Diffusion constant

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Green’s function in superconductor (ballistic)

We denote simply

Tanaka Golubov PRL 98, 037003 (2007)

Diffusive Normal metal (DN) Superconductor

+ 

Green’s function in DN Conventional proximity (even-frequency) Unconventional proximity (odd-frequency)

Quasiparticle Green’s function Pair amplitude

slide-9
SLIDE 9

DN S

Even frequency spin singlet s-wave (ESE) pair is induced in DN.

) ( Re  f

) ( Im  f

Conventional proximity effect

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Purely Even frequency s-wave component in DN Conventional proximity effect in spin-singlet d- wave junction (similar to s-wave)

DN

PRL 98, 037003 (2007)

) ( Re  f

) ( Im  f

slide-11
SLIDE 11

DN + ー Px-wave case

New type of proximity effect

Odd frequency spin triplet s-wave (OTE) pair is induced in DN

Y.Tanaka, A.A.Golubov, Phys.Rev.Lett. 98, 037003 (2007)

) ( Re  f

) ( Im  f

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Density of states in DN

Conventional proximity effect with Even-frequency Cooper pair in DN Unconventional proximity effect with Odd-frequency Cooper pair in DN

Tanaka, Kashiwaya PRB 70 012507 (2004)

Peak(dip) width, Thouless energy

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Unconventional proximity effect No proximity effect Odd-frequency pairing at the interface: Odd-parity (can not enter) Odd-frequency pairing at the interface includes s-wave component Peak width, Thouless energy

slide-14
SLIDE 14

–1 1 1 2 3 a b c

Local density of state in DN

–1 1 1 2 3 a b c

–1 1 2 4 6 8 a b c

slide-15
SLIDE 15

How to detect triplet superconductor

MARS (Mid gap Andreev resonance state) can penetrate into DN by proximity effect only for triplet superconductor junctions LDOS in DN has a zero energy peak

Diffusive normal Metal (DN) STS Triplet superconductor MARS Diffusive normal Metal (DN) STS Singlet superconductor MARS

LDOS in DN does not have a zero energy peak

ZEP No ZEP

  • Y. Tanaka & S. Kashiwaya, PRB 70, 012507 (2004)

Proximity effect via odd-frequency pairing

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Theoretical prediction to detect odd-frequency paring amplitude

Asano Tanaka Golubov Kashiwaya, PRL 99, 067005 (2007).

Sr2RuO4 Au:I+ Au:V+ Au:I- Au:V-

Kashiwaya, Maeno 2007

Zero energy peak No Zero energy peak

OTE proximity ESE proximity (conventional)

OTE (Odd-frequency spin-triplet even-parity) ESE (Even-frequency spin-singlet even-parity)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Meissner effect

Narikiyo and Fukuyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58, 4557 (1989) Belzig Bruder PRB 53 5727 (1996)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

1 –0.02 0.02 a b c d

Temperature dependence of averaged value of local penetration depth

a purely imaginary number for spin-triplet junctions

Tanaka, et al, PRB 72, 140503R 2005

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Summary

(1)For spin-triplet superconductor / diffusive normal metal (DN) junctions, pure odd- frequency pairing is possible in the diffusive normal metal. (2)We can expect anomalous proximity effect with enhanced zero energy density

  • f states.

(3)Sr2RuO4 junction is very interesting.

  • Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 037003 (2007)
  • Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 067005 (2007).
slide-20
SLIDE 20

ABS Vortex

Proximity (interference) F/S junction

Odd-frequency pairing

slide-21
SLIDE 21

–1 1 1 2 3 a b c

Local density of state in DN

–1 1 1 2 3 a b c –1 1 2 4 6 8 a b c

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Ferromagnet (metal)/superconductor junctions

(1) Generation of OSO pairing by broken inversion (translational) symmetry (2) Generation of OTE pairing by broken time reversal symmetry (3) Generation of ETO pairing both in the presence of broken inversion (translational) symmetry and broken time reversal symmetry Superconductor All four kinds of pairing is possible in ferromagnet

(Eschrig, 2007)

Ferromagnet

ESE : Even-frequency spin-Singlet Even-parity ETO : Even-frequency spin-Triplet Odd-parity OSO : Odd-frequency spin-Singlet Odd-parity OTE : Odd-frequency spin-Triplet Even-parity

ESE s-wave

slide-23
SLIDE 23

_

Odd frequency spin-triplet s-wave pair

Superconductor Ferromagnet Bergeret, Efetov, Volkov, (2001) Eschrig, Buzdin,Golubov, Kadigrobov,Fominov, Radovic…

Generation of the odd-frequency pair amplitude in ferromagnet

Odd-frequency Pair amplitude not pair potential ) is generated in ferromagnet junctions

spin-singlet s-wave pair

+

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Josephson current through half metal

(1) Spin precession, triplet pairing with m=0 is generated from singlet pairing (2) Spin rotation, triplet pairing with m=1 is generated (3) even-frequency triplet or odd-frequency triplet

Eschrig (2008)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Ferromagnet (metal)/superconductor junctions

(1)Weak spin-polarized ferromagnet

  • T. Yokoyama, Y. Tanaka, and A.A. Golubov PRB 75 134510 (2007)

(only spin precession)

(2)Fully spin-polarized ferromagnet

Y.Asano, Y.Tanaka and A.A. Golubov PRL 98, 107002 (2007) Purely odd-frequency equal spin-triplet pairing is possible

Diffusive Ferromagnet (DF) Superconductor Only s-wave pairing state is possible in DF

(spin precession & rotation)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

3 3 / 1 / 0.1 / 0.1

d b d b Th

Z Z R R R R E        

LDOS at  is enhanced, when the magnitude of the OTE pair amplitude is enhanced.

x=0 x=L Ferromagnet S

  • T. Yokoyama, Y. Tanaka, and A.A. Golubov PRB 75 134510 (2007)

ESE (x=0) OTE (x=0)

LDOS (x=0) Pair amplitude

ESE (Even-frequency spin-singlet even-parity) OTE (Odd-frequency spin-triplet even-parity)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Josephson current in S/ HM/ S

Half metal (HM) : CrO2

Keizer et.al., Nature (‘06) Eschrig et. al., PRL(03)

Theory in the clean limit Spin active interface Bergeret et. al., PRL(‘01),

Kadigrobov et. al., Europhys Lett.(‘01)

Theory in the diffusive limit

Aasno Tanaka Golubov, PRL(‘07)

Theory in general case

Eschrig, Lofwander Nature Physics(08)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Furusaki, Physica B(‘92), Asano, PRB(‘01)

Advantages

SNS, SFS, S/HM/S Parameters

S ex

V V

: exchange : spin-flip (interface)

Lattice model (numerical)

Y.Asano, Y.Tanaka and A.A. Golubov PRL 98, 107002 (2007) Eschrig Lofwander Nature Physics(2008) Braude Nazarov PRL 98 07003 (2007) Takahashi Hikino et al. PRL 99 057003(2007)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Pair amplitude and LDOS

Y.Asano, Y.Tanaka and A.A. Golubov PRL 98, 107002 (2007)

Even-frequency spin-singlet s-wave (ESE) Vex=0 VS=0 S/N/S Odd-frequency equal-spin-triplet s-wave (OTE) in S/HF/S

  • 1.0
  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0

  • 0.5

0.0 0.5 1.0 < f > Pairing function / fB < f0 >

n / 0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1 2 3 LDOS at j = 37 / n0

S/HM/S

SNS E / 

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Anomalous Josephson effect between odd-frequency superconductor/ even frequency superconductor junctions

  • Y. Tanaka, A. Golubov, S. Kashiwaya, and M. Ueda
  • Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 037005 (2007)
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Josephson couplings between even-frequency superconductor and odd-frequency one

  • 1. (1) and (6)
  • 2. (2) and (5)
  • 3. (3) and (8)
  • 4. (4) and (7)

Presence of the Lowest order Josephson coupling

PRL 99 037005 (2007)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Previous theory

  • Phys. Rev. B 52, 1271 - 1278 (1995)

Abrahams, Balatsky, Scalapino, and Schrieffer

There is no lowest-order Josephson coupling between odd- and even-frequency superconductors.

Interface induced state is neglected!!

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Josephson current

R (odd-frequency)

(Lowest Order coupling)

Interface state

(1)L-side (Even-frequency superconductor)

Odd function of Matsubara Even function of Matsubara (Macroscopic phase difference between two superconductors)

+  L (even-frequency)

(2)R-side (odd-frequency superconductor)

Even function of Matsubara Odd function of Matsubara

Anomalous current phase relation

PRL 99 037005 (2007)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Summary (4)

(1)Ubiquitous presence of odd-frequency pairing in non-uniform superconducting systems. (2)Bound state can be reinterpreted as a manifestation of odd-frequency pairing. (3)Possible existence about odd-frequency energy gap function in Q1D system.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

LDOS (magneto-tunneling spectroscopy) based on the Doppler effect

Shift of the quasiparticle energy

slide-36
SLIDE 36

OSO frequency-dependence

  • 0.03
  • 0.02
  • 0.01

0.01 0.02 0.03

  • 4
  • 2

2 4

  • 45
  • 30
  • 15

15 30 45

Vas/tx

RPA

Gap function

 

, 2 ,

OSO

 n i 

 

2 , ,   m

s a i

V , 95 . 

t

S , 1 .

2

 

x x y

t t t t 05 . 

x

t T

Pairing interaction

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Josephson current through half metal