Observational constraints to boxy/peanut bulge formation time - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

observational constraints to boxy peanut bulge formation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Observational constraints to boxy/peanut bulge formation time - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Observational constraints to boxy/peanut bulge formation time Isabel Prez Departamento Fsica Terica y del Cosmos, Universidad de Granada I. Martinez-Valpuesta(IAC), T. Ruiz-Lara(IAC), A. de Lorenzo-Caceres(IAC)), J. Falcn- Barroso


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Observational constraints to boxy/peanut bulge formation time

Isabel Pérez

Departamento Física Teórica y del Cosmos, Universidad de Granada

  • I. Martinez-Valpuesta(IAC), T. Ruiz-Lara(IAC), A. de Lorenzo-Caceres(IAC)), J. Falcón-

Barroso (IAC), Estrella Florido (UGR),R.M. Gonzalez-Delgado (IAA), M. Lyubenova (RUG), R.A. Marino (ETH), S.F. Sanchez (UAM), P. Sánchez-Bláquez (U. autóma de Madrid), G. van de Ven (MPI), A. Zurita (UGR)

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Observations trace a boxy/peanut structure in the MW

V a l e n t i , e t a l . ( 2 1 6 )

based on RC stars from VVV

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Boxy/peanut are ubiquitous

Martinez-Valpuesta et al. 2006

Boxy/peanut shape bulges in more than 40% of disc galaxies (Lutticke et al . 2000). Simulations show that boxy peanut bulges are bars (Combes & Sanders 1981; Athanassoula et

  • al. 2002, Debattista et al. 2006,

etc) Observational evidence from spectroscopy of edge-on galaxies (e.g. Kuijken & Merrifield 1995; Bureau & Freeman 1999; Chung & Bureau 2004)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

How do B/P bulges look like in less inclined galaxies?

Boxy/peanut shape bulges related to bar/lense structures seen face-on (Debattista et al. 2013, Laurikainen et al. 2017, 2014, Athanassoula et al 2015)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

When and how bars and boxy/peanut bulges form?

  • resolved star formation histories (near-field cosmology)

CALIFA survey PMAS (Ppak configuration) 3400-7300 Å Final spectral resolution FWHM ~ 6 Å and spatial resolutiion 1”

Subsample of 20 barred spirals beloging to size outliers such as NGC6032

slide-7
SLIDE 7

When and how bars and boxy/peanut bulges form?

  • star formation histories:

Integrated spectra from elliptical annuli bins

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Stellar content analysis different approaches:

  • Colours
  • Line indices
  • Full spectral fitting

Sanchez-Blazquez et al. 2011

slide-9
SLIDE 9

``STEllar Content and Kinematics

via Maximum A Posteriori likelihood''STECKMAP (Ocvirk 2006)

Stellar Population models: MILES (Vazdekis et al. 2010: http://miles.iac.es)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Comparison between CMD and integrated stellar populations: LMC

Ruiz-Lara, Pérez, Gallart et al. 2015

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Comparison between CMD and integrated stellar populations: LMC

WFPC2, reaching the oldest MS turn-off Aparicio & Gallart 2004 EFOSC2 Ruiz-Lara et al. 2015

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Comparison between CMD and integrated stellar populations: LMC

Good agreement between state-of- the-art resolved stellar analysis and full spectral fitting (Ruiz-Lara, Pérez et al 2015)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

When and how bars and boxy/peanut bulges form from star formation histories

Integrated spectra from elliptical annuli bins

slide-14
SLIDE 14

S n a p s h

  • t
  • f

b a r a n d b u l g e f

  • r

m a t i

  • n

f r

  • m

t h e S F H

  • f

N G C 6 3 2

Pérez, Martinez-Valpuesta et al. 2017. Pérez, Martinez-Valpuesta et al. 2017.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

S n a p s h

  • t
  • f

b a r a n d b u l g e f

  • r

m a t i

  • n

f r

  • m

t h e S F H

  • f

N G C 6 3 2

Pérez, Martinez-Valpuesta et al. 2017. Pérez, Martinez-Valpuesta et al. 2017.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Q u e n c h i n g

  • f

t h e S F i n t h e ' i n n e r ' b a r : b a r a s a c

  • n

v e y

  • r

b e l t

Pérez, Martinez-Valpuesta et al. 2017.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

B a r g r

  • w

s f r

  • m

d i s c m a t e r i a l

Pérez, Martinez-Valpuesta et al. 2017. Pérez, Martinez-Valpuesta et al. 2017.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

S n a p s h

  • t
  • f

b a r a n d b u l g e f

  • r

m a t i

  • n

f r

  • m

n u m e r i c a l s i m u l a t i

  • n

s : b a r f

  • r

m a t i

  • n

a n d b u c k l i n g p e r i

  • d

Pérez, Martinez-Valpuesta et al. 2017.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Summary

  • The close relation between morphological features and SFHs

suggest a long-lasting bar

  • The enhancement of star formation in the inner bar suggests,

based on the new simulation a relation with the bar formation and main growth, right before the buckling event. In this way we can estimate the buckling occurring around 8 Gyrs ago. We can also infer the formation of the stable disc and the bar at least before 10 Gyrs.

  • After the event of the B/P formation, the bar grows again mainly

from disc material

  • When the bar forms there is a quenching in the star formation of

the inner bar, suggesting that the bar can act as a conveyor belt, transferring material to the centre from the disc without forming stars within it.

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Sanchez-Menguiano, Sanchez, Perez et al 2017 accepted (T
  • day!)
  • 102 spiral galaxies with MUSE (part of the AMUSING project) 2D distributions Gas

abundances, stellar properties, kinematics, physical properties of HII regions