O. Re g . 406/ 19, On-Site a nd E xc e ss So il Ma na g e me nt - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

o re g 406 19 on site a nd e xc e ss so il ma na g e me
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

O. Re g . 406/ 19, On-Site a nd E xc e ss So il Ma na g e me nt - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

May 13, 2020 O. Re g . 406/ 19, On-Site a nd E xc e ss So il Ma na g e me nt Re g ula tio n Wha t Do e s it Me a n? Presented by: Krista Barfoot, Ph.D., C.Chem., QPRA Dylan Hemmings, M.Sc. Ag e nda 1. Introduction 2. Regulation Basics


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presented by: Krista Barfoot, Ph.D., C.Chem., QPRA Dylan Hemmings, M.Sc.

  • O. Re g . 406/ 19,

On-Site a nd E xc e ss So il Ma na g e me nt Re g ula tio n

May 13, 2020

Wha t Do e s it Me a n?

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Ag e nda

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Regulation Basics
  • 3. Timing
  • 4. Implications
  • 5. Challenges
  • 6. Case Studies & Digital Tools
  • 7. Q&A
slide-3
SLIDE 3

I ntro duc tio n

Section 1

slide-4
SLIDE 4

E xpe rie nc e yo u c a n c o unt o n

Krista Barfoot Ph.D., C.Chem., QPRA

Principal, Environmental Services

Dylan Hemmings M.Sc.

Vice President, Environmental Services

6

Stantec has 300 environmental staff across Ontario to help support your needs – from strategic planning and sampling, to construction oversight.

Se nior R e sour c e s

T ia na Ro b inso n Ja so n Hudso n Gra c e F e rg uso n Ste ve De sro c he r Jill Pe te rs-De c hma n Jo e l Va n Po pta Pa ula Sda o F ra nc ine K e lly-Ho o pe r E rika Ryte r Chris Cushing

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Re g ula tio n Ba sic s - I nte nt

Section 2

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why do we have a ne w r e gulation?

Wha t Do e s I t Do ?

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s - I

nte nt

Owners have always been responsible for managing their excess soil in an environmentally responsible manner; however, vagueness in Regulation 347 regarding soil made enforcement a challenge.

  • O. Reg. 406/19 provides clear,

enforceable rules regarding soil reuse.

Cannot “contract out” of liability

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Prevent improper placement/reuse of soil

Goals

I nte nde d Be ne fits

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s - I

nte nt

Soil is a valuable resource SECONDARY: Encourage and facilitate local reuse, thus decreasing greenhouse gas emissions Reduce amount of excess soil disposed

  • f in landfills

Inhibit contamination of clean sites

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Re g ula tio n Ba sic s – Re q uire me nts

Section 2

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

“Soil, or soil mixed with rock, that has been excavated as part of a project and removed from the project area for the project”

What is e xc e ss soil?

Project Area - a single property or adjoining properties on which the project is carried out Project Leader - the person or persons who are ultimately responsible for making decisions relating to the planning and implementation of the project

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Ne w Standar ds

De te rmine d b y Pro po se d Re use Site

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

Shallow or Stratified Soil Sites Potable vs Non- Potable, and Proximity to Surface Water Option to Use Beneficial Reuse Assessment Tool (BRAT) Soil quality (chemistry) focused and Volume Based (Bulk, Leach) Option to Develop Site-specific Risk- Based Standards Special Condition Rules (salt-impacted, blended, pH, sensitive sites, etc.)

Regulation establishes sampling and documentation requirements to confirm standards are met

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Planning Requirements

Registration on Public Register

Registration and Tracking Assessment of Past Uses

Identify volumes and quality of excess soil to be removed Dates of movement and contingency measures

Soil Characterization Excess Soil Destination Assessment Report

Tracking system for each load – from excavation to final destination Similar to Phase One ESA under O. Reg. 153 SWM ponds, agricultural soil movements, and RPI soils to non-agricultural sites exempt Sampling and Analysis Plan Automatically triggered for higher risk sites Mandatory sampling parameters Minimum sample numbers based on volumes Some relief from sampling requirements if > Table 3 Excess Soil Quality Standards Soil Characterization Report tied to Schedule E

  • f O. Reg. 153

Identify destination information Describe any processing completed Not required if soil is transported directly to Class 1 Soil Management facility

slide-12
SLIDE 12

In-situ vs e x-situ sampling (non-SWM pond)

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

Volume (m3) In-Situ Samples Ex-Situ Samples Volume (m3) In-Situ Samples Ex-Situ Samples <130 3 3 >1700 to 1850 10 16 >130 to 220 3 4 >1850 to 2050 11 17 >220 to 320 3 5 >2050 to 2200 11 18 >320 to 430 3 6 >2200 to 2350 12 19 >430 to 550 3 7 >2350 to 2500 13 20 >550 to 670 4 8 >2500 to 2700 14 21 >670 to 800 4 9 >2700 to 2900 15 22 >800 to 950 5 10 >2900 to 3100 16 23 >950 to 1100 6 11 >3100 to 3300 17 24 >1100 to 1250 7 12 >3300 to 3500 18 25 >1250 to 1400 7 13 >3500 to 3700 19 26 >1400 to 1550 8 14 >3700 to 3900 20 27 >1550 to 1700 9 15 >3900 to 4100 21 28 SWM – Stormwater Management

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Qualifie d Pe r son (QP)

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

  • Certain documents are required to

be prepared by a QP

  • Defined in Ontario Regulation

153/04: P.Eng., P.Geo.

  • QP cannot have direct or indirect

interest in the project

  • Potential for contractors to hire QP
slide-14
SLIDE 14

E xe mptions fr

  • m Planning R

e quir e me nts

Re g ula tio n still a pplic a b le

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

Topsoil (as defined, with specific reuse requirements) Emergency work (e.g., spill) Soil from an infrastructure project reused at another infrastructure project

  • f the same owner
  • r a public body

<100m3 transported directly to waste disposal site <2,000 m3 in settlement area and impacts not expected Soil excavated to maintain infrastructure in a fit state of repair

*includes public highways, transit lines and railways, gas and oil pipelines, sewage collection systems and water distribution systems, stormwater management systems, electricity management systems, telecommunications lines and facilities, and associated right of ways

Special conditions Volume- based Select Infrastructure Projects*

Excludes SWM Ponds

slide-15
SLIDE 15

E xe mptions fr

  • m Planning R

e quir e me nts

I nfra struc ture

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

Both of the following circumstances apply:

  • 1. The excess soil is excavated as part of an infrastructure project.
  • 2. The project leader for the infrastructure project intends, after removing

the excess soil from the project area, to finally place it at a reuse site that is owned by the project leader or a public body and that is part of an undertaking related to another infrastructure project. Reuse site(s) would have to be identified and specified when contracting the work

slide-16
SLIDE 16

E xe mptions fr

  • m Planning R

e quir e me nts

Gra ndfa the ring

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

Exemption to the Planning Requirements if the Project Leader has entered into a contract with another person with respect to the management of excess soil from the project before January 1, 2021.

Exemption removed January 1, 2026

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Soil Stor age

Pro je c t Are a (o n-site ) Cla ss 2 Site , Wa ste T ra nsfe r Site , Re use Site (o ff-site )

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

What about linear infrastructure projects?

  • Prevent adverse effects (e.g., noise, dust,

mud tracking, run-off/erosion, outdoor air impacts [odour], leaching)

  • Stockpiles ≤ 2,500 m3
  • Segregated by quality or Project Area (off-

site)

  • Setback ≥ 30 m from waterbodies
  • Setback ≥ 10 m from property lines
slide-18
SLIDE 18

T r anspor tation

Ha ule rs o f E xc e ss So il

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

  • Provide Provincial Officers information regarding the excess soil load:

‒ Location, date, time loaded ‒ Quantity and deposit location ‒ Contact name for further info (e.g., quality) ‒ Organization transporting the soil ‒ Vehicle driver, plate numbers

What does this mean for contract specifications?

  • More formal record required after January 1, 2022
  • Transport in vehicle that provides safe transfer without nuisance (i.e., no

abrasion, corrosion; leakproof and covered, when needed)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Spe c ial r e quir e me nts for liquid soil

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

  • Storage and hauling requirements
  • Select dewatering/processing allowed in the Project Area or local

waste transfer facility

  • Quality requirements apply; testing is

generally specific to dry soil with consideration of additives

  • Deposit at a reuse site as dry soil, or

as liquid soil but with an appropriate instrument

  • Landfill or further treatment
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

  • Is it rock or rock mixed with soil?

‒ 100% rock not considered “excess soil” ‒ Rock and soil particles smaller than 2 mm in size considered “excess soil”

What about tunne ling spoils?

I s the re g ula tio n re le va nt?

  • What drilling mud was used?

‒ Water-based or oil-based ‒ Impacts to quality mean treatment as waste

  • What amendments or drying agents were added?

‒ Natural non-polymer, natural polymer, or synthetic polymer additive ‒ Impacts to quality mean treatment as waste

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

  • Is it rock or rock mixed with soil?

‒ 100% rock not considered “excess soil” ‒ Rock and soil particles smaller than 2 mm in size considered “excess soil”

What about tunne ling spoils?

I s the re g ula tio n re le va nt?

  • What drilling mud was used?

‒ Water-based or oil-based ‒ Impacts to quality mean treatment as waste

  • What amendments or drying agents were added?

‒ Natural non-polymer, natural polymer, or synthetic polymer additive ‒ Impacts to quality mean treatment as waste

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Se c tion 2 Re g ulatio n Basic s – Re quire me nts

What about SWM Pond Se dime nt?

Wha t a re the re q uire me nts?

  • Excess Soil Standards apply to reuse site

Planning Requirements Apply Exempt from Planning Requirements

  • Prescriptive sampling of

dried, excavated sediment (specified parameters, frequency based on whether

  • r not segregated by zone)
  • Flexibility in approach

for confirming quality, including use of in-situ sampling

  • Site-specific instruments (e.g., municipal permit, Environmental Compliance

Approval, etc.) can be sought to allow site-specific variations in quality for reuse sites

slide-23
SLIDE 23

T iming

Section 3

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Reuse Sites July 1, 2020 “Planning” Requirements January 1, 2022 Transportation Requirements July 1, 2020 Excess Soil Quality Standards July 1, 2020

Assessment Registration Tracking Characterization Vehicle type and condition standards Hauling Records Verbal – Until January 1, 2022 Written/electronic – Starting January 1, 2022 Exempt from certain waste management requirements Identified Beneficial Reuse

Soil Storage and Processing Requirements July 1, 2020

Reuse Criteria (Generic, Site Specific) Soil must be dry soil to be reused Class 1 = Soil Bank or Soil Storage Site

Class 2 = Temporary Management Site Owned/Operated by Public Body or Project Leader

Additional rules for reuse sites >10,000m3 January 1, 2022 Project Area Requirements for Liquid Soils

T ime line

Grandfathering Clause expires January 1, 2026

Landfilling restriction January 1, 2025

Generic Site Specific Rules for specific soil types

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Basic soil ge ne r ation r e quir e me nts – July 1, 2020

Se c tion 3 T

iming

  • Understand soil quality (due diligence testing?)
  • Identify where to take it
  • Get consent to deposit the soil at the reuse site
  • Transport the soil to the site appropriately
  • Haulers must be able to provide “verbal” haul

records

  • Meet storage rules while on-site

APPLICABLE TO ONGOING WORK AFTER JULY 1, 2020, NO EXEMPTIONS!

slide-26
SLIDE 26

I mplic a tio ns

Section 4

slide-27
SLIDE 27

T ake -aways

Se c tion 4 I

mplic atio ns

  • Advance planning can facilitate cost-savings and risk

management

  • Understanding volume and quality of soil to be managed

important to identifying strategic options

  • Consider where exemptions can be applied to produce flexibility

and cost-savings

  • Contract language and specifications may need updating:

‒ Note requirements of new regulation ‒ If using exemptions based on reuse site ‒ Given liability remains with Project Leader

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Contr ac t L anguage / Spe c ific ations

Se c tion 4 I

mplic atio ns

DISPOSAL OF MATERIAL OFF-SITE

  • A. Material designated to be removed from the site must be promptly removed.
  • B. Make necessary arrangements for environmentally safe transportation and ultimate disposal in compliance with all

applicable Ministry Regulations and Guidelines at no cost to the Owner, unless noted otherwise. C.Carry out additional chemical analysis of site materials suspected to be contaminated and determine applicable Ministry Regulations and Guidelines as may be required to determine the environmental quality of materials encountered and to determine suitable means for transportation and ultimate disposal. Notify Engineer of concerns and provide copy of test results. Load excavated material identified to be contaminated into required haulage trucks and dispose off site at an approved disposal sites. Pay for haulage and disposal fees for contaminated excavated material. D.Contractor is encouraged to recycle materials where possible, instead of disposing of materials off-site at an approved disposal sites. Advise the Engineer of the recycling centres to be used. Follow all applicable local and provincial waste reduction guidelines.

  • E. Remove unwanted material, as classified by the Owner or Engineer, from the site and dispose of same at acceptable

sites outside of the worksite.

  • F. Prior to the disposal of material offsite, submit to the Engineer for record purposes, a copy of the agreement(s) with the

Owner(s) outside of the worksite, with such agreements to include: a release and indemnification of the Owner; who is responsible for the levelling and drainage grading of the site; and the quantity and quality of the material that may be disposed of at the site(s). G.Removal of unwanted material, as designated by the Owner of the Engineer, from the site and dispose of same at the site(s) outside of the worksite in accordance with the agreement(s) submitted to the Engineer.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Contr ac t L anguage / Spe c ific ations

Se c tion 4 I

mplic atio ns

DISPOSAL OF MATERIAL OFF-SITE

  • A. Material designated to be removed from the site must be promptly removed.
  • B. Make necessary arrangements for environmentally safe transportation and ultimate disposal in compliance with all

applicable Ministry Regulations and Guidelines at no cost to the Owner, unless noted otherwise. C.Carry out additional chemical analysis of site materials suspected to be contaminated and determine applicable Ministry Regulations and Guidelines as may be required to determine the environmental quality of materials encountered and to determine suitable means for transportation and ultimate disposal. Notify Engineer of concerns and provide copy of test results. Load excavated material identified to be contaminated into required haulage trucks and dispose off site at an approved disposal sites. Pay for haulage and disposal fees for contaminated excavated material. D.Contractor is encouraged to recycle materials where possible, instead of disposing of materials off-site at an approved disposal sites. Advise the Engineer of the recycling centres to be used. Follow all applicable local and provincial waste reduction guidelines.

  • E. Remove unwanted material, as classified by the Owner or Engineer, from the site and dispose of same at acceptable

sites outside of the worksite.

  • F. Prior to the disposal of material offsite, submit to the Engineer for record purposes, a copy of the agreement(s) with the

Owner(s) outside of the worksite, with such agreements to include: a release and indemnification of the Owner; who is responsible for the levelling and drainage grading of the site; and the quantity and quality of the material that may be disposed of at the site(s). G.Removal of unwanted material, as designated by the Owner of the Engineer, from the site and dispose of same at the site(s) outside of the worksite in accordance with the agreement(s) submitted to the Engineer.

Documentation, transportation, tracking requirements, including characterization Record-keeping per Regulation; uploads to registry Seek reuse options and get agreements in place

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Contr ac t L anguage / Spe c ific ations

Se c tion 4 I

mplic atio ns

DISPOSAL OF MATERIAL OFF-SITE

  • A. Material designated to be removed from the site must be promptly removed.
  • B. Make necessary arrangements for environmentally safe transportation and ultimate disposal in compliance with all

applicable Ministry Regulations and Guidelines at no cost to the Owner, unless noted otherwise. C.Carry out additional chemical analysis of site materials suspected to be contaminated and determine applicable Ministry Regulations and Guidelines as may be required to determine the environmental quality of materials encountered and to determine suitable means for transportation and ultimate disposal. Notify Engineer of concerns and provide copy of test results. Load excavated material identified to be contaminated into required haulage trucks and dispose off site at an approved disposal sites. Pay for haulage and disposal fees for contaminated excavated material. D.Contractor is encouraged to recycle materials where possible, instead of disposing of materials off-site at an approved disposal sites. Advise the Engineer of the recycling centres to be used. Follow all applicable local and provincial waste reduction guidelines.

  • E. Remove unwanted material, as classified by the Owner or Engineer, from the site and dispose of same at acceptable

sites outside of the worksite.

  • F. Prior to the disposal of material offsite, submit to the Engineer for record purposes, a copy of the agreement(s) with the

Owner(s) outside of the worksite, with such agreements to include: a release and indemnification of the Owner; who is responsible for the levelling and drainage grading of the site; and the quantity and quality of the material that may be disposed of at the site(s). G.Removal of unwanted material, as designated by the Owner of the Engineer, from the site and dispose of same at the site(s) outside of the worksite in accordance with the agreement(s) submitted to the Engineer.

Documentation, transportation, tracking requirements, including characterization Record-keeping per Regulation; uploads to registry Seek reuse options and get agreements in place

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Cha lle ng e s

Section 5

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Challe nge s

Se c tion 5 Challe ng e s

  • During the design phase, cut/fill

planning is constantly changing

  • During construction /soil management

phase, site configuration constantly changing

  • Can be difficult to pinpoint soil data

locations on active site using traditional methods

  • Potential for over excavation
  • Grade changes
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Ca se Studie s & Dig ita l T

  • o ls

Section 6

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Case Study: Por t Cr e dit R e de ve lopme nt Pr

  • je c t

Se c tion 6 Case Studie s & Dig ital T

  • o ls
  • Former refinery site ~ 75 acres
  • Over 2,000 boreholes and test pit

locations

  • Over 3,500 historical soil results
  • Project wanted to manage soil in

real time including new data

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Solution-Colle c tor for Ar c GIS

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

  • Collector is the app to record field data

and incorporate analytical results

  • Map based system with editable forms
  • Forms are customizable and include

drop-down menus

  • Continuously updates
  • Attach photos of features
  • Can tie into survey equipment to improve

accuracy

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Solution

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Solution

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Case Study: Por t Cr e dit R e de ve lopme nt Pr

  • je c t: Soil <1 mbg

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Case Study: Por t Cr e dit R e de ve lopme nt Pr

  • je c t: Soil 1-2 mbg

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Case Study: Por t Cr e dit R e de ve lopme nt Pr

  • je c t: Soil 2-3 mbg

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Case Study: Por t Cr e dit R e de ve lopme nt Pr

  • je c t: Soil >3 mbg

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Case Study: T

  • r
  • nto

Por t L ands

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

  • To mitigate flood risk associated with the

Don River, a new naturalized river channel is being excavated.

  • 1000 m of new river channel is being

constructed

  • Involves the excavation and

management of over 1,000,000 cubic meters of excess soil

  • Soil reuse is to be maximized to the

extent practical

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Case Study: T

  • r
  • nto Por

t L ands

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Case Study: T

  • r
  • nto Por

t L ands Soil Cate gor ization

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

  • Soils were divided into eleven categories
  • f potential reuse or disposal based on

their environmental and geotechnical characteristics.

  • Soils were divided into these categories

by interpolating borehole data to create a 3D model.

  • The 3D model is loaded into a machine

control system in each excavator, which provides 3D coordinates and the category of soil being excavated.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Case Study: T

  • r
  • nto Por

t L ands Soil T r ac king

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Case Study: T

  • r
  • nto Por

t L ands Unmanne d Ae r ial Ve hic le s

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

  • Verification of soil volumes is difficult
  • ver large scales
  • A high-resolution aerial survey is

conducted monthly

  • Photogrammetry is used to generate a

digital model of ground surface elevations

  • Changes in elevation from month-to-

month are used to determine volumes and are compared to ground survey and truck tickets

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Case Study: T

  • r
  • nto Por

t L ands High R e solution Ae r ial Sur ve y

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Case Study: T

  • r
  • nto Por

t L ands Photogr amme tr y

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Case Study: Combine d Se wage Stor age T unne l

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

  • Deep tunnel storage for combined

sewer flow in downtown Ottawa

  • Tunnels are 4.4 km and 1.6 km long,

3 m wide in shale and limestone

  • Baseline assessments at staging

areas/shafts to characterize soil

  • Significant volume of tunnel spoils

and drilling fluids

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Case Study: Combine d Se wage Stor age T unne l

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

Approach Used To Consider under New Excess Soils Regulation

Specifications required contractor to develop Soil Management Plan Project leader will be responsible to prepare Excess Soil Destination Assessment Report Tunnel spoils (crushed rock) sold to another party for re-use in aggregate products Still permissible since rock was broken down by mechanical means Contractor responsible to manage drilling mud/fluids No more than 10,000 m3 of liquid soil, processed or dewatered or solidified soil on- site

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Othe r Sc e nar ios

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

Project Scenario Recommendation

Design is complete, tender awarded, construction to start this fall. New soil regulation is not referenced. Since contract is awarded, grandfathered from planning requirements, but not testing, transportation and soil standards. Specifications are complete, tender is out for bid. Contact our Senior Resources. We’ll review

  • specification. If required, issue an amendment.

My construction project is on-going. Does the project need to follow the new regulation? Planning requirements are grandfathered, but after July 1, due diligence testing, transportation and soil standards must be followed.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Othe r Sc e nar ios

Section 6 Case Studies & Digital Tools

Project Scenario Recommendation

Stormwater pond sediment requires removal/management/disposal. Contact Stantec. Based on characterization results, Francine Kelly- Hooper has success obtaining accelerated MECP approvals. Your project site has received fill of unknown quality. Contact Stantec. Our Senior Resources can help identify strategy to characterize and manage in accordance with regulations. You want to know more about managing a Class-1 (soil bank or soil processing) or Class-2 (temporary) Soil Management Site. Contact Stantec. Our Senior Resources can review site information and your objectives to provide recommendations to help you comply with regulations.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

K rista .Ba rfo o t@ sta nte c .c o m Dyla n.He mming s@ Sta nte c .c o m

Que stions & Answe r s

Se nior R e sour c e s

K rista Ba rfo o t Dyla n He mming s T ia na Ro binso n Ja so n Hudso n Gra c e F e rg uso n Ste ve De sro c he r Jill Pe te rs-De c hma n Jo e l Va n Po pta Pa ula Sda o F ra nc ine K e lly-Ho o pe r E rika Ryte r Chris Cushing