SLIDE 11 7/24/2014 11 Findingss
Six articles were found to be most relevant and appraised
- 3 meta-analysis or systematic review(1a,1a,1b)
- 1 qualitative studies (4b)
- 1 cohort studies (4b)
- 1published expert opinions (5a)
- 3 published recommendation statements from
professional perioperative organizations (5,5,5)
Evidence Synthesis
- OR personnel are at risk for blood-borne pathogen exposure (BBPE) due to
sharps injuries and glove tears.
- Surgeons and first assistants have the greatest risk of injury followed by
scrub personnel
- While engineered safety devices are encouraged, few have been found to
be useful for use with suture needles and blades.
- A Cochrane review and others support risk reduction through the use of
double gloving and use of blunt suture needles.
- Five of six articles supported the use of hands free technique (HFT), also
known as the neutral zone.
- One article was supportive of suturing adjuncts(devices for hands free
loading)
- Compliance with the utilization of recommended safety techniques is an
issue ( lack of adherence)
Grade for Body of Evidence
Moderate grade was given for the following reasons:
- Evidence directly relates to recommendation for this
target population
- Has significant benefit to target population as well as
patient population
- Has minimal adverse effects