Nunavut Wildlife Management Board CONSERVING WILDLIFE THROUGH THE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nunavut Wildlife Management Board

CONSERVING WILDLIFE THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF INUIT QAUJIMAJATUQANGIT AND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE

1

National Advisory Panel on MPA Standards, Iqaluit, June 8-10

Overview

• NWMB mandate
• NWMB Responsibilities
• Co-Management in Nunavut
• Challenges for the use of IUCN guidelines in Nunavut
• Addressing challenges in Nunavut

2

National Advisory Panel on MPA Standards, Iqaluit, June 8-10

NWMB Mandate

• NWMB is the main instrument of wildlife management

and the main regulator of access to wildlife in the Nunavut Settlement Area (NSA)

• Institution of public government and independent

tribunal

• Vision: Conserving wildlife and habitat through the

application of Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit and scientific knowledge

• Responsibilities assigned by Nunavut Agreement:
• Article 5, Wildlife;
• Article 8, Parks;
• Article 9, Conservation Areas;
• Article 15, Marine Areas

3

NWMB Responsibilities

• Functions:
• Approve boundaries of conservation areas
• Advice to NPC regarding important wildlife areas
• Approve management/protection plans for wildlife

habitats including within Protected Areas

• Participating in or facilitating wildlife research in

Nunavut

• Establishing/modifying/removing total allowable

harvests and non-quota limitations

• Management/designation/protection of rare,

threatened and endangered wildlife

4

Photo: M. Ghazal

Co-Management in Nunavut

• Co-management partners: organizations with wildlife

management responsibilities

• Government, Inuit organizations
• Communities, Non-Governmental Organizations, and public
• Making decisions and recommendations to Ministers
• Cooperatively conserve wildlife and habitat for the long-term

benefit of Nunavummiut

• Respects Inuit harvesting rights and priorities
• Uses best available information: Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit

and science

5

Photo: F. Lemire Photo: CBC

Considerations for MPAs in Nunavut

• Are there specific circumstances unique to Canada that pose

challenges for the use of the IUCN guidelines?

• How should these circumstances be addressed?
• Co-management in Nunavut:
• 1. Nunavut Agreement
• 2. Engagement With Co-management Partners and Communities
• 3. Timelines
• 4. Remoteness and Low Population Density

6

• 1. Nunavut Agreement

7

• IUCN guidelines do not necessarily prescribe the use of traditional

knowledge sources.

• In Nunavut, there is a need for the use of both Inuit

Qaujimajatuqangit and scientific knowledge in all aspects of wildlife management and protection of habitat (Nunavut Agreement S. 5.1.2 [e, h]).

• 1. Nunavut Agreement

8

• Using traditional knowledge represents knowledge accumulated

through many generations through close interactions between people and the environment.

• Ensure that Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit is meaningfully incorporated

into each step of the MPA planning, establishment, and operation.

• 2. Engagement

9

• Organizations need to engage with co-management partners,

stakeholders, and communities that will be affected by the establishment of a Marine Protected Area

• Consensus can be difficult to reach with varying mandates and

perspectives of stakeholders

• 2. Engagement

10

• Engagement and consensus by co-managers, stakeholders, and communities

ensures that factors affecting the success of a MPA such as proper regulations, enforcement, and location of a MPA are considered

• Potential solution: ensuring that all co-management partners and communities

are engaged with from the beginning of the process and onward

• Potential solution: engaging stakeholders to determine how their ideas can

complement one another

• 3. Timelines

11

• Canada is committed to protecting 10 percent of coastal and marine areas by 2020
• Often the success or failure of an MPA is determined by the processes that lead to their

establishment – ‘step zero’

• The goal of ‘quickly’ establishing MPAs could conflict with the ability to adequately consult and

accommodate

• NWMB may not be able to execute its decision-making process if timeline is too short
• Pursuant to s.5.2.34(a) of the Nunavut Agreement, NWMB approve the establishment,

disestablishment, and changes to boundaries of Conservation Areas, related to management and protection of wildlife and wildlife habitat;

• 3. Timelines

12

• Potential solution: Engagement needs to be scheduled well in advance and provide

stakeholders with the opportunity to meet and issue formal responses

• Potential solution: Update relevant parties, including HTOs and RWOs regularly and seek

feedback about potential issue

• NWMB holds quarterly meetings in March, June, September, and December – organizations

can provide update on progress

• 4. Remoteness and Low Population

Density

13

• Nunavut Settlement Area covers approximately 2,000,000 km2 with

a population of 38,000.

• Regulations may involve impeding commercial activities or shipping

from outside Canada or Nunavut.

• Difficult to enforce MPA regulations in Nunavut because of cost,

remoteness, and few people in certain areas.

• 4. Remoteness and Low Population

Density

14

• “…most MPAs depend on the support of local communities for

survival and such support may well depend on recognition of the contribution which the MPA makes to human welfare through maintaining biological productivity.” (IUCN Guidelines for MPAs)

• Potential solution: Local buy-in from community stakeholders will

be important to ensure the success of an MPA in Nunavut.

QUESTIONS?

NWMB.com

15

Photo: M. Ghazal