Nov 2, 2018 1. What is a system and how do systems behave? ( How we - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nov 2 2018
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nov 2, 2018 1. What is a system and how do systems behave? ( How we - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DA Petrie Department of Emergency Medicine Nov 2, 2018 1. What is a system and how do systems behave? ( How we formulate a problem is far more essential than the solution Einstein) Simple Systems (if this, then that) Complicated


slide-1
SLIDE 1

DA Petrie Department of Emergency Medicine Nov 2, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 1. What is a system… and how do systems behave? (How we

formulate a problem is far more essential than the solution – Einstein)

▪ Simple Systems (if this, then that) ▪ Complicated Reductionistic (machine)-Systems ▪ Complex Adaptive (eco)-Systems

  • 2. How is system change and leadership fundamentally different

in Complex Adaptive Systems?

  • 3. What? So What? Now What?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

‘‘We’ve got 21st century technology and speed colliding head-on with 20th and 19th century institutions, rules and cultures.’’ –Amory Lovins

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“There are no Boundaries Anymore” – Jeff Barnes Head of Global Leadership General Electric

Volatile: change happens rapidly and on a large scale Uncertain: the future can not be predicted with any certainty Complex: challenges have multiple interdependent and

dynamic contributing factors and there are few single causes

  • r solutions

Ambiguous: there is little clarity on what events mean, and

what effect they may have

slide-5
SLIDE 5

“Man-made systems become unstable, creating uncontrollable situations even when decision-makers are well-skilled, have all the data and technology at their disposal, and do their best”.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Pt outcomes

Value

The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those that cannot read and write, it will be those with the inability to learn, un-learn, and re- learn

  • Alvin Toffler

Ch-ch-changes…

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Complicated System

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Works like clockwork
  • Well-oiled machine
  • Firing on all cylinders
  • Humming like an engine
  • The wheels are falling off
  • Broken non-system
  • Overheating of the gears
  • Gumming up the works
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Reductionist thinking (hypothetico-deductive reasoning)

  • 3. “What works, works” (Best Practice) 4. Systems are closed and controllable
  • 1. Knowing parts explains wholes 2. Safe inferences re predicting future behavior
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Understanding relationships between parts, and their implications to the whole… and how they co-evolve over time

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The medium is the message

I don’t know who discovered water, but I’m pretty sure it wasn’t a fish

  • Marshall McLuhan
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Shared Vision

  • r Attractor

 Example: ▪ IHI’s Triple Aim ▪ Alignment of sub-system goals

Definition: A shared picture of the future that we want to create (a point in the future that shapes the developing patterns of the present)

Vision or attractor

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Shared Vision

  • r Attractor

 Example:

▪ IHI’s Triple Aim (Optimizing Health Outcomes,

Patient Experience, and Population Costs)

▪ Alignment of sub-system goals

Definition: A shared picture

  • f the future

that we want to create

Vision or attractor

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Simple Rules

 Examples: ▪ Do no harm ▪ Align incentives with “value” (outcomes/cost) ▪ Nordstrom handbook – use your best

judgement in all situations; there will be no

  • ther rules

Definition: Principle-based aims, prohibitions, and resources intended to govern system behaviour toward a shared vision

Vision or attractor

Three Simple Rules of birds flocking:

  • 1. Avoid collisions
  • 2. Match speed with neighbor
  • 3. Move towards centre of mass
  • f neighbors
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Simple Rules

 Examples: ▪ Do no harm ▪ Do unto others… ▪ Nordstrom handbook – use your best

judgement in all situations; there will be no

  • ther rules

Definition: Principle-based aims, prohibitions, and resources intended to govern system behaviour toward a shared vision

Vision or attractor

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Self- Organization

 Examples: ▪ Formation of specialties and sub-specialties ▪ Interdisciplinary coalitions to tackle wicked

problems

Definition: The process through which a CAS organizes in the absence of central control, with surprising results

Vision or attractor

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Self- Organization

 Examples:

▪ Formation of specialties and sub-specialties ▪ Front Line Ownership and positive deviants ▪ Design thinking, fail fast/early, learning organizations

Definition: The process through which a CAS organizes in the absence of central control, with surprising results

Vision or attractor

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Emergence

 Examples

▪ Care provider huddles ▪ Free Open Access Meducation (FOAMed)

movement

Definition: The existence or spontaneous formation of collective behaviours

Vision or attractor

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Emergence

 Examples

▪ Care provider huddles (work-arounds, “gaming”) ▪ Free Open Access Meducation (FOAMed) ▪ Dalhousie Interest Groups / Interediciplinary Teams

Definition: The existence or spontaneous formation of collective behaviours

Vision or attractor

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Dal Interest Groups Inter- disciplinary Teams

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Unintended Consequences

 Examples

▪ Increased costs / worse outcomes with some

screening programs

▪ Increased bed capacity lowers performance

accountability

Definition: Unintended effects of inputs into a CAS, can be positive or negative (often counterintuitive)

Vision or attractor

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Unintended Consequences

 Examples

▪ Increased costs / worse outcomes with some

screening programs

▪ Increased bed capacity lowers performance

accountability

Definition: Unintended effects of inputs into a CAS, can be positive or negative (often counterintuitive)

Vision or attractor

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Unintended Consequences

 Examples

▪ Increased costs / worse outcomes with some cancer

screening programs

▪ Over emphasis on efficiency compromises

effectiveness

Definition: Unintended effects of inputs into a CAS, can be positive or negative (often counterintuitive)

Vision or attractor

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Shadow billing purportedly measures the # and type of

clinical widgets and beans produced but NOT what improves quality of care, and whether outcomes are improved

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Box 1 = Measure the Past Box 2 = Manage the Present Box 3 = Selectively Abandon the Past Box 4 = Create the Future

  • Performance management
  • Benchmark Best Practices
  • Focus on today’s patients
  • Focus on today’s technologies
  • Focus on today’s constraints
  • Centralize resource allocation

decision-making

  • Leverage current competencies
  • Innovation and adaptation
  • Create Next Practices
  • Focus on tomorrow’s patients
  • Focus on tomorrow’s technologies
  • Focus on tomorrow’s enablers
  • De-centralize resource allocation

decision-making

  • Build new competencies
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Mental Models

 Example ▪ How we formulate the problem is far more

essential than the solutions – Einstein

▪ Polarity Management of conflicting principles

Definition: Deeply engrained assumptions, generalizations, or images that influence how we interpret the world, and how we take action

Vision or attractor

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Mental Models

 Example ▪ Is Emergency Department access and flow a

simple, complicated, or complex problem

▪ Polarity Management of conflicting principles

Definition: Deeply engrained assumptions, generalizations, or images that influence how we interpret the world, and how we take action

Vision or attractor

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Either/or…

Centralization vs Decentralization Efficiency vs Effectiveness Private vs Public MD autonomy vs Accountability Patient Rights vs Responsibilities Operational vs Strategic focus

Good and bad, I defined these terms, quite clear no-doubt somehow / but I was so much older then, I’m younger than that now

  • Bob Dylan

…both/and…

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Pro Con

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Pro Con

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Pro Con

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Pro Con

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Path Dependency

 Example ▪ Spending millions after millions to “fix” the

flawed assumption that low acuity patients cause ED access block

▪ Fee-for-service high volume / low value

incentives for physicians and institutions

Definition: The tendency of actors and institutions in CAS to follow precedent

Vision or attractor

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Path Dependency

 Example ▪ Spending millions after millions to “fix” the

flawed assumption that low acuity patients cause ED access block

▪ Fee-for-service high volume / low value

incentives for physicians and institutions

Definition: The tendency of actors and institutions in CAS to follow precedent

Vision or attractor

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Feedback Loops

 Example ▪ Patient and community engagement ▪ Public scrutiny of performance improves

accountability

▪ Escalating surge capacity in face of threshold

metrics

Definition: Structures are built into a system where

  • utputs feedback

into the system as inputs (+ve / -ve)

Vision or attractor

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Feedback Loops

 Example

▪ Hospital funding based on “money follows the

patient” principle (+ve feedback)

▪ Pay for performance (+ve feedback) ▪ ED surge metrics automatically smooth ambulance

patients to other hospitals (-ve feedback)

Definition: Structures are built into a system where

  • utputs feedback

into the system as inputs (+ve / -ve)

Vision or attractor

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Non-Linearity

 Example ▪ A 5% increase in capacity of an acute care hospital

leads to a 100% increase in ED wait times

▪ Tipping point impacts of adaptive change (vs

technical change)

Definition: When the magnitude of a system’s

  • utputs is

disproportional to it’s inputs

Vision or attractor

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Non-Linearity

 Example ▪ A 5% increase in capacity of an acute care hospital

leads to a 100% increase in ED wait times

▪ Tipping point impacts of adaptive change (vs

incremental impact of technical change)

Definition: When the magnitude of a system’s

  • utputs is

disproportional to it’s inputs

Vision or attractor

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Interdependencies

 Example ▪ Acute care system depends upon Primary Care ▪ Hospital Care depends upon Community/Home

care

▪ Health outcomes depends upon social

determinants of health

Definition: Relationships, interactions, and dependencies between individuals, groups, and

  • rganizations

Vision or attractor

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Interdependencies

 Example ▪ Acute care system depends upon Primary Care ▪ Hospital Care depends upon Community/Home

care

▪ Health outcomes depends upon social

determinants of health

Definition: Relationships, interactions, and dependencies between individuals, groups, and

  • rganizations

Vision or attractor

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Complexity Leadership

Definition: Individuals who challenge mental models, unite stakeholders around a shared vision, and utilize systems thinking, CAS principles / practices / tool-kits

Vision or attractor

slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51
slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • 1. Boundary Conditions and constraints in the current system

Health care demand vs capacity, structure, and integration of response

  • 2. Responsiveness of the system to an intervention

Length of delay relative to imperative for change (status quo inertia)

  • 3. Negative Feedback loops

Strengthen appropriate (high volumes of amb redistributes trip destination)

  • 4. Positive Feedback loops

Strengthen appropriate (pay for performance, hosp funding follows pts)

  • 5. Information flow

Who has access to what information (radical transparency)

slide-54
SLIDE 54
  • 6. Rules of the system

Legislative framework, Governance, Incentives, and Policies

  • 7. Enablers, space, and power to self-organize / innovate

Balance bottom up with top down, reward front line ownership

  • 8. The goals of the system

Clarity of purpose, alignment, and focus on overarching vision

  • 9. Mindsets / paradigm out of which the system (goals, structure,

rules, relationships, delays, parameters) arise

  • 10. The power to transcend paradigms so that a future system arises

Mindsets of leaders in the emerging system

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Leadership & Complexity

slide-56
SLIDE 56

An evidence-based formative assessment of skills for leadership decision-making under complexity

David Petrie, MD, Theo L. Dawson, Ph.D.

Toronto Iinternational Summit on Leadership Education for Physicians (TISLEP) Conference - October 16, 2018 – Halifax, Nova Scotia

https://medium.com/@theo_dawson

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Advanced Linear Thinking

(1050-1099)

Complicated What’s in focus?

Individuals with personalities, skills, attitudes, & points-of- view

Early Systems Thinking

(1100-1149)

Complex What’s in focus?

Integrated groups of individuals with different roles and relationships

Advanced Systems Thinking

(1150-1199)

Highly complex What’s in focus?

Multiple integrated groups interacting with dynamic organizational systems

Early Principles Thinking

(1200-1249)

Elegantly simple What’s in focus?

Multiple dynamic

  • rganizational systems

that form marketplaces, economies, & societies

Peter Drucker: “Hospitals are the most complex organizations ever devised”

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Interdependent Agents Dynamic Co-evolution Non-linear feedback loops and threshold effects Self organization and Emergence No single point of control Hind sight does not give foresight

Health Care as a Complex Adaptive Eco-System

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Leader

  • People have long confused the notion of

leadership with authority, power, and influence. We find it extremely useful to see leadership as a practice, an activity that some people do some of the time.

  • Leaders facilitate the necessary adaptive work

that needs to be done by the people connected to the problem.

  • Heifetz (Learning/Adapting in a Complex World)