Northern Branch Corridor Northern Branch Corridor CLC Meeting CLC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Northern Branch Corridor Northern Branch Corridor CLC Meeting CLC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Northern Branch Corridor Northern Branch Corridor CLC Meeting CLC Meeting June 30, 2008 June 30, 2008 Agenda Agenda Introductions Project Status Environmental Process Technical Findings Capital Costs Next Steps
Agenda Agenda
Introductions Project Status Environmental Process Technical Findings Capital Costs Next Steps Break Out Areas
Introductions Introductions
Project Status Project Status
Preliminary DEIS
– Submitted to FTA for Review
SHPO / Section 106 Agency Coordination
– Section 4F Parklands – Threatened and Endangered Species – Wetlands
NEPA NEPA
- Draft EIS
Draft EIS
– Distribute Draft EIS for Review/Comment – Public Hearing – 45-day Comment Period
Final EIS
– Address Comments on Draft EIS – Distribute Final EIS for Review – 30-day Comment Period
Obtain Record of Decision
– Completes NEPA Process
Section 106 Process Section 106 Process
Scoping Historic PIL/HARBS
– Identify Area of Potential Effect (APE) – Determine Eligibility
Archaeological Initiation
– Identify APE – Phase I / Phase II Evaluation
Effects Assessment Public Hearing (combined with DEIS) Memorandum of Agreement
Section 4(f) Section 4(f)
Section 4(f) Evaluation
– De minimus Impact at Overpeck Park
Coordination
– NJ DEP, Bergen County – Achieve Concurrence – Public input during DEIS/Section 4(f) comment period
Green Acres (State Program)
– Overpeck County Park is Encumbered Parkland – Replace with Equal Utility/Value, Improvements May be Agreed Upon.
Revised Leonia Station Revised Leonia Station
Preliminary Findings Preliminary Findings
Built Environment Built Environment
Findings Findings
No impacts to the following categories:
– Land Use, Zoning, Economic Development, Community Facilities, Local Plans, Visual, Environmental Justice, Cumulative/Indirect
Land Acquisitions
– 19 to 34 Properties Will Be Impacted – 16 to 43 Business Displacements – 2 to 4 Residential Displacements
Parklands
– De-minimus Impact (Overpeck) – Indirect Impacts Related to Noise
Mitigation Mitigation
Land Acquisitions/ Displacements
– Will Be Acquired Per Federal Guidelines
Parkland
– Quiet Zones – Coordinated Mitigation at Overpeck Park
Construction
– Specifications to Monitor Dust, Noise & Vibration – Traffic Management Plan – Staging Plan for Contractors
Natural Environment Natural Environment
Findings Findings
Water Quality – Additional Impervious Surfaces – Temporary Impacts on Rivers for Structure Rehabilitation Wetlands – 4.35 Acres – ROW and Leonia Station Floodplains – Stations and Improvements Threatened & Endangered Species Hazardous Waste
– Related to Adjacent Uses
Mitigation Mitigation
Water Quality
– Construct Water Quality Basins
Wetlands
– NJDEP Permit – Mitigation 2:1 or 4:1
Floodplains Threatened & Endangered Hazardous Waste
Cultural Resources Cultural Resources
Findings Findings
Historic
– Resources w/i Area of Potential Effect (APE)
3 South of Route 4 13 North of Route 4
– Recommendation “No Adverse Effect”
Archaeology
– Possibility of Prehistoric Sites at Some Stations
Mitigation Mitigation
Historic
– Construction Plans Must Be Followed By Contractor for Noise, Vibration & Dust on Resources – SHPO Coordination Through Design
Archaeology
– Additional Evaluation Concurrent w/ Engineering
Air Quality, Noise Air Quality, Noise
Findings Findings
Noise
– Analysis Performed Per FTA 2006 Standards – Number of “Moderate” or “Severe” Impacts
170 south of Route 4 900 Route 4 to Tenafly 200 Cresskill to Northvale (LRT Alternatives only)
Air Quality, Vibration, Energy – No Impact
Mitigation Mitigation
None Required “Quiet Zones”
– Work with Communities – Coordinate with the FRA – Incorporate into Design and Costs
Transportation Transportation
Findings Findings
Traffic
– Impacts South of Route 4
10 to 13 Intersections
– North of Route 4
24 Intersections
Freight
– Overnight Service required for LRT alternatives
Transit, Pedestrians, Safety & Security
– No Impact
Mitigation Mitigation
- Signal Modifications
Signal Modifications
- Widening at Intersections
Widening at Intersections
- Lane Modifications
Lane Modifications
– – Turn Lanes Turn Lanes – – Additional Thru Lanes Additional Thru Lanes
- Restrict Station Access or Turning Movements
Restrict Station Access or Turning Movements
- Coordinate with Communities for Grade Crossing
Coordinate with Communities for Grade Crossing Safety and Commuter Rail Awareness Campaigns Safety and Commuter Rail Awareness Campaigns
Ridership Ridership
Ridership Ridership Forecasts Forecasts
- Ridership
Ridership (total per day) (total per day)
– – DMU to Tenafly DMU to Tenafly – – 8,100 8,100 – – DMU to Englewood DMU to Englewood – – 5,400 5,400 – – LRT to Tenafly LRT to Tenafly – – 24,000 24,000 – – LRT to Englewood LRT to Englewood – – 20,100 20,100
Capital Costs Capital Costs
Capital Costs Capital Costs
(in millions)
$685.97 $865.93 $540.67 $690.78 Project Total $24.00 $52.00 $36.00 $64.00 Vehicles $661.97 $813.93 $504.67 $626.78 Construction 2A (LRT) 2 (LRT) 1A (DMU) 1 (DMU) Alternative
Next Steps Next Steps
Next Steps Next Steps
- Complete EIS Process
Complete EIS Process
- Select Alternative
Select Alternative
- Funding Commitments
Funding Commitments
- Preliminary/Final Engineering
Preliminary/Final Engineering
- Construction