nonassociative right hoops
play

Nonassociative right hoops Peter Jipsen , Chapman University joint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nonassociative right hoops Peter Jipsen , Chapman University joint work with Michael Kinyon , University of Denver BLAST 2018 University of Denver August 7, 2018 Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver)


  1. Small right quasigroups ( A , · ,/ ) is a right quasigroup iff r a ( x ) = xa and q a ( x ) = x / a are inverses i.e., the columns of the operation table of · are permutations For A = { 0 , 1 } with discrete order: · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 , three nonisomorphic 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 | A | = 3, ⇒ 6 permutations , 3 columns , so 6 3 = 216, only 44 up to iso | A | = 4, ⇒ 24 4 = 331776 quasigroups, only 14022 up to iso Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  2. Small right residuated magmas ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right residuated magma iff r a ( x ) = xa and q a ( x ) = x / a are a unary residuated pair, hence order preserving and 0 a = 0 Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  3. Small right residuated magmas ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right residuated magma iff r a ( x ) = xa and q a ( x ) = x / a are a unary residuated pair, hence order preserving and 0 a = 0 For A = 2 = { 0 < 1 } · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , so total 7 noniso 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  4. Small right residuated magmas ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right residuated magma iff r a ( x ) = xa and q a ( x ) = x / a are a unary residuated pair, hence order preserving and 0 a = 0 For A = 2 = { 0 < 1 } · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , so total 7 noniso 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 For | A | = 3 there are 299 right residuated magmas up to isomorphism Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  5. Small right residuated magmas ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right residuated magma iff r a ( x ) = xa and q a ( x ) = x / a are a unary residuated pair, hence order preserving and 0 a = 0 For A = 2 = { 0 < 1 } · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , so total 7 noniso 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 For | A | = 3 there are 299 right residuated magmas up to isomorphism | A | = 1 2 3 4 5 6 Right res. magmas 1 7 299 Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  6. Small right residuated magmas ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right residuated magma iff r a ( x ) = xa and q a ( x ) = x / a are a unary residuated pair, hence order preserving and 0 a = 0 For A = 2 = { 0 < 1 } · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , so total 7 noniso 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 For | A | = 3 there are 299 right residuated magmas up to isomorphism | A | = 1 2 3 4 5 6 Right res. magmas 1 7 299 Quasigroups 1 3 44 14022 Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  7. Small right residuated magmas ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right residuated magma iff r a ( x ) = xa and q a ( x ) = x / a are a unary residuated pair, hence order preserving and 0 a = 0 For A = 2 = { 0 < 1 } · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , so total 7 noniso 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 For | A | = 3 there are 299 right residuated magmas up to isomorphism | A | = 1 2 3 4 5 6 Right res. magmas 1 7 299 Quasigroups 1 3 44 14022 Right hoops 1 1 2 8 24 91 Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  8. Small right residuated magmas ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right residuated magma iff r a ( x ) = xa and q a ( x ) = x / a are a unary residuated pair, hence order preserving and 0 a = 0 For A = 2 = { 0 < 1 } · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 · 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , so total 7 noniso 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 For | A | = 3 there are 299 right residuated magmas up to isomorphism | A | = 1 2 3 4 5 6 Right res. magmas 1 7 299 Quasigroups 1 3 44 14022 Right hoops 1 1 2 8 24 91 2-elt right hoop = BA reduct, 3-elt right hoops = Gödel alg and MV-alg Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  9. Introduction Right hoops were introduced by Bosbach [1969,1970] under the name “left complementary semigroups” Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  10. Introduction Right hoops were introduced by Bosbach [1969,1970] under the name “left complementary semigroups” Büchi and Owens [1975] studied the case where · is commutative, referring to these structures as “hoops”. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  11. Introduction Right hoops were introduced by Bosbach [1969,1970] under the name “left complementary semigroups” Büchi and Owens [1975] studied the case where · is commutative, referring to these structures as “hoops”. The partial order is definable in both cases, which motivates the next definition. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  12. Nonassociative right hoops A nonassociative right hoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) , or narhoop for short, is a right-residuated magma such that for all x , y ∈ A Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  13. Nonassociative right hoops A nonassociative right hoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) , or narhoop for short, is a right-residuated magma such that for all x , y ∈ A (N) x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  14. Nonassociative right hoops A nonassociative right hoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) , or narhoop for short, is a right-residuated magma such that for all x , y ∈ A (N) x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x . In any right-residuated magma ( x / y ) y ≤ x or equivalently x ⊓ y ≤ x holds for all x , y , Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  15. Nonassociative right hoops A nonassociative right hoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) , or narhoop for short, is a right-residuated magma such that for all x , y ∈ A (N) x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x . In any right-residuated magma ( x / y ) y ≤ x or equivalently x ⊓ y ≤ x holds for all x , y , hence in a narhoop (N) implies that the identity ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y holds. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  16. Nonassociative right hoops A nonassociative right hoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) , or narhoop for short, is a right-residuated magma such that for all x , y ∈ A (N) x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x . In any right-residuated magma ( x / y ) y ≤ x or equivalently x ⊓ y ≤ x holds for all x , y , hence in a narhoop (N) implies that the identity ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y holds. This provides an alternative definition for narhoops: they are right-residuated magmas that satisfy the identity (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y and Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  17. Nonassociative right hoops A nonassociative right hoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) , or narhoop for short, is a right-residuated magma such that for all x , y ∈ A (N) x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x . In any right-residuated magma ( x / y ) y ≤ x or equivalently x ⊓ y ≤ x holds for all x , y , hence in a narhoop (N) implies that the identity ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y holds. This provides an alternative definition for narhoops: they are right-residuated magmas that satisfy the identity (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y and (N’) x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  18. Nonassociative right hoops A nonassociative right hoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) , or narhoop for short, is a right-residuated magma such that for all x , y ∈ A (N) x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x . In any right-residuated magma ( x / y ) y ≤ x or equivalently x ⊓ y ≤ x holds for all x , y , hence in a narhoop (N) implies that the identity ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y holds. This provides an alternative definition for narhoops: they are right-residuated magmas that satisfy the identity (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y and (N’) x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x since in the presence of (N1), if x = y ⊓ x then multiplying by y on the right we have x ⊓ y = ( y ⊓ x ) ⊓ y = y ⊓ x = x . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  19. Nonassociative (left) hoops A nonassociative left hoop or nalhoop ( A , ≤ , · , \ ) is defined dually Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  20. Nonassociative (left) hoops A nonassociative left hoop or nalhoop ( A , ≤ , · , \ ) is defined dually A nonassociative hoop or nahoop is both a narhoop and a nalhoop Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  21. Nonassociative (left) hoops A nonassociative left hoop or nalhoop ( A , ≤ , · , \ ) is defined dually A nonassociative hoop or nahoop is both a narhoop and a nalhoop We consider only na r hoops in this talk. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  22. Nonassociative (left) hoops A nonassociative left hoop or nalhoop ( A , ≤ , · , \ ) is defined dually A nonassociative hoop or nahoop is both a narhoop and a nalhoop We consider only na r hoops in this talk. The two motivating varieties fit into this framework as follows: A narhoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right quasigroup if and only if ≤ is the equality relation. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  23. Nonassociative (left) hoops A nonassociative left hoop or nalhoop ( A , ≤ , · , \ ) is defined dually A nonassociative hoop or nahoop is both a narhoop and a nalhoop We consider only na r hoops in this talk. The two motivating varieties fit into this framework as follows: A narhoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right quasigroup if and only if ≤ is the equality relation. A narhoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right hoop if and only if x / yz = ( x / z ) / y and the quasiequation x ⊓ y = x ⇒ x ≤ y holds. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  24. Nonassociative (left) hoops A nonassociative left hoop or nalhoop ( A , ≤ , · , \ ) is defined dually A nonassociative hoop or nahoop is both a narhoop and a nalhoop We consider only na r hoops in this talk. The two motivating varieties fit into this framework as follows: A narhoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right quasigroup if and only if ≤ is the equality relation. A narhoop ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a right hoop if and only if x / yz = ( x / z ) / y and the quasiequation x ⊓ y = x ⇒ x ≤ y holds. | A | = 1 2 3 4 5 6 Right res. magmas 1 7 299 Narhoops 1 4 52 14607 Quasigroups 1 3 44 14022 Right hoops 1 1 2 8 24 91 Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  25. Main result Narhoops form a finitely based variety of algebras. We assume that x / y binds stronger than x ⊓ y = ( x / y ) y . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  26. Main result Narhoops form a finitely based variety of algebras. We assume that x / y binds stronger than x ⊓ y = ( x / y ) y . Theorem Let ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) be a narhoop. Then the following identities hold: (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  27. Main result Narhoops form a finitely based variety of algebras. We assume that x / y binds stronger than x ⊓ y = ( x / y ) y . Theorem Let ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) be a narhoop. Then the following identities hold: (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y (N2) xy / y ⊓ x = x Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  28. Main result Narhoops form a finitely based variety of algebras. We assume that x / y binds stronger than x ⊓ y = ( x / y ) y . Theorem Let ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) be a narhoop. Then the following identities hold: (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y (N2) xy / y ⊓ x = x (N3) xz ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) z = ( x ⊓ y ) z Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  29. Main result Narhoops form a finitely based variety of algebras. We assume that x / y binds stronger than x ⊓ y = ( x / y ) y . Theorem Let ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) be a narhoop. Then the following identities hold: (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y (N2) xy / y ⊓ x = x (N3) xz ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) z = ( x ⊓ y ) z (N4) ( x / z ) ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / z = ( x ⊓ y ) / z. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  30. Main result Narhoops form a finitely based variety of algebras. We assume that x / y binds stronger than x ⊓ y = ( x / y ) y . Theorem Let ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) be a narhoop. Then the following identities hold: (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y (N2) xy / y ⊓ x = x (N3) xz ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) z = ( x ⊓ y ) z (N4) ( x / z ) ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / z = ( x ⊓ y ) / z. Conversely, let ( A , · ,/ ) be an algebra with two binary operations satisfying (N1)–(N4), and define x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x. Then the identities (N5) x ⊓ xy / y = x Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  31. Main result Narhoops form a finitely based variety of algebras. We assume that x / y binds stronger than x ⊓ y = ( x / y ) y . Theorem Let ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) be a narhoop. Then the following identities hold: (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y (N2) xy / y ⊓ x = x (N3) xz ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) z = ( x ⊓ y ) z (N4) ( x / z ) ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / z = ( x ⊓ y ) / z. Conversely, let ( A , · ,/ ) be an algebra with two binary operations satisfying (N1)–(N4), and define x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x. Then the identities (N5) x ⊓ xy / y = x (N6) ( x ⊓ y ) / y = x / y Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  32. Main result Narhoops form a finitely based variety of algebras. We assume that x / y binds stronger than x ⊓ y = ( x / y ) y . Theorem Let ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) be a narhoop. Then the following identities hold: (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y (N2) xy / y ⊓ x = x (N3) xz ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) z = ( x ⊓ y ) z (N4) ( x / z ) ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / z = ( x ⊓ y ) / z. Conversely, let ( A , · ,/ ) be an algebra with two binary operations satisfying (N1)–(N4), and define x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x. Then the identities (N5) x ⊓ xy / y = x (N6) ( x ⊓ y ) / y = x / y (N7) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ y = x ⊓ y Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  33. Main result Narhoops form a finitely based variety of algebras. We assume that x / y binds stronger than x ⊓ y = ( x / y ) y . Theorem Let ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) be a narhoop. Then the following identities hold: (N1) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y (N2) xy / y ⊓ x = x (N3) xz ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) z = ( x ⊓ y ) z (N4) ( x / z ) ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / z = ( x ⊓ y ) / z. Conversely, let ( A , · ,/ ) be an algebra with two binary operations satisfying (N1)–(N4), and define x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x. Then the identities (N5) x ⊓ xy / y = x (N6) ( x ⊓ y ) / y = x / y (N7) ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ y = x ⊓ y hold and ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a narhoop . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  34. Proof. Assume ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a narhoop. As noted before, the identity (N1: ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y ) holds in narhoops Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  35. Proof. Assume ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a narhoop. As noted before, the identity (N1: ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y ) holds in narhoops Right-residuated magmas also satisfy x ≤ xy / y Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  36. Proof. Assume ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a narhoop. As noted before, the identity (N1: ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y ) holds in narhoops Right-residuated magmas also satisfy x ≤ xy / y hence (N2) xy / y ⊓ x = x follows from (N’: x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x ) Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  37. Proof. Assume ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a narhoop. As noted before, the identity (N1: ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y ) holds in narhoops Right-residuated magmas also satisfy x ≤ xy / y hence (N2) xy / y ⊓ x = x follows from (N’: x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x ) Having a right residual implies that right-multiplication is order preserving so ( x ⊓ y ) z ≤ xz holds in all narhoops, which produces (N3). Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  38. Proof. Assume ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) is a narhoop. As noted before, the identity (N1: ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y ) holds in narhoops Right-residuated magmas also satisfy x ≤ xy / y hence (N2) xy / y ⊓ x = x follows from (N’: x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x ) Having a right residual implies that right-multiplication is order preserving so ( x ⊓ y ) z ≤ xz holds in all narhoops, which produces (N3). Similarly the right residual is order preserving in the first argument, hence ( x ⊓ y ) / z ≤ x / z holds, and now (N4) follows from (N’). Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  39. Proof continued. Conversely, suppose ( A , · ,/ ) satisfies (N1)–(N4), and ≤ is defined by (N’) Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  40. Proof continued. Conversely, suppose ( A , · ,/ ) satisfies (N1)–(N4), and ≤ is defined by (N’) From (N2: xy / y ⊓ x = x ), (N1: ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y ) and (N2) again, we get (N5): x ⊓ ( xy / y ) = ( xy / y ⊓ x ) ⊓ ( xy / y ) = ( xy / y ) ⊓ x = x Replace x in (N5) by x / y to get x / y ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / y = x / y Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  41. Proof continued. Conversely, suppose ( A , · ,/ ) satisfies (N1)–(N4), and ≤ is defined by (N’) From (N2: xy / y ⊓ x = x ), (N1: ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y ) and (N2) again, we get (N5): x ⊓ ( xy / y ) = ( xy / y ⊓ x ) ⊓ ( xy / y ) = ( xy / y ) ⊓ x = x Replace x in (N5) by x / y to get x / y ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / y = x / y then use (N4: ( x / z ) ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / z = ( x ⊓ y ) / z ) to get N6: ( x ⊓ y ) / y = x / y Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  42. Proof continued. Conversely, suppose ( A , · ,/ ) satisfies (N1)–(N4), and ≤ is defined by (N’) From (N2: xy / y ⊓ x = x ), (N1: ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ y ) and (N2) again, we get (N5): x ⊓ ( xy / y ) = ( xy / y ⊓ x ) ⊓ ( xy / y ) = ( xy / y ) ⊓ x = x Replace x in (N5) by x / y to get x / y ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / y = x / y then use (N4: ( x / z ) ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / z = ( x ⊓ y ) / z ) to get N6: ( x ⊓ y ) / y = x / y To prove (N7: ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ y = x ⊓ y ) multiply (N6) on the right by y Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  43. Proof continued. Now reflexivity of ≤ follows from (N5) and (N1): x ⊓ x = ( x ⊓ xy / y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ ( xy / y ) = x . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  44. Proof continued. Now reflexivity of ≤ follows from (N5) and (N1): x ⊓ x = ( x ⊓ xy / y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ ( xy / y ) = x . For antisymmetry, if x ≤ y and y ≤ x , then x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x and y = x ⊓ y , hence x = y . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  45. Proof continued. Now reflexivity of ≤ follows from (N5) and (N1): x ⊓ x = ( x ⊓ xy / y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ ( xy / y ) = x . For antisymmetry, if x ≤ y and y ≤ x , then x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x and y = x ⊓ y , hence x = y . Transitivity: Suppose x ≤ y and y ≤ z so that x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x and y ⊓ z = y = z ⊓ y . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  46. Proof continued. Now reflexivity of ≤ follows from (N5) and (N1): x ⊓ x = ( x ⊓ xy / y ) ⊓ x = x ⊓ ( xy / y ) = x . For antisymmetry, if x ≤ y and y ≤ x , then x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x and y = x ⊓ y , hence x = y . Transitivity: Suppose x ≤ y and y ≤ z so that x ⊓ y = x = y ⊓ x and y ⊓ z = y = z ⊓ y . First, note that z / x ⊓ y / x = z / x ⊓ ( z ⊓ y ) / x = ( z ⊓ y ) / x = y / x using (N4) in the second equality. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  47. Proof continued. Now we compute z ⊓ x = ( z ⊓ x ) ⊓ x by N6: ( x ⊓ y ) / y = x / y = ( z ⊓ x ) ⊓ ( y ⊓ x ) = ( z / x ) x ⊓ ( y / x ) x = ( z / x ) x ⊓ ( z / x ⊓ y / x ) x since z / x ⊓ y / x = y / x = ( z / x ⊓ y / x ) x by (N3) = ( z / x ⊓ ( z ⊓ y ) / x ) x = (( z ⊓ y ) / x ) x by (N4) = ( z ⊓ y ) ⊓ x = y ⊓ x = x . From x = z ⊓ x we deduce x ⊓ z = ( z ⊓ x ) ⊓ z = z ⊓ x by (N1), hence x ≤ z . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  48. Proof continued. Finally, we prove / is the right residual of · with respect to ≤ Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  49. Proof continued. Finally, we prove / is the right residual of · with respect to ≤ The right residuation property is equivalent to ( x / y ) y ≤ x ≤ xy / y and Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  50. Proof continued. Finally, we prove / is the right residual of · with respect to ≤ The right residuation property is equivalent to ( x / y ) y ≤ x ≤ xy / y and x ≤ y implies xz ≤ yz and x / z ≤ y / z Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  51. Proof continued. Finally, we prove / is the right residual of · with respect to ≤ The right residuation property is equivalent to ( x / y ) y ≤ x ≤ xy / y and x ≤ y implies xz ≤ yz and x / z ≤ y / z Note that (N2) and (N’) show x ≤ xy / y . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  52. Proof continued. Finally, we prove / is the right residual of · with respect to ≤ The right residuation property is equivalent to ( x / y ) y ≤ x ≤ xy / y and x ≤ y implies xz ≤ yz and x / z ≤ y / z Note that (N2) and (N’) show x ≤ xy / y . If x ≤ y , then (N3) gives yz ⊓ xz = yz ⊓ ( y ⊓ x ) z = ( y ⊓ x ) z = xz , and so (N’) implies xz ≤ yz . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  53. Proof continued. Finally, we prove / is the right residual of · with respect to ≤ The right residuation property is equivalent to ( x / y ) y ≤ x ≤ xy / y and x ≤ y implies xz ≤ yz and x / z ≤ y / z Note that (N2) and (N’) show x ≤ xy / y . If x ≤ y , then (N3) gives yz ⊓ xz = yz ⊓ ( y ⊓ x ) z = ( y ⊓ x ) z = xz , and so (N’) implies xz ≤ yz . By the same argument, (N4) gives x / z ≤ y / z . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  54. Proof continued. To prove ( x / y ) y ≤ x , or equivalently x ⊓ y ≤ x , Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  55. Proof continued. To prove ( x / y ) y ≤ x , or equivalently x ⊓ y ≤ x , substitute x / x for x , x for y , and ( x ⊓ y ) / x for z in (N3) to get ( x / x ) x ⊓ ( x / x ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / x ) x = ( x / x ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / x ) x Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  56. Proof continued. To prove ( x / y ) y ≤ x , or equivalently x ⊓ y ≤ x , substitute x / x for x , x for y , and ( x ⊓ y ) / x for z in (N3) to get ( x / x ) x ⊓ ( x / x ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / x ) x = ( x / x ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / x ) x Using (N4) this simplifies to ( x ⊓ x ) ⊓ (( x ⊓ y ) / x ) x = (( x ⊓ y ) / x ) x Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  57. Proof continued. To prove ( x / y ) y ≤ x , or equivalently x ⊓ y ≤ x , substitute x / x for x , x for y , and ( x ⊓ y ) / x for z in (N3) to get ( x / x ) x ⊓ ( x / x ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / x ) x = ( x / x ⊓ ( x ⊓ y ) / x ) x Using (N4) this simplifies to ( x ⊓ x ) ⊓ (( x ⊓ y ) / x ) x = (( x ⊓ y ) / x ) x so by (N1), (N’) and reflexivity we have x ⊓ y ≤ x ⊓ x = x Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  58. Independence of axioms The equational basis (N1)–(N4) for narhoops is independent as can be seen from algebras A i = { 0 , 1 } ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) that each satisfy the axioms except for (N i ). In A 1 , · is ordinary multiplication and x / y = y . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  59. Independence of axioms The equational basis (N1)–(N4) for narhoops is independent as can be seen from algebras A i = { 0 , 1 } ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) that each satisfy the axioms except for (N i ). In A 1 , · is ordinary multiplication and x / y = y . In A 2 , x · y = x and x / y = 1. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  60. Independence of axioms The equational basis (N1)–(N4) for narhoops is independent as can be seen from algebras A i = { 0 , 1 } ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) that each satisfy the axioms except for (N i ). In A 1 , · is ordinary multiplication and x / y = y . In A 2 , x · y = x and x / y = 1. In A 3 , x · y is addition modulo 2 and x / y = 0 except that 1 / 0 = 1. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  61. Independence of axioms The equational basis (N1)–(N4) for narhoops is independent as can be seen from algebras A i = { 0 , 1 } ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) that each satisfy the axioms except for (N i ). In A 1 , · is ordinary multiplication and x / y = y . In A 2 , x · y = x and x / y = 1. In A 3 , x · y is addition modulo 2 and x / y = 0 except that 1 / 0 = 1. In A 4 , x · y is the max operation and x / y is addition modulo 2. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  62. In general, neither · nor the term operation ⊓ of a narhoop is associative. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  63. In general, neither · nor the term operation ⊓ of a narhoop is associative. However ⊓ is associative both in right quasigroups and in right hoops. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  64. In general, neither · nor the term operation ⊓ of a narhoop is associative. However ⊓ is associative both in right quasigroups and in right hoops. In right quasigroups, this follows from the identity x ⊓ y = x . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  65. In general, neither · nor the term operation ⊓ of a narhoop is associative. However ⊓ is associative both in right quasigroups and in right hoops. In right quasigroups, this follows from the identity x ⊓ y = x . In right hoops, ⊓ turns out be a semilattice operation (J. 2017, Lem. 4). Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  66. In general, neither · nor the term operation ⊓ of a narhoop is associative. However ⊓ is associative both in right quasigroups and in right hoops. In right quasigroups, this follows from the identity x ⊓ y = x . In right hoops, ⊓ turns out be a semilattice operation (J. 2017, Lem. 4). In both cases the reduct ( A , ⊓ ) is a left normal band , i.e., an idempotent semigroup satisfying the identity x ⊓ y ⊓ z = x ⊓ z ⊓ y . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  67. Narhoops with associative ⊓ If ( A , · ,/ ) is a narhoop and B ⊆ A is closed under ⊓ , then B inherits the order ≤ from A . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  68. Narhoops with associative ⊓ If ( A , · ,/ ) is a narhoop and B ⊆ A is closed under ⊓ , then B inherits the order ≤ from A . Theorem Let ( A , · ,/ ) be a narhoop and let B ⊆ A be closed under ⊓ . The following are equivalent. 1 ( B , ⊓ ) is a left normal band; Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  69. Narhoops with associative ⊓ If ( A , · ,/ ) is a narhoop and B ⊆ A is closed under ⊓ , then B inherits the order ≤ from A . Theorem Let ( A , · ,/ ) be a narhoop and let B ⊆ A be closed under ⊓ . The following are equivalent. 1 ( B , ⊓ ) is a left normal band; 2 ( B , ⊓ ) is a semigroup; Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  70. Narhoops with associative ⊓ If ( A , · ,/ ) is a narhoop and B ⊆ A is closed under ⊓ , then B inherits the order ≤ from A . Theorem Let ( A , · ,/ ) be a narhoop and let B ⊆ A be closed under ⊓ . The following are equivalent. 1 ( B , ⊓ ) is a left normal band; 2 ( B , ⊓ ) is a semigroup; 3 For all x , y ∈ B, x ⊓ ( y ⊓ x ) = x ⊓ y and ( x ⊓ ( y ⊓ z )) ⊓ z = x ⊓ ( y ⊓ z ) . Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  71. Narhoops with commutative ⊓ ⊓ -reducts of right hoops are semilattices A nonassociative generalization of right hoops is the following variety of narhoops: Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  72. Narhoops with commutative ⊓ ⊓ -reducts of right hoops are semilattices A nonassociative generalization of right hoops is the following variety of narhoops: Theorem Let ( A , · ,/ ) be a narhoop and let B ⊆ A be closed under ⊓ . The following are equivalent. 1 ( B , ⊓ ) is commutative; Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  73. Narhoops with commutative ⊓ ⊓ -reducts of right hoops are semilattices A nonassociative generalization of right hoops is the following variety of narhoops: Theorem Let ( A , · ,/ ) be a narhoop and let B ⊆ A be closed under ⊓ . The following are equivalent. 1 ( B , ⊓ ) is commutative; 2 For all x , y ∈ B, x ⊓ ( y ⊓ x ) = y ⊓ x. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  74. Narhoops with commutative ⊓ ⊓ -reducts of right hoops are semilattices A nonassociative generalization of right hoops is the following variety of narhoops: Theorem Let ( A , · ,/ ) be a narhoop and let B ⊆ A be closed under ⊓ . The following are equivalent. 1 ( B , ⊓ ) is commutative; 2 For all x , y ∈ B, x ⊓ ( y ⊓ x ) = y ⊓ x. When these equivalent conditions hold, ( B , ⊓ ) is a semilattice. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  75. Principal ideals of narhoops In a left normal band, the identity x ⊓ y ⊓ z = x ⊓ z ⊓ y expresses the fact that every downset ( a ] = { x ∈ A | x ≤ a } = { a ⊓ x | x ∈ A } is a subsemilattice. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  76. Principal ideals of narhoops In a left normal band, the identity x ⊓ y ⊓ z = x ⊓ z ⊓ y expresses the fact that every downset ( a ] = { x ∈ A | x ≤ a } = { a ⊓ x | x ∈ A } is a subsemilattice. The same role is played by ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ z = ( x ⊓ z ) ⊓ y in narhoops. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  77. Principal ideals of narhoops In a left normal band, the identity x ⊓ y ⊓ z = x ⊓ z ⊓ y expresses the fact that every downset ( a ] = { x ∈ A | x ≤ a } = { a ⊓ x | x ∈ A } is a subsemilattice. The same role is played by ( x ⊓ y ) ⊓ z = ( x ⊓ z ) ⊓ y in narhoops. Theorem Let ( A , · ,/ ) be a narhoop that satisfies ( x ⊓ ( y ⊓ z )) ⊓ z = x ⊓ ( y ⊓ z ) , and fix a ∈ A. Then the downset ( a ] is closed under ⊓ and is a semilattice. Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  78. Narhoops with a left identity element Lemma Let ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) be a right-residuated magma such that x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x holds for all x , y ∈ A. Then 1 x / x is a maximal element for all x ∈ A, Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

  79. Narhoops with a left identity element Lemma Let ( A , ≤ , · ,/ ) be a right-residuated magma such that x ≤ y ⇐ ⇒ x = y ⊓ x holds for all x , y ∈ A. Then 1 x / x is a maximal element for all x ∈ A, 2 the identity ( x / x ) y / y = x / x holds in A, and Peter Jipsen (Chapman University) and Michael Kinyon (University of Denver) — BLAST, August 7, 2018

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend