non core fixed income process recommendations
play

Non-Core Fixed Income Process & Recommendations June 23-24, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Non-Core Fixed Income Process & Recommendations June 23-24, 2016 Jason Weiner, Director of Fixed Income Germn Gaymer, Fixed Income Investment Analyst Weston Kasper, RVK Agenda I. Non-Core Fixed Income (NCFI) Timeline & Allocation


  1. Non-Core Fixed Income Process & Recommendations June 23-24, 2016 Jason Weiner, Director of Fixed Income Germán Gaymer, Fixed Income Investment Analyst Weston Kasper, RVK

  2. Agenda I. Non-Core Fixed Income (NCFI) Timeline & Allocation Objectives II. Market Opportunity III. Manager Search Process IV. Manager Selection Recommendations V. Requested Board Action 2

  3. I. NCFI Timeline & Allocation Objectives

  4. NCFI Timeline Fall 2014 Spring Summer December December Current 2015 2015 2015 2015 2016 • Board approves 2015 Non-Core • Board approves • Board approves • Board approves • Board approves • June Board Fixed Income EMD target asset Direct Lending 3-phase Pacing meeting: Pacing Plan for recommended allocation of recommended Plan for Non- Consider and EMD and other managers 20% of total managers Core Fixed act on approved sub- plan to Non- Income in 2016 Opportunistic asset classes Core Fixed Credit Income managers 4

  5. NCFI Current & Target Portfolio (as of March 31, 2016) NCFI Current Allocation NCFI Expected Allocation Bank Loan/CLO, 3.1% Bank Loan/CLO, 3.1% Unallocated, 4.8% Unallocated, RMBS/CMBS, RMBS/CMBS, 7.7% 3.2% 3.2% Oportunistic Credit**, 2.9% Emerging Emerging Direct Market Debt*, Market Debt*, Direct Lending*, 4.0% 2.0% 2.0% Lending*, 4.0% * Approved by the board, funding pending. ** Pending Board’s approval 5

  6. II. Market Opportunity

  7. Opportunistic Credit What is Opportunistic Credit? A broad category ranging from multi sector fixed-income funds to direct hedge funds and less liquid, hedge fund/private equity fund hybrid structures. They generally represent a good substitute for traditional core/core plus fixed income. • Strategies vary widely, but common attributes include:  Enhanced flexibility to generate returns  Usually have less duration risk than traditional fixed income  Focus on identifying mispriced assets, often with a catalyst  Complex and often less liquid holdings. Fund terms/structures vary, but need to be reflective of holdings • Key characteristics include:  Benchmark agnosticism  Reliance on non-duration return drivers  Broadened capital structure exposure • Strategy exposure can include:  Corporate Credit (Bank loans, High Yield, stressed/distressed, direct lending)  Mortgage credit (RMBS, CMBS)  Structured credit (ABS, CLO) • Geographic exposure is more global than a traditional core/core plus fixed income portfolio:  North America (U.S., Canada)  Europe  Asia/EM 7

  8. Opportunistic Credit Opportunistic credit managers adjust their strategies in an attempt to produce returns over various economic cycles. 8

  9. Opportunistic Credit Investment Drivers Dramatic industry shifts alongside extraordinary policy and regulatory actions are driving market dislocations and creating uncertainty that are transforming how the credit markets function. CAPITAL MARKETS REGULATORY • Bank Disintermediation • Regulatory aggressiveness has redefined the financing landscape • Less Liquidity • Financing gap is most acute in Europe • Dodd-Frank and Basel III INDUSTRY ECONOMIC • Technology-driven disruption • The path to policy normalization is fundamentally changing industries: expected to be bumpy and expose e.g. energy, retail, transportation companies with weak financials • Elevated price volatility in • Economic recession may occur during commodities and energy the Fund's investment period Portfolio Considerations • Higher return potential than traditional fixed income strategies. • Most products have less interest rate risk than traditional fixed income strategies. • Diversification benefits – relatively low correlation to traditional credit and equity markets. • Return based on manager skill, sourcing relationships, and are not reliant on leverage for returns. 9

  10. Opportunistic Credit Opportunistic credit focused strategies can be divided into two distinct approaches: 1. Distressed (“Alternative Growth”): buying securities or loans at significant discounts with the anticipation of future price appreciation. Distressed debt through the last 20 years: 10

  11. Opportunistic Credit 2. Cash Flow (“Alternative Yield”): implement strategies that focus on high current income generation. Within the Alternative Yield strategy, the most common types of assets include:  Residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS)  Agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS)  Commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS)  Asset-backed securities (ABS)  Collateralized debt obligations (CDO)  Collateralized loan obligations (CLO)  Direct Loan Origination  Structured Finance  Performing Loans 11

  12. III. Manager Search Process

  13. Manager Search Process Review (1 of 3) • Initial Screening • TMRS evaluated market opportunity and did an initial screenig of potential managers. Step 1 • TMRS fixed income team filtered managers with potential fit in the opportunistic credit strategy. • Opportunistic Credit Manager Identification • RVK and TMRS (team) identified 25 managers with opportunistic credit managers capabilities. Step 2 • Semi-Finalist Candidate Analysis (Best ideas) • The team selected 7 managers to move to the semifinals. Step 3 • Each of the 7 semi-finalist candidates was scored independently by the team. • Finalist Candidate Analysis • Based on the scoring, 4 managers were selected to move to the finals. Step 4 • Final Due Diligence & Manager Selection • On site due diligence was performed at the 4 finalist locations. • The team re-ranked the managers. Step 5 • 5 strategies across 3 managers were selected for recommendation to the Board. 13

  14. Manager Search Process Review (2 of 3) After an initial screening was completed by TMRS, the fixed income staff collaborated with RVK (the team) and identified 25 managers for further review. As a result of this review, the team carefully selected 7 managers for the semi-finalist stage. The criteria used for this selection was: Portfolio fit • Broad capabilities and knowledge within their specific sector • Proven track record • 7 managers were selected to advance to the semifinalist. Next table shows the scoring of these managers Possible Beach Scoring Category Points Point Marathon PIMCO Oak Hill Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 People (Firm & Team) 0 - 25 24.5 25.0 23.5 22.5 23.7 23.0 21.3 Process (Investment Process & Risk Management) 0 - 25 24.5 24.3 24.8 23.8 23.3 22.0 20.7 Performance History 0 - 25 24.0 23.5 23.8 23.3 21.3 22.0 17.7 Philosophy/Strategy (Attractiveness of Opportunity/Portfolio Fit) 0 - 12.5 12.4 12.4 12.1 10.9 10.6 9.7 8.8 Terms (Fees, Liquidity, etc.) 0 - 12.5 11.4 12.5 11.5 10.8 11.5 10.0 12.5 Total 100 96.8 97.6 95.6 91.1 90.3 86.7 81.0 14

  15. Manager Search Process Review (3 of 3) Based on previous scoring, the team selected the 4 top managers to move to the finals. The team performed on-site due diligence for each manager. Next table shows how these managers were re-ranked. Beach Point Marathon PIMCO Oak Hill TMRS 1 3 1 4 2 TMRS 2 3 1 4 2 RVK 1 3 1 4 2 RVK 2 2 1 4 3 Total 3 1 4 2 After careful consideration and completing extensive analysis in addition to establishing the complementarity of each manager within a portfolio context, the team decided to recommend five strategies from the top three managers for approval at the June Board Meeting. 15

  16. IV. Manager Selection Recommendations

  17. Executive Summary of Manager Recommendations Summary of Recommendations Recommended Fund Recommended Amount Strategy Focus Beach Point Total Return Fund II LP Event Driven – $200 million (Beach Point) Distressed/Restructuring Multi-Strategy Marathon Structured Product Strategies Fund, LP Structured Credit- $150 million (SPS) Relative Value Multi-Strategy Marathon European Credit Opportunity Fund III, Structured Credit- $100 million LP (ECO) Relative Value Multi-Strategy Marathon CLO Equity Fund, L.P. Structured Credit- $50 million (CLO) Relative Value PIMCO Corporate Opportunities Fund II Onshore Event Driven – $200 million Feeder, L.P. (COF II) Distressed/Restructuring Total Recommendation $700 million 17

  18. Top Candidate Characteristics – Beach Point (1/2) $200 Million Recommendation Strategy Focus: Event Driven – Distressed/Restructuring Firm Beach Point Capital Management was founded in 2008 by Co-CIOs Carl Goldsmith and Scott • Klein and remains 100% employee owned. The firm was spun out of Post Advisory Group, where Carl and Scott ran the alternative fixed income business. The two have worked together since 1997. The firm manages over $10 billion, specializing in opportunistic credit, high yield, and • distressed/special situations. The firm is headquartered in Los Angeles with additional offices in London and New York. • Team 87 employees with 35 investment professionals with an average industry experience of 13 years. • Low turnover within the firm, with no senior level departures since inception. • Members of the investment team have a legal background, which lends well to building out • covenant analysis and debt restructuring expertise. 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend