Neutrinos Anna Julia Zsigmond Max-Planck-Institut fr Physik ELFT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Neutrinos Anna Julia Zsigmond Max-Planck-Institut fr Physik ELFT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
What can we learn about the Universe from Neutrinos Anna Julia Zsigmond Max-Planck-Institut fr Physik ELFT Summer School 3-7. Sept 2018 Questions Nature of neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana) Absolute neutrino mass scale Origin of
Questions
- Nature of neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana)
- Absolute neutrino mass scale
- Origin of tiny neutrino masses
- Dark matter
- Baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- Right-handed neutrinos
Some ideas from an experimentalist based on results presented at the Neutrino 2018 conference
2
Introduction to neutrino mixing
3
- Standard model originally with massless left-handed neutrinos
- Adv. High Energy Phys. 2012 (2012) 718259
Neutrino masses and mixing
- Two ways to include neutrino masses in the SM
- Dirac mass term
like all other fermions
- Majorana mass term
- nly for neutrinos
new physics scale Λ in coupling ➔ New scale could naturally explain the tiny neutrino masses ➔ Lepton number violation could generate the observed baryon asymmetry
- f the Universe
➔ What new states are responsible for the new scale?
4
Neutrino masses and mixing
- Neutrino masses imply lepton mixing
- Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix
where cij = cosθij, sij = sinθij, θij∈[0, π/2], δCP CP violating phase, α1,2 Majorana phases
5
Neutrino masses and mixing
- Parameters: 3 mass eigenstates, 3 mixing angles, 1 CP violating Dirac
phase, 2 Majorana phases
- Mass differences from oscillations
Δm21
2 ≪ |Δm31 2| ≃ |Δm32 2|
- Two possible mass orderings
normal ordering (NO) m1 < m2 < m3
- r inverted ordering (IO) m3 < m1 < m2
6
arXiv:1307.5487
Neutrino oscillation experiments
Cl Homestake, Gallex, GNO, SAGE, Super-Kamiokande, SNO, KamLAND, Borexino
7
- Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 052002
- Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 112007
- Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011301
Neutrino oscillation experiments
Super-Kamiokande IceCube-DeepCore ANTARES
8
- Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 112005
- Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 101801
Neutrino oscillation experiments
MINOS(+) T2K NOνA
9
T2K Run1-8
arXiv:1807.07891
- M. Sanchez @ Neutrino 2018
- A. Aurisano @ Neutrino 2018
Neutrino oscillation experiments
Double Chooz Daya Bay RENO
10
- J. P. Ochoa-Ricoux @ Neutrino 2018
- I. Yu @ Neutrino 2018
- C. Buck @ Neutrino 2018
RENO Daya Bay
Short baseline reactor neutrinos
3ν oscillation global fits
Long baseline accelerator neutrinos
11
Atmospheric neutrinos Solar neutrinos + KamLAND
- M. Tortóla, Neutrino 2018
Precision of 3ν oscillation global fits
12
Precision 2.4% 1.3% 5.5% 4.7% 4.4% 3.5% 10% 9%
Different group performing global fits: globalfit.astroparticles.es
- Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 633
www.nu-fit.org
JHEP 1701 (2017) 087
Bari
- Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102 (2018) 48
Reaching very good precision Open questions:
- Leptonic CP violation
- Neutrino mass ordering
- Octant of θ23
Answers within reach ...
- M. Tortóla, Neutrino 2018
Questions
- Nature of neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana)
- Absolute neutrino mass scale
- Origin of tiny neutrino masses
- Dark matter
- Baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- Right-handed neutrinos
13
Neutrinoless double beta decay
- The best hope for observing the
Majorana nature of the neutrinos
- Neutrino accompanied double
beta (2ν2β) decay observed in various isotopes with a lifetime of T2ν2β > 1019 - 1021 years
- In case of light massive Majorana
neutrino exchange → 0ν2β decay also sensitive to absolute neutrino mass scale
14
arXiv:1708.01046
Search for neutrinoless double beta decay
- Sensitivity on half-life
- Background-free regime
- Challenges
○ Good energy resolution ○ Eliminate all backgrounds ■ Cosmic rays → underground ■ Environmental radioactivity → shielding and active veto ■ Radioactivity in setup material → radio-pure material selection ○ Isotope enrichment 15
Status of 0ν2β decay searches
Isotope T1/2 sensitivity T1/2 limit Reference EXO-200
136Xe
0.38 × 1026 0.18 × 1026
PRL 120 (2018) 072701
KamLAND-Zen
136Xe
0.56 × 1026 1.07 × 1026
PRL 117 (2016) 082503
GERDA
76Ge
1.1 × 1026 0.9 × 1026
- A. Zsigmond, Neutrino 2018
Majorana
76Ge
0.48 × 1026 0.27 × 1026
- V. Giuseppe, Neutrino 2018
CUORE
130Te
0.07 × 1026 0.15 × 1026
PRL 120 (2018) 132501 16
Approaches and experiments
17
- A. Giuliani, Neutrino 2018
Questions
- Nature of neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana)
- Absolute neutrino mass scale
- Origin of tiny neutrino masses
- Dark matter
- Baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- Right-handed neutrinos
18
Observables related to neutrino mass
19
Oscillations Cosmology Decay kinematics 0ν2β decay Observable Δmij
2 = mi 2 ‒ mj 2
Mν = ∑mi mβ = ( ∑|Uei|2 mi
2
)1/2 mββ = |∑Uei
2
mi| Present knowledge
Δm21
2 = 7.6(2)×10-5 eV2
|Δm31
2| = 2.4(1)×10-3 eV2
< (0.12 - 1) eV < 2 eV < (0.2 - 0.4) eV Future 0.01 - 0.05 eV 0.2 eV 0.01 - 0.05 eV Model dependence No mass scale information ΛCDM with many parameters Energy conservation Majorana ν, nuclear matrix elements, gA
Effective Majorana neutrino mass
- Large uncertainties due to
nuclear matrix elements and gA
- Future experiments should
fully probe the inverted
- rdering mass region
20
- Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 053001
- Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 033005
Neutrinos in cosmology
- Cosmological measurements provide
constraints on the sum of the neutrino masses
○ CMB temperature and polarisation power spectrum ○ Matter power spectrum ○ Baryon acoustic oscillations ○ ...
- Current limits ∑mi < 0.1 - 0.7 eV
depending on the dataset and model assumptions
- Some indications on preference for
normal hierarchy
21
- Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13
PDG 2018: Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018)
Planck
Direct neutrino mass measurements
- KATRIN started data taking with tritium this summer
→ Extract effective neutrino mass from spectral shape near to the endpoint of 3H decay at 18.6 keV
- ECHo and HOLMES projects measuring electron neutrino mass with 163Ho
electron capture decay
- Project 8: cyclotron radiation emission spectroscopy on atomic tritium
22
Overview of neutrino masses
- Oscillations set minimum mass
for at least two neutrinos Δmsol
2 = 7.6×10-5 eV2
|Δmatm
2| = 2.4×10-3 eV2
- Cosmology sets upper limit for
the sum of neutrino masses ∑mi < 0.1 - 0.7 eV
- Direct neutrino mass
measurements and neutrinoless double beta decay searches set also upper limits mββ < 0.1 - 0.5 eV
23
- Contemp. Phys. 53 (2012) 315
Questions
- Nature of neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana)
- Absolute neutrino mass scale
- Origin of tiny neutrino masses
- Dark matter
- Baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- Right-handed neutrinos
24
Neutrino masses
- Masses of standard model particles between 5.11×105 eV and
1.72 ×1011 eV compared to neutrino masses ≲ 10-1 eV
- Do the neutrinos get their mass from the Higgs mechanism as the others?
- Or some new scale beyond the standard model is responsible for the
small neutrino masses?
25
Questions
- Nature of neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana)
- Absolute neutrino mass scale
- Origin of tiny neutrino masses
- Dark matter
- Baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- Right-handed neutrinos
26
Dark matter
- Numerous indirect evidences for the existence of dark matter
○ Redshift of galaxy clusters ○ Rotational curves of galaxies ○ Gravitational lensing ○ Bullet cluster ○ CMB ○ ...
- Can neutrinos tell us something about the nature of dark matter?
○ The three active neutrinos have a mass that is too small ○ BUT controversial indications of sterile neutrinos 27
Questions
- Nature of neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana)
- Absolute neutrino mass scale
- Origin of tiny neutrino masses
- Dark matter
- Baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- Right-handed neutrinos
28
Baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- No significant amount of antimatter observed in our Universe
- Baryon to photon ratio measures the asymmetry
- Primordial abundances of light elements from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
→ 5.8 × 10-10 < ηSBBN < 6.6 × 10-10 within ΛCDM and SM
- Temperature power spectrum of CMB sensitive to equation of state of the
baryon-photon plasma → 6.1 × 10-10 < ηCMB < 6.2 × 10-10
- Agreement gives confidence in
ΛCDM model
29
Sakharov conditions for baryogenesis
Baryon asymmetry has been dynamically created by baryogenesis from a matter-antimatter symmetric initial state. 3 necessary conditions for successful baryogenesis
- Baryon number violation
→ ΔB ≠ 0 process necessary
- C and CP violation
→ P(A → Ᾱ) ≠ P(Ᾱ → A) process necessary
- Deviation from thermal equilibrium
→ in equilibrium the expectation values of all observables are constant → change from B = 0 to B ≠ 0 needs deviation from equilibrium
30
- Baryon number violation
→ Sphalerons at T > 130 GeV, ΔB = ΔL, B−L conserved
- C and CP violation
→ weak interaction, CKM phase BUT too small
- Deviation from thermal equilibrium
→ Hubble expansion of the Universe BUT too small
Baryogenesis within the Standard Model
31
Baryogenesis beyond the Standard Model
- Neutrino oscillations and dark matter indicate physics beyond the SM
- Baryon number violating processes (e.g. proton decay) not observed in
the Universe
- Two scenarios: direct or baryogenesis through leptogenesis
- Top-down approach: GUTs and supersymmetric theories constrained by
the baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- Bottom-up approach: extensions of the SM (minimality and naturalness)
- One testable scenario discussed today
→ baryogenesis from sterile neutrino oscillations
32
Questions
- Nature of neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana)
- Absolute neutrino mass scale
- Origin of tiny neutrino masses
- Dark matter
- Baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- Right-handed neutrinos
One possible solution by extending the SM
33
Extension of the Standard Model
34
- Adv. High Energy Phys. 2012 (2012) 718259
Neutrino minimal Standard Model (νMSM)
- If MM eigenvalues above the electroweak scale
○ Basis for thermal leptogenesis scenarios ○ CP asymmetry responsible for baryon asymmetry generated during freeze-out and decay
- f right-handed neutrinos
○ Explains both baryon asymmetry and small neutrino masses at the same time
- If MM eigenvalues below electroweak scale
○ Asymmetry created during thermal production of sterile neutrinos in the early Universe ○ The initial sterile neutrino abundance deviates from its equilibrium value and chemical equilibrium is not established before sphaleron freeze-out
- Can explain observed neutrino oscillations, dark matter (DM) and the
baryon asymmetry of the Universe (BAU)
35
Heavy sterile neutrinos
- Mixing with the SM neutrinos suppressed by
small angles θαI = (mDMM
- 1)αI where mD = λv
with v being the Higgs vacuum expectation value
- The mass matrix for SM neutrinos is
generated by the seesaw (type I) mechanism leading to the observed neutrino oscillations mν ≃ θMMθT
- This requires the Yukawa couplings λ to be
tiny for eigenvalues of MM below the electroweak scale
36
νMSM and baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- The measured baryon asymmetry of the Universe can constrain the
parameter space of the model
- Assuming N1 (lightest) is responsible for dark matter
○ Only two sterile neutrinos participate in baryogenesis ○ N1 mass constrained to 1 keV ≲ M1 ≲ 50 keV ○ Fixes the absolute mass scale of SM neutrinos with the lightest being practically massless ○ CP-violating oscillation between N2,3 can generate lepton asymmetry → translated into baryon asymmetry via sphaleron interactions ○ N2,3 masses in the GeV range, quasi-degenerate (resonant amplification of the CP-violating effects)
- Assuming all N1,2,3 participate in baryogenesis → no need for mass
degeneracy
37
Questions
- Nature of neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana)
- Absolute neutrino mass scale
- Origin of tiny neutrino masses
- Dark matter
- Baryon asymmetry of the Universe
- Right-handed neutrinos
38
Sterile neutrinos
- Many further models predict sterile neutrinos (right-handed neutrinos /
heavy neutral leptons / singlet fermions) with a wide range of masses
- Constraints from cosmology (structure formation, CMB, BBN), neutrino
- scillations, LHC, meson decays, lepton flavor mixing, etc.
- Examples
○ MN ~ 109 - 1014 GeV: motivated by GUTs, explains BAU (CP violating decay), problem with fine tuning, no DM, no direct searches ○ MN ~ 102 - 103 GeV: motivated by EW hierarchy, explains BAU (resonant leptogenesis), direct searches at LHC, no DM? ○ MN ~ keV - GeV: explains neutrino masses, oscillations, BAU, DM, direct searches e.g. in beam dump experiments, beta decay, etc. ○ MN ~ eV: motivated by anomalies observed in neutrino oscillation experiments, many further experiments ongoing 39
Status of eV scale sterile neutrino searches
- Controversial signal from LSND and MiniBOONE accelerator neutrino
- scillation experiments: νμ → νe appearance
- Reactor anomaly: after antineutrino fluxes from reactors have been
reevaluated many experiments see a deficit: νe → νe disappearance
- NEOS and DANSS short baseline reactor neutrino experiments see also
hints of sterile neutrinos
- GALLEX and SAGE saw deficit from predicted ν rates from intense 51Cr and
37Ar sources also pointing sterile neutrinos
- No signal in νμ → νμ disappearance with e.g. atmospheric neutrinos
- All anomalies individually explained by eV scale sterile neutrinos BUT
severe tension between data samples when combining different channels in global (3+1) analyses
40
Status of eV scale sterile neutrino searches
- Multitude of follow-up experiments at reactors and accelerators taking
data already
41
DANSS NEOS STEREO PROSPECT SOLiD MicroBOONE
Searches for heavy sterile neutrinos
KATRIN → TRISTAN project
42
SHiP experiment
Conclusions
- Neutrino oscillations entering precision physics era
- Neutrinoless double beta decay experiments pioneering in
no-background physics
- Neutrino masses are pushed down by cosmology that will be confirmed
by KATRIN in the near future
- Minimal extensions of the standard model can explain the tiny neutrino
masses, the baryon asymmetry of the universe as well as dark matter
- Searches for right-handed / sterile neutrinos in a wide range of masses
with different experimental approaches ongoing / planned
43