Neighbourhood Plan Household survey results November 2018 The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Horsmonden Neighbourhood Plan Household survey results November 2018 The first few questions were aimed at identifying if the questionnaire was representative of the views of the General community. There were 209 respondents This response
The first few questions were aimed at identifying if the questionnaire was representative of the views of the
This response rate is good compared to market research surveys. There was a good response across the age groups (compared to the Census 2011).
1.0 1.0 3.8 8.1 21.1 18.2 26.3 17.2 2.9 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 14 - 16 YEARS 16 - 18 YEARS 18 - 29 YEARS 30 - 39 YEARS 40 - 49 YEARS 50- 59 YEARS 60 - 69 YEARS 70 - 79 YEARS OVER 80 YEARS
Age of person completing questionnaire %
70.8 13.4 7.2 1.4 3.8 12.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 RURAL ENVIRONMENT FAMILY CONNECTIONS WORKING LOCALLY ACCESS TO GOOD SCHOOLS NEARBY TRAIN LINK TO LONDON OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
Main reason for living here %
47.8 52.2 67.9 37.8 64.6 60.3 3.8 34.0 57.4 9.6 21.5 44.5 12.4 12.4 8.6 32.1 21.1 37.8 3.8 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 SAFE ENVIRONMENT PUBLIC GREEN SPACES, EG THE VILLAGE GREEN (THE HEATH), SPORTS FIELD LIVING IN AN AREA OF OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY VILLAGE FACILITIES, EG. SOCIAL CLUB, PARISH HALL, ST MARGARET’S CHURCH … RURAL LIVING SENSE OF COMMUNITY PLACES OF WORSHIP DOCTORS SURGERY VILLAGE SHOPS, EG. HEATH STORES, PHARMACY, HAIRDRESSER VILLAGE PUB - THE GUN WILDLIFE FOOTPATHS AND BRIDLEWAYS ACCESS TO GOOD SCHOOLS FAMILY CONNECTIONS OUTDOOR PURSUITS PROXIMITY TO NEARBY TOWNS (TUNBRIDGE WELLS, CRANBROOK, PADDOCK … COMMUTABLE TO LONDON BEAUTIFUL HISTORIC VILLAGE OTHER, PLEASE LIST, NOTE – THIS COUNTS AS ONE OF YOUR SELECTIONS
What do you value most %
78.9 45.9 52.2 8.1 19.1 47.4 91.9 73.2 83.7 76.6 85.6 15.8 18.2 45.5 22.5 9.1 3.8 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 PUBLIC GREEN SPACESK OUTREACH POST OFFICE SOCIAL CLUB KINDERGARTEN PRIMARY SCHOOL VILLAGE PUB VILLAGE SHOPS SPRIVERS FOOTPATHS AND BRIDLEWAYS DOCTORS SURGERY PHARMACY PLACES OF WORSHIP PUBLIC TOILETS VILLAGE HALL TENNIS CLUB CRICKET CLUB OTHERS (PLEASE LIST)
Which amenities do you use?
58.9 21.5 23.9 24.4 43.5 65.6 50.2 8.1 14.4 74.2 46.4 11.5 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 CAR PARKING CRIME DOG FOULING LITTER FLY-TIPPING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY PUBLIC TRANSPORT STREET LIGHTING HOUSE PRICES/RENTAL COSTS LOSS OF VILLAGE/LANDSCAPE CHARACTER SUSTAINABILITY OF LOCAL BUSINESSES AND SERVICES OTHER, PLEASE LIST – NOTE THIS COUNTS AS ONE OF YOUR FIVE SELECTIONS
Other than traffic, what concerns you?
17.7 27.3 66.5 12.9 65.6 64.6 11.5 36.8 16.7 0.5 9.1 11.5 27.3 12.9 15.8 6.2 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 COMMUNITY ALLOTMENTS DOG WASTE BINS FASTER BROADBAND HOME-WORKING FACILITIES… IMPROVED MOBILE PHONE COVERAGE RECYCLING FACILITIES BENCHES OR SEATING IMPROVED PLAY/RECREATION FACILITIES… LITTER BINS BABY CHANGING FACILITIES SPORTING FACILITIES IMPROVED COMMUNITY COMMUNICATION… CONNECTION TO NATIONAL GAS GRID MOBILE LIBRARY SERVICE OUTDOOR GYM OTHER, PLEASE LIST NOTE THIS COUNTS…
Facilities or services to develop or improve %
9.6 7.7 1.9 11.5 47.4 43.5 40.2 3.8 39.2 80.4 15.8 6.7 10.5 37.8 31.6 16.7 62.2 6.2 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 ACCESS FOR THE DISABLED COMMUNITY ALLOTMENTS BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES CHILDREN’S PLAYGROUND SERVICES FOR OLDER PEOPLE FACILITIES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ADDITIONAL PAVEMENTS NURSERY/DAY CARE FOR 0-5 YEARS MEDICAL FACILITIES ROAD SAFETY MEASURES (EG: IMPROVED VISIBILITY AT JUNCTIONS) SEWERAGE AND STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES WATER PRESSURE SPORTS AND LEISURE FACILITIES WILDLIFE HABITATS/BIODIVERSITY COMMUNITY TRANSPORT IMPROVED SCHOOL FACILITIES RETAINING AND GROWING LOCAL SHOPS AND BUSINESSES OTHER, PLEASE LIST – NOTE THIS COUNTS AS ONE OF YOUR FIVE SELECTIONS
Priorities over the next 10 years
60.3, 61% 27.3, 28% 11.0, 11%
Need for new homes in the parish?
Yes No Don't know
60.3 44.0 9.6 23.9 37.3 28.7 60.8 19.1 1.4 11.5 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 HOUSES WITH ONE OR TWO BEDROOMS HOUSES WITH THREE OR FOUR BEDROOMS HOUSES WITH MORE THAN FOUR BEDROOMS FLATS/APARTMENTS (ONE OR TWO BEDROOMS) SHARED OWNERSHIP (PART-RENT/PART-BUY) HOUSES FOR RENT RETIREMENT OR SHELTERED HOUSING CARE HOMES TRAVELLER SITE OTHER, PLEASE LIST – NOTE THIS COUNTS AS ONE OF YOUR FOUR SELECTIONS
Types of new homes most needed %
51.2, 51% 30.1, 30% 19.1, 19%
What level of housing growth can the village absorb without losing its character %
About the same level of house-building as in previous years More house-building than previous years Less house-building than in previous years
21.1 16.3 3.3 1.0
11 to 20 per year 21 to 30 per year 31 to 35 per year more than 35 per year
83.3 13.9
Yes No
63.2 77.0 12.4 1.9
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
INFILLING BETWEEN EXISTING HOUSES (1-5 HOUSES) A RANGE OF SMALL-SCALE DEVELOPMENTS (6-10 HOUSES) MEDIUM-SIZED DEVELOPMENTS (11-50 HOUSES) A LARGE ESTATE (50+ HOUSES)
Type of development
90.0 28.2 12.4 75.6 44.5 38.3 6.2 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 ON BROWNFIELD SITES (LAND THAT HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN DEVELOPED) ON GREENFIELD SITES (VACANT LAND THAT HAS NOT BEEN DEVELOPED) INSIDE EXISTING VILLAGE BOUNDARIES ON GREENFIELD SITES OUTSIDE EXISTING VILLAGE BOUNDARIES BY CONVERSION OF REDUNDANT AGRICULTURAL BUILDINGS BY CONVERSION OF EXISTING PROPERTIES INTO FLATS/APARTMENTS IN THE GROUNDS OF EXISTING PROPERTIES OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
Location of development
11.0 23.0 35.4 29.7 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 STRONGLY AGREE NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
Roads adequate for traffic ...
60.8 89.5 20.1 75.6 10.5 73.2 56.5 75.6 14.4 5.7 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 VOLUME OF TRAFFIC SPEED OF TRAFFIC NOISE POLLUTION SIZE OF VEHICLES TRAFFIC CONGESTION PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ROAD MAINTENANCE VISIBILITY AT JUNCTIONS AIR POLLUTION OTHER, PLEASE LIST – NOTE THIS COUNTS AS ONE OF YOUR FIVE SELECTIONS
Aspects of traffic you are concerned about?
87.1 13.4
Yes No
61.7 48.8 62.2 38.3 33.5 67.0 32.5 29.2 11.0 24.4 11.5 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 IMPROVED OR MORE PAVEMENTS INCREASED OFF-STREET PARKING REDUCED SPEED LIMITS USE OF SPEED CAMERAS INTERACTIVE/FLASHING STOP SIGNS TRAFFIC-CALMING MEASURES CREATING PEDESTRIAN/PELICAN CROSSINGS REDUCING TRAFFIC CONGESTION IMPROVING ACCESS FOR THE DISABLED CREATION OF DEDICATED CYCLE PATHS OTHER – PLEASE LIST – NOTE THIS COUNTS AS ONE OF YOUR FIVE SELECTIONS
Which of the following might improve safety?
Activities Regular Meetings with TWBC Every 8 weeks Steering group meetings Monthly (2nd Thursday) Next phase Scoping and project initiation meeting December 2018 Questionnaire report January 2019 Set up working / task and finish groups February Forming, briefing and supporting ‘topic’ task and finish groups February / March Themed workshops April / May Plan writing Complete evidence base (assessments) June Training on drafting the plan and planning policies June Drafting chapters and policies July Put together “rough draft” August Consultation Consult on “rough draft” September Strategic Environmental and Habitat Regulations Assessment screening September Formal (Regulation 14) consultation – 6 weeks October and November Amend Plan, write Consultation and Basic Conditions Statement December and January 2020 Formal Statutory (Regulation 15) consultation – 6 weeks February and March Examination April Referendum May