NBI - TOP 10 MISTAKES
After the Love Is Gone - What Not To Do
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
NBI - TOP 10 MISTAKES After the Love Is Gone - What Not To Do - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
NBI - TOP 10 MISTAKES After the Love Is Gone - What Not To Do Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com Theme: You are the Attorney for One or More Members Discuss What not to Do Discuss Where to Look for
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
How Do you Get In How Do You Get Out How Do You Get Paid
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
(k) “Operating agreement” means any agreement, whether referred to as an operating agreement, limited liability company agreement
member or members… … … An operating agreement is not subject to any statute of frauds, including K.S.A. 33-106, and amendments thereto. An operating agreement may provide rights to any person, including a person who is not a party to the operating agreement, to the extent set forth therein…
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
(13) “Operating agreement”, any valid agreement or agreements, written or oral, among all members, or written declaration by the sole member concerning the conduct of the business and affairs of the limited liability company and the relative rights, duties and obligations of the members and managers, if any;
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
member officer employee…”
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
K.S.A. 17–76,117(b) allows for judicial dissolution of a limited-liability company when its business “is suffering or is threatened with irreparable injury” due to deadlock of the
can't be dissolved so long as it's still solvent.
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Constructive fraud or fraud by silence is premised on a party's obligation or duty to
.2d at 970; Ensminger v. Terminix Int'l Co., 102 F .3d. 1571, 1573 (10th Cir.1996) (interpreting Kansas law). “A suppression or concealment of the truth is not at all times such fraud or deceit as will be relieved against. It must be a suppression
communicate and in respect of which he could not be innocently silent.” DuShane v. Union Nat'l Bank, 576 P .2d 674, 678-79 (Kan.1978). “The question of what gives rise to a legal or equitable obligation to communicate is not always an easy question to resolve, but generally the duty must arise from a relationship existing between the parties when the suppression or concealment is alleged to have occurred.” Id. at 679.
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
1. Representing the Startup 2. Conflicts During Operation 3. Taking Equity as a Fee 4. When to Refer Out 5. Fraudulent Transfers
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
“An attorney representing a corporation does not become the representative of its shareholders merely because the attorney's actions on behalf of the corporation also benefit the shareholders; the attorney owes no duty to the shareholders and no attorney-client relationship is present to sustain liability of the attorney to the shareholders.” 7 Am.Jur.2d, Attorneys at Law § 249, p. 269-70. Miller v. Staab, 113 P.3d 274 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005)
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
K.S.A. 17–7673(b) provides that a LLC—similar to a corporation—is “a separate legal entity, the existence of which as a separate legal entity shall continue until cancellation of the limited liability company's articles of organization.” (Emphasis added.) Moreover, according to Kansas Rule of Professional Conduct 1.13(b)(2011 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 513), an attorney retained by an organization “shall proceed as is reasonably necessary in the best interest of the organization.” (Emphasis added.) In other words, “an attorney's duties to a limited liability company run only to the company itself and not to its members.” Penn, LLC v. Prosper Business Development Corp., No. 2:10–cv–993, 2011 WL 2118072, *15 (S.D.Ohio 2011) (unpublished opinion). See also Miller v. Staab, No. 91,931, 2005 WL 1429834, at *4, (Kan.App.), rev. denied 280 Kan. 983 (2005) (“[A]s a general legal principle, attorneys representing corporations owe no duty to third-party shareholders.”). Thus, because Barbieri's fiduciary duty as an attorney ran only to the LLC, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing White's individual claim. White ex rel. B.W. II, L.L.C. v. Barbieri, 284 P.3d 375 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012)
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if: (1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client; (2) the representation is not prohibited by law; (3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and (4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
reasonably understood by the client;
the client’s choice and the client must be given a reasonable opportunity to do so; and
the lawyer’s role in the investment transaction.
ETHICS FOR BUSINESS LAWYERS REPRESENTING START-UP COMPANIES Therese Maynard Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property, Vol. 11, No. 3 2010-11, 401, 409
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
enumerated under Rule 1.5(a) and then accept stock that at the time of the transaction is worth the reasonable fee. Of course, the stock should, if feasible, be valued at the amount per share that cash investors, knowledgeable about its value, have agreed to pay for their stock about the same time.19
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
lawyer client relationship;
lawyer may retain the stock if she is terminated before all the services are performed;
conflict between the lawyer’s exercise of independent professional judgment and her desire to protect the value of her stock; and
counsel, or, at the very least, to recommend that another lawyer advise the client on the matter giving rise to the conflict.
ETHICS FOR BUSINESS LAWYERS REPRESENTING START-UP COMPANIES Therese Maynard Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property, Vol. 11, No. 3 2010-11, 401, 413
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
ABA Comments: The lawyer's own interests should not be permitted to have an adverse effect on representation of a client. For example, if the probity of a lawyer's own conduct in a transaction is in serious question, it may be difficult or impossible for the lawyer to give a client detached advice…. … …In addition, a lawyer may not allow related business interests to affect representation, for example, by referring clients to an enterprise in which the lawyer has an undisclosed financial interest. See Rule 1.8 for specific Rules pertaining to a number of personal interest conflicts, including business transactions with clients. See also Rule 1.10 (personal interest conflicts under Rule 1.7 ordinarily are not imputed to other lawyers in a law firm).
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com
RULE 1.13 ORGANIZATION AS CLIENT
Christopher Pickering The Pickering Law Firm cfp@pickeringlawfirm.com