National Liver EQA Scheme Circulation C1 Autumn 2010 Discussed 4 th - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

national liver eqa scheme circulation c1 autumn 2010
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

National Liver EQA Scheme Circulation C1 Autumn 2010 Discussed 4 th - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

National Liver EQA Scheme Circulation C1 Autumn 2010 Discussed 4 th November 2010 Dundee 62 responses 19 sent in on the last day! Suggested scoring based on first 44 responses, circulated to 5 steering committee members and incorporates


slide-1
SLIDE 1

National Liver EQA Scheme Circulation C1 Autumn 2010

Discussed 4th November 2010 Dundee

slide-2
SLIDE 2

62 responses – 19 sent in on the last day! Suggested scoring based on first 44 responses, circulated to 5 steering committee members and incorporates their views on criteria. The same principles then applied to the additional responses and sent to the scheme members a few days before and sent to the scheme members a few days before the meeting, with request for comments. One member sent comments on two cases. Scoring and discussion from the meeting are included

  • here. Due to cancellation of B1 discussion in July,

there was very limited time for discussion of this round.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

350 58/Female History of adrenocortical carcinoma previously

  • resected. Now multiple lesions in liver, 4 lesions

now resected. All show similar appearances Liver nodule From segment 4 Liver nodule From segment 4 Irregular piece of liver 3x2x2.5cm bearing nodule 1cm in diameter

slide-4
SLIDE 4

350

slide-5
SLIDE 5

350

slide-6
SLIDE 6

350

slide-7
SLIDE 7

350

slide-8
SLIDE 8

350

slide-9
SLIDE 9

350

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Lesion: 18 Carcinoma, c/w adrenal metastasis only 8 c/w adrenal, but exclude HCC 32 c/w adrenal metastasis, confirm with immunos 1 metastatic endocrine carcinoma, do immunos 1 metastatic carcinoma – compare with previous primary 1 atypical hepatic adenoma, do immunos (CD34, CK7, glipican, etc not adrenal markers) Background liver: Case 350 Background liver: 5 steatosis/steatohepatitis 23 steatosis 2 normal 1 features adjacent to SOL 2 non-cirrhotic 26 no mention of background liver Agreed scoring: accept all diagnoses of metastasis, +/- immune to confirm adrenal

  • rigin. Comment on background liver good practice but not required for scoring on

this occasion, since this would have resulted in insufficient consensus for scoring.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Case 350: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

metatastic adenocortical carcinoma Follow up information:

slide-12
SLIDE 12

351 19/Male Pruritis for few months then jaundice following course of treatment with tetracycline for acne.ALT 300, Anti SMA

  • positive. ? PSC, AIH? overlap
  • positive. ? PSC, AIH? overlap

Liver biopsy 2 cores larger 20mm in length

slide-13
SLIDE 13

351

slide-14
SLIDE 14

351

slide-15
SLIDE 15

351

slide-16
SLIDE 16

351

slide-17
SLIDE 17

351

slide-18
SLIDE 18

351

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Case 351 Morphology 49 cholestasis with ductopaenia 3 cholestasis, sclerosing lesions 1 Cholestasis and possible bile duct damage 1 cholestasis, ducts probably normal 4 cholestasis NOS 3 ductopaenia and hepatitic changes; cholesatasis not mentioned clinicopathological 15 PSC without differential 12 drugs without differential 27 differential that includes PSC and drugs 27 differential that includes PSC and drugs 1 in keeping with AIH, PSC not excluded but less likely 18 AIH in differential, includes 5 AIH/PSC overlap 17 unlikely AIH 13 AIH not mentioned 1 ‘cholangiopathy rather than AIH’ 1 ‘PSC also cholestatic hepatitis’ Suggested scoring: either not suitable for scoring, or lose marks for not including ductopaenia. Meeting – agreed to retain for scoring, since ductopaenia is unequivocal (5 marks deducted for responses in red). However there is insufficient consensus on the clinicopathological section for this to be scored.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Case 351: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

  • BILE DUCTS ABSENT/DAMAGED-PSC, NO

EVIDENCE OF AIH

slide-21
SLIDE 21

352 44/female Abnormal LFT ALP802, GGT319, psoriasis, exclude PBC, serology negative liver biopsy - 2 cores each 18mm in length H&E slide plus photomic of special stain

slide-22
SLIDE 22

352

slide-23
SLIDE 23

352

slide-24
SLIDE 24

352

slide-25
SLIDE 25

352

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Case 352 Morphology 51 biliary/portal fibrosis and inflammation and ductular reaction 1 ‘portal and periportal granulomatous inflammation, Shikata positive’ 6 chronic active inflammation – no mention of biliary features 1 chronic hepatitis with granuloma – no mention of biliary features 1 focal ductopaenia, CAP+, chronic active hepatitis clinicopathological 35 biliary disease, consistent with PBC 35 biliary disease, consistent with PBC 8 PBC without mentioning biliary disease more generally 6 PBC unlikely – favours other diagnoses (drugs x5, LBDO) 5 no mention of PBC (diagnoses = PSC, LBDO, drug induced/psoriasis x3) 4 chronic cholestatic condition NOS Agreed scoring: lose marks if not clear recognition that this is a biliary process, and if report directs clinician away from diagnosis of PBC

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Biliary process without specific features AMA negative PBC is a possibility as well as PSC but chronic large duct obstruction should also be excluded.

Case 352: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

excluded.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

353 33/male Abnormal LFT, Hepatitis C, ?Fibrosis. (Later info: Thalassaemia, multiple blood transfusions) Liver biopsy - 2 cores each 20mm in length H&E slide plus photomic of special stain

slide-29
SLIDE 29

353

slide-30
SLIDE 30

353

slide-31
SLIDE 31

353

slide-32
SLIDE 32

353

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Case 353 11 Fibrosis (all include bridging fibrosis and/or needs connective tissue stains) 23 developing cirrhosis/probable cirrhosis/stage 5 fibrosis 27 cirrhosis 50 hepatitis C 12 no mention of hepatitis C 41 iron, c/w transfusion 7 iron – excl. Haemochromatosis (transfusion not mentioned) 11 iron – siderosis NOS 11 iron – siderosis NOS 34 steatosis 18 gave some hepatitis activity grade, 15 used Ishak: 14 grade 2-5 (6 grade 3) and 1 grade 9 8 others none/mild/mod 1 ‘cirrhosis with excess iron secondary to transfusion’ only, no mention of hepatitis 1 ‘ cirrhosis, heavy iron overload’ – only, no mention of hepatitis as contributing Agreed scoring: lose 5 marks for no mention of hepatitis C, score 0 if no indication of chronic hepatitis. Results should include a comment on iron in relation to transfusions, but insufficient consensus on this point for it to be scored.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Case 353: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

Chronic hepatitis C, Ishak grade 3, stage 5 (at least) plus iron overload secondary to

  • transfusions. Both may be contributory

factors to fibrosis factors to fibrosis

slide-35
SLIDE 35

354 50/Male Information on request form- ?NASH information on electronic clinic letter History of coeliac disease and clinic letter History of coeliac disease and hypertension.Elevated ALT. Clinical suspicion of NASH Liver core biopsy - Two cores of tan tissue 12 and 15mm long

slide-36
SLIDE 36

354

slide-37
SLIDE 37

354

slide-38
SLIDE 38

354

slide-39
SLIDE 39

354

slide-40
SLIDE 40

354

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Case 354 Morphology

57 steatohepatitis 1 severe steatosis, possibly steatohepatitis 3 steatosis clinicopathological 37 c/w NASH 14 c/w NASH exclude alcohol 1 ? diabetic (no mention of NASH) 1 rule out excess alcohol (no comment on non-alcoholic cause) 5 steatohepatitis, no mention of cause 5 steatohepatitis, no mention of cause 1 c/w NAFLD 1 BMI, DM, alcohol etc (no mention NASH/NAFLD) 1 ‘severe steatosis, probably alcoholic’ 1 ‘steatosis and portal inflammation ? due to coeliac, exclude drug, alcohol’ 1 ‘NASH – likely to be coeliac related’ Agreed scoring: lose points for steatosis – there are definite full house steatohepatitis features in this biopsy. Given the clinical suspicion of NASH, answers should include c/w NASH/NAFLD. There was discussion on the contribution of coeliac disease – members were aware of cases where coeliac disease had been at least a contributary factor, so last response accepted

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Case 354: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

NASH with early bridging fibrosis (but clinical correlation required exclude ASH)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

355 49/female Raised ALT and immunoglobulins, ANA +ve (1/640), antimitochondrial antibody +ve, negative M2, ultrasound showed fatty liver, no copper-associated protein showed fatty liver, no copper-associated protein liver biopsy - 3 cores, measuring 6mm, 8mm and 20mm in length

slide-44
SLIDE 44

355

slide-45
SLIDE 45

355

slide-46
SLIDE 46

355

slide-47
SLIDE 47

355

slide-48
SLIDE 48

355

slide-49
SLIDE 49

355

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Case 355 morphology 32 portal inflammation with granuloma – PBC 18 other portal inflammation and bile duct damage 8 biliary features not mentioned clinicopathological 34 c/w PBC 12 overlap with AIH/PBC 2 autoimmune cholangitis 3 c/w AIH/cholangitis 1 c/w antibody negative PBC, exclude drugs

21 steatohepatitis 39 steatosis 2 no mention of fatty change

28 – responses included comment on NASH/ASH 1 CAH (lupoid) SLE? 3 AIH and steatosis 2 steatohepatitis, no features ofautoimmune disease 1 steatohepatitis – PBC unlikely(negative M2 and Cu protein) AIH unlikely, exclude hepatitis C 1 ? viral hepatitis, esp Hep C 1 morphology description only Agreed scoring: morphology deduct 5 points if no mention of portal granuloma/other bile duct damage. or none of fatty change. Clinicopathological – insufficient consensus for this part to be scored.

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Case 355: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

  • 1. steatohepatitis
  • 2. cholangiopathy. Could be PBC
slide-52
SLIDE 52

356 30/Male Jaundice ?drug induced liver damage. Bilirubin 750 Liver core biopsy - 2.5cm core

slide-53
SLIDE 53

356

slide-54
SLIDE 54

356

slide-55
SLIDE 55

356

slide-56
SLIDE 56

356

slide-57
SLIDE 57

356

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Case 356

29 cholestatic hepatitis 6 cholestatic hepatitis with confluent/bridging necrosis 17 cholestasis 7 cholestasis and fibrosis 1 severe steatosis 35 c/w drugs 11 drugs favoured with differential of LBDO 2 LBDO favoured with differential of drugs 3 differential between drugs v. viruses (1 hep E) 5 chronic cholestatic disease, of which 3 ? PSC 2 distal obstruction, cholangiopathy 1 viral/augmentin/PSC 1 cholestasis, differential includes paraneoplastic, ingestion, genetic Suggested scoring: probably not possible to score this – need clinical information about the drugs to decide whether this is likely or other causes should be considered. OR could decide to include for scoring, and accept responses indicating cholestasis and no evidence of chronicity/fibrosis/chronic biliary disease. If able to score, should also deduct 5 points for bridging necrosis – none of that present. 5 marks deducted if no mention of drugs as potential cause of cholestasis. The members voted to include this case in the scoring.

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Case 356: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

drug induced acute cholestatic hepatitis

slide-60
SLIDE 60

357 Female/73 New onset jaundice, last INR 1.3, ?liver pathology, US normal Liver biopsy - 1.5cm and 1.2cm cores Liver biopsy - 1.5cm and 1.2cm cores

slide-61
SLIDE 61

357

slide-62
SLIDE 62

357

slide-63
SLIDE 63

357

slide-64
SLIDE 64

357

slide-65
SLIDE 65

357

slide-66
SLIDE 66

357

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Case 357 18 acute hepatitis 31 acute hepatiits with bridging/confluent necrosis 2 ‘acute liver injury’ 5 hepatitis ? chronic 2 chronic hepatitis 1 portal fibrosis and inflammation, interface hepatitis 1 ‘PCs, neutrophils, mild lobular inflammation’ 22 differential includes viral, drug, AIH – none favoured 17 AIH favoured, with differential including drugs/virus 30 frequent plasma cells 17 AIH favoured, with differential including drugs/virus 11 c/w AIH, no differential given 10 no mention of autoimmune hepatitis: 4 ? drug related, no differential given 1 most likely drug. Exclude hep E 1 ‘c/w acute/subacute seronegative hepatitis’ 1 drug/sepsis 1 drug/viral 2 no aetiology given Agreed scoring: lose 5 marks if not recognise that this is (or may be) acute, and 5 if not include AIH in differential.

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Case 356: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

PBC

slide-69
SLIDE 69

358 56/Female High BMI, diabetes, abnormal liver function tests, ultrasound showed steatosis, rectic and masson trichrome showed significant fibrosis and

  • ccasional small nodules

Liver needle biopsy - 4 cores combined length 43mm

slide-70
SLIDE 70

358

slide-71
SLIDE 71

358

slide-72
SLIDE 72

358

slide-73
SLIDE 73

358

slide-74
SLIDE 74

358

slide-75
SLIDE 75

358

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Case 358 57 steatohepatitis 3 Steatosis 8 cirrhosis (unequivocal) 40 developing/early cirrhosis 1 ‘bridging and nodularity’ 1 nodules 11 fibrosis 1 perivenular sclerosis 36 NASH 36 NASH 15 NASH – exclude alcohol 9 no aetiology Suggested scoring: lose marks if not diagnosing steatohepatitis, and if no aetiology

  • given. ? Deduct marks for not including at least developing cirrhosis, since fibrosis

and occasional nodules on connective tissue stain is given information. One written comment received – ‘the proposal for deducting marks for not mentioning cirrhosis/developing cirrhosis is unreasonable’ This was discussed – the clinical importance of the biopsy is to detect likely cirrhosis or incipient cirrhosis to plan appropriate follow up. However, there is insufficient consensus for scoring stage in this case (48/61 at least developing cirrhosis).

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Case 358: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

non alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant fibrosis and early cirrhosis

slide-78
SLIDE 78

359 50/Male ? cirrhosis ?cause AST 183 ALP 376 IgG 18.2. Previous IgG 37.26 and previously SMA positive, now negative. Reticulin –collapsed areas, some elastin fibres also present (orcein). Reticulin –collapsed areas, some elastin fibres also present (orcein). Tiny amounts of copper associated protein,nil else on specials Liver biopsy - 15mm core and fragments

slide-79
SLIDE 79

359

slide-80
SLIDE 80

359

slide-81
SLIDE 81

359

slide-82
SLIDE 82

350 350

slide-83
SLIDE 83

359

slide-84
SLIDE 84

359

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Case 359 39 hepatitis and confluent necrosis 4 hepatitis 21 chronicity 8 cirrhosis 1 description only – ductular proiferation, inflammation, partial nodularity 45 favours AIH 10 differential of viral/drug/AIH (of which 1 includes Wilson’s) 6 no mention of AIH: 2 differential viral/drug, no mention of AIH 22 frequent plasma cells 2 differential viral/drug, no mention of AIH 1 no aetiology given 1 ‘massive hepatocellular necrosis with inflammation’ 1 ‘cirrhosis ? durg ? parasitic ?? lymphoproliferative’ 1 ‘chronic hepatitis, suggestive of biliary disease’ 4 specifically made comments about copper associated protein indicating chronicity Agreed scoring: Duration acute/chronic is unclear, but lose 5 marks for description

  • nly that doesn’t mention hepatitis, and 5 if no mention of AIH in this plasma cell

rich severe hepatitis.

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Case 359: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

severe acute on chronic hepatitis. Autoimmune

slide-87
SLIDE 87

360 71/male Abnormal LFT’s, hepatosplenomegaly ?Iatrogenic BCGosis, secondary to bladder cancer treatment. Liver biopsy- Tan cores 15mm x 2

slide-88
SLIDE 88

360

slide-89
SLIDE 89

360

slide-90
SLIDE 90

360

slide-91
SLIDE 91

360

slide-92
SLIDE 92

360

slide-93
SLIDE 93

360

slide-94
SLIDE 94

360

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Case 360 47 granulomas/granulomatous hepatitis 6 granulomas, including bile duct destruction 8 granulomas with lymphocyic cholangitis 1 chronic hepatitis (no mention of granulomas) 33 c/w BCG 19 BCG, consider differential diagnosis 2 differential TB, sarcoid, drugs, no mention of BCG 2 differential TB, sarcoid, drugs, no mention of BCG 3 favour PBC over BCG 1 BCG, ? additional cause of duct loss 1 unlike BCG, ? sarcoid 3 no aetiology given Agreed scoring: lose marks if not recognised that BCG is a possible cause. The bile duct changes are interesting, - definitely there, and ? a recognised feature with BCG – not that we were aware of!

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Case 360: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

Granulomatosis hepatitis consistent with recent BCG treatment. No chronic liver disease

slide-97
SLIDE 97

361 Male/54 Alcohol access. Jaundice Liver biopsy

  • Two cores of tissue up to

15mm length

slide-98
SLIDE 98

361

slide-99
SLIDE 99

361

slide-100
SLIDE 100

361

slide-101
SLIDE 101

361

slide-102
SLIDE 102

361

slide-103
SLIDE 103

361

slide-104
SLIDE 104

Case 361 morphology 54 steatohepatitis (+/- alcoholic) 3 alcoholic hepatitis (not including ‘steatohepatitis’) 3 steatosis, bilirubinostasis, fibrosis 1 acute hepatitis with confluent necrosis 38 cholestasis 21 no mention of cholestasis clinicopathological 56 c/w alcoholic 56 c/w alcoholic 5 in addition, ? also drug/sepsis i.e. consider additional cause for cholestasis 1 exclude LBDO, drugs – no mention of alcohol 3 no mention of alcohol, no aetiology given Agreed scoring: lose marks if not recognise that this is steatohepatitis. OK to use alcoholic hepatitis as morphological terminology? Members felt this was OK although not the preferred terminology for a morphological diagnosis. Lose 5 marks if don’t include alcohol aetiology. 2 ‘many people have access to alcohol................’

slide-105
SLIDE 105

Case 361: submitting pathologist’s diagnosis:

steatohepatitis with acute cholestasis + bridging fibrosis The end.