nanosatellite aerobrake maneuvering
play

Nanosatellite aerobrake maneuvering device Team: SunPulse Authors: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nanosatellite aerobrake maneuvering device Team: SunPulse Authors: Valeriia Melnikova, Alexander Borovikov, Koretskii Maksim, Iuliia Smirnova, Ekaterina Timakova Instructor Names: Stepan Tenenbaum , Dmitry Rachkin, Nikolay Nerovny, Oleg Kotsur


  1. Nanosatellite aerobrake maneuvering device Team: SunPulse Authors: Valeriia Melnikova, Alexander Borovikov, Koretskii Maksim, Iuliia Smirnova, Ekaterina Timakova Instructor Names: Stepan Tenenbaum , Dmitry Rachkin, Nikolay Nerovny, Oleg Kotsur

  2. Pr Prob oblem lem CubeSats form a constellation CubeSats are in one point Propulsion system 2

  3. Inn Innova vativ tive so e solution lution Two bladed rotary Solar Sail CubeSats form a constellation CubeSats with our unit Our unit 3

  4. Ope Operation tion prin principle ciple Diagram of Solar Sails deploying and folding The algorithm to form a constellation N – serial number of CubeSat - step t – Time of deploying start for each sail - sail deploying T – Sail operation time - sail folding 4

  5. Simulation software developed by our team Balli Ballistics stics X ’’(t)= F /m where X – coordinates vector; m – mass of CubeSat; F=Fg+Fa+Fs – net force vector, consist of: Fg – gravity force of the Earth vector (compression of the Earth were taken into account - the second zonal harmonic), Fa – atmospheric drag force (state standard specification GOST R 25645.166-2004, F 10,7 = 100 sfu), Fs – solar radiation force. 40 ∆ϕ , degrees 30 20 8 CubeSats - Evolution in time of the angles forming in 10 between 8 spacecrafts with 40 days! the height of the orbit 450 km 2 0 and sail area – 1 m 0,00 0,05 0,10 0,15 0,20 (machine time – 12 hours) Time, years 5

  6. Simulation software developed by our team Ballistics Balli stics Influence of orbit height Influence of the sail area for the period of deploying for the period of deploying 2 (sail area – 0,5 m ) (height – 450 km) NOTE: Decrease of height < 15 km only! Sail area: 6

  7. Tec echn hnical ical fea eatur tures es Mass, kg 0,30 Dimensions, mm 90 x 96 x 38 (sail is folded) Sail max length, m 20 (two blades total) Sail max width, mm 76 Average energy 0 consumption Energy consumption 1,2 W during sail (up to 15 min) 7 deploying/folding

  8. Sail Sail u unit inter nit interna nal l de design sign Sail Stepper motor Transitionl PCB Board-to-Board connector Bobbin with sail Electrical interfaces with the CubeSat Gear Coupling nut Principal PCB Rotation sensor 8

  9. Sail u Sail unit e nit exte xterna nal l de design sign Top connector free for use 8 37,6 46 occupied by circuits 5 85,73 Bottom connector Coupling nut 73,66 90 80,01 96 9

  10. Str Stren ength gth an anal alysis ysis Dynamic load profile Design environment: SolidWorks Simulation Static load: 10 g acceleration FEM mesh: 42908 Tet10 elements Safety factor: > 4.0 Results of the static strength analysis: Results of the dynamic strength analysis (Q=10): Maximum stress (Z – axis)  10 MPa Maximum stress (X – axis)  10 MPa The unit withstand static and dynamic loads during a launch with safety factor >4 10

  11. Avionics vionics Specifications : • Regulated power(3,3; 5,0 V) for internal circuits • Control of all operating modes of a sail • Full-redundancy • One failure in any component tolerance • Unit control by I2C bus • Telemetry/sail status by I2C bus • Sail deploying/folding is done by commands from groundstations throw CubeSat radio Avionics architecture Primary Russian reliable electronic components PCB developed by our team 11

  12. Motor Moto r driv drives es • Stepper bipolar motors are used for Drivers Sensors sail deploying/folding Keys Vcc Encoder Stepper • Typical H-bridge motors drivers Stepper drive Vcc driver GND Encoder realized, but cold redundant GND • Fails are detected by sensing Vcc bobbins rotation Redundant GND driver Bobbin rotation Control Power, sensing signals control signals 12

  13. Integration into the CubeSat Operates the sail Telemetry Spinning for Sail deploying Commands from Power ground supply station 13

  14. Ana Analogs logs an and d ou our ad r adva vant ntage ges BMSTU ClydeSpace Micro- Solar Sail Unit Pulsed Plasma space Criteria for Thruster micropro- comparing pulsion system Thin-filmed Electric pulse MEMS cold gas Technology construction thrusters thruster Mass 0,30 kg 0,28 kg 0,30 kg Low energy Average: 0 2,7 W 2 W Energy consumption Ability to During sail deploying: consumption 1,5 W up to 15 min deorbit the Total - 42 N*s 40 N*s spacecraft in a Impulse fully passive - 10,5 m/s 10,0 m/s Delta V (for Low cost mode 3U CubeSat) compared to 40x10 -6 N*s Operation Continuous micro Continuous thrust conventional features thrust impulses with 1Hz frequency propulsion ≈ 90 k$ 3 k$ 15 k$ Cost systems And more over: • Absence of consumable materials (fuel); • Simple design and therefore higher reliability; • Using primary Russian electronic components; • Long-term benefits (Solar Sail technology). 14

  15. Econ Economic omic be bene nefit fit Satellite form CubeSat 3U BMSTU ClydeSpace Microspace factor Solar Sail Unit Pulsed Plasma micropropulsion Satellite mass 4 kg Cost Thruster system Power 10 W part Number of 4 satellites in constellation Orbit Sun synchronous orbit 500km Device cost 3 k$ 15 k$ 90 k$ Satellites position In orbit plane with phasing in orbit angles: 0 ° , 90 ° , 180 ° , 270 ° Time of orbit Operating life 5 years 0,18 year 0,055 year ≈ 0 year Launch type Piggy back launch with main phasing payload - Earth observation satellite Cost of satellite operation time 11,8 k$ 1) 3,6 k$ 0 k$ C TIME = (C SAT + C launch ) / T LIFE losses C SAT = 200k$ – satellite Total Cost: 14,8 k$ 18,6 k$ 90 k$ development and production cost (BMSTU expert estimation) Mission 75,2 k$ 1) 71,4 k$ 0 k$ C launch = 130k$ - satellite launch benefit cost (DNEPR rocket launch provider) 1) Conservative estimation. Really CubeSats payloads will be out of operation for only 1-2 weeks (only when Solar Sail is deployed). T LIFE – satellite operation time 15 Operation time looses will decrease significantly

  16. Con Conclusion lusions • The work proved the feasibility and technological competitive of forming a satellite constellation with solar sail • The algorithm and mathematical model for ballistic simulation are developed • The Solar Sail unit for CubeSats was developed, that can: • Form a constellation • Reduce the waste satellites • Our Solar Sail Unit withstand static and dynamic loads during a launch on typical launch vehicle • Economics estimates have shown that our solution for CubeSat orbit constellation forming can be competitive 16

  17. Per erspe spectiv ctive Real time Space weather Mobile Earth communication monitoring observation Solar Sail Unit • We made a mock- up and it’s testing is planned soon • The next step for this technology is flight proving and demonstration • We will be ready to flight in one year and started to find opportunity for a launch 17

  18. Gr Gratitud titude Thanks to: organization committee, BMSTU, labor union of students, BMSTU YSC “Youth Space Center” , SM-2 “Aerospace Systems” department, SM-12 “Technology of Manufacturing for Aerospace” department and A.N. Korolev. And thanks everybody, who is here today, for your attention! 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend