Na Natio ional E l Eco colo logica ical l Obse serva - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Na Natio ional E l Eco colo logica ical l Obse serva rvatory ry Ne Network rk

• Introductions – Rissler
• NEON Science Overview – Loescher
• Infrastructure review -

Thompson

• Operations/Decommission – Bolyard
• Open Discussion

Monday, August 13, 2012 2

AGENDA

• NEON Introductions

– Erik Rissler: Permitting and Safety Coordinator – Jody Bolyard: Director, Permitting and Central Operations – Hank Loescher: Assistant Director, Biometeorology – David Tazik: Director, Science – Chris Thompson: Facilities and Civil Construction

Monday, August 13, 2012 3

Monday, August 13, 2012 4

Desi sign C gn Consi

• nside

derations

• ns
• Minimize footprint
• Reduce impact to science
• Ensure environmental protection
• Infrastructure required

– Power – Communications – Access

Monday, August 13, 2012 5

SCIENCE O OVERVIEW

• Dr. Hank Loescher

(a ¡brief) ¡Introduction to NEON ¡

Hank ¡Loescher ¡ Assistant ¡Director ¡-­‑ ¡NEON ¡ Ins2tute ¡for ¡Alpine ¡and ¡Arc2c ¡Research, ¡ ¡ University ¡of ¡Colorado ¡ ¡

1 August 11,2012 Healy ¡Community, ¡Healy, ¡Alaska ¡

2

• Design ¡history ¡
• How ¡did ¡we ¡get ¡here?, ¡Requirements ¡framework ¡
• Scien2fic ¡Crea2vely ¡verses ¡Baseline ¡Infrastructure ¡
• Scien2fic ¡scope ¡and ¡design ¡
• Sub-­‑system ¡designs, ¡FSU, ¡FIU, ¡AOP, ¡AQU, ¡LUAP ¡

TALK OUTLINE

NEON DESIGN

3

J.A. Klein

• 1. Biodiversity
• 2. Biogeochemical cycles
• 3. Climate change
• 4. Ecohydrology
• 5. Infectious disease
• 6. Invasive species
• 7. Land use

NRC (National Research Council). 2001. Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. Washington DC: National Academies Press. NRC (National Research Council). 2003. NEON: Addressing the Nation's Environmental Challenges. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

Grand ¡Challenges ¡in ¡ Environmental ¡Sciences ¡

NEON’s Scientific Approach

4

The ¡goal ¡of ¡NEON ¡is ¡to ¡enable ¡understanding ¡and ¡forecas0ng ¡of ¡ the ¡impacts ¡of ¡climate ¡change, ¡land ¡use ¡change ¡and ¡invasive ¡ species ¡on ¡con0nental-­‑scale ¡ecology ¡by ¡providing ¡infrastructure ¡to ¡ support ¡research, ¡educa2on ¡and ¡environmental ¡management ¡in ¡ these ¡areas. ¡

!"#$%&'(!)%*+',(Understanding and predicting climate variability, including directional climate change and its impacts on natural and human systems

• %*.(/0',(Understanding and predicting

changes in land use and land cover that are critical to biogeochemical cycling, ecosystem functioning and services, and human welfare. 1*2%0#2'(34'5#'0,(Understanding and forecasting the distribution of biological invasions and their impacts on ecological processes and ecosystem services. 6#7+'75)'$#0&89,(Understanding and predicting the impacts of human activities on the E arth’s major biogeochemical cycles. 6#7.#2'80#&9,(Understanding the regulation

• f biological diversity and its functional

consequences for ecosystems. :57)9.87"7+9,(Understanding and predicting changes in freshwater resources and the environment. 1*;'5&#7<0(=#0'%0'0,(Understanding and predicting the ecological and evolutionary aspects of infectious diseases and of the interactions among pathogens, hosts/receptors, and ecosystems.

Interactions and Feedbacks

!>/3:3(?@(!A>BC: D:3E?B3:3(F?(!A>BC:

NEON GOALS

• Information infrastructure: Consistent, continental, long-

term, multi-scaled data-sets and data products that serve as a context for research and education.

• Physical Infrastructure: A research platform for investigator-

initiated sensors, observations, and experiments providing physical infrastructure, cyberinfrastructure, human resources, and expertise, and program management and coordination.

5

The overarching goal of NEON is to enable understanding and forecasting of climate change, land use change, and invasive species on continental-scale ecology by providing infrastructure to support research in these areas.

A National Observatory: 20 Eco-climatic Domains

6

Mapping the Questions to Specific Sites

7 !"#$%&'(&#)*+,-().- /0#)-(*1232").)3( 4#523*6%0-,-().- 7'$.2()*7823")*0#*!(.0-98)#$%*:#23-90#( ;3<2-$03*=$0'0", !>&2($%

How will NEON observe?

8

NEON Deployment

• Headquarters (incl. CI, labs, etc.) - Boulder
• 20 Domains (labs and other facilities)
• 20 Core sites

(wildland)

• 40 Relocatable sites (land-use sites)
• 10 Mobile laboratories (AK, HI, CONUS+PR)
• Human-based observations
• 3 Airborne Observation Platforms
• Land Use Analysis Package
• STREON Experiment

9

(green = taskable)

NEON Science Facilities (subsystems) (alphabet soup)

10

FSU Fundamental ¡Sen2nel ¡Unit Human ¡Obs. ¡Bioarchive FIU Fundamental ¡Instrument ¡ Unit Automated ¡ Instrumenta2on AOP Airborne ¡Observa2on ¡ Package AircraR ¡Remote ¡Sensing ¡ AQU ¡ Aqua2c/STREON ¡ Human ¡Obs/automated ¡ instrumenta2on ¡ LUAP Land ¡Use ¡Analysis ¡Package Satellite ¡Remote ¡Sensing ¡+ ¡

11

Fundamental Sentinel Unit

• Biodiversity
• Population Dynamics
• Productivity
• Phenology
• Infectious Disease
• Biogeochemistry
• Microbial Function and Diversity
• Ecohydrology

12

Sentinel Organisms (FSU)

12

Microbes Mosquitoes Beetles Small Mammals Birds Fish Aquatic Invertebrates Plants Genera2on ¡Time ¡

Fundamental Instrument Unit

FIU ¡working ¡group, ¡NEON ¡HQ ¡ 13

Fundamental Instrument Unit

• Physical and chemical climate

forcing (incl wet dep, AOD)

• Micrometeorological scalars

and fluxes

• CO2, δC13, H2O, δO18, DH,

CH4, O3, NOy

• Soil Array
• Over 2000 measurements per

core site at frequencies of

• Daily, and ~0.1 to 20 Hz
• Generating > 800 Tb y-1 or

raw data, and more at higher level data products

14

Mobile Deployment Platform

• Mobile

(formally Continental Toolbox and the Rapid Deployment System)

• Cam paign based m easurem ents
• < 1 year
• Observational
• Cal/ Val support

Mobile Platform s, ( 1 0 ) perm anent for the life of NEON, ~ 0 .5 per Dom ain

• (1) Truck, (1) mobile, trailer-able Tower, (1) mobile, trailer-able Lab,
• Core suite of instrumentation (Basic micromet, EC package)
• Independent power and internet communications (housekeeping data minimum)

Applied Modules, ( various # ’s) to be deployed according to observatory needs, m ix and m atch

• Micrometeorology
• Atmospheric Chemistry
• Ecohydrology
• Organismal Ecology
• Education and Outreach
• NEON training

15

16

Mapping Ecosystems from the Air

17

Airborne Remote Sensing (AOP)

• Spectroscopy

– Vegetation biochemical & biophysical properties – Cover type & fraction

• LiDAR altimetry

– Vegetation Structure – Sub-canopy topography – biomass

• High resolution imagery

– Land use & land cover

18

AOP Imaging Spectrometer

19

Airborne Remote Sensing (AOP)

Spatial Scaling Strategy

LUAP AOP FIU Ecological Forecast models FSU+ AQS Mobile Labs

20

Supporting Facilities

21

• Chemical analysis resources
• Isotopic analysis resources
• Genetic analysis resources
• Disease facility
• BioArchive collections
• HQ - Boulder
• Civil Construction (FCC)
• Permitting (EHS)
• CyberInfrastructure (CI)
• Engineering labs (ENG)
• Calibration/Validation Laboratory (CAL/VAL)
• Advanced Technology labs

NE ON Data T r ac k to F

• ur

Major De sign E le me nts

• Measurement Traceability
• Data Product Algorithms

22

• Scientific Requirements
• Procedures and Protocols

NEON Near Death Experience

23

• Late 90’s – concept of standardized ecological observatory
• 2000-2005 – community workshops, establish boundary
• conditions. Shopping list/Christmas tree approach (diag).
• (~2005) NSF began to push in key directions. Replaced mgt.
• 2006 … Integrated Science and Education Plan (ISEP).
• 2007 … PDR1: NEON needs further D&D, Mgt.
• 2008 … new D&D phase: flowdown & deliverables, site

design contract underway, project office ramp-up (6-50 staff).

• 2009 … PDR/FDR, (+65 staff), successfully completed FDR
• 2010… Prototyping and business operations (+135 staff)
• 2011 late… Began construction (+190 staff)

Research / Research Activities MREFC - Construction Operations

2006 2011 2017 2012

Why/How did we design Alaska sites?

24

Request for information (public announcement)

• Oct 2006
• 2008-2010 meetings took pace in

Fairbanks and Anchorage

• NSF run EA NEPA
• Rigorous review cycle
• NEON had limited resources for

community engagement

Why/How did we design Alaska sites?

25

Key Ecological Theme is Ecohydrology

• Sites focus on permafrost dynamics and the impact of

permafrost thawing on ecosystem processes and their feed back mechanisms, sites spanning; Permafrost – Discontinuous Permafrost - Permafrost free Temperature - Precipitation – Fire

• Spatially distributed sites will capture important trends in

permafrost thaw expected over the next several decades

• All these sites represent ecosystems that extend to large

regional landscapes far into the interior of the Alaska and the continent

Why/How did we design Alaska sites?

26

Why/How did we design Alaska sites?

27

Why/How did we design Alaska sites?

28

Why/How did we design Alaska sites?

29

Why/How did we design Alaska sites?

30

Fundamental Instrument Unit

FIU ¡working ¡group, ¡NEON ¡HQ ¡ 31

32

Site design-plume dispersion

33

Site design - Healy

34

Airshed: ¡335° ¡ Airshed: ¡190° ¡ Soil ¡ array ¡

Site design - Healy

Why/How did we design Alaska sites?

35

Science issues

• Avoidance or the road and dust

it generates

• Adequate fetch
• Optimizing the spatial coverage

(tower/soils)

• ‘flat area’ and no edge effects

Operating issues

• Optimizing construction limits
• Proximity to power, access,

communications

• Permitting

Benefits

36

• A crucial site for enabling Alaskans and

scientists to study and forecast local ecosystem changes

• Critical to informing Alaskans how to mitigate

for future change.

• Anchors our understanding
• Provides important data to scale to region-

to-high arctic comparisons

• Local climate information

hloescher@neoninc.org jtalyor@neoninc.org eayres@neoninc.org hluo@neoninc.org msanclements@neoninc.org smetzger@neoninc.org jroberti@neoninc.org mgebremedhin@sea2.org ndurden@neoninc.org desai@aos.wisc.edu

37

The National Ecological Observatory Network is a project sponsored by the National Science Foundation and managed under cooperative agreement by NEON Inc.

www.neoninc.org

Hank Loescher Jeff Taylor Ed Ayres Hongyan Luo Michael San Clements Stefan Metzger Josh Roberti Maheteme Gebremedhin Natchaya Durden Ankur Desai Assistant Director Atmospheric Physicist Soil Ecologist Micrometeorologist Biogeochemist Spatial Scaling Applied Meteorologist Ecosystem Ecologist Micrometeorologist FIU WG Chair

THANK YOU !!

FACIL ILIT ITIE IES A AND CIV IVIL IL CONSTR TRUCTIO TION

Christian Thompson, P .E.

• Survey and Geotechnical

Analysis

• Pre-Vegetation Survey
• Design Documents
• Construction

Faci cilities s and C nd Civi vil Const

• nstruct

uction (

• n (FCC)

Desi sign D gn Docu

• cument

nts

Desi sign D gn Docu

• cument

nts

Domai ain 1 19 9 - Heal ealy

• Tower
• Instrument Hut
• Electrical/Communications
• Boardwalk
• Soil Arrays

Infrast astruct cture

About the Tower

• 26’ Self Support
• 6 ½’ x 6 ½’ Footprint
• Internal Ships Ladder
• Security Gate

T

• we r

About the IH

• 8’ x 20’ x 9’ (w, l, h)
• Climate Controlled
• Keypad Lock

Instrume nt Hut

About the AP

• Transformer
• Manual Transfer

Switch

• Meter
• Communications

Pedestal

Auxilia ry Porta l

About the Elec/Comms

• Conduits On-Ground
• Fiberglass Unistrut

Support

E le c tric a l/ Communic a tion

About the Boardwalk

• “Tundra Mat”
• On-Ground
• 40” wide

Boa rdwa lk

About the Soil Arrays

• 5 Individual Plots
• Device Posts at each

Plot

Soil Arra ys

• Approximately 6 months
• Licensed Contractor
• NEON On-Site Supervisor
• Staging/Parking Area
• Strict Construction Limits
• 2 to 4 vehicles
• 6 to 10 people
• Construction Equipment
• Delivery Trucks

– IH – Tower – Materials

• Port-a-Jon

Const

• nstruct

uction

• n – Wha

What t to E

• Expe

xpect ct

TRANSI SITION TO OPERATIONS

Jody Bolyard

• Identify DNR design requirements – This week
• Obtain Community input – This week
• Complete geotech characterization – 2-3 weeks
• Process authorization with DNR – 1 month
• Formal community comment – 2 months
• Final design available – 3 months
• Materials Arrive – 5-6 months
• Contractor Mobilize – 5-6 months (Feb/Mar 2013)

Plan t n to

• Const
• nstruct

uction

• n

• Construction duration – 6 months
• Engineering Outfit Site

– Team of 4 people for 2 months

• System Validation

– Team of 4 people for 2 months

• Acceptance into Operations
• Domain Operations 2015
• Operates for 7-10 years

Transi nsition t

• n to
• Ope

perations

• ns

• Support facilities in Fairbanks

– Lab – Sample storage – Office

• Staffing

– 1 Manager Field Operations – 5-8 Technicians – Seasonal hires for sampling support

• Scope of Work

– Sensor Maintenance – Site Maintenance – Sample Collection

• Staff size

– 2 persons, 2-3 days every other week instrument maintenance – Organismal sampling 30-50 plots in summer season – Samples include some soil plant and animal materials – Airborne activities once per year during peak greenness – Maximum 20 people for seasonal sampling campaign

Wha What t to

• expe

xpect ct i in n Ope perations

• ns

• Remove all sensors
• Tower removed and reused
• Instrument Hut removed and reused
• Boardwalk removed
• Power removed to portal, remove wiring where

buried

• Local restoration and replanting where needed

Deco ecommissi ssion t the e Site