Mutual information deep regularization for semi- supervised segmentation
- J. Peng, M. Pedersoli, C. Desrosiers
MIDL 2020 presentation
Mutual information deep regularization for semi- supervised - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
MIDL 2020 presentation Mutual information deep regularization for semi- supervised segmentation J. Peng, M. Pedersoli, C. Desrosiers Outline We proposed a semi-supervised segmentation method for medical image regularized by Mutual Information
MIDL 2020 presentation
Modalities: MRI CT Ultrasound Cardiac Segmentation
Labeling is hard for 3D volumns Three different views of a patient from [1]
ref: [1]: Zhuang, Xiahai, et al. "Evaluation of algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An open-access grand challenge." Medical image analysis 58 (2019): 101537.
Labeled images Supervised loss: ➢ Dice loss [1] ➢ Cross entropy loss [2] ➢ Uncertainty based loss [3] Regularization loss: ➢ Consistency based reg. [4-7] ➢ Prior-enabled based reg.[8] ➢ Entropy based reg.[9] ➢ Mutual information based reg. Unlabeled images
Ref: [1]: Sudre, Carole H., et al. [2]:Zhang, Zhilu, and Mert Sabuncu, 2018. [3]: Kendall, Alex, et al.,CVPR 2018. [4]: Perone, et al., 2018. [5]: Li, Xiaomeng, et al.,
measures the amount of information that two variables X, Y share:. if X, Y are independent, then p(X,Y) = p(X)p(Y), I (X;Y) = 0
MI = 0 MI Maximized MI Maximized
measures the amount of information that two variables X, Y share:. p(X)
How about having X and Y as a segmentation distribution? Case1: We explore the consistency with MI
p(Y) Maximazing I(X;Y)
Afffine transfrom Same transfrom
measures the amount of information that two variables X, Y share:. p(X)
How about having X and Y as a segmentation distribution? Case2: We explore the structural information of nearby patches by maximazing the MI. MI does not require a strict assignment mapping.
p(Y)
shift n pixels
unlabeled image Maximazing I(X;Y)
We compute the joint distribution by using product of the two marginal distribution (conditionally independent given the same input image) We compute the MI from the joint probability matrix.
2D convolution
ref: [1]: Perone, Christian S., and Julien Cohen-Adad. "Deep semi-supervised segmentation with weight-averaged consistency targets." Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Springer, Cham, 2018. 12-19. [2]: Vu, Tuan-Hung, et al. "Advent: Adversarial entropy minimization for domain adaptation in semantic segmentation." Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019.
We examine the proposed idea in a semi supervised learning setting on three benchmark datasets: ACDC, prostate and spleen. ACDC: 4% data as labeled, 83.5% as unlabeled, 12.5% as validation Prostate: 14% data as labeled, 66% as unlabeled, 20% as validation Spleen: 10% as labeled data, 78% as unlabeled, 12% as validation. We compared our method against mean teacher [1] and entropy minimization [2]
ref: [1]: Zhuang, Xiahai, et al. "Evaluation of algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An open-access grand challenge." Medical image analysis 58 (2019): 101537.
as a deep regularization
are usually under regular shape.
that the proposed method achieved significant improvement compared with baseline method and comparable performance compared with SOTA methods.