mutual information deep regularization for semi
play

Mutual information deep regularization for semi- supervised - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MIDL 2020 presentation Mutual information deep regularization for semi- supervised segmentation J. Peng, M. Pedersoli, C. Desrosiers Outline We proposed a semi-supervised segmentation method for medical image regularized by Mutual Information


  1. MIDL 2020 presentation Mutual information deep regularization for semi- supervised segmentation J. Peng, M. Pedersoli, C. Desrosiers

  2. Outline We proposed a semi-supervised segmentation method for medical image regularized by Mutual Information ● Introduction on Semi-Supervised Segmentation ● Explanation on Mutual information concept for segmentation ● Our proposed scheme ● Experimental setup and results ● Conclusion

  3. Medical Image segmentation ● Important stage for quantification (volume), visualization, intra-operative navigation, radiotherapy and clinical-oriented analysis ● Widely employed with CT MRI, and X-ray and Ultrasound for organs such as brain, lung, spleen, prostate organs. Modalities: MRI CT Ultrasound Cardiac Segmentation

  4. Limited access to annotations Well know constraint for MIDL: ● require experts with long experience ● require annotation slice by slice ● cost hours for a single patient ● privacy requirement Labeling is hard for 3D volumns Three different views of a patient from [1] ref: [1]: Zhuang, Xiahai, et al. "Evaluation of algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An open-access grand challenge." Medical image analysis 58 (2019): 101537.

  5. Semi-supervised learning framework Supervised loss: ➢ Dice loss [1] ➢ Cross entropy loss [2] ➢ Uncertainty based loss [3] Regularization loss: Labeled images Unlabeled images ➢ Consistency based reg. [4-7] ➢ Prior-enabled based reg.[8] ➢ Entropy based reg.[9] ➢ Mutual information based reg. Ref: [1]: Sudre, Carole H., et al. [2]:Zhang, Zhilu, and Mert Sabuncu, 2018. [3]: Kendall, Alex, et al.,CVPR 2018. [4]: Perone, et al., 2018. [5]: Li, Xiaomeng, et al., 2018. [6]: Wang, Fan, et al.,.ICCV 2013, [7]: Cui, Wenhui, et al. 2019. [8]: Zheng, Han, et al. MICCAI 2019. [9]: Vu, Tuan-Hung, et al. CVPR 2019.

  6. Mutual information measures the amount of information that two variables X , Y share:. if X , Y are independent, then p ( X , Y ) = p ( X ) p ( Y ), I ( X ; Y ) = 0 MI Maximized MI Maximized MI = 0

  7. Mutual information for different transformation measures the amount of information that two variables X , Y share:. How about having X and Y as a segmentation distribution? Case1: p(X) Same transfrom We explore the Afffine transfrom consistency with MI p(Y) Maximazing I ( X ; Y )

  8. Mutual information on nearby patches measures the amount of information that two variables X , Y share:. How about having X and Y as a segmentation distribution? Case2: shift n pixels We explore the structural information of nearby patches by maximazing the MI. MI does not require a strict assignment mapping. unlabeled image p(X) p(Y) Maximazing I ( X ; Y )

  9. How to compute I(X; Y) for 2D? We compute the joint distribution by using product of the two marginal distribution (conditionally independent given the same input image) 2D convolution We compute the MI from the joint probability matrix.

  10. The proposed scheme We examine the proposed idea in a semi supervised learning setting on three benchmark datasets: ACDC, prostate and spleen. ACDC: 4% data as labeled, 83.5% as unlabeled, 12.5% as validation Prostate: 14% data as labeled, 66% as unlabeled, 20% as validation Spleen: 10% as labeled data, 78% as unlabeled, 12% as validation. We compared our method against mean teacher [1] and entropy minimization [2] ref: [1]: Perone, Christian S., and Julien Cohen-Adad. "Deep semi-supervised segmentation with weight-averaged consistency targets." Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Springer, Cham, 2018. 12-19. [2]: Vu, Tuan-Hung, et al. "Advent: Adversarial entropy minimization for domain adaptation in semantic segmentation." Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019.

  11. Experimental results

  12. Experimental results ref: [1]: Zhuang, Xiahai, et al. "Evaluation of algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An open-access grand challenge." Medical image analysis 58 (2019): 101537.

  13. Conclusion ● We proposed a semi-supervised learning algorithm employing mutual information as a deep regularization ● Mutual information can capture structural/schematic information of organs which are usually under regular shape. ● We examined the proposed idea on three benchmark dataset and have proven that the proposed method achieved significant improvement compared with baseline method and comparable performance compared with SOTA methods.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend