muon cooling with space charge
play

Muon cooling with space-charge 6D Vacuum meeting September 10, 2013 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Muon cooling with space-charge 6D Vacuum meeting September 10, 2013 David Grote LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract


  1. Muon cooling with space-charge 6D Vacuum meeting September 10, 2013 David Grote LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC

  2. Outline  Overview of Warp  Comparison to ICOOL  Simulations with space-charge  Conclusions Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  3. Warp is a framework for particle accelerator modeling HIF/HEDP accelerators Multi-charge state beams Laser plasma acceleration LEBT – Project X Particle traps Electron cloud studies 2-D slab of electrons p+ bunches s Courtesy H. Sugimoto Alpha anti-H trap Paul trap e- clouds SPS - CERN Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 3-D beam 3 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  4. Warp: a parallel framework combining features of plasma (Particle-In-Cell) and accelerator codes  Geometry: 3D (x,y,z), 2-1/2D (x,y), (x,z) or axisym. (r,z)  Python and Fortran: “ steerable, ” input decks are programs  Field solvers: Electrostatic - FFT, multigrid; implicit; AMR R (m) Electromagnetic - Yee, Cole-Kark.; PML; AMR  Boundaries: “ cut-cell ” --- no restriction to “ Legos ”  Applied fields: magnets, electrodes, acceleration, user-set Z (m)  Bends: “ warped ” coordinates; no “ reference orbit ” Warp 3D EM/PIC on Hopper  Particle movers: Energy- or momentum-conserving; Boris, large time step “ drift-Lorentz ” , novel relativistic Leapfrog  Surface/volume physics: secondary e - & photo-e - emission, gas emission/tracking/ionization , time-dependent space-charge-limited emission  Parallel: MPI (1, 2 and 3D domain decomposition) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 4 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  5. Warp has proven useful to multiple applications  HIFS-VNL (LBNL,LLNL,PPPL): ion beams and plasmas  VENUS ion source (LBNL): beam transport  LOASIS (LBNL): LWFA in a boosted frame  FEL/CSR (LBNL): free e - lasers, coherent synch. radiation  Anti H- trap (LBNL/U. Berkeley): model of anti H - trap  U. Maryland: UMER sources and beam transport; teaching  Ferroelectric plasma source (Technion, U. MD) : source  Fast ignition (LLNL): physics of filamentation  E-cloud for HEP (LHC, SPS, ILC, Cesr-TA, FNAL-MI): Warp-POSINST  Laser Isotope Separation (LLNL): now defunct  PLIA (CU Hong Kong) : pulsed line ion accelerator  Laser driven ion source (TU Darmstadt) : source  Magnetic Fusion (LLNL) : oblique sheath at tokamak divertor Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 5 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  6. Warp reads and parses the ICOOL for001.dat input file  This avoids human errors in the translation.  Warp directly reads in the same forXXX.dat data files and ecalc9f.inp.  Warp handles all fields and manipulations, except the muon-material interaction.  For the interaction, Warp calls delta_ray and dedx from ICOOL.  All ICOOL input not supported, but only that needed for the current simulations. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 6 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  7. The cooling lattice in Warp  All pieces supported • RF cavities — Time dependent fields — Be windows, as absorbers and field boundary conditions • Cooling block — Wedge shaped — With windows • Solenoids • Beam, via macroparticles • Warp uses time as the independent variable — It relies on “residence corrections” for 2 nd order integration across boundaries. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  8. Simulations using RecFOFO lattice  Lattice from Diktys, dated July 16, 2013  16 stages • 8 at 325 MHz • 8 at 650 MHz  LH wedge absorbers  Tilted solenoids Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 8 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  9. Comparison to ICOOL – no space-charge  Expect small differences • Different integrations – z versus t • Different diagnostics – Warp interpolates particles to diagnostic planes No decay e long ICOOL decay ICOOL no decay Warp decay N 0 e perp Decay Warp no decay Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 9 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  10. Simulations with space charge  Using electrostatics  Simulations start with 1.25x10 13 muons Volts Volts Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 10 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  11. Muon cooling with space-charge  Little effect on emittance  Increase in loss – out the bunch ends. e long ICOOL (no space-charge) N 0 Warp (space- e perp charge) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 11 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  12. More diagnostics with space charge ICOOL (no space-charge) Warp (space-charge) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 12 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  13. Effect of increased RF gradient – an easy knob to turn  Previous simulations showed (RZ) reduced particle loss.  Here, however, little effect is seen on N 0 . ICOOL Warp: e long +0 kV +1.5 kV N 0 +3.0 kV e perp +6.0 kV +7.5 kV +20. kV Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 13 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

  14. Conclusions  Warp is setup to simulate muon cooling.  Good agreement found with ICOOL (without space-charge).  For the RecFOFO design, the effect of space- charge is small – but increasing particle loss.  Hopefully, Warp can continue to be useful for the MAP project – unfortunately it looks like there may be no funds available in FY14. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 14 LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend