Multimodal Implementation Plan Multimodal Implementation Plan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

multimodal implementation plan multimodal implementation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Multimodal Implementation Plan Multimodal Implementation Plan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bowling Green-Warren County MPOs Multimodal Implementation Plan Multimodal Implementation Plan OUTLINE Overview Planning Process Overview Non-Motorized Latent Demand Level of T raffjc Stress Pairwise


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Bowling Green-Warren County MPO’s

Multimodal Implementation Plan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • OUTLINE

 Overview  Planning Process Overview

  • Non-Motorized Latent

Demand

  • Level of T

raffjc Stress

  • Pairwise Comparison
  • Facility T

erminology  Lessons Learned & Implementation Successes

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Bowling Green-Warren County MPO

Bowling Green Woodbur Plum Springs Oakland Smit hs Grov e W a r r e n C

  • u

n t y TN KY IN IL O H M O

Bowling Green

Nashville Lexington Cincinnati Louisville Evansv ille

slide-4
SLIDE 4

201 4 201 5 201 6 201 7 Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • Consolidate. Identify. Refjne.

Prioritize.

9 Planning Efgorts

Relating to Multimodal Transportation in 4 Years

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • EMPHASIS ON

CONNECTING:

 T

  • Transit

 Existing Bike-Ped Facilities  Parks & Schools

FOCU S

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • NON-MOTORIZED LATENT

DEMAND

 Predicts latent (unrealized) demand for non-motorized infrastructure based on probability to walk/bike  Uses parcel-level population, employment, land use, & proximity data  Aggregated to 1/10 mile grid

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • NON-MOTORIZED LATENT

DEMAND

0.75 mi = 0.32 trip 0.2 mi = 0.71 trip 1.6 mi = 0.17 trip

Total trips to school generated= 0.32 + 0.71 + 0.17 = 1.2 trips

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • NON-MOTORIZED LATENT

DEMAND

Transit Stop Greenway Sidewalk

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS

(L TS)

 Bicycle network planning methodology-2012  Basic scoring to:

  • understand stress levels of

existing & proposed facilities

  • identify clusters of low-stress

connectivity

  • identify improvements to
  • vercome stressful barriers
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS

(L TS) Bicycl e Desig n User Profjl es:

Interested but Concerned Somewhat Confjdent Highly Confjd ent

51%- 56% 5%-9% 4%-7%

Low Stress Tolerance High Stress Tolerance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS

(L TS)

Neighborhoo d Street Neighborhoo d Boulevard

Low Stress High Stress

Major Collector Arterial

L TS 1 L TS 2 L TS 3 L TS 4

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS

(L TS)

2-3 LANES 4-5 LANES 6+ LANES < 25 mph 30 mph 35+ mph Speed Limit Street Width

1 2 3 4

*Functiona l Class

*

SEGMENT

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS

(L TS)

< 3 LANES 4-5 LANES 6+ LANES < 25 mph 30 mph 35 mph 40+ mph Speed Limit (Crossing ) Street Width (Crossin g)

1 2 3 4 CROSSIN G

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS

(L TS) L TS 1’s & 2’s

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER

ENGAGEMENT

  • MPO T

echnical Advisory Committee (TAC)

  • Steering Committee
  • Public

Survey Focus Groups Public Meeting Wikimap

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Multimodal Implementation Plan

 One-on-One Comparisons

  • Overall Strategy
  • Destinations
  • Facilities
  • Factors that Impact

Walking/Biking

  • PAIRWISE COMPARISON

OVERALL STRATEGY

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • PAIRWISE COMPARISON -

RESUL TS

 OVERALL STRATEGY

Address Gaps

 DESTINATIONS

Connect Schools

 FACILITIES

Neighborhood Streets

 FACTORS

Lack of Bufger

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • FACILITY TERMINOLOGY
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • FACILITY TERMINOLOGY

GREENWAY URBAN GREENWAY GREEN STREET BIKEWAY FACILITIES Conventional Bike Lane Open Space Roadway ROW Shared Roadway

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • LESSONS LEARNED

 Competing interests

 Similar mission, difgerent strategies

 Collaboration & Communication  Perceived safety vs. access (neighborhood to store)  Need for maintenance plan  Safety & Education Gap

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Multimodal Implementation Plan

  • IMPLEMENTATION

SUCCESSES

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Multimodal Implementation Plan

 Direction for future bicycle and pedestrian projects  Formation of BikeWalkBG

 Promotes biking and walking  Safety Initiative

 City’s Sidewalk Prioritization Process Revamped

 Use of Latent Demand Generation

 Momentum for bicycle and pedestrian focus

 Road projects & priorities

 Community Involvement

  • IMPLEMENTATION

SUCCESSES

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Bowling Green-Warren County MPO’s

Multimodal Implementation Plan

Karissa Lemon

Bowling Green & Warren County MPO Karissa.Lemon@bgky.org

Preston Elliott, AICP

KCI T echnologies Preston.Elliott@kci.com

Liesel Goether , AICP

KCI T echnologies Liesel.Goethert@kci.com