multimodal implementation plan multimodal implementation
play

Multimodal Implementation Plan Multimodal Implementation Plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bowling Green-Warren County MPOs Multimodal Implementation Plan Multimodal Implementation Plan OUTLINE Overview Planning Process Overview Non-Motorized Latent Demand Level of T raffjc Stress Pairwise


  1. Bowling Green-Warren County MPO’s Multimodal Implementation Plan

  2. Multimodal Implementation Plan • OUTLINE  Overview  Planning Process Overview • Non-Motorized Latent Demand • Level of T raffjc Stress • Pairwise Comparison • Facility T erminology  Lessons Learned & Implementation Successes

  3. Bowling Green-Warren County MPO Plum Bowling Springs Oakland Green IL IN O Smit Cincinnati H hs Louisville Grov Evansv e Lexington ille KY M Bowling Green n e r O y r a t Nashville n W TN u o C Woodbur

  4. Multimodal Implementation Plan 201 4 9 Planning Efgorts Relating to 201 Multimodal 5 Transportation in 4 201 Years 6 Consolidate. Identify. Refjne. Prioritize. 201 7

  5. Multimodal Implementation Plan • EMPHASIS ON CONNECTING:  T o Transit  Existing Bike-Ped Facilities  Parks & Schools FOCU S

  6. Multimodal Implementation Plan • NON-MOTORIZED LATENT DEMAND  Predicts latent (unrealized) demand for non-motorized infrastructure based on probability to walk/bike  Uses parcel-level population, employment, land use, & proximity data  Aggregated to 1/10 mile grid

  7. Multimodal Implementation Plan • NON-MOTORIZED LATENT DEMAND Total trips to school 0.75 mi = 0.32 generated= trip 0.32 + 0.71 + 0.17 = 1.2 trips 1.6 mi = 0.17 0.2 mi = 0.71 trip trip

  8. Multimodal Implementation Plan • NON-MOTORIZED LATENT DEMAND Transit Stop Greenway Sidewalk

  9. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (L TS)  Bicycle network planning methodology-2012  Basic scoring to: • understand stress levels of existing & proposed facilities • identify clusters of low-stress connectivity • identify improvements to overcome stressful barriers

  10. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (L TS) Highly Interested Somewhat but Confjdent Confjd ent Concerned Bicycl 51%- 5%-9% 4%-7% e 56% Desig n User Profjl High Stress Low Stress es: Tolerance Tolerance

  11. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (L TS) Low High Stress Stress Neighborhoo Major Neighborhoo d Boulevard Collector Arterial d Street L TS 1 L TS 3 L TS 4 L TS 2

  12. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (L TS) 1 SEGMENT 2-3 4-5 6+ 2 Street *Functiona LANES LANES LANES l Class Width 3 < 25 * mph 4 30 mph 35+ Speed mph Limit

  13. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (L TS) CROSSIN 1 Street < 3 4-5 6+ G Width 2 LANES LANES LANES (Crossin < 25 3 g) mph 4 30 mph Speed 35 mph Limit 40+ (Crossing mph )

  14. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS L TS 1’s & (L TS) 2’s

  15. Multimodal Implementation Plan • PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT • MPO T echnical Advisory Committee (TAC) • Steering Committee • Public  Survey  Focus Groups  Public Meeting  Wikimap

  16. Multimodal Implementation Plan • PAIRWISE COMPARISON  One-on-One Comparisons • Overall Strategy • Destinations • Facilities • Factors that Impact Walking/Biking OVERALL STRATEGY

  17. Multimodal Implementation Plan • PAIRWISE COMPARISON - RESUL TS  OVERALL STRATEGY  FACILITIES Address Neighborhood Gaps Streets  DESTINATIONS  FACTORS Connect Lack of Schools Bufger

  18. Multimodal Implementation Plan • FACILITY TERMINOLOGY

  19. Multimodal Implementation Plan • FACILITY TERMINOLOGY URBAN BIKEWAY GREENWAY GREEN GREENWAY FACILITIES STREET Roadway Shared Conventional Open ROW Roadway Space Bike Lane

  20. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LESSONS LEARNED  Competing interests  Similar mission, difgerent strategies  Collaboration & Communication  Perceived safety vs. access (neighborhood to store)  Need for maintenance plan  Safety & Education Gap

  21. Multimodal Implementation Plan • IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESSES

  22. Multimodal Implementation Plan • IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESSES  Direction for future bicycle and pedestrian projects  Formation of BikeWalkBG  Promotes biking and walking  Safety Initiative  City’s Sidewalk Prioritization Process Revamped  Use of Latent Demand Generation  Momentum for bicycle and pedestrian focus  Road projects & priorities  Community Involvement

  23. Bowling Green-Warren County MPO’s Multimodal Karissa Lemon Implementation Bowling Green & Warren County MPO Karissa.Lemon@bgky.org Plan Preston Elliott, AICP KCI T echnologies Preston.Elliott@kci.com Liesel Goether , AICP KCI T echnologies Liesel.Goethert@kci.com

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend