multilingual and low resource asr
play

Multilingual and low-resource ASR Lecture 18 CS 753 Instructor: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Multilingual and low-resource ASR Lecture 18 CS 753 Instructor: Preethi Jyothi Recall Hybrid DNN-HMM Systems Triphone state labels (DNN posteriors) Instead of GMMs, use scaled DNN posteriors as the HMM observation


  1. Multilingual and low-resource ASR Lecture 18 CS 753 Instructor: Preethi Jyothi

  2. Recall Hybrid DNN-HMM Systems Triphone state labels 
 (DNN posteriors) Instead of GMMs, use scaled • DNN posteriors as the HMM … … … observation probabilities 39 features in one frame DNN trained using triphone • labels derived from a forced alignment “Viterbi” step. Fixed window of 
 5 speech frames

  3. Multilingual Training 
 (Hybrid DNN/HMM System) Stacked RBMs DNN finetuned DNN finetuned DNN finetuned DNN finetuned trained on PL on CZ on DE on PT on PL Image/Table from Ghoshal et al., “Multilingual training of deep neural networks”, ICASSP, 2013.

  4. Multilingual Training 
 (Hybrid DNN/HMM System) Stacked RBMs DNN finetuned DNN finetuned DNN finetuned DNN finetuned trained on PL on CZ on DE on PT on PL Di ff erent training language schedules Mono- and multilingual results Languages Dev Eval Language Vocab PPL ML-GMM DNN Multilingual DNN WER(%) WER(%) Languages WER(%) RU 27.5 24.3 CZ 29K 823 18.5 15.8 — — DE 36K 115 13.9 11.2 CZ → DE 9.4 CZ → RU 27.5 24.6 FR 16K 341 25.8 22.6 CZ → DE → FR 22.6 SP 17K 134 26.3 22.3 CZ → DE → FR → SP 21.2 CZ → DE → FR → SP → RU 26.6 23.8 PT 52K 184 24.1 19.1 CZ → DE → FR → SP → PT 18.9 RU 24K 634 32.5 27.5 CZ → DE → FR → SP → PT → RU 26.3 CZ → DE → FR → SP → PT → RU 26.3 23.6 PL 29K 705 20.0 17.4 CZ → DE → FR → SP → PT → RU → PL 15.9 Image/Table from Ghoshal et al., “Multilingual training of deep neural networks”, ICASSP, 2013.

  5. Shared hidden layers + Language-specific softmax layers Language 1 senones Language 2 senones Language 3 senones Language 4 senones ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Shared Many Hidden Layers Feature Transformation ... ... ... Text Input Layer: A window of acoustic feature frames Training or Testing Samples Lang 1 Lang 2 Lang 3 Lang 4 Figure 1: rchitecture of the shared-hidden-layer multilingual Huang et al., “Cross-language knowledge transfer using multilingual DNNs with shared hidden layers”, ICASSP 2013. ’s output nodes correspond 7305

  6. Shared hidden layers + Language-specific softmax layers Language 1 senones Language 2 senones Language 3 senones Language 4 senones ... ... ... ... ... Hidden layers are shared across • languages; treated as a universal feature ... transformation ... Shared Many Hidden Layers Feature Transformation ... Each language has its own softmax layer • ... to estimate posterior probabilities of tied triphone states specific to each language ... Text Input Layer: A window of acoustic feature frames Training or Testing Samples Lang 1 Lang 2 Lang 3 Lang 4 Figure 1: rchitecture of the shared-hidden-layer multilingual Huang et al., “Cross-language knowledge transfer using multilingual DNNs with shared hidden layers”, ICASSP 2013. ’s output nodes correspond 7305

  7. � � � Shared hidden layers + Language-specific softmax layers Hidden layers are transferable � WER (%) Baseline (9-hr ENU) 30.9 FRA HLs + Train All Layers 30.6 FRA HLs + Train Softmax Layer 27.3 Language 1 senones Language 2 senones Language 3 senones Language 4 senones ... ... ... ... SHL-MDNN + Train Softmax Layer 25.3 � ... Training strategy based on target language data ... ENU training data (#. Hours) 3 9 36 Baseline DNN (no Transfer) 38.9 30.9 23.0 ... SHL-MDNN + Train Softmax Layer 22.4 28.0 25.3 Shared Many Hidden Layers SHL-MDNN + Train All Layers 33.4 28.9 21.6 Feature Transformation ... Best Case Relative WER Reduction (%) 28.0 18.1 6.1 � ... Cross-lingual transfer Measured in CER Reduction (%). ... Text Input Layer: CHN Training Set (Hrs) 3 9 36 139 A window of acoustic feature frames Baseline - CHN only 45.1 40.3 31.7 29.0 SHL-MDNN Model Transfer 35.6 33.9 28.4 26.6 Training or Testing Samples Lang 1 Lang 2 Lang 3 Lang 4 Relative CER Reduction 21.1 15.9 10.4 8.3 Figure 1: rchitecture of the shared-hidden-layer multilingual � � Huang et al., “Cross-language knowledge transfer using multilingual DNNs with shared hidden layers”, ICASSP 2013. 7306 � 7306 ’s output nodes correspond 7306 7305

  8. Recall Tandem DNN-HMM Systems Output Layer Neural network outputs are • used as “features” to train HMM-GMM models Bottleneck Layer Use a low-dimensional • bottleneck layer representation to extract features from the bottleneck layer 
 Input Layer

  9. Multilingual Training 
 (Tandem System) softmax layer for language 1 bottleneck 
 layer softmax layer for language 2 ⋮ softmax layer for language N Language-independent 
 hidden layers Vesely et al., “The language-independent bottleneck features”, SLT, 2012.

  10. Multilingual Training 
 (Tandem System) softmax layer for language 1 bottleneck 
 layer softmax layer for language 2 ⋮ softmax layer for language N Language-independent 
 hidden layers Monolingual/multilingual BN feature-based results Language Czech English German Portugese Spanish Russian Turkish Vietnamese HMM 22.6 16.8 26.6 27.0 23.0 33.5 32.0 27.3 1-Softmax 20.3 16.1 25.9 27.2 24.2 33.4 31.3 26.9 mono-BN 19.7 15.9 25.5 27.2 23.2 32.5 30.4 23.4 1-Softmax(IPA) 19.4 15.5 24.8 25.6 23.2 32.5 30.3 25.9 8-Softmax 19.3 14.7 24.0 25.2 22.6 31.5 29.4 24.3 Vesely et al., “The language-independent bottleneck features”, SLT, 2012.

  11. Multilingual Training 
 (Tandem System) softmax layer for language 1 bottleneck 
 layer softmax layer for language 2 ⋮ Cross-lingual WERs ANN output : softmax layer for language N baselines Language-independent 
 5-Softmax Language hidden layers PLP-HLDA Mono-BN (lang-pooled) (II.) (III.) (d) Czech 22.6 19.7 19.2 English 16.8 15.9 14.7 German 26.6 25.5 24.5 Portuguese 27.0 27.2 26.0 Spanish 23.0 23.2 23.0 32.3 Russian 33.5 32.5 Turkish 32.0 30.4 30.7 Vietnamese 27.3 23.4 26.8 Vesely et al., “The language-independent bottleneck features”, SLT, 2012. 340

  12. Cross- and Multilingual Bottleneck features . . . GER EN . . . . . . . . . . . . ENU FR DE . . . FRA Tuske et al., “Investigation on cross- and multilingual MLP features”, ICASSP, 2013 7351

  13. Cross- and Multilingual Bottleneck features . GER . . EN . . . . . . . . . . . . ENU FR DE . . . FRA Features from three languages are merged and presented as input to the model • Language-specific softmax layers • Bottleneck layer which is shared across languages • 7351

  14. Cross- and Multilingual Bottleneck features . GER . . EN . . . . . . . . . . . . ENU FR DE . . . FRA Multilingual BN features using mismatched data Target and cross-lingual BN features in round brackets. WER MFCC+BN MFCC+BN [%] BN trained on WER [%] MFCC Bottleneck trained on ENU+FRA GER+FRA GER+ENU GER+ENU+FRA GER ENU FRA GER 28.37 27.06 26.89 26.90 27.50 29.63 30.38 Test language Test language GER 29.97 (5.3) (9.7) (10.3) (10.2) (8.2) (1.1) (-1.4) GER+FRA ENU+FRA ENU+GER GER+ENU+FRA 21.31 18.85 22.63 ENU 20.29 18.21 17.99 17.89 ENU 21.69 (1.8) (13.1) (-4.3) (6.5) (16.0) (17.1) (17.5) 37.76 38.72 33.95 GER+ENU FRA+GER FRA+ENU GER+ENU+FRA FRA 37.78 (0.1) (-2.5) (10.1) FRA 35.88 33.52 33.45 33.61 (5.0) (11.3) (11.5) (11.0) 7351 7351 7352

  15. e2e multilingual models

  16. ે Multilingual ASR with an e2e Model Speller y 2 y 3 y 4 h eos i Use attention-based encoder-decoder models • Decoder outputs one character per time-step • c 1 c 2 h h h For multilingual models, use union over character sets • s 1 s 2 y 2 y 3 y S − 1 h sos i Bengali 
 আজ �মঘলা িদন તે વાદળછા�ું iદવસ છ Gujarati h = ( h 1 , . . . , h U ) Hindi 
 यह एक बादल का िदन है ಇದು �␣ೂೕಡ ಕ�␣ದ �␣ನ Kannada Listener Malayalam ഇത് െതളി� ദിവസമാണ് h 1 h U Marathi तो ढगाळ िदवस आहे Tamil இ� ஒ� ேமக��டமான நாlm Telugu �� � ఇ� ��వృత�న �� � ����� � � �� ���� ٓ � �� Urdu x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x T Image from: Chan et al., Listen, Attend and Spell: A NN for LVCSR, ICASSP 2016 ����

  17. Multilingual ASR with an e2e Model Language-specific vs. Multilingual models Speller y 2 y 3 y 4 h eos i Language Language-specific Joint Joint + MTL Bengali 19.1 16.8 16.5 Gujarati 26.0 18.0 18.2 Hindi 16.5 14.4 14.4 Kannada 35.4 34.5 34.6 Malayalam 44.0 36.9 36.7 c 1 c 2 Marathi 28.8 27.6 27.2 Tamil 13.3 10.7 10.6 h h h Telugu 37.4 22.5 22.7 Urdu 29.5 26.8 26.7 s 1 s 2 Weighted Avg. 29.05 22.93 22.91 LAS models conditioned on language ID y 2 y 3 y S − 1 h sos i Language Joint Dec Enc Enc + Dec h = ( h 1 , . . . , h U ) Bengali 16.8 16.9 16.5 16.5 Gujarati 18.0 17.7 17.2 17.3 Listener Hindi 14.4 14.6 14.5 14.4 h 1 h U Kannada 34.5 30.1 29.4 29.2 Malayalam 36.9 35.5 34.8 34.3 Marathi 27.6 24.0 22.8 23.1 Tamil 10.7 10.4 10.3 10.4 Telugu 22.5 22.5 21.9 21.5 Urdu 26.8 25.7 24.2 24.5 Weighted Avg. 22.93 22.03 21.37 21.32 x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x T Image from: Chan et al., Listen, Attend and Spell: A NN for LVCSR, ICASSP 2016 ����

  18. Hybrid End-to-end Multilingual ASR Watanabe et al., “e2e architecture for joint language identification and ASR”, ASRU, 2017

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend