Multilayer Optical X-ray Coatings GOAL OF PROJECT: CHARACTERIZING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

multilayer optical x ray coatings
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Multilayer Optical X-ray Coatings GOAL OF PROJECT: CHARACTERIZING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Characterization of growth rate and interfacial roughness of Multilayer Optical X-ray Coatings GOAL OF PROJECT: CHARACTERIZING THE NEW PROFILE COATING SYSTEM DEPOSIT MONO AND MULTILAYERED THIN-FILMS USING XRR AND IMD SIMULATIONS FOR


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Characterization of growth rate and interfacial roughness of Multilayer Optical X-ray Coatings

Yumeng Melody Cao

Undergraduate Student at Smith College and Argonne National Lab Lee Teng Fellow

Supervisors: Lahsen Assoufid, Ray Conley and Bing Shi GOAL OF PROJECT:

  • CHARACTERIZING THE NEW PROFILE COATING SYSTEM
  • DEPOSIT MONO AND MULTILAYERED THIN-FILMS
  • USING XRR AND IMD SIMULATIONS FOR D-SPACING ANALYSIS
slide-2
SLIDE 2

BRAGG’S LAW

Crystal vs Thin film

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Experiment

  • MAGNETRON SPUTTERING
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • INVESTIGATE SPUTTERING PARAMETERS
  • INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
  • Power
  • Gas-mixture percentages (N2)
  • Substrate target distances
  • DEPENDENT VARIABLES
  • Growth Rate
  • Interfacial Roughness

Parameters

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Experiment

  • DEPOSITION SYSTEM
  • Uses Magnetron Sputtering
  • Tungsten and Boron Carbide

bilayers

  • Gaseous (Ar + N2) plasma
  • 1 mT vacuum conditions
  • High performance servo

drive

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Experiment

  • XRR
  • E = 8.048Kev or 1.54Å
  • Bragg’s Law
  • -0.1 to 5 degrees grazing angle
  • X-Ray Reflectivity inversely proportional to interfacial

roughness

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Experiment

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Power at 320 W

Power at 160W Power at 80 W

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusions & Outlook

  • 5% N seems to be the best performance
  • Power level indeed also has an impact on performance
  • Different target-substrate distances