Mueller Navelet jets at LHC: An observable to reveal high - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mueller navelet jets at lhc an observable to reveal high
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Mueller Navelet jets at LHC: An observable to reveal high - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mueller Navelet jets at LHC: An observable to reveal high energy resummation eets? Bertrand Dulou Lab o ratoire de Physique Tho rique d'Orsa y P a ris, Ma y 20th 2013 in ollab o ration with L. Szymano


slide-1
SLIDE 1 Mueller Navelet jets at LHC: An
  • bservable
to reveal high energy resummation ee ts? Bertrand Du lou Lab
  • ratoire
de Physique Tho rique d'Orsa y P a ris, Ma y 20th 2013 in
  • llab
  • ration
with L. Szymano wski (NCBJ W a rsa w), S. W allon (UPMC & LPT Orsa y) D. Colferai; F. S hw ennsen, L. Szymano wski, S. W allon, JHEP 1012:026 (2010) 1-72 [a rXiv:1002.1365℄ B.D., L. Szymano wski, S. W allon, a rXiv:1208.6111 B.D., L. Szymano wski, S. W allon, a rXiv:1302.7012 (to app ea r in JHEP) 1 / 23
slide-2
SLIDE 2 Motivations One
  • f
the imp
  • rtant
longstanding theo reti al questions raised b y QCD is its b ehaviour in the p erturbative Regge limit s ≫ −t Based
  • n
theo reti al grounds,
  • ne
should identify and test suitable
  • bservables
in
  • rder
to test this p e ulia r dynami s PSfrag repla ements

h1(M 2

1 )

h2(M 2

2 )

s → t ↓ ←

va uum quantum numb er

h′

1(M ′2 1 )

h′

2(M ′2 2 )

ha rd s ales: M 2

1 , M 2 2 ≫ Λ2 QCD

  • r M ′2

1 , M ′2 2 ≫ Λ2 QCD

  • r t ≫ Λ2

QCD

where the t− hannel ex hanged state is the so- alled ha rd P
  • meron
2 / 23
slide-3
SLIDE 3 The dierent regimes
  • f
QCD PSfrag repla ements Saturation

Qs ln Q2 Y = ln 1

x

DGLAP BFKL Non-p erturbative 3 / 23
slide-4
SLIDE 4 Resummation in QCD: DGLAP vs BFKL Small values
  • f αS
(p erturbation theo ry applies due to ha rd s ales) an b e
  • mp
ensated b y la rge loga rithmi enhan ements.

resummation
  • f

n(αS ln A)n

series DGLAP BFKL PSfrag repla ements

x1

, kT 1

x2

, kT 2

kT n+1 ≪ kT n

PSfrag repla ements

x1

, kT 1

x2

, kT 2

xn+1 ≪ xn

strong
  • rdering
in kT strong
  • rdering
in x

(αS ln Q2

µ2 )n

(αS ln s

s0 )n

When √s b e omes very la rge, it is exp e ted that a BFKL des ription is needed to get a urate p redi tions 4 / 23
slide-5
SLIDE 5 Ho w to test QCD in the p erturbative Regge limit? What kind
  • f
  • bservables?
p erturbation theo ry should b e appli able: sele ting external
  • r
internal p rob es with transverse sizes ≪ 1/ΛQCD
  • r
b y ho
  • sing
la rge t in
  • rder
to p rovide the ha rd s ale governed b y the soft p erturbative dynami s
  • f
QCD PSfrag repla ements

p → 0

and not b y its
  • llinea
r dynami s PSfrag repla ements

m = 0 m = 0

θ → 0 ⇒

sele t semi-ha rd p ro esses with s ≫ p2

T i ≫ Λ2 QCD

where p2

T i

a re t ypi al transverse s ale, all
  • f
the same
  • rder
5 / 23
slide-6
SLIDE 6 The sp e i ase
  • f
QCD at la rge s QCD in the p erturbative Regge limit The amplitude an b e written as:

A = +    + + · · ·    +    + · · ·    + · · · ∼ s ∼ s (αs ln s) ∼ s (αs ln s)2

this an b e put in the follo wing fo rm :

Impa t fa to r

Green's fun tion

Impa t fa to r 6 / 23
slide-7
SLIDE 7 Higher
  • rder
  • rre tions
Higher
  • rder
  • rre tions
to BFKL k ernel a re kno wn at NLL
  • rder
(Lipatov F adin; Cami i, Ciafaloni), no w fo r a rbitra ry impa t pa rameter

αS

  • n(αS ln s)n
resummation impa t fa to rs a re kno wn in some ases at NLL

γ∗ → γ∗

at t = 0 (Ba rtels, Colferai, Giesek e, Kyrieleis, Qiao; Balitski, Chirilli) fo rw a rd jet p ro du tion (Ba rtels, Colferai, V a a) in lusive p ro du tion
  • f
a pair
  • f
hadrons sepa rated b y a la rge interval
  • f
rapidit y (Ivanov, P apa)

γ∗

L → ρL

in the fo rw a rd limit (Ivanov, K
  • tsky
, P apa) 7 / 23
slide-8
SLIDE 8 Mueller-Navelet jets: Basi s Mueller-Navelet jets Consider t w
  • jets
(hadrons ying within a na rro w
  • ne)
sepa rated b y a la rge rapidit y, i.e. ea h
  • f
them almost y in the dire tion
  • f
the hadron lose to it, and with very simila r transverse momenta in a pure LO
  • llinea
r treatment, these t w
  • jets
should b e emitted ba k to ba k at leading
  • rder: ∆φ − π = 0
(∆φ = φ1 − φ2 = relative azimuthal angle) and k⊥1 =k⊥2 . There is no phase spa e fo r (untagged) emission b et w een them PSfrag repla ements

p(p1) p(p2)

jet1

(k⊥1, φ1)

jet2

(k⊥2, φ2)

φ1 φ2 − π

la rge + rapidit y la rge
  • rapidit
y zero rapidit y

plane Beam axis 8 / 23
slide-9
SLIDE 9 Master fo rmulas

kT

  • fa to
rized dierential ross-se tion PSfrag repla ements

x1 x2 k1, φ1 k2, φ2 → → kJ1, φJ1, xJ1 kJ2, φJ2, xJ2

dσ d|kJ1| d|kJ2| dyJ1 dyJ2 =

  • dφJ1 dφJ2
  • d2k1 d2k2

× Φ(kJ1, xJ1, −k1) × G(k1, k2, ˆ s) × Φ(kJ2, xJ2, k2)

with Φ(kJ2, xJ2, k2) =
  • dx2 f(x2)V (k2, x2)

f ≡

PDF

xJ = |kJ |

√s eyJ

9 / 23
slide-10
SLIDE 10 Studies at LHC: Mueller-Navelet jets in LL BFKL (∼ (αs ln s)n ), the emission b et w een these jets leads to a strong de o rrelation b et w een the jets, in ompatible with p¯

p

T evatron
  • llider
data up to re ently , the subseries αs

(αs ln s)n

NLL w as in luded
  • nly
in the Green's fun tion, and not inside the jet verti es Sabio V era, S hw ennsen Ma rquet, Ro y
  • n
the imp
  • rtan e
  • f
these
  • rre tions
w as not kno wn 10 / 23
slide-11
SLIDE 11 Results: symmetri
  • nguration
(√s = 7 T e V) Results fo r a symmetri
  • nguration
In the follo wing w e sho w results fo r

35 GeV < |kJ1| , |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 , y2 < 4.7

These uts allo w us to
  • mpa
re
  • ur
p redi tions with re ent results p resented b y CMS at DIS 2013 (CMS-P AS-FSQ-12-002) note: unlik e exp eriments w e have to set an upp er ut
  • n |kJ1|
and |kJ2| . W e have he k ed that va rying this ut do esn't mo dify
  • ur
results signi antly . 11 / 23
slide-12
SLIDE 12 Results Cross-se tion

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

σ [nb] Y

pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun.

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

The ee t due to NLL
  • rre tions
to the jet vertex is
  • f
the same
  • rder
  • f
magnitude as the ee t due to NLL
  • rre tions
to the Green's fun tion. 12 / 23
slide-13
SLIDE 13 Results Cross-se tion: stabilit y with resp e t to s0 and µR = µF hanges
  • 0.5

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

∆σ σ

Y

µF → µF /2 µF → 2µF √s0 → √s0/2 √s0 → 2√s0

NLL vertex + NLL Green fun.

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

Our result is rather stable w.r.t s0 and µ hoi es fo r 5 < Y < 9 . 13 / 23
slide-14
SLIDE 14 Results Relative va riation
  • f
the ross se tion when using
  • ther
PDF sets than MSTW 2008
  • 0.5
  • 0.4
  • 0.3
  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 4 5 6 7 8 9 ABKM09 CT10 HERAPDF 1.5 NNPDF 2.1

PSfrag repla ements

Y

∆σ σ

NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLO DGLAP

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

14 / 23
slide-15
SLIDE 15 Results Azimuthal
  • rrelation cos ϕ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos ϕ Y

pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun.

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

The ee t
  • f
NLL
  • rre tions
to the jet vertex is very imp
  • rtant
A t full NLL a ura y , cos ϕ is very at in Y and very lose to 1. 15 / 23
slide-16
SLIDE 16 Results Azimuthal
  • rrelation cos ϕ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos ϕ Y

pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

None
  • f
the BFKL
  • mputations
des rib e the data very w ell 16 / 23
slide-17
SLIDE 17 Results Azimuthal
  • rrelation cos ϕ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos ϕ Y

pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

None
  • f
the BFKL
  • mputations
des rib e the data very w ell The result at NLL is still rather dep endent
  • n
the hoi e
  • f s0
and µR = µF 17 / 23
slide-18
SLIDE 18 Results Relative va riation
  • f cos ϕ
when using
  • ther
PDF sets than MSTW 2008
  • 0.04
  • 0.02

0.02 0.04 4 5 6 7 8 9 ABKM09 CT10 HERAPDF 1.5 NNPDF 2.1

PSfrag repla ements

Y

∆cos ϕ cos ϕ

NLL vertex + NLL Green fun.

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

The result at NLL is still rather dep endent
  • n
the hoi e
  • f s0
and µR = µF

cos ϕ

do es not dep end strongly
  • n
the PDF set 18 / 23
slide-19
SLIDE 19 Results Azimuthal
  • rrelation cos 2ϕ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos 2ϕ Y

pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

19 / 23
slide-20
SLIDE 20 Results Azimuthal
  • rrelation cos 2ϕ/cos ϕ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos 2ϕ/cos ϕ Y

pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

The
  • bservable cos 2ϕ/cos ϕ
is des rib ed reasonably w ell b y NLL BFKL and is mo re stable with resp e t to the s ales 20 / 23
slide-21
SLIDE 21 Results: asymmetri
  • nguration
Azimuthal
  • rrelation cos 2ϕ/cos ϕ :
xed
  • rder
NLO versus NLL BFKL

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos 2ϕ/cos ϕ Y

pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. Dijet

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 50 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV

(su h an asymmetri
  • nguration
is required to get stable results in a xed
  • rder
al ulation)

0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

dots: based
  • n
the xed
  • rder
NLO pa rton generato r Dijet (thanks to M. F
  • ntannaz)
xed
  • rder
NLO and NLL BFKL dier signi antly fo r 4.5 < Y < 8 21 / 23
slide-22
SLIDE 22 Results: asymmetri
  • nguration
Azimuthal
  • rrelation cos 2ϕ/cos ϕ :
xed
  • rder
NLO versus NLL BFKL

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos 2ϕ/cos ϕ Y

µF → µF /2 µF → 2µF √s0 → √s0/2 √s0 → 2√s0

NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. Dijet

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 50 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

xed
  • rder
NLO and NLL BFKL dier signi antly fo r 4.5 < Y < 8 This result is rather stable w.r.t s0 and µ hoi es. 22 / 23
slide-23
SLIDE 23 Con lusion The ee t
  • f
NLL
  • rre tions
to the verti es is very imp
  • rtant,
simila r to the NLL Green's fun tion
  • rre tions
Surp risingly small de o rrelation ee t First
  • mpa
rison to data tak en at LHC fo r the azimuthal
  • rrelations
The quantities cos nϕ a re still rather dep endent
  • n
the hoi e
  • f
the s ales F
  • r
the
  • bservable cos 2ϕ/cos ϕ :
  • NLL
BFKL p redi tions a re mo re stable with resp e t to the hoi e
  • f
the s ales
  • data
is quite w ell des rib ed b y NLL BFKL in a symmetri
  • nguration
  • there
is a lea r dieren e b et w een xed-o rder NLO and
  • ur
NLL BFKL al ulation in an asymmetri
  • nguration

It
  • uld
b e interesting to study exp erimentally this
  • bservable
also in the asymmetri ase 23 / 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24 Ba kup 24 / 23
slide-25
SLIDE 25 Results: asymmetri
  • nguration
Azimuthal
  • rrelation cos ϕ :
xed
  • rder
NLO versus NLL BFKL

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos ϕ Y

pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. Dijet

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 50 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

dots = based
  • n
the xed
  • rder
NLO pa rton generato r Dijet (thanks to M. F
  • ntannaz)
25 / 23
slide-26
SLIDE 26 Results: asymmetri
  • nguration
Azimuthal
  • rrelation: cos ϕ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos ϕ Y

µF → µF /2 µF → 2µF √s0 → √s0/2 √s0 → 2√s0

NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. Dijet

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 50 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

Putting (almost) the same s ale, exa tly the same uts, w e get a dieren e b et w een xed
  • rder
NLO and NLL BFKL fo r 4.5 < Y < 8.5 This dieren e is w ashed-out b e ause
  • f s0
and µ dep enden y 26 / 23
slide-27
SLIDE 27 Results Azimuthal
  • rrelation cos 3ϕ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos 3ϕ Y

pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

T aking into a ount the un ertaint y asso iated with the hoi e
  • f
the s ales, NLL BFKL is quite lose to the data fo r Y 6 . 27 / 23
slide-28
SLIDE 28 Results Azimuthal
  • rrelation cos 3ϕ/cos 2ϕ

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9

PSfrag repla ements

cos 3ϕ/cos 2ϕ Y

pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

The 3 dierent BFKL
  • mputations
fo r cos 3ϕ/cos 2ϕ a re quite lose to ea h
  • ther
28 / 23
slide-29
SLIDE 29 Results: symmetri
  • nguration
Azimuthal distribution Computing cos(nφ) up to la rge values
  • f n
gives a ess to the angula r distribution

1 σ dσ dφ = 1 2π

  • 1 + 2

  • n=1

cos (nφ) cos (nφ)

  • This
is a quantit y a essible at exp eriments lik e A TLAS and CMS 29 / 23
slide-30
SLIDE 30 Results: symmetri
  • nguration
Azimuthal distribution 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
1 2 3 PSfrag repla ements 1 σ dσ dϕ

ϕ Y = 6.2 Y = 7.2 Y = 8.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
1 2 3 PSfrag repla ements 1 σ dσ dϕ

ϕ Y = 6.2 Y = 7.2 Y = 8.2

pure LL LL verti es + NLL Green's fun.

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
1 2 3 PSfrag repla ements 1 σ dσ dϕ

ϕ Y = 6.2 Y = 7.2 Y = 8.2

NLL vert. + NLL Green's fun. 30 / 23
slide-31
SLIDE 31 Results: symmetri
  • nguration
Azimuthal distribution: stabilit y with resp e t to s0 and µR = µF 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
1 2 3 PSfrag repla ements 1 σ dσ dϕ ϕ µF → µF /2 µF → 2µF √s0 → √s0/2 √s0 → 2√s0 pure LL 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
1 2 3 PSfrag repla ements 1 σ dσ dϕ ϕ µF → µF /2 µF → 2µF √s0 → √s0/2 √s0 → 2√s0 LL verti es + NLL Green's fun. pure LL LL verti es + NLL Green's fun.

35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7

integrating
  • n
the bin:

6 < Y = y1 + y2 < 9.4

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
1 2 3 PSfrag repla ements 1 σ dσ dϕ ϕ µF → µF /2 µF → 2µF √s0 → √s0/2 √s0 → 2√s0 NLL vert. + NLL Green's fun. NLL vert. + NLL Green's fun. 31 / 23
slide-32
SLIDE 32 Op ening the b
  • xes:
Impa t rep resentation γ∗ γ∗ → γ∗ γ∗ as an example Sudak
  • v
de omp
  • sition: ki = αi p1 + βi p2 + k⊥i
(p2

1 = p2 2 = 0, 2p1 · p2 = s)

write

d4ki = s

2 dαi dβi d2k⊥i

(k = Eu l. ↔ k⊥ = Mink.)

t− hannel

gluons have non-sense p
  • la
rizations at la rge s : ǫup/down

NS

= 2

s p2/1

PSfrag repla ements

set α1 = 0 and
  • dβ1 ⇒ Φγ∗→γ∗(k1, r − k1)
impa t fa to r

set βn = 0 and
  • dαn ⇒ Φγ∗→γ∗(−kn, −r + kn)

β ր α ց γ∗ γ∗ r − k1 k1 k2 kn α1 α2

M = is (2π)2 d2k k2 Φup(k, r − k) d2k′ k′2 Φdown(−k′, −r + k′) ×

δ+i∞

  • δ−i∞

dω 2πi s s0 ω Gω(k, k′, r)

αn−1

← −

multi-Regge kinemati s

β2 βn αq, ¯

q

βq, ¯

q 32 / 23
slide-33
SLIDE 33 Master fo rmulas Angula r
  • e ients

Cm ≡

  • dφJ1 dφJ2 cos
  • m(φJ,1 − φJ,2 − π)
  • ×
  • d2k1 d2k2 Φ(kJ1, xJ,1, −k1) G(k1, k2, ˆ

s) Φ(kJ2, xJ,2, k2). m = 0 = ⇒

ross-se tion

dσ d|kJ1| d|kJ2| dyJ1 dyJ2 = C0 m > 0 = ⇒

azimuthal de o rrelation

cos(mφ) ≡ cos

  • m(φJ,1 − φJ,2 − π)
  • = Cm

C0

33 / 23
slide-34
SLIDE 34 Jet vertex: jet algo rithms Jet algo rithms a jet algo rithm should b e IR safe, b
  • th
fo r soft and
  • llinea
r singula rities the most
  • mmon
jet algo rithm a re:

kt

algo rithms (IR safe but time
  • nsuming
fo r multiple jets
  • ngurations)
  • ne
algo rithm (not IR safe in general; an b e made IR safe at NLO: Ellis, Kunszt, Sop er) 34 / 23
slide-35
SLIDE 35 Jet vertex: jet algo rithms Cone jet algo rithm at NLO (Ellis, Kunszt, Sop er) Should pa rtons (|p1|, φ1, y1) and (p2|, φ2, y2) b e
  • mbined
in a single jet?

|pi| = transverse

energy dep
  • sit
in the alo rimeter ell i
  • f
pa rameter

Ω = (yi, φi)

in y − φ plane dene transverse energy
  • f
the jet: pJ = |p1| + |p2| jet axis:

Ωc       

yJ = |p1| y1 + |p2| y2 pJ φJ = |p1| φ1 + |p2| φ2 pJ

PSfrag repla ements pa rton1 (Ω1, |p1|) pa rton2 (Ω2, |p2|)
  • ne
axis (Ωc)

Ω = (yi, φi)

in y − φ plane If distan es |Ωi − Ωc|2 ≡ (yi − yc)2 + (φi − φc)2 < R2 (i = 1 and i = 2 )

= ⇒

pa rtons 1 and 2 a re in the same
  • ne Ωc
  • mbined
  • ndition: |Ω1 − Ω2| <

|p1| + |p2| max(|p1|, |p2|)R

35 / 23
slide-36
SLIDE 36 Jet vertex: LL versus NLL and jet algo rithms LL jet vertex and
  • ne
algo rithm

k, k′ =

Eu lidian t w
  • dimensional
ve to rs PSfrag repla ements

0, x k k, x S(2)

J (k⊥; x) = δ

  • 1 − xJ

x

  • |k| δ(2)(k − kJ)
36 / 23
slide-37
SLIDE 37 Jet vertex: LL versus NLL and jet algo rithms NLL jet vertex and
  • ne
algo rithm

k, k′ =

Eu lidian t w
  • dimensional
ve to rs

S(3,cone)

J

(k′, k − k′, xz; x) =

PSfrag repla ements

0, x k k, x

S(2)

J (k, x) Θ

  • |k−k′|+|k′|

max(|k−k′|,|k′|)Rcone

2 −

  • ∆y2 + ∆φ2
PSfrag repla ements

0, x k k′ k − k′, x z k, x(1 − z)

+ S(2)

J (k − k′, xz) Θ

  • ∆y2 + ∆φ2

  • |k−k′|+|k′|

max(|k−k′|,|k′|)Rcone

2

PSfrag repla ements

0, x k k′ k − k′, x z k, x(1 − z)

+ S(2)

J (k′, x(1 − z)) Θ

  • ∆y2 + ∆φ2

  • |k−k′|+|k′|

max(|k−k′|,|k′|)Rcone

2 ,

37 / 23
slide-38
SLIDE 38 The LL impa t fa to r

V (0)

a

(k, x) = h(0)

a (k)S(2) J (k; x)

with: h(0)

a (k) = αs

√ 2 CA/F k2 , S(2)

J (k; x) = δ

  • 1 − xJ

x

  • |kJ|δ(2)(k − kJ)
38 / 23
slide-39
SLIDE 39 NLL
  • rre tions
to the jet vertex: the qua rk pa rt (Ba rtels, Colferai, V a a)

V (1) q (k, x) =     3 2 ln k2 Λ2 − 15 4   CF π +   85 36 + π2 4   CA π − 5 18 Nf π − b0 ln k2 µ2   V (0) q (k, x) +

  • dz

CF π 1 − z 2 + CA π z 2

  • V (0)

q (k, xz) + CA π

  • d2k′

π

  • dz

1 + (1 − z)2 2z

  • (1 − z)

(k − k′) · (1 − z)k − k′ (k − k′)2(1 − z)k − k′2 h(0) q (k′)S(3) J (k′, k − k′, xz; x) − 1 k′2 Θ(Λ2 − k′2)V (0) q (k, xz)

1 z(k − k′)2 Θ|k − k′| − z(|k − k′| + |k′|)V (0) q (k′, x)

  • +

CF 2π

  • dz

1 + z2 1 − z

  • d2l

πl2

  • N CF

l2 + (l − k)2

  • S(3)

J (zk + (1 − z)l, (1 − z)(k − l), x(1 − z); x) + S(3) J (k − (1 − z)l, (1 − z)l, x(1 − z); x)

  • − Θ

  Λ2 (1 − z)2 − l2  

  • V (0)

q (k, x) + V (0) q (k, xz) − 2CF π

  • dz
  • 1

1 − z d2l πl2

  • N CF

l2 + (l − k)2 S(2) J (k, x) − Θ   Λ2 (1 − z)2 − l2   V (0) q (k, x)

  • 39
/ 23
slide-40
SLIDE 40 NLL
  • rre tions
to the jet vertex: the gluon pa rt (Ba rtels, Colferai, V a a)

V (1) g (k, x) =   11 6 CA π − 1 3 Nf π

  • ln

k2 Λ2 +   π2 4 − 67 36   CA π + 13 36 Nf π − b0 ln k2 µ2   V (0) g (k, x) +

  • dz

Nf π CF CA z(1 − z)V (0) g (k, xz) + Nf π

  • d2k′

π 1 dz Pqg(z)

  • h(0)

q (k′) (k − k′)2 + k′2 S(3) J (k′, k − k′, xz; x) − 1 k′2 Θ(Λ2 − k′2)V (0) q (k, xz)

  • +

Nf 2π

  • d2k′

π 1 dz Pqg(z) N CA (1 − z)k − k′2

  • z(1 − z)

(k − k′) · k′ (k − k′)2k′2 S(3) J (k′, k − k′, xz; x) − 1 k2 Θ

  • Λ2 −
  • (1 − z)k − k′2

S(2) J (k, x)

  • +

CA π 1 dz 1 − z [(1 − z)P (1 − z)]

  • d2l

πl2

  • N CA

l2 + (l − k)2

  • S(3)

J (zk + (1 − z)l, (1 − z)(k − l), x(1 − z); x) + S(3) J (k − (1 − z)l, (1 − z)l, x(1 − z); x)

  • − Θ

  Λ2 (1 − z)2 − l2  

  • V (0)

g (k, x) + V (0) g (k, xz) − 2CA π 1 dz 1 − z

  • d2l

πl2

  • N CA

l2 + (l − k)2 S(2) J (k, x) − Θ   Λ2 (1 − z)2 − l2   V (0) g (k, x)

  • +

CA π

  • d2k′

π 1 dz

  • P (z)
  • (1 − z)

(k − k′) ·

  • (1 − z)k − k′

(k − k′)2(1 − z)k − k′2 h(0) g (k′) × S(3) J (k′, k − k′, xz; x) − 1 k′2 Θ(Λ2 − k′2)V (0) g (k, xz)

1 z(k − k′)2 Θ|k − k′| − z(|k − k′| + |k′|)V (0) g (k′, x)

  • 40
/ 23