- bservable
- ratoire
- llab
- ration
Mueller Navelet jets at LHC: An observable to reveal high - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Mueller Navelet jets at LHC: An observable to reveal high energy resummation eets? Bertrand Dulou Lab o ratoire de Physique Tho rique d'Orsa y P a ris, Ma y 20th 2013 in ollab o ration with L. Szymano
h1(M 2
1 )
h2(M 2
2 )
s → t ↓ ←
va uum quantum numb erh′
1(M ′2 1 )
h′
2(M ′2 2 )
ha rd s ales: M 21 , M 2 2 ≫ Λ2 QCD
1 , M ′2 2 ≫ Λ2 QCD
QCD
where the t− hannel ex hanged state is the so- alled ha rd PQs ln Q2 Y = ln 1
x
DGLAP BFKL Non-p erturbative 3 / 23⇒
resummationn(αS ln A)n
series DGLAP BFKL PSfrag repla ementsx1
, kT 1x2
, kT 2kT n+1 ≪ kT n
PSfrag repla ementsx1
, kT 1x2
, kT 2xn+1 ≪ xn
strong(αS ln Q2
µ2 )n
(αS ln s
s0 )n
When √s b e omes very la rge, it is exp e ted that a BFKL des ription is needed to get a urate p redi tions 4 / 23p → 0
and not b y itsm = 0 m = 0
θ → 0 ⇒
sele t semi-ha rd p ro esses with s ≫ p2T i ≫ Λ2 QCD
where p2T i
a re t ypi al transverse s ale, allA = + + + · · · + + · · · + · · · ∼ s ∼ s (αs ln s) ∼ s (αs ln s)2
this an b e put in the follo wing fo rm :←
Impa t fa to r←
Green's fun tion←
Impa t fa to r 6 / 23αS
γ∗ → γ∗
at t = 0 (Ba rtels, Colferai, Giesek e, Kyrieleis, Qiao; Balitski, Chirilli) fo rw a rd jet p ro du tion (Ba rtels, Colferai, V a a) in lusive p ro du tionγ∗
L → ρL
in the fo rw a rd limit (Ivanov, Kp(p1) p(p2)
jet1
(k⊥1, φ1)jet2
(k⊥2, φ2)φ1 φ2 − π
la rge + rapidit y la rge⊥
plane Beam axis 8 / 23kT
x1 x2 k1, φ1 k2, φ2 → → kJ1, φJ1, xJ1 kJ2, φJ2, xJ2
dσ d|kJ1| d|kJ2| dyJ1 dyJ2 =
× Φ(kJ1, xJ1, −k1) × G(k1, k2, ˆ s) × Φ(kJ2, xJ2, k2)
with Φ(kJ2, xJ2, k2) =f ≡
PDFxJ = |kJ |
√s eyJ
9 / 23p
T evatron(αs ln s)n
NLL w as in luded35 GeV < |kJ1| , |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 , y2 < 4.7
These uts allo w us to0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementsσ [nb] Y
pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun.35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
The ee t due to NLL0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ements∆σ σ
Y
µF → µF /2 µF → 2µF √s0 → √s0/2 √s0 → 2√s0
NLL vertex + NLL Green fun.35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
Our result is rather stable w.r.t s0 and µ hoi es fo r 5 < Y < 9 . 13 / 230.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 4 5 6 7 8 9 ABKM09 CT10 HERAPDF 1.5 NNPDF 2.1
PSfrag repla ementsY
∆σ σ
NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLO DGLAP35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
14 / 230.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos ϕ Y
pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun.35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
The ee t0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos ϕ Y
pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
None0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos ϕ Y
pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
None0.02 0.04 4 5 6 7 8 9 ABKM09 CT10 HERAPDF 1.5 NNPDF 2.1
PSfrag repla ementsY
∆cos ϕ cos ϕ
NLL vertex + NLL Green fun.35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
The result at NLL is still rather dep endentcos ϕ
do es not dep end strongly0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos 2ϕ Y
pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
19 / 230.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos 2ϕ/cos ϕ Y
pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
The0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos 2ϕ/cos ϕ Y
pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. Dijet35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 50 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV
(su h an asymmetri0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
dots: based0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos 2ϕ/cos ϕ Y
µF → µF /2 µF → 2µF √s0 → √s0/2 √s0 → 2√s0
NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. Dijet35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 50 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
xed⇒
It0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos ϕ Y
pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. Dijet35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 50 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
dots = based0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos ϕ Y
µF → µF /2 µF → 2µF √s0 → √s0/2 √s0 → 2√s0
NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. Dijet35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 50 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
Putting (almost) the same s ale, exa tly the same uts, w e get a dieren e b et w een xed0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos 3ϕ Y
pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
T aking into a ount the un ertaint y asso iated with the hoi e0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9
PSfrag repla ementscos 3ϕ/cos 2ϕ Y
pure LL LL vertex + NLL Green fun. NLL vertex + NLL Green fun. CMS data35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
The 3 dierent BFKL1 σ dσ dφ = 1 2π
∞
cos (nφ) cos (nφ)
ϕ Y = 6.2 Y = 7.2 Y = 8.2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4ϕ Y = 6.2 Y = 7.2 Y = 8.2
pure LL LL verti es + NLL Green's fun.35 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4ϕ Y = 6.2 Y = 7.2 Y = 8.2
NLL vert. + NLL Green's fun. 30 / 2335 GeV < |kJ1| < 60 GeV 35 GeV < |kJ2| < 60 GeV 0 < y1 < 4.7 0 < y2 < 4.7
integrating6 < Y = y1 + y2 < 9.4
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.41 = p2 2 = 0, 2p1 · p2 = s)
writed4ki = s
2 dαi dβi d2k⊥i
(k = Eu l. ↔ k⊥ = Mink.)t− hannel
gluons have non-sense pNS
= 2
s p2/1
PSfrag repla ements⇒
set α1 = 0 and⇒
set βn = 0 andβ ր α ց γ∗ γ∗ r − k1 k1 k2 kn α1 α2
M = is (2π)2 d2k k2 Φup(k, r − k) d2k′ k′2 Φdown(−k′, −r + k′) ×
δ+i∞
dω 2πi s s0 ω Gω(k, k′, r)
αn−1
← −
multi-Regge kinemati sβ2 βn αq, ¯
qβq, ¯
q 32 / 23Cm ≡
s) Φ(kJ2, xJ,2, k2). m = 0 = ⇒
ross-se tiondσ d|kJ1| d|kJ2| dyJ1 dyJ2 = C0 m > 0 = ⇒
azimuthal de o rrelationcos(mφ) ≡ cos
C0
33 / 23kt
algo rithms (IR safe but time|pi| = transverse
energy depΩ = (yi, φi)
in y − φ plane dene transverse energyΩc
yJ = |p1| y1 + |p2| y2 pJ φJ = |p1| φ1 + |p2| φ2 pJ
PSfrag repla ements pa rton1 (Ω1, |p1|) pa rton2 (Ω2, |p2|)Ω = (yi, φi)
in y − φ plane If distan es |Ωi − Ωc|2 ≡ (yi − yc)2 + (φi − φc)2 < R2 (i = 1 and i = 2 )= ⇒
pa rtons 1 and 2 a re in the same|p1| + |p2| max(|p1|, |p2|)R
35 / 23k, k′ =
Eu lidian t w0, x k k, x S(2)
J (k⊥; x) = δ
x
k, k′ =
Eu lidian t wS(3,cone)
J
(k′, k − k′, xz; x) =
PSfrag repla ements0, x k k, x
S(2)
J (k, x) Θ
max(|k−k′|,|k′|)Rcone
2 −
0, x k k′ k − k′, x z k, x(1 − z)
+ S(2)
J (k − k′, xz) Θ
−
max(|k−k′|,|k′|)Rcone
2
PSfrag repla ements0, x k k′ k − k′, x z k, x(1 − z)
+ S(2)
J (k′, x(1 − z)) Θ
−
max(|k−k′|,|k′|)Rcone
2 ,
37 / 23V (0)
a
(k, x) = h(0)
a (k)S(2) J (k; x)
with: h(0)a (k) = αs
√ 2 CA/F k2 , S(2)
J (k; x) = δ
x
V (1) q (k, x) = 3 2 ln k2 Λ2 − 15 4 CF π + 85 36 + π2 4 CA π − 5 18 Nf π − b0 ln k2 µ2 V (0) q (k, x) +
CF π 1 − z 2 + CA π z 2
q (k, xz) + CA π
π
1 + (1 − z)2 2z
(k − k′) · (1 − z)k − k′ (k − k′)2(1 − z)k − k′2 h(0) q (k′)S(3) J (k′, k − k′, xz; x) − 1 k′2 Θ(Λ2 − k′2)V (0) q (k, xz)
1 z(k − k′)2 Θ|k − k′| − z(|k − k′| + |k′|)V (0) q (k′, x)
CF 2π
1 + z2 1 − z
πl2
l2 + (l − k)2
J (zk + (1 − z)l, (1 − z)(k − l), x(1 − z); x) + S(3) J (k − (1 − z)l, (1 − z)l, x(1 − z); x)
Λ2 (1 − z)2 − l2
q (k, x) + V (0) q (k, xz) − 2CF π
1 − z d2l πl2
l2 + (l − k)2 S(2) J (k, x) − Θ Λ2 (1 − z)2 − l2 V (0) q (k, x)
V (1) g (k, x) = 11 6 CA π − 1 3 Nf π
k2 Λ2 + π2 4 − 67 36 CA π + 13 36 Nf π − b0 ln k2 µ2 V (0) g (k, x) +
Nf π CF CA z(1 − z)V (0) g (k, xz) + Nf π
π 1 dz Pqg(z)
q (k′) (k − k′)2 + k′2 S(3) J (k′, k − k′, xz; x) − 1 k′2 Θ(Λ2 − k′2)V (0) q (k, xz)
Nf 2π
π 1 dz Pqg(z) N CA (1 − z)k − k′2
(k − k′) · k′ (k − k′)2k′2 S(3) J (k′, k − k′, xz; x) − 1 k2 Θ
S(2) J (k, x)
CA π 1 dz 1 − z [(1 − z)P (1 − z)]
πl2
l2 + (l − k)2
J (zk + (1 − z)l, (1 − z)(k − l), x(1 − z); x) + S(3) J (k − (1 − z)l, (1 − z)l, x(1 − z); x)
Λ2 (1 − z)2 − l2
g (k, x) + V (0) g (k, xz) − 2CA π 1 dz 1 − z
πl2
l2 + (l − k)2 S(2) J (k, x) − Θ Λ2 (1 − z)2 − l2 V (0) g (k, x)
CA π
π 1 dz
(k − k′) ·
(k − k′)2(1 − z)k − k′2 h(0) g (k′) × S(3) J (k′, k − k′, xz; x) − 1 k′2 Θ(Λ2 − k′2)V (0) g (k, xz)
1 z(k − k′)2 Θ|k − k′| − z(|k − k′| + |k′|)V (0) g (k′, x)