Motor Neurone Disease (MND): An overview Suresh Chhetri MD, FRCP, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

motor neurone disease mnd an overview
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Motor Neurone Disease (MND): An overview Suresh Chhetri MD, FRCP, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Motor Neurone Disease (MND): An overview Suresh Chhetri MD, FRCP, FHEA Consultant Neurologist and Co-Director Lancashire and South Cumbria MND care and Research centre Royal Preston Hospital Declaration of interests Funding from GBT


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Motor Neurone Disease (MND): An overview

Suresh Chhetri MD, FRCP, FHEA

Consultant Neurologist and Co-Director Lancashire and South Cumbria MND care and Research centre Royal Preston Hospital

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Declaration of interests

Funding from GBT

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

1881: Jean-Martin Charcot, French neurobiologist and physician.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

  • Amyotrophy: muscle atrophy
  • Lateral: lateral corticospinal tracts
  • Sclerosis: scarring or hardening
slide-5
SLIDE 5

UMN and LMN pathways

Damjanov, I. (Ed.). (2012). Pathology for the health-related professions. Saunders, Elsevier, Missouri, pp. 437

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Nomenclature

Motor Neurone Disease (Brain, 1962)

Brain, W. R. Motor Neurone Disease (1962). In W. R. Brain (Ed.), Diseases of the Nervous System. Oxford University Press, London,

  • pp. 531-543.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Lou Gehrig's disease

“……for some reason that I do not know, his old power isn’t there . . . He is meeting the ball, time after time, and it isn’t going anywhere….”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Epidemiology

  • Mean age 55 to 65 years
  • Incidence: 1.5 - 2.5 cases/100,000/year
  • Median prevalence: 5.4/100,000 ((IQR 4.06–

7.89)

  • 5000 individuals with MND in UK

Alonso et al. Eur J Neurol, 2009; 16:745-51 Hoppitt T et al. Neuroepidemiology, 2011; 36:19–28 Chio et al. Neuroepidemiology, 2013; 41:118–30

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Age groups at symptom onset (n = 340)

Chhetri et al. J Clin Neurosci, 2016;24:47-51

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Epidemiology

  • Males > Females (1.5:1)
  • Lifetime risk : 1 in 350 for men and 1 in 472

for women

Alonso et al. Eur J Neurol, 2009; 16:745-51 Hoppitt T et al. Neuroepidemiology, 2011; 36:19–28 Chio et al. Neuroepidemiology, 2013; 41:118–30

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Clinical features

  • Marked phenotypic variability
  • Progressive weakness and wasting
  • Limb
  • Bulbar
  • Respiratory muscles

Hardiman et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17085 van Es et al. Lancet 2017; 390: 2084–98

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Clinical features - symptoms

  • Muscle wasting and weakness
  • Muscle twitching/cramps
  • Sensory, EOM and sphincters spared

Hardiman et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17085 van Es et al. Lancet 2017; 390: 2084–98

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Clinical features – symptoms

  • Limb onset : roughly 60%
  • Muscle weakness and wasting
  • Cramps
  • Impaired hand dexterity
  • Leg weakness/heaviness
  • Difficulty walking/foot drop

Kiernan et al. Lancet, 2011;377:942-955 Hardiman et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17085 van Es et al. Lancet 2017; 390: 2084–98

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Clinical features – symptoms

  • Bulbar onset : 30% (eventually 80%)
  • Difficulty swallowing
  • Dysarthria
  • Sialorrhoea
  • Females more commonly affected
  • Respiratory onset: 3 - 5%

Kiernan et al. Lancet, 2011;377:942-955 Hardiman et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17085 van Es et al. Lancet 2017; 390: 2084–98

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Clinical features – signs

  • Signs of UMN and/or LMN degeneration
  • UMN features
  • Preservation of reflexes in a wasted extremity
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Bulbar dysfunction

  • Pseudobulbar palsy
  • Spastic dysarthria
  • Slow and spastic tongue movements
  • Brisk jaw jerk
  • Emotional lability
  • Bulbar palsy
  • Flaccid dysarthria
  • Tongue wasting and fasciculations

Kiernan et al. Lancet, 2011;377:942-955 Hardiman et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17085 van Es et al. Lancet 2017; 390: 2084–98

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Clinical features – signs

Tiryaki et al. Continuum. 2014; 20:1185-1207

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Clinical features

  • Head drop
  • Progressive hemiplegia (Mills variant)

Kiernan et al. Lancet, 2011;377:942-955 Hardiman et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17085 van Es et al. Lancet 2017; 390: 2084–98

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Cruel……….

“There was no hope in it anywhere along the line, just downhill going, every day a little more downhill . . . [He] just died away by inches, every day a little bit more . . . .

Eleanor Gehrig

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Split hand syndrome

Eisen et al. JNNP, 2012; 83:399-403

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Wasting

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Wasting

Kiernan et al. Lancet, 2011;377:942-955

slide-24
SLIDE 24

“Creeping paralysis”

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Variants

  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Progressive bulbar palsy
  • Progressive muscular atrophy
  • Primary lateral sclerosis
  • Other rare variants
  • Familial motor neurone disease

Kiernan et al. Lancet, 2011;377:942-955 Hardiman et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17085 van Es et al. Lancet 2017; 390: 2084–98

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Progressive muscular atrophy

  • Pure LMN dysfunction
  • 2.4 to 7.6% of cases with sporadic MND
  • Median survival of 48 to 56 months

Visser et al. Neurology, 2008; 70:723-727 Kim et al. Neurology,2009; 73:1686-1692

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Primary Lateral Sclerosis

  • Progressive pure upper motor syndrome
  • 1.6 to 4.4% of patients with MND
  • Patients report stiffness and clumsiness rather

than weakness as compared to ALS

Gordon et al. Neurology, 2006;66:647-653 Singer et al. Muscle and Nerve, 2007;35:291-302

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Primary Lateral Sclerosis

  • UMN signs and absence of LMN signs
  • No evidence of denervation on EMG at 4 years
  • 77% develop LMN clinical or EMG features
  • Median survival of 13.1 years and a 10 year

survival rate of 71.1%

Gordon et al. Neurology, 2006;66:647-653 Singer et al. Muscle and Nerve, 2007;35:291-302 Chio et al. JNNP, 2011;82:740-746

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Familial MND

  • 5 to 10% of cases (Renton et al., 2014)
  • Most cases are autosomal dominant (Renton et

al., 2014)

Renton et al. Nature Neuroscience, 2014;17:17-23 Brown et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1602

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The story of genes

Brown et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1602

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Aetiology

  • Remains unknown
  • Occupation
  • Physical activity
  • Alcohol
  • Environmental toxins
  • Smoking

Ingre et al. Clinical Epidemiology, 2015; 7:181–193

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Pathogenesis

  • Multifactorial
  • Complex interactions between genetic and

molecular pathways

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Hardiman et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17085

slide-35
SLIDE 35

The ‘myths’

Wicks P. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19: 531–32.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Heterogeneity of MND

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • Neurodegenerative rather than neuromuscular
  • Complex multisystem disorder
  • Marked heterogeneity
  • Degeneration of motor system unifying feature

Curr Opin Neurol. 2017;30:599-607

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Prognosis

  • Median survival varies from 20 to 48 months
  • 3 and 5 year survival rates: approximately

48% and 24% respectively

  • About 4% survive longer than 10 years after

symptom onset

Testa et al , Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord, 2004;5:208-212 Turner et al , JNNP, 2003;, 74:995-997. Beghi et al. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, 2011; 12:1-10

slide-39
SLIDE 39

King’s Staging

  • Stage 1: One region functionally involved (symptom onset)
  • Stage 2: Two regions functionally involved
  • Stage 3: Three regions functionally involved
  • Stage 4: As above +
  • Nutritional failure/need for gastrostomy (4A) or
  • Respiratory failure/need for noninvasive ventilation (4B)
  • Stage 5: Death

Roche et al. Brain, 2012:;135: 847–852 Balendra, R. et al. JNNP , 2015; 86:45–49

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Milestones

  • Predictable time points over the disease

course

  • Median of 3–7 months spent at each

milestone for stages 2 to 4

  • Balendra. et al. JNNP 2015; 86 :45–49
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Prognostic indicators

  • Age
  • Phenotype e.g. bulbar onset
  • Early respiratory dysfunction
  • Nutritional status
  • Executive dysfunction
  • Rapid progression of symptoms
  • Short time from symptom onset to diagnosis
  • Access to MDT

Kiernan et al. Lancet, 2011;377:942-955 Hardiman et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17085 van Es et al. Lancet 2017; 390: 2084–98

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Diagnosis

  • Clinical (criteria e.g. Revised El Escorial)
  • No diagnostic test
  • No Biomarkers
  • Exclusion of MND mimics
  • Diagnostic delay of 12 months
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Revised El Escorial criteria

  • Clinically Definite: Mixed signs in 3 regions
  • Clinically Probable: Mixed sings in 2 regions with some

UMN sings rostral to LMN signs

  • Clinically Probable – Laboratory supported: UMN signs

in at least one region with EMG evidence of LMN loss in two regions

  • Clinically Possible: UMN and LMN signs in one region,
  • r UMN signs in two regions, or UMN and LMN signs

in two regions but no UMN rostral to LMN signs

Brooks et al. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2000: 293–99

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Treatment

  • No cure
  • Symptomatic and supportive
  • Quality of life
slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46
slide-47
SLIDE 47

“When [no therapy] avails to ward off the fatal ending, it is still no small portion of [the physician's] art to rid his patient's path of thorns if he cannot make it bloom with roses.”

Alfred Stille

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Thank you