models of set theory in lukasiewicz logic
play

Models of set theory in Lukasiewicz logic Zuzana Hanikov a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Models of set theory in Lukasiewicz logic Zuzana Hanikov a Institute of Computer Science Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague seminar on non-classical mathematics 11 13 June 2015 (joint work with Petr H ajek) Zuzana


  1. Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic Zuzana Hanikov´ a Institute of Computer Science Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague seminar on non-classical mathematics 11 – 13 June 2015 (joint work with Petr H´ ajek) Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  2. Why fuzzy set theory? try to capture a mathematical world: develop fuzzy mathematics (indicate a direction) study the notion of a set, and rudimentary notions of set theory (some properties may be available on a limited scale; classically equivalent notions need not be available in a weak setting) wider set-theoretic universe: recast the classical universe of sets as a subuniverse of the universe of fuzzy sets Explore the limits of (relative) consistency. (Which logics allow for an interpretation of classical ZF? Which logics give a consistent system?) Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  3. Why fuzzy set theory? try to capture a mathematical world: develop fuzzy mathematics (indicate a direction) study the notion of a set, and rudimentary notions of set theory (some properties may be available on a limited scale; classically equivalent notions need not be available in a weak setting) wider set-theoretic universe: recast the classical universe of sets as a subuniverse of the universe of fuzzy sets Explore the limits of (relative) consistency. (Which logics allow for an interpretation of classical ZF? Which logics give a consistent system?) Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  4. Why fuzzy set theory? try to capture a mathematical world: develop fuzzy mathematics (indicate a direction) study the notion of a set, and rudimentary notions of set theory (some properties may be available on a limited scale; classically equivalent notions need not be available in a weak setting) wider set-theoretic universe: recast the classical universe of sets as a subuniverse of the universe of fuzzy sets Explore the limits of (relative) consistency. (Which logics allow for an interpretation of classical ZF? Which logics give a consistent system?) Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  5. Why fuzzy set theory? try to capture a mathematical world: develop fuzzy mathematics (indicate a direction) study the notion of a set, and rudimentary notions of set theory (some properties may be available on a limited scale; classically equivalent notions need not be available in a weak setting) wider set-theoretic universe: recast the classical universe of sets as a subuniverse of the universe of fuzzy sets Explore the limits of (relative) consistency. (Which logics allow for an interpretation of classical ZF? Which logics give a consistent system?) Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  6. Why fuzzy set theory? try to capture a mathematical world: develop fuzzy mathematics (indicate a direction) study the notion of a set, and rudimentary notions of set theory (some properties may be available on a limited scale; classically equivalent notions need not be available in a weak setting) wider set-theoretic universe: recast the classical universe of sets as a subuniverse of the universe of fuzzy sets Explore the limits of (relative) consistency. (Which logics allow for an interpretation of classical ZF? Which logics give a consistent system?) Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  7. Programme Work with classical metamathematics. Consider a logic L, magenta weaker than classical logic. (Also, with well-developed algebraic semantics.) Consider an axiomatic set theory T , governed by L. The theory T should: generate a cumulative universe of sets be provably distinct from the classical set theory be reasonably strong be consistent (relative to ZF) Between classical and non-classical: classical set-theoretic universe is a sub-universe of the non-classical one Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  8. Programme Work with classical metamathematics. Consider a logic L, magenta weaker than classical logic. (Also, with well-developed algebraic semantics.) Consider an axiomatic set theory T , governed by L. The theory T should: generate a cumulative universe of sets be provably distinct from the classical set theory be reasonably strong be consistent (relative to ZF) Between classical and non-classical: classical set-theoretic universe is a sub-universe of the non-classical one Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  9. Programme Work with classical metamathematics. Consider a logic L, magenta weaker than classical logic. (Also, with well-developed algebraic semantics.) Consider an axiomatic set theory T , governed by L. The theory T should: generate a cumulative universe of sets be provably distinct from the classical set theory be reasonably strong be consistent (relative to ZF) Between classical and non-classical: classical set-theoretic universe is a sub-universe of the non-classical one Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  10. Programme Work with classical metamathematics. Consider a logic L, magenta weaker than classical logic. (Also, with well-developed algebraic semantics.) Consider an axiomatic set theory T , governed by L. The theory T should: generate a cumulative universe of sets be provably distinct from the classical set theory be reasonably strong be consistent (relative to ZF) Between classical and non-classical: classical set-theoretic universe is a sub-universe of the non-classical one Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  11. Programme Work with classical metamathematics. Consider a logic L, magenta weaker than classical logic. (Also, with well-developed algebraic semantics.) Consider an axiomatic set theory T , governed by L. The theory T should: generate a cumulative universe of sets be provably distinct from the classical set theory be reasonably strong be consistent (relative to ZF) Between classical and non-classical: classical set-theoretic universe is a sub-universe of the non-classical one Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  12. Programme Work with classical metamathematics. Consider a logic L, magenta weaker than classical logic. (Also, with well-developed algebraic semantics.) Consider an axiomatic set theory T , governed by L. The theory T should: generate a cumulative universe of sets be provably distinct from the classical set theory be reasonably strong be consistent (relative to ZF) Between classical and non-classical: classical set-theoretic universe is a sub-universe of the non-classical one Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  13. Plan for talk Logics without the contraction rule 1 � Lukasiewicz logic 2 A set theory can strengthen its logic 3 A -valued universes 4 the theory FST (over � L) 5 generalizations 6 Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  14. A family of substructural logics: FL ew and extensions Consider propositional language F . (FL ew -language: {· , → , ∧ , ∨ , 0 , 1 } .) A logic in a language F is a set of formulas closed under substitution and deduction. “Substructural” — absence of some structural rules (of the Gentzen calculus for INT). In particular, FL ew is contraction free. Structural rules: Γ , ϕ, ψ, ∆ ⇒ χ (e) Γ , ∆ ⇒ χ Γ , ϕ, ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ (c) (w) Γ , ψ, ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ Γ , ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ Γ , ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ Removal of these rules calls for some changes: splitting of connectives changes to interpretation of a sequent NB: FL ew is equivalent to H¨ ohle’s monoidal logic (ML). Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  15. A family of substructural logics: FL ew and extensions Consider propositional language F . (FL ew -language: {· , → , ∧ , ∨ , 0 , 1 } .) A logic in a language F is a set of formulas closed under substitution and deduction. “Substructural” — absence of some structural rules (of the Gentzen calculus for INT). In particular, FL ew is contraction free. Structural rules: Γ , ϕ, ψ, ∆ ⇒ χ (e) Γ , ∆ ⇒ χ Γ , ϕ, ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ (c) (w) Γ , ψ, ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ Γ , ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ Γ , ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ Removal of these rules calls for some changes: splitting of connectives changes to interpretation of a sequent NB: FL ew is equivalent to H¨ ohle’s monoidal logic (ML). Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

  16. A family of substructural logics: FL ew and extensions Consider propositional language F . (FL ew -language: {· , → , ∧ , ∨ , 0 , 1 } .) A logic in a language F is a set of formulas closed under substitution and deduction. “Substructural” — absence of some structural rules (of the Gentzen calculus for INT). In particular, FL ew is contraction free. Structural rules: Γ , ϕ, ψ, ∆ ⇒ χ (e) Γ , ∆ ⇒ χ Γ , ϕ, ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ (c) (w) Γ , ψ, ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ Γ , ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ Γ , ϕ, ∆ ⇒ χ Removal of these rules calls for some changes: splitting of connectives changes to interpretation of a sequent NB: FL ew is equivalent to H¨ ohle’s monoidal logic (ML). Zuzana Hanikov´ a Models of set theory in � Lukasiewicz logic

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend