models for inexact reasoning introduction to uncertainty
play

Models for Inexact Reasoning Introduction to Uncertainty - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Models for Inexact Reasoning Introduction to Uncertainty Introduction to Uncertainty, Imprecision and Approximate p pp Reasoning Miguel Garca Remesal Department of Artificial Intelligence mgremesal@fi.upm.es Uncertainty and Imprecision


  1. Models for Inexact Reasoning Introduction to Uncertainty Introduction to Uncertainty, Imprecision and Approximate p pp Reasoning Miguel García Remesal Department of Artificial Intelligence mgremesal@fi.upm.es

  2. Uncertainty and Imprecision Uncertainty and Imprecision • The ideal model of reasoning (human or computer ‐ based) is the exact reasoning p ) g • However, in the real world, reasonings are H i h l ld i made with information that is either: – Uncertain – Imprecise Imprecise

  3. Uncertainty Uncertainty • Uncertainty Principle (Heisenberg, 1927) – In quantum physics, the outcome of an ideal q p y , measurement of a system is not deterministic: • It is not possible to exactly determine the position and It is not possible to exactly determine the position and speed of a particle – It is characterized by a probability distribution It is characterized by a probability distribution • The larger the associated standard deviation is, the more "uncertain" we might say that that characteristic g y is for the system.

  4. Uncertainty Uncertainty • Uncertain knowledge: – Expressed with precise predicates p p p – It is not possible to extrapolate a truth value from the statement the statement – Examples: • I believe that John weights 80 Kg I b li th t J h i ht 80 K • It is possible that I will be visiting you at 8 pm • It is probable that this car can reach 200 Km/h I i b bl h hi h 200 K /h

  5. Imprecision Imprecision • Imprecise Knowledge: – Expressed with imprecise predicates p p p – The variables are assigned imprecise values – Examples: Examples: • Charles is tall • John is between 30 and 35 years old J h i b 30 d 35 ld – Note that “tall” and “between 30 and 35 years old” are imprecise subsets

  6. Uncertainty vs Imprecision Uncertainty vs Imprecision • Knowledge can be exact – John is 1.90 m tall • Knowledge can be imprecise but not uncertain – John is tall J h i ll • Knowledge can be uncertain but not imprecise g p – I believe that John is 1.90 m tall • Knowledge can be uncertain and imprecise • Knowledge can be uncertain and imprecise – I believe that John is tall

  7. Sources of Uncertainty and Imprecision • Information – Incomplete Incomplete • Lack of analysis in medicine • Lack of field variables in control systems, etc. L k f fi ld i bl i t l t t – Unreliable • Unrealiable measurements and analysis • Imprecise tools and instruments – Noise and Distortion • Artificial Vision, Speech Recognition Systems, etc.

  8. Sources of Uncertainty and Imprecision • Knowledge g – Uncertain/Imprecise • “If she has a headache probably she has the flu” • “The patient has high temperature” – Contradictory • Physician 1 : “If she has a headache probably she has the flu” • Physician 1 : If she has a headache probably she has the flu • Physician 2 : “ It is also possible that she has not the flu” • The world itself: it is imprecise and non ‐ deterministic

  9. Sources of Uncertainty and Imprecision • Representation – Wrong choice g • The formalism used to represent the available knowledge is not adequate – Lack of Expressive Power • The formalism does not provide enough expressive The formalism does not provide enough expressive power – It is not possible to fully represent the background knowledge (as provided by experts)

  10. Examples Examples • Incomplete Information – In many cases the clinical record of a given patient y g p is not available – The patient cannot remember all the The patient cannot remember all the experimented symptoms • Erroneous Information E I f ti – Incorrectly described symptoms – The patient deliberately lies to the physician about her symptoms y p

  11. Examples Examples • Imprecise Information – Non ‐ quantifiable parameters: q p • pain • fatigue, etc. fatigue, etc. • Non ‐ deterministic world (e.g. medicine) – General laws cannot be applied in some situations l l b l d – Each patient is different • Same causes may produce different effects in different patients with no apparent explanation

  12. Examples Examples • Incomplete Models – Some medical phenomena arise due to unknown p reasons – It is normally difficult to reach a consensus among It is normally difficult to reach a consensus among different medical experts – If this information was available it would be If this information was available it would be difficult to include it into an expert system due to practical issues practical issues

  13. Examples Examples • Examples of domains involving uncertainty • Examples of domains involving uncertainty and imprecision – Medical diagnosis and prognosis (expected outcome of a disease) – Financial prediction – Prospection (mines, petrol) Prospection (mines, petrol) – Image interpretation and artificial vision – Speech recognition S h iti – Monitoring/Control of complex industrial processes

  14. Handling Uncertainty and Imprecision • To handle uncertainty and imprecision: – It is necessary to take them into consideration in y an explicit way at two different stages: • Representation Representation • Inference – There are many different techniques that can be – There are many different techniques that can be classified into two different groups: • Symbolic techniques • Symbolic techniques • Numerical techniques

  15. Handling Uncertainty and Imprecision • Symbolic Approaches – Based in non ‐ monotonous reasoning: Based in non monotonous reasoning: • If there is not enough available information, the system makes assumptions than can be corrected later when makes assumptions than can be corrected later when new information is received – Default reasoning Systems (Reiter) Default reasoning Systems (Reiter) – Truth Maintenance Systems (Doyle & DeKleer) • TMS and Assumption ‐ based TMS – Theory of Endorsements (Cohen & Grinberg)

  16. Handling Uncertainty and Imprecision • Symbolic Approaches: Drawbacks Symbolic Approaches: Drawbacks – Cualitative nature � it is difficult to take into account the different uncertainty degrees of the account the different uncertainty degrees of the hypothesis – Present serious combinatorial explossion P i bi i l l i problems – Not suitable for practical applications

  17. Handling Uncertainty and Imprecision • Numerical Approaches – Theoretical Methods • Probabilistic Models – Probabilistic Logics (Nilsson) – Entropy Maximization • Dempster ‐ Shafer Theory • Fuzzy Logic Theory (Zadeh) – Heuristic Methods • Certainty Factors (MYCIN, Prospector) • Bayesian Inference Bayesian Inference

  18. Approximate Reasoning Approximate Reasoning • Definition: “Reasoning involving imprecise and uncertain Reasoning involving imprecise and uncertain knowledge and made using numerical methods”

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend