Modeling of the EMRAS II Urban Working Group Seoul Scenario Using - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

modeling of the emras ii urban working group seoul
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Modeling of the EMRAS II Urban Working Group Seoul Scenario Using - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Modeling of the EMRAS II Urban Working Group Seoul Scenario Using the RESRAD-RDD Methodology Presented at the Urban WG Meeting Vienna, Austria October 18, 2011 Charley Yu and Sunita Kamboj Environmental Science Division Argonne National


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presented at the Urban WG Meeting Vienna, Austria October 18, 2011

Modeling of the EMRAS II Urban Working Group Seoul Scenario Using the RESRAD-RDD Methodology

Charley Yu and Sunita Kamboj Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Presentation Outline

  • RESRAD‐RDD conceptual Model
  • Seoul scenario and modeling end points

– Initial ground surface concentration – Partitioning factors for different surfaces – Modeling endpoints – Weathering coefficient

  • Exposure pathways and dose calculations

– Exposure pathways – Exposure Scenarios – Dose calculations – Countermeasures

  • Results

– Contamination density variation with time and countermeasures – External dose rate variations with time and countermeasures – Contribution of different surfaces to external dose rate – External annual and cumulative dose variations with time and countermeasures – Internal annual and cumulative dose variations with time and countermeasures

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 3

Conceptual Model of Environmental Transport in RESRAD-RDD

Soil Street Outdoor Walls Roof Indoor Floor Indoor walls Indoor Air

Input concentration Calculated concentration Input/calculated concentration

Pathway considered One Way transport Equilibrium assumed Outdoor Contamination Transport Indoor Contamination Transport

Plant

Root Uptake

Outdoor RDD Outdoor RDD Event

Pathway not considered

Legend

Outdoor Air

Foliar Deposition Outdoor Resuspension Indoor Resuspension Air filtration

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Seoul Scenario – Initial Deposition and Partitioning

4

Initial Estimated Concentrations (Bq/m2) on to the Reference Surface Used in the Modeling Under Three Weather Conditions

Dry Light rain Heavy rain 5.29E+07 2.83E+09 1.72E+10 Initial estimated concentration for Co-60 and Pu-239 was assumed to be the same

Assumed Initial Partitioning Factors Relative to Reference Surface

Deposition Lawn Exterior walls Roofs Interior floor* Interior walls Paved areas Dry 0.9 0.1 0.7 0.04 0.02 0.4 Wet 0.7 0.015 0.7 0.055 0.0275 0.55

  • Interior floor concentration is assumed to be 10% of outside concentration

Other initial partitioning factors based on Chernobyl accident data (Anderson 2003)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Eight Modeling End Points

  • Contamination density at three outdoor test locations
  • External dose rates at 6 specified locations (3 outside and 3 inside

building 1) from all relevant surfaces

  • Contribution to the external dose rates at 6 above locations from each

surface and identification of the three most important surfaces

  • Annual and cumulative external doses for two exposure scenarios
  • Annual and cumulative internal doses for two exposure scenarios
  • Countermeasure effectiveness in terms of external dose rate reduction
  • Countermeasure effectiveness in terms of external dose reduction
  • Countermeasure effectiveness in terms of internal dose reduction

*For modeling purposes building characteristics, receptor locations and receptor characteristics were specified and all calculations were carried forward for 5 years. All predictions were made with no countermeasure and were repeated with different countermeasures.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Weathering Correction

6

Weathering Coefficients used for Seoul Scenario Surface Mobile fraction (a) Shorter half-life (ln2/b), yr Longer half-life (ln2/c), yr Street (paved areas) 0.5 0.2 2 Soil (lawn) 0.46 1.5 50 Roof/Sloped roofs 0.5 4 50 Exterior Wall 0.2 0.2 20 Interior Floor 0.5 0.2 2 Interior Wall 0.2 0.2 20

   

   

2 1

1 1

1 2 t t t ) ct ( ) bt (

dt e ] e ) a ( e a [ t t WCF

Effect of Weathering on Different Surfaces

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 5 10 15 20

Time (years) Fraction paved areas walls roofs lawn

  • Paved surfaces and interior floor weather very fast

due to small half-lifves.

  • Walls initially weather faster compared with roofs

and lawns due to small shorter half-life, but later weathering is faster for lawn and roof because lawn and roof have much higher mobile fractions compared with walls.

  • Lawn weathers faster compared with roof due to

small shorter half-life.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Pathways Considered for Dose Calculations

  • Direct external

– External exposure (groundshine) to contaminants on streets/soils while

  • utdoors

– External exposure to contaminants on exterior walls while indoors – External exposure to contaminants on roofs while indoors – External exposure to contaminants on interior walls while indoors – External exposure to contaminants on interior floors while indoors – External exposure to contaminants on streets/soils while indoors

  • Inhalation

– Inhalation exposure while outdoors (resuspension of contaminants from streets/soils only) – Inhalation exposure while indoors (indoor air contamination results from both outdoor air contamination and resuspension of contaminants

  • n interior floors)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Two Exposure Scenarios: One in Business Area and Other in Park Area

8

Exposure Scenario Assumptions

Region Indoor Outdoor Duration (hrs/wk) Inhalation rate (m3/hr) Duration (hrs/wk) Inhalation rate (m3/hr) Region - 1 (Business area) 40 0.5 5 1.0 Region - 2 (Park area) NA 3 1.5 Building/source Floor length (m) Floor width (m) Floor height (m) Thickness of walls (cm) Thickness of roof (cm) Material of walls/roof Material density (g/cm3) Office building 30 30 2.75 1 10 Aluminum/ Concrete 2.7/2.4 Lawn/paved area Infinite Infinite NA NA NA NA NA

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 9

Dose Calculation for External Pathways

g , n g , n n n s g , n , ext

DCF GRC SF OF WCF P C t Dose        (t) (0) ) (

Doseext, n,g (t) = dose from external pathways at time t (mrem/yr), Cs(0) = concentration on streets/soil at t = 0 (pCi/m2), Pn = Initial partitioning factor for surface n, = average weathering and radiological decay correction factor at time t, n = index for surface, g = index for external exposure geometries, OFn,g = occupancy factor (time fraction of a year), SF = shielding factor, GRC = ground roughness correction factor (assumed = 1 for all surfaces), and DCFn,g = external dose conversion factor [(mrem/yr) per (pCi/m2)].

) t ( WCFn

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 10

Dose Calculation for Inhalation Pathways

i floor inh

  • i
  • s

s

  • RF

t C SHF t C t C RF WCF C t C        ) ( ) ( ) ( (0) ) (

Co (t) = outdoor air concentration at time t (pCi/m3), Ci (t) = indoor air concentration at time t (pCi/m3), SHFinh = indoor dust filtration factor = 0.55, and RFi = indoor resuspension factor = 1 × 10-6 m-1.

inh i

  • inh

DCF OF t C

  • r

C t Dose IR )] ( (t) [ ) (    

Doseinh(t) = inhalation dose at time t (mrem/yr), IR = inhalation rate while staying outdoors or indoors (m3/yr), OF = occupancy factor (fraction of time spent outdoors or indoors), and DCFinh = inhalation dose conversion factor from ICRP-72 (mrem/pCi).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 11

Resuspension and Average Outdoor Air Concentration Correction Factors

day 1 for t ) ( 10 1 days 1000 for t ) ( 10 1 days 1000 1 for t ) ( 10 1 ) (

1 6 1 9 1 6

                 

     

m m m t t RFo

t = time in days after deposition,

1 2

2 1

1 t t dt e ] e ) a ( e a )[ t ( RF RF WCF

t t t ) ct ( ) bt (

   

   

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Countermeasures Considered and Decontamination Factors Assumed for Dose Modeling

12

Serial Number Countermeasure Decontamination Factor (DF) Time Applicability in paved area Applicability in soil area # 1 No remediation none Day 0 yes yes # 2 Relocation infinite First six week yes yes # 4 Vacuuming or sweeping of roads 2 Day 14 yes no # 5 Washing or hosing

  • f roads

5 Day 14 yes no # 6 Washing of roof and exterior walls 1.4 (roof) and 10 (exterior walls) Day 14 no no # 7 Cutting of grass and removal of soil 3 (grass cutting) and 10 (soil removal) Day 7 (grass cutting) and Day 180 (soil removal) no yes # 9 Relocation and road cleaning by washing Infinite (no dose during relocation) and 5 (washing of road) First six weeks (relocation) and Day 14 (road cleaning) yes yes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Contamination Density (Bq/m2) at Outdoor Paved Area

13

0.00E+00 5.00E+06 1.00E+07 1.50E+07 2.00E+07 2.50E+07 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

(Co‐60 ‐ Dry)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation No Action Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation 0.00E+00 5.00E+08 1.00E+09 1.50E+09 2.00E+09 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

(Co‐60 ‐ Light rain)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation No Action Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation 0.00E+00 2.00E+09 4.00E+09 6.00E+09 8.00E+09 1.00E+10 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

(Co‐60 ‐ Heavy rain)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation No Action Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation

Same trend in three weather conditions, the

  • nly difference is due to

the difference in initial deposition. For the options (no action, relocation, and cutting grass + removal of soil) the contamination density in the paved area does not change. The washing of road results in the maximum change in the contamination density.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

External Dose Rate (mGy/h)

14

0.00E+00 1.00E‐02 2.00E‐02 3.00E‐02 4.00E‐02 5.00E‐02 6.00E‐02 7.00E‐02 8.00E‐02 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

Inside on First Floor (Co‐60 ‐ Dry)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation No Action Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation 0.00E+00 5.00E‐02 1.00E‐01 1.50E‐01 2.00E‐01 2.50E‐01 3.00E‐01 3.50E‐01 4.00E‐01 4.50E‐01 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

Outdoor Soil Area (Co‐60 ‐ Dry)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation No Action Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation

The external dose rate is much higher at outdoor soil area compared to inside on first floor. The most external dose is reduced by Washing or hosing of road at inside location whereas cutting grass and removing soil is most effective countermeasure for outdoor soil area.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

External Dose Rate Contributions from Different Surfaces

15

1.00E‐01 1.00E+00 1.00E+01 1.00E+02 1 2 3 4 5

Location # 1 (First floor) in Dry Weather

(1 ‐ Floor, 2‐ Roof, 3 ‐ Interior wall, 4 ‐ Exterior wall, 5 ‐ From outside) Year 0, 1 July Year 1, 1 July Year 5, 1 July 1.00E‐01 1.00E+00 1.00E+01 1.00E+02 1 2 3 4 5

Location # 1 (First floor) in Light rain

(1 ‐ Floor, 2‐ Roof, 3 ‐ Interior wall, 4 ‐ Exterior wall, 5 ‐ From outside) Year 0, 1 July Year 1, 1 July Year 5, 1 July 1.00E‐01 1.00E+00 1.00E+01 1.00E+02 1 2 3 4 5

Location # 1 (First floor) in Heavy rain

(1 ‐ Floor, 2‐ Roof, 3 ‐ Interior wall, 4 ‐ Exterior wall, 5 ‐ From outside) Year 0, 1 July Year 1, 1 July Year 5, 1 July

Maximum contribution is From outside followed by contribution from floor Wall contribution increases With time due to difference In weathering from different surfaces

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Variation of Predicted External Dose Indoor on First Floor with Time and Countermeasure

16

0.00E+00 2.00E+01 4.00E+01 6.00E+01 8.00E+01 1.00E+02 1.20E+02 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

Predicted External Annual Dose (mSv) (Co‐60 ‐ Dry)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation No Action Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation 0.00E+00 5.00E+01 1.00E+02 1.50E+02 2.00E+02 2.50E+02 3.00E+02 3.50E+02 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

Predicted External Cumulative Dose (mSv) (Co‐60 ‐ Dry)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation No Action Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation

Washing of roads results in the maximum change in external annual dose. Washing of roads + relocation results in the maximum change in external cumulative dose.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Variation of Predicted Internal Dose Indoor on First Floor with Time and Countermeasure

17

Except for time zero there is not much change in internal annual dose. Washing of roads + relocation results in the maximum reduction in internal cumulative dose.

0.00E+00 5.00E+00 1.00E+01 1.50E+01 2.00E+01 2.50E+01 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

Predicted Internal Annual Dose (mSv) (Co‐60 ‐ Heavy rain)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation No Action Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation 0.00E+00 1.00E+01 2.00E+01 3.00E+01 4.00E+01 5.00E+01 6.00E+01 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

Predicted Internal Cumulative Dose (mSv) (Co‐60 ‐ Heavy rain)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation No Action Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Variation of Percent External Dose Reduction on First Floor with Time and Countermeasures

18

0.00E+00 1.00E+01 2.00E+01 3.00E+01 4.00E+01 5.00E+01 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

Percent External Annual Dose Reduction (Co‐60 ‐ Dry)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation 0.00E+00 1.00E+01 2.00E+01 3.00E+01 4.00E+01 5.00E+01 6.00E+01 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

Percent External Cumulative Dose Reduction (Co‐60 ‐ Dry)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation

The percent dose reduction from washing of roof and exterior wall increases with time because of difference in weathering of contamination on different surfaces.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Variation of Percent Internal Dose Reduction on First Floor with Time and Countermeasures

19

0.00E+00 2.00E‐01 4.00E‐01 6.00E‐01 8.00E‐01 1.00E+00 1.20E+00 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

Percent Internal Annual Dose Reduction (Co‐60 ‐ Dry)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation 0.00E+00 5.00E+00 1.00E+01 1.50E+01 2.00E+01 2.50E+01 3.00E+01 3.50E+01 01‐Jul‐00 01‐Jul‐01 01‐Jul‐02 01‐Jul‐03 30‐Jun‐04 30‐Jun‐05

Percent Internal Cumulative Dose Reduction (Co‐60 ‐ Dry)

Washing or hosing of roads Washing of roof and exterior walls Vacuuming or sweeping of roads Relocation Cutting grass + removal of soil Washing + Relocation

The percent dose reduction changes with time.