Interim Joint Committee on Interim Joint Committee on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

interim joint committee on interim joint committee on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Interim Joint Committee on Interim Joint Committee on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interim Joint Committee on Interim Joint Committee on Appropriations and Revenue November 29, 2011 FY 12 Budget Balancing Measures Mary Lassiter, State Budget Director John Hicks, Deputy State Budget Director Kevin Cardwell, Deputy State


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Interim Joint Committee on Interim Joint Committee on Appropriations and Revenue

November 29, 2011

FY 12 Budget Balancing Measures

Mary Lassiter, State Budget Director John Hicks, Deputy State Budget Director Kevin Cardwell, Deputy State Budget Director

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FY 12 Budget Updates g p

  • Agencies have been planning for reductions

– additional 2% reductions – additional 2% reductions

  • Improved revenue outlook continues in the

current year current year

  • Necessary Government Expenses are

covered by FY 11 surplus expenditure plan y p p p

  • Kentucky still faring better than many states
  • No furloughs of state employees planned this

No furloughs of state employees planned this year

  • FY 13 & 14 will be very challenging

y g g

  • Impact of pending federal budget cuts
slide-3
SLIDE 3

FY 12 Revenue Outlook Continues to Exceed Budget Levels Exceed Budget Levels

($millions) CFG Estimated Revenues in Excess of Budget 137 7 $ CFG Estimated Revenues in Excess of Budget 137.7 $ Dedicated Revenues for Severance Programs (31.0) $ Net Estimated Excess Revenues 106.7 $

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Draft Plan to Balance FY 12 Budget Gap

($millions) ($millions) Problem: Budget Gap between Appropriations and Resources 168.9 $ $ Additional Spending Reductions 21.0 $ Total 189.9 $ Solution: Spending Reductions 114.4 $ Partial Use of Current Year Estimated Excess Revenues 75.5 $ Total 189.9 $

slide-5
SLIDE 5

FY 12 Budget Balancing Plans g g

FY 12 Additional Spending Reductions ($millions) Recurring FY 2011 1.5% and Non-merit Reductions 27.5 $ g Debt Service Lapse Estimate 57.9 $ Additional 2% Budget Reductions 29.0 $ 114.4 $

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Exemptions from Additional 2% Reductions – Same as FY 11 Reductions Same as FY 11

  • Debt Service
  • SEEK
  • Severance Tax

Dedicated Funds

  • SEEK
  • School District Health

Insurance

  • Parks
  • Prosecutors
  • Public Advocacy
  • Medicaid
  • Community Based

Services

  • Public Advocacy
  • Juvenile Justice
  • Executive Branch

Ethi C i i Services

  • Behavioral Health
  • Corrections

Ethics Commission

  • Kentucky Horse Park

Commission B d f El i Corrections

  • Teachers' Retirement

System

  • Universities and
  • Board of Elections-

State Share of Elections N

  • Universities and

Student Financial Aid

  • Necessary

Government Expense Areas

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Nearly $300 million in FY 12 Required Budget Balancing Measures g g

E d

$100 million

Enacted Appropriation Reductions

$190 million $190 million

Budgeted Gap

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FY 12 Budget Balancing Plans g g

  • Most Agencies have 8.0% reductions

from FY 10 appropriation levels pp p

  • 4.5% enacted reductions for FY 12
  • 1.5% additional reductions in FY 11 as part
  • f budget balancing actions
  • 2.0% additional reductions for FY 12
slide-9
SLIDE 9

General Fund Contract Spending Has Decreased $115 Million Since FY 09 $115 Million Since FY 09

$714

$720

$661

$680 $700 s

$599

$620 $640 $660 Millions

$599

$580 $600 $620 M $540 $560 $580 $ FY 09 FY 10 FY 11

*Excludes Passport and Disaster expenses

slide-10
SLIDE 10

General Fund Revenue Changes - Kentucky and All 50 States FY 2008 to FY 2012

6.0% 8.0% 2.0% 4.0% e 4 0%

  • 2.0%

0.0% nual % Change All States Kentucky

  • 8.0%
  • 6.0%
  • 4.0%

Ann

  • 12.0%
  • 10.0%

FY 2008 Actuals FY 2009 Actuals FY 2010 Actuals FY 2011 Actuals FY 2012 Budgeted Fiscal Year All States 4.2%

  • 10.0%
  • 1.8%

6.6% 4.4% Kentucky 1.0%

  • 2.7%
  • 2.4%

6.5% 1.3%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

How have we weathered the Recession?

FY 2007 FY 2012 Actual Revised $ Diff. % Diff. Executive Branch 8,384.4 $ 8,967.6 $ 583.2 $ 7.0% Judicial Branch 244 3 $ 316 3 $ 72 0 $ 29 5% Judicial Branch 244.3 $ 316.3 $ 72.0 $ 29.5% Legislative Branch 45.8 $ 53.8 $ 8.0 $ 17.5% Total 8,674.5 $ 9,337.7 $ 663.2 $ 7.6% Executive Branch: Executive Branch: Medicaid * 1,039.1 $ 1,372.8 $ 333.7 $ 32.1% SEEK 2,670.3 $ 2,900.1 $ 229.8 $ 8.6% School District Health Insurance 461.9 $ 614.8 $ 152.9 $ 33.1% Teachers' Retirement System 169.3 $ 238.6 $ 69.3 $ 40.9% Teachers Retirement System 169.3 $ 238.6 $ 69.3 $ 40.9% State Agency Pension Contributions 80.0 $ 140.0 $ 60.0 $ 75.0% Debt Service 394.1 $ 451.1 $ 57.0 $ 14.5% Corrections * 335.0 $ 378.4 $ 43.4 $ 13.0% Student Financial Aid 166.3 $ 190.5 $ 24.2 $ 14.6% Dedicated Severance Taxes 114.7 $ 136.0 $ 21.3 $ 18.6% State Agency Health Insurance 99.4 $ 113.9 $ 14.5 $ 14.6% Prosecutors * 50.9 $ 52.5 $ 1.5 $ 3.0% Universities and KCTCS 1,028.6 $ 979.4 $ (49.2) $

  • 4.8%

( ) Rest of Executive Branch 1,774.8 $ 1,399.5 $ (375.3) $

  • 21.1%

Total-Executive Branch 8,384.4 $ 8,967.6 $ 583.2 $ 7.0% * Figures exclude pension and health insurance.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Next Biennium Will Be Very Challenging

(Millions) 2 4 %

The Next Biennium Will Be Very Challenging

General Fund Revenues

$ 9 0 0 0 $ 9 ,5 0 0

(Millions) 2 .4 % 1 .8 % 2 .8 % 6 5 % 1 3 %

$ 8 ,5 0 0 $ 9 ,0 0 0

O b 1 .1 %

  • 2 .7 %
  • 2 .4 %

6 .5 % 1 .3 %

$ 8 ,0 0 0

Enacted October Prelim inary Estim ates 2 .4 %

$ 7 ,5 0 0 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Impact of Federal Sequestration p q

  • The Budget Control Act of 2011:
  • Set caps on discretionary spending for 2012
  • Set caps on discretionary spending for 2012

to 2021

  • Established the “Supercommittee”

Established the Supercommittee

  • Put in place automatic procedures called

Sequestration to reduce spending by $1.2 trillion through 2021 if Congress doesn’t enact at least $1.2 trillion in deficit reduction by January 15 2012 by January 15, 2012

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Impact of Federal Sequestration p q

  • Sequestration is the automatic, across-the-board

ll i f b d cancellation of budgetary resources

  • The across-the-board cuts take effect January,

2013: 50% from defense, 50% from non- d f defense

  • Exempt from sequestration:
  • Medicaid KCHIP TANF Supplemental

Medicaid, KCHIP, TANF, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Child (School) Nutrition, Child Care, Foster Care, Adoption Assistance, Child Support Enforcement, Pell ss s a ce, C d S ppo

  • ce e

, e grants, Federal-Aid Highway Obligations, Airport grants, Highway Traffic Safety, Motor Carrier Safety. y

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Impact of Federal Sequestration p q

  • Largest areas not exempt:
  • Education Women Infants and Children
  • Education, Women, Infants and Children

(WIC), Workforce Investment, Head Start, Vocational Rehabilitation, CDBG, National Guard, Substance Abuse, Clean & Drinking Water Revolving Funds, Transit grants, V ti l t h i l A i pr r Ad lt Vocational-technical, Aging programs, Adult Education, Community Services block grant, Homeland Security, Employment Services, y, p y , LIHEAP

  • One estimate is a -8.8% cut.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Interim Joint Committee on Interim Joint Committee on Appropriations and Revenue

November 29, 2011

FY 12 Budget Balancing Measures

Mary Lassiter, State Budget Director John Hicks, Deputy State Budget Director Kevin Cardwell, Deputy State Budget Director