SLIDE 1 Modeling Climate Change in the Laboratory
Miklós Vincze
MTA-ELTE Theoretical Physics Research Group ELTE Institute of Physics, von Kármán Laboratory for Enviromental Flows (HU), BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg, Department of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics (DE)
- Intl. Conf. On Teaching Physics Innovatively – Budapest, Hungary
August, 2015
SLIDE 2
First of all: What kind of laboratory?
A Laboratory for environmental flows (aka geophysical fluid dynamics), called Kármán Laboratory of Eötvös University (hidden abbreviation: K.ár.mán. – can also stand for ‚Environmental Flow maniacs(?)’ in Hungarian) Founded in 1998 by Imre M. Jánosi, Tamás Tél, Gábor K. Szabó, and Viktor Horváth The principle of hydrodynamical similarity enables modeling large-scale (atmosphere, ocean) flow structures Demonstration, teaching (incl. High school groups, Researchers’ Night, etc.), research Website (www.karman.elte.hu) almost up-to-date… Video (courtesy index.hu)
SLIDE 3
First of all: What kind of laboratory?
A Laboratory for environmental flows (aka geophysical fluid dynamics), called Kármán Laboratory of Eötvös University (hidden abbreviation: K.ár.mán. – can also stand for ‚Environmental Flow maniacs(?)’ in Hungarian) Founded in 2002 by Imre M. Jánosi, Tamás Tél, Gábor K. Szabó, and Viktor Horváth The principle of hydrodynamical similarity enables modeling large- scale (atmosphere, ocean) flow structures Website (www.karman.elte.hu) almost up-to-date… Demonstration, teaching (incl. High school groups, Researchers’ Night, etc.), research
SLIDE 4
First of all: What kind of laboratory?
A Laboratory for environmental flows (aka geophysical fluid dynamics), called Kármán Laboratory of Eötvös University (hidden abbreviation: K.ár.mán. – can also stand for ‚Environmental Flow maniacs(?)’ in Hungarian) Founded in 1998 by Imre M. Jánosi, Tamás Tél, Gábor K. Szabó, and Viktor Horváth The principle of hydrodynamical similarity enables modeling large-scale (atmosphere, ocean) flow structures Demonstration, teaching (incl. High school groups, Researchers’ Night, etc.), research Website (www.karman.elte.hu) almost up-to-date… Video (courtesy index.hu) LINK: http://index.hu/video/2010/09/26/kutatok_ejszakaja_2010/ [from 02:00 to 04:00]
SLIDE 5
Hot topics
A Laboratory for environmental flows (aka geophysical fluid dynamics), called Kármán Laboratory of Eötvös University (hidden abbreviation: K.ár.mán. – can also stand for ‚Environmental Flow maniacs(?)’ in Hungarian) Founded in 2002 by Imre M. Jánosi, Tamás Tél, Gábor K. Szabó, and Viktor Horváth The principle of hydrodynamical similarity enables modeling large-scale (atmosphere, ocean) flow structures Demonstration, teaching (incl. High school groups, Researchers’ Night, etc.), research Website (www.karman.elte.hu) almost up-to-date… Video (courtesy: index.hu)
SLIDE 6
Hot topics
A Laboratory for environmental flows (aka geophysical fluid dynamics), called Kármán Laboratory of Eötvös University (hidden abbreviation: K.ár.mán. – can also stand for ‚Environmental Flow maniacs(?)’ in Hungarian) Founded in 2002 by Imre M. Jánosi, Tamás Tél, Gábor K. Szabó, and Viktor Horváth The principle of hydrodynamical similarity enables modeling large-scale (atmosphere, ocean) flow structures Demonstration, teaching (incl. High school groups, Researchers’ Night, etc.), research Website (www.karman.elte.hu) almost up-to-date… Video (courtesy: index.hu)
SLIDE 7
Hot topics
A Laboratory for environmental flows (aka geophysical fluid dynamics), called Kármán Laboratory of Eötvös University (hidden abbreviation: K.ár.mán. – can also stand for ‚Environmental Flow maniacs(?)’ in Hungarian) Founded in 2002 by Imre M. Jánosi, Tamás Tél, Gábor K. Szabó, and Viktor Horváth The principle of hydrodynamical similarity enables modeling large-scale (atmosphere, ocean) flow structures Demonstration, teaching (incl. High school groups, Researchers’ Night, etc.), research Website (www.karman.elte.hu) almost up-to-date… Video (courtesy: index.hu)
SLIDE 8
Hot topics
A Laboratory for environmental flows (aka geophysical fluid dynamics), called Kármán Laboratory of Eötvös University (hidden abbreviation: K.ár.mán. – can also stand for ‚Environmental Flow maniacs(?)’ in Hungarian) Founded in 2002 by Imre M. Jánosi, Tamás Tél, Gábor K. Szabó, and Viktor Horváth The principle of hydrodynamical similarity enables modeling large-scale (atmosphere, ocean) flow structures Demonstration, teaching (incl. High school groups, Researchers’ Night, etc.), research Website (www.karman.elte.hu) almost up-to-date… Video (courtesy: index.hu)
SLIDE 9 Why to use such a lab for research purposes nowadays? - #1: Lab experiments as ‚analog computers’
“It alw lways bothers me e tha that, accord rding to the the law laws as s we e under erstand the them today, it it takes a computing mach chine an inf infinite number of f log logical oper erations to fig figure out what goes on in in no matter r how tin tiny a reg region of f spa space, and no matter how tiny a region of time.”
(In: The Character of Physical Law, 1967)
SLIDE 10 Why to use such a lab for research purposes nowadays? - #2: Test-bed for „Nimitz class” complex flow models
somewhat provocative statement: : The e opera rational numerical methods and models for r wea eather fora rasting and cli climate pre rediction can be e validated only in in the the la lab! ! (if if at t all ll)
SLIDE 11
SLIDE 12
SLIDE 13
SLIDE 14
SLIDE 15
SLIDE 16
SLIDE 17
SLIDE 18
SLIDE 19
SLIDE 20
SLIDE 21
SLIDE 22
SLIDE 23
SLIDE 24
SLIDE 25
SLIDE 26
SLIDE 27
SLIDE 28 So, what can be done?
- How to separate parametrization
(discretization, etc.) errors from those that
- riginate from our incomplete understanding
- f the system
- Let’s build/find a physical system which
behaves like the atmosphere, but still much simpler, and all the governing equations are correctly understood!
SLIDE 29 A minimal model of mid-latitude weather
typical atmospheric phenomena of the mid- latitudes are primarily driven by two factors
- nly.
- Rotation + meridional
temperature difference ≈ weather
- Let’s use a differentially
heated rotating circular tank for method validation!
SLIDE 30
ifferentia ially ly heated cyli cylindrical l tan ank, mounted on
a tu turntable
Geometrical parameters (Cottbus): a = 45 mm b = 120 mm d = 135 mm
A minimal model of mid-latitude weather
SLIDE 31
ifferentia ially ly heated cyli cylindrical l tan ank, mounted on
a tu turntable
Geometrical parameters (Cottbus): a = 45 mm b = 120 mm d = 135 mm
A minimal model of mid-latitude weather
SLIDE 32
ifferentia ially ly heated cyli cylindrical l tan ank, mounted on
a tu turntable
Geometrical parameters (Budapest): a = 45 mm b = 150 mm d = 40 mm
A minimal model of mid-latitude weather
SLIDE 33
Basics: baroclinic instability
SLIDE 34
Basics: baroclinic instability
“Sideways convection” – no threshold in ΔT (i.e. No ‘critical Rayleigh number’) Any temperature difference can initiate the flow
SLIDE 35
Basics: baroclinic instability
“Sideways convection” – no threshold in ΔT (i.e. No ‘critical Rayleigh number’) Any temperature difference can initiate the flow
SLIDE 36
Basics: baroclinic instability
SLIDE 37
Basics: baroclinic instability
Rotation!
SLIDE 38 Baroclinic instability
Rotation!
Zonal flow (thermal wind) Geostrophic theory: Tilted density surfaces
SLIDE 39 Baroclinic instability
Rotation!
Zonal flow (thermal wind) Geostrophic theory: Tilted density surfaces
SLIDE 40 Baroclinic instability
Rotation!
Zonal flow (thermal wind) Geostrophic theory: Tilted density surfaces
Baroclinic instability!
SLIDE 41 Baroclinic waves
- control parameters:
- rotation rate, radial
temperature difference
atmospheres can be modelled
zonal flow
Coriolis effect cyclones (“weather”)
SLIDE 42 Baroclinic waves, planetary analogies
- control parameters:
- rotation rate, radial
temperature difference
atmospheres can be modelled
zonal flow
Coriolis effect cyclones (“weather”)
SLIDE 43
SLIDE 44
SLIDE 45
SLIDE 46
The regime diagram (after Fultz)
SLIDE 47
The regime diagram (after Fultz)
SLIDE 48
The regime diagram (after Fultz)
SLIDE 49
The regime diagram (after Fultz)
SLIDE 50
Preliminary results
SLIDE 51
Preliminary results
SLIDE 52 Comments, conclusions:
In the model decreasing equator-to-pole temperature difference seems to yield smaller fluctuations (in terms of magnitude) Temporal behaviour needs to be investigated! (Expectation: smaller temperature difference makes the model weather less predictable – smaller velocities, smaller cyclones, more freedom for the structures to interact) Significant differences between the three runs! In many cases the trends are not even evident in the temperature anomaly records! – A much-much larger ensemble is
- needed. (Work in progress.)
Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get.
SLIDE 53
Thank you for your attention!