- rk
- f
MODELING AND ANAL YSIS OF TRAFFIC IN HIGH SPEED NETW ORKS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
MODELING AND ANAL YSIS OF TRAFFIC IN HIGH SPEED NETW ORKS A CTS A TM In ternet w ork Pro ject Information and T elecomm unication T ec hnology Cen ter Univ ersit y of Kansas. Mo deling and Analysis of T
(A) 1 Load Mean Delay (B)
Figure 1: T ypical Dela y curv es for long-range dep enden t mo del (B) and con v en tional mo del (A). A CTS A TM In ternet wP(Q>x) Buffer Size log( , x (B) (A) )
Figure 2: T ypical loss curv es for long-range dep enden t mo del (B) and con v en tional mo del (A).5 10 15 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 x 10
9Time (Hours) Number of Cells 5 10 15 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time(Hours) Rate(Mb/s)
Cell coun t pro cess Rate pro cess. A CTS A TM In ternet wk Time Rate x x x N 1 x 1
A CTS A TM In ternet wTime Rate γ . N+1 γ N γ 1 2 γ γ k . .
A CTS A TM In ternet w1 RATE γ γ γ γ γ 2 3 4 Ν+1 1 γ Ν CDF
Figure 3: Quan tizing the CDFx 2 x
R
3 x 1 x 4 x n x i
Figure 4: Concept for p erformance analysis metho dology .aai-pop.nrl.aai.net aai-pop-ether.nccosc.aai.net aai-pop-ether.nrlssc.aai.net aai-pop-ether.cewes.aai.net
AAI
CEWES NRL ARL NRLSSC NCCOSC GSD
aai-pop-ether.gsd.aai.net aai-pop-ether.arl.aai.net
SWITCH SITE
KU
merlin.edc.magic.net
EDC TIOC
hettz.tioc.magic.net spork.tisl.ukans.edu OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 12
Figure 5: Connections120 60 Cell conts Time
t t2 1 c(t 2) c(t 1) c(k t k ∆ t) ∆
Figure 6: Re-sampling b y linear in terpn(k-1) TIME Number of Cells k k+1 k-1 n(k) n(k+1)
Figure 7: Dela y estimation from cell coun tsSampled cell counts
SOURCE
Figure 8: V alidation0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 x 10
−3
Load Mean Cell Delay Simulation Theory
Figure 9: V alidation10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer Size Log(P(X>x) Simulation Theory
Figure 10: V alidation5 10 15 20 25 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 Time(Hours) Rate(Mb/s)
Figure 11: Data Collected from NCCOSC site. A CTS A TM In ternet w0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Load Mean Cell Delay (Seconds) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model
Figure 12: Mean Cell Dela y estimate10 20 30 40 50 60 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer Size, x Log10(P(Q>x)) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model
Figure 13: Comparison5 10 15 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time(Hours) Rate(Mb/s)
Figure 14: Data trace Collected from the Phillips site. A CTS A TM In ternet w0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Load Mean Cell Delay (Seconds) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model
Figure 15: Comparison20 40 60 80 100 120 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer Size, x Log10(P(Q>x)) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model
Figure 16: Comparison1 2 3 4 5 6 5 10 15 20 25 Time (Hours) Rate(Mb/s)
Figure 17: Data trace Collected from the NRL site. A CTS A TM In ternet w0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 Load Mean Cell Delay (Seconds) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model
Figure 18: Comparison10 20 30 40 50 60 70 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer Size, x Log10(P(Q>x)) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model
Figure 19: Comparison0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 x 10
−4
Mean Cell Delay (Sec) Load Exponential Uniform
Figure 20: Eect0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 x 10
−4
Load Mean Cell Delay (Sec) Exponential Uniform
Figure 21: Eect5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer size, x Log10(P(Q>x)) load=.4 load=.7 Exponential Uniform
Figure 22: Eect0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Load Log10(P(Q>x)) Exponential Uniform
Figure 23: Eect0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 x 10
−4
Load Mean Cell Delay (Secs) Exponeetial Uniform
Figure 24: Eect0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 x 10
−4
Load Mean Cell Delay(Sec) Uniform Exponential
Figure 25: Eect0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 −5 −4.5 −4 −3.5 −3 −2.5 −2 −1.5 −1 −0.5 Load Log(P(Q>x)) Exponential Uniform
Figure 26: Eect0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 x 10
−4
Load Mean Cell Delay ( Secs) Exponential Uniform
Figure 27: Eect0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1 2 x 10
−4
Load Mean Cell Delay (Sec) Exponential Uniform
Figure 28: Eect0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Load log(P(Q>x)) Exponential Uniform
Figure 29: Eect100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Lag(1 unit = 60 secs) Autocorrelation Function Pareto/Exponential Trace data
Figure 30: Second20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Lag (1 unit = 60 seconds) Autocorrelation Function Pareto/Exponential Trace data
Figure 31: Second50 100 150 200 250 300 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Lag (1 unit = 60 secs) Autocorrelation Function Pareto/Exponential Trace data
Figure 32: Second0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Load Mean Cell Delay (Seconds) N=10 N=15 N=25 N=35
Figure 33: Eect10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 −10 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer Size, x Log10(P(Q>x)) N=10 N=15 N=25 N=35
Figure 34: Eect