MODELING AND ANAL YSIS OF TRAFFIC IN HIGH SPEED NETW ORKS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

modeling and anal ysis of traffic in high speed netw orks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MODELING AND ANAL YSIS OF TRAFFIC IN HIGH SPEED NETW ORKS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MODELING AND ANAL YSIS OF TRAFFIC IN HIGH SPEED NETW ORKS A CTS A TM In ternet w ork Pro ject Information and T elecomm unication T ec hnology Cen ter Univ ersit y of Kansas. Mo deling and Analysis of T


slide-1
SLIDE 1 MODELING AND ANAL YSIS OF TRAFFIC IN HIGH SPEED NETW ORKS A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject Information and T elecomm unication T ec hnology Cen ter Univ ersit y
  • f
Kansas.
slide-2
SLIDE 2 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Organization
  • Motiv
ation F ailure
  • f
Classical Mo dels.
  • In
tro duction. Long Range Dep endence.
  • Analytical
Mo del. Macro-dynamics Micro-dynamics
  • P
erformance Analysis Metho dology . Mean Cell dela y . Cell loss probabilit y .
  • Data
collection pro cess and the AAI Net w
  • rk.
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 1
slide-3
SLIDE 3 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Organization (con td.)
  • Sim
ulation Mo del. Mo del Description. V alidation.
  • Exp
erimen tal Ev aluation. Mean Cell dela y and Cell Loss Probabilit y results. T rac Micro-dynamics. Sensitivit y
  • f
n um b er
  • f
phases. Second-order statistics.
  • Conclusions.
  • F
uture W
  • rk.
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 2
slide-4
SLIDE 4 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Motiv ation
  • T
rac studies.
  • Queueing
p erformance
  • f
a pro cess with innite v ariance.
  • Switc
h buers get lled up faster than those predicted b y con v en tional mo dels
  • Example:
Mean cell dela y:

(A) 1 Load Mean Delay (B)

Figure 1: T ypical Dela y curv es for long-range dep enden t mo del (B) and con v en tional mo del (A). A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 3
slide-5
SLIDE 5 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Motiv ation (con td.)
  • Example:
Probabilit y
  • f
Cell Loss:

P(Q>x) Buffer Size log( , x (B) (A) )

Figure 2: T ypical loss curv es for long-range dep enden t mo del (B) and con v en tional mo del (A).
  • T
rac mo deling and p erformance prediction required for ecien t
  • p
erational algorithms. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 4
slide-6
SLIDE 6 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
In tro duction
  • Self
similar trac mo dels: FBM, ARIMA, Mo deling with Chaotic Maps.
  • Denition
  • f
self similarit y: Let X = (X t , t= 0, 1, 2...) b e a co v ariance stationary pro cess X k (m) = 1 m m1 X i=0 X k mi (1) Exactly: r (m) (k ) = r (k ); k
  • (2)
Asymptotically: r (m) (k ) ! r (k ); m ! 1 (3) A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 5
slide-7
SLIDE 7 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
In tro duction (con td.)
  • Ramications
Non-summable auto correlation function. Div ergen t P
  • w
er-Sp ectrum at the
  • rigin.
  • Implication
Burstiness
  • f
Aggregate trac.
  • Origin
ON-OFF source frame-w
  • rk
with ON and OFF p erio ds that follo w a distribution with innite v ariance. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 6
slide-8
SLIDE 8 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
T rac Mo del
  • Denition:
Rate Pro cess: A random pro cess R (t), whic h is the short-term time a v erage
  • f
the arriv al pro cess A(t).

5 10 15 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 x 10

9

Time (Hours) Number of Cells 5 10 15 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time(Hours) Rate(Mb/s)

Cell coun t pro cess Rate pro cess. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 7
slide-9
SLIDE 9 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
T rac Mo del (con td.)
  • Mo
del the Macro-dynamics and Micro-dynamics
  • f
the Rate Pro cess.
  • Rate
pro cess is mo deled as a non-Mark
  • vian
, stationary and ergo dic phase-pro cess ha ving a nite state space S=fx 1 ; x 2 ; :::x N g.

k Time Rate x x x N 1 x 1

A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 8
slide-10
SLIDE 10 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
T rac Mo del (con td.)
  • The
rate v ector
  • =
[ 1 ;
  • 2
; :::;
  • N
+1 ] represen ts the b
  • undary
rates for the states and
  • 1
  • 1
  • ::::
  • N
+1 .

Time Rate γ . N+1 γ N γ 1 2 γ γ k . .

A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 9
slide-11
SLIDE 11 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
T rac Mo del (con td.)
  • The
probabilit y v ector
  • =
[ 1 ;
  • 2
; :::;
  • N
] denotes the steady-state probabilit y v ector
  • f
the phase pro cess.
  • The
steady state phase probabilities
  • f
the phase pro cess are assumed to follo w a distribution with a hea vy tail.
  • The
rates in
  • and
the probabilit y v ector
  • dene
the macro-dynamics. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 10
slide-12
SLIDE 12 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
T rac Mo del (con td.)
  • is
  • btained
b y partitioning the range [ min , max ] where
  • min
and
  • max
represen t the minim um and maxim um rates resp ectiv ely .
  • The
rate v ector
  • for
N phases is:
  • 1
=
  • min
(4)
  • i
=
  • 1
+
  • max
  • min
N ; i = 2; 3; 4; :::; N (5)
  • N
+1 =
  • max
: (6) A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 11
slide-13
SLIDE 13 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
T rac Mo del (con td.)
  • is
  • btained
from the CDF
  • f
R (t).
  • The
CDF
  • f
R (t) can b e
  • btained
from a theoretical innite v ariance distribution. Here, a theoretical P areto Distribution w as used. A P areto Distribution can b e giv en as: F X (x) = 1
  • K
x
  • ;
  • >
1; x > K : (7) The maxim um lik eliho
  • d
estimate
  • f
the shap e parameter
  • ,
for a giv en set
  • f
data samples D = fd 1 ; d 2 ; ::; d M g is giv en as
  • =
1 1 M P M i=1 l n(d i ) (8) A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 12
slide-14
SLIDE 14 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
T rac Mo del (con td.)
  • The
CDF can also b e
  • btained
from an empirical CDF
  • f
the rate pro cess.
  • The
steady-state probabilit y
  • i
for state x i , whic h is b
  • unded
b y rates
  • i
and
  • i+1
is computed as:
  • i
= P [X
  • i+1
]
  • P
[X
  • i
]; i = 1; 2; 3:::N
  • 1
= F X ( i+1 )
  • F
X ( i ); i = 1; 2; 3:::; N
  • 1
(9)

1 RATE γ γ γ γ γ 2 3 4 Ν+1 1 γ Ν CDF

Figure 3: Quan tizing the CDF
  • f
R (t). A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 13
slide-15
SLIDE 15 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
T rac Mo del (con td.)
  • Within
eac h state x i , with asso ciated probabilit y
  • i
, the arriv al pro cess is mo deled as a p
  • in
t pro cess with a with nite mean
  • i+1
and nite v ariance.
  • The
distribution function denes the trac micro-dynamics
  • f
that state.
  • Assuming
  • i+1
as the mean rate in state x i is a conserv ativ e assumption as it is the upp er b
  • und
  • n
the rates in eac h state. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 14
slide-16
SLIDE 16 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
P erformance Analysis Metho dology
  • Let
Z denote the random v ariable asso ciated with a p erformance parameter
  • f
a queue with R (t) as the input pro cess.

x 2 x

R

3 x 1 x 4 x n x i

Figure 4: Concept for p erformance analysis metho dology .
  • F
  • llo
wing the linearit y prop ert y
  • f
exp ected v alue, the exp ected v alue
  • f
the random v ariable Z can b e written as E [Z ] = X i2S
  • i
E [Z jS = x i ] (10)
  • In
the ab
  • v
e equation the trac macro-dynamics are describ ed b y the v alues
  • f
  • and
the micro-dynamics are represen ted b y E [Z jS = x i ]. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 15
slide-17
SLIDE 17 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
P erformance Analysis Metho dology (con td.)
  • P
erformance prediction in terms
  • f
Mean Cell Dela y and Cell loss Probabilit y .
  • Notation:
Let Slotted system, innite buer. n denote the n um b er
  • f
cells in the system at a giv en time. P i n (j ) represen ts the probabilit y that there are n cells in the queue at the end
  • f
the j th slot, giv en that the input pro cess is in state x i . p i k denote the probabilit y that there are k arriv als to the system when the input pro cess is in state x i .
  • Queue
dynamics are describ ed b y: P i n (j + 1) = n+1 X k =0 P i k (j )p i n(k 1) + (11)
  • (x)
+ represen ts the maxim um
  • f
f0; xg. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 16
slide-18
SLIDE 18 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
P erformance Analysis Metho dology (con td.)
  • Mean-Dela
y: Slotted-G/ D/ 1 system, analysis based
  • n
Probabilit y Generating F unction (PGF). Av erage cell dela y giv en as: E [D ] = 1
  • N
X i=1
  • i
1
  • i
f 1 2
  • 2
i + 3 2
  • 2
i g (12) where = P N i=1
  • i
  • i+1
is the mean arriv al rate. D is the random v ariable represen ting the dela y exp erienced b y cells arriving at the input
  • f
the queueing system.
  • i
, is the probabilit y that the system is
  • ccupied
i.e., the utilization giv en S = x i A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 17
slide-19
SLIDE 19 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
P erformance Analysis Metho dology (con td.)
  • Cell
loss Probabilit y Let P L [K jS = x i ] denote cell loss probabilit y in a nite buer
  • f
size K , giv en that the input pro cess is in state x i .
  • P
L [K jS = x i ] is appro ximated as P [Q > K jS = x i ] P L [K jS = x i ]
  • P
[Q > K ] (13)
  • Analysis
  • f
Cell loss for a General arriv al pro cess to a slotted system is hard. Assume that the micro-dynamics are exp
  • nen
tial. P L (K ) = N X i=1
  • i
(1
  • K
X k =0 (1
  • i
)p i k + P i n=1 f1
  • P
n m=0 p i m gP i k n p i ) (14) p i n = e
  • i
  • i
n n! (15) A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 18
slide-20
SLIDE 20 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Summary
  • f
Metho dology
  • Obtain
( min ;
  • max
).
  • Obtain
the CDF
  • f
the rate pro cess. The CDF can b e
  • btained
as a { theoretical distribution, for example using
  • ,
the shap e parameter
  • f
a P areto distribution. {
  • r
can b e calculated from a giv en collected data trace.
  • Quan
tize the CDF in to 'N' lev els, where lev el i is represen ted b y rate
  • i+1
in the v ector
  • .
  • The
probabilit y
  • f
b eing in the state x i is giv en b y the elemen t
  • i
in the v ector
  • as
  • i
= F( i+1 )-F( i ).
  • Giv
en the linearit y prop ert y
  • f
exp ected v alue E [Z ] = P i2S
  • i
E [Z jS = x i ] A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 19
slide-21
SLIDE 21 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Data Collection Pro cess and the AAI.
  • P
erformance Analysis is based
  • n
T race data collected from the AAI net w
  • rk.
  • Conguration:

aai-pop.nrl.aai.net aai-pop-ether.nccosc.aai.net aai-pop-ether.nrlssc.aai.net aai-pop-ether.cewes.aai.net

AAI

CEWES NRL ARL NRLSSC NCCOSC GSD

aai-pop-ether.gsd.aai.net aai-pop-ether.arl.aai.net

SWITCH SITE

KU

merlin.edc.magic.net

EDC TIOC

hettz.tioc.magic.net spork.tisl.ukans.edu OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 3 OC 12

Figure 5: Connections
  • f
the sites and switc hes b eing sampled. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 20
slide-22
SLIDE 22 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Data Collection Pro cess and the AAI(con td.)
  • Data
collected from sev eral edge switc hes using Simple Net w
  • rk
Managemen t Proto col (SNMP).
  • T
  • tal
Data collected:
  • 1.8
Gb ytes.
  • Sampling
in terv al is appro ximately 60 seconds.
  • Data
w as re-sampled using linear in terp
  • lation
so that sampling in terv al is exactly 60 seconds.

120 60 Cell conts Time

t t2 1 c(t 2) c(t 1) c(k t k ∆ t) ∆

Figure 6: Re-sampling b y linear in terp
  • lation
  • f
cell coun ts. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 21
slide-23
SLIDE 23 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Data Collection Pro cess and the AAI (con td.)
  • Re-sampling:
c(k t) = c(t 1 ) + c(t 2 )
  • c(t
1 ) t 2
  • t
1
  • (k
t
  • t
1 ); k = 1; 2; 3; ::: (16) where c(k t) is the cell coun t
  • btained
b y in terp
  • lation.
t is the time in terv al after re-sampling and is 60 seconds. c(t 2 ) and c(t 1 ) are cell coun ts from collected data whic h are sampled at appro ximately 60 seconds.
  • The
rate pro cess R (t) can no w b e
  • btained
as: R (t) = c(t + 60)
  • c(t)
60 (17) A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 22
slide-24
SLIDE 24 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Sim ulation Mo del
  • Queueing
Mo del is an innite buer with a deterministic serv er.
  • Time
is slotted with a single cell serv ed at the end
  • f
the slot.
  • Sim
ulation based
  • n
calculating the "unnished w
  • rk"
in the queue at the end
  • f
a slot, from the equation: n(k + 1) = max(0; n(k ) + a(k )
  • 1):
(18) where n(k ) is the n um b er
  • f
cells in the system at the end
  • f
the k th slot. a(k ) is the n um b er
  • f
cells that arriv ed during the k th slot. max(a; b) represen ts the maxim um
  • f
the quan tities a and b. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 23
slide-25
SLIDE 25 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Sim ulation Mo del (con td.)

n(k-1) TIME Number of Cells k k+1 k-1 n(k) n(k+1)

Figure 7: Dela y estimation from cell coun ts
  • Mean
Cell dela y is giv en b y:
  • =
1 M M X k =1 n(k )
  • (19)
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 24
slide-26
SLIDE 26 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Sim ulation Mo del (con td.)
  • In
Equation (19)
  • is
mean cell dela y
  • v
er the whole trace and M is the total n um b er
  • f
slots for the giv en trace.
  • is
the rate
  • f
the deterministic rate
  • f
the serv er in cells/sec.
  • Probabilit
y
  • f
Cell loss: The cell loss probabilit y for a buer size x denoted as P L (x), is
  • btained
b y coun ting the relativ e n um b er
  • f
times, the queue length n(k ) exceeds the v alue x. P L (x) = P [n(k ) > x] (20) A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 25
slide-27
SLIDE 27 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Sim ulation Mo del (con td.)
  • V
alidation: Sim ulator v alidated for Mean Dela y and Cell loss. { By comparing sim ulation results with those predicted b y standard theoretical results. { Source whic h generates cells with exp
  • nen
tially distributed in ter-arriv al times with a kno wn a v erage rate has b een constructed. { Exp
  • nen
tial in ter-arriv als generated using T ransform Metho d. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 26
slide-28
SLIDE 28 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Sim ulation Mo del (con td.)

Sampled cell counts

SOURCE

Figure 8: V alidation
  • f
Mo del
  • Output
  • f
the source sampled at constan t time in terv als
  • f
T S seconds
  • Sim
ulates the data collection pro cess.
  • T
S =60 seconds as in the case
  • f
collected data.
  • Queueing
system is a M/ D/ 1 system for whic h theoretical results are a v ailable.
  • Considering
the statistical nature
  • f
the sim ulation, sim ulation results closely agree with the exp erimen tal results. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 27
slide-29
SLIDE 29 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 27
slide-30
SLIDE 30 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 x 10

−3

Load Mean Cell Delay Simulation Theory

Figure 9: V alidation
  • f
the sim ulator for mean cell transfer dela y results. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 28
slide-31
SLIDE 31 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 28
slide-32
SLIDE 32 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer Size Log(P(X>x) Simulation Theory

Figure 10: V alidation
  • f
the sim ulator for Cell loss ratio results. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 29
slide-33
SLIDE 33 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Exp erimen tal Ev aluation
  • Exp
erimen tal Ev aluation done b y comparing the p erformance predicted b y the mo del, with the sim ulation results
  • btained
from the AAI net w
  • rk.
  • T
races used: T able 1: Data traces used for mo del v alidation T race Name Duration (Hours) # cells Characteristic Mean Rate(Mb/s) NCCOSC 25 3.02697e08 Bac kground 1.55795 Phillips 15 2.227e09 SC '95 20.3064 NRL 6 5.1054e08 EMMI 10.307321
  • T
races c hosen suc h that dieren t trac lev els are used.
  • T
race T yp es: { Bac kground: Managemen t Flo ws, routing up dates etc. { EMMI: Multimedia trac proles. { SC '95
  • ws:
Burst y application trac proles t ypical in wide area A TM net w
  • rks.
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 30
slide-34
SLIDE 34 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 30
slide-35
SLIDE 35 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

5 10 15 20 25 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 Time(Hours) Rate(Mb/s)

Figure 11: Data Collected from NCCOSC site. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 31
slide-36
SLIDE 36 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 31
slide-37
SLIDE 37 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Load Mean Cell Delay (Seconds) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model

Figure 12: Mean Cell Dela y estimate
  • btained
from theory ( = 8:2), histogram and sim ulation for the trace lab eled 'NCCOSC' and sho wn in Figure 11, using N = 15 input phases. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 32
slide-38
SLIDE 38 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 32
slide-39
SLIDE 39 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

10 20 30 40 50 60 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer Size, x Log10(P(Q>x)) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model

Figure 13: Comparison
  • f
cell loss probabilit y estimates
  • btained
from theory ( = 8:2), histogram and sim ulation
  • f
the collected data trace lab eled NCCOSC and sho wn in Figure 11, using N = 15 input phases.
  • =
:4. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 33
slide-40
SLIDE 40 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 33
slide-41
SLIDE 41 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

5 10 15 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time(Hours) Rate(Mb/s)

Figure 14: Data trace Collected from the Phillips site. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 34
slide-42
SLIDE 42 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 34
slide-43
SLIDE 43 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Load Mean Cell Delay (Seconds) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model

Figure 15: Comparison
  • f
Mean Cell Dela y estimates
  • btained
from theory ( = 1:2), histogram and sim ulation
  • f
the collected data trace lab eled Phillips and sho wn in Figure 14, using N = 15 input phases. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 35
slide-44
SLIDE 44 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 35
slide-45
SLIDE 45 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

20 40 60 80 100 120 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer Size, x Log10(P(Q>x)) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model

Figure 16: Comparison
  • f
cell loss probabilit y estimates
  • btained
from theory ( = 1:2), histogram and sim ulation
  • f
the collected data trace lab eled Phillips and sho wn in Figure 14, using N = 15 input phases.
  • =
:4. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 36
slide-46
SLIDE 46 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 36
slide-47
SLIDE 47 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

1 2 3 4 5 6 5 10 15 20 25 Time (Hours) Rate(Mb/s)

Figure 17: Data trace Collected from the NRL site. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 37
slide-48
SLIDE 48 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 37
slide-49
SLIDE 49 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 Load Mean Cell Delay (Seconds) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model

Figure 18: Comparison
  • f
Mean Cell Dela y estimates
  • btained
from theory ( = 2:2), histogram and sim ulation
  • f
the collected data trace lab eled NRL and sho wn in Figure17, using N = 15 input phases. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 38
slide-50
SLIDE 50 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 38
slide-51
SLIDE 51 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer Size, x Log10(P(Q>x)) Simulation Histogram Pareto/Exponential model

Figure 19: Comparison
  • f
cell loss probabilit y estimates
  • btained
from theory ( = 2:2), histogram and sim ulation
  • f
the collected data trace lab eled NRL and sho wn in Figure 17 using N = 15 input phases.
  • =
:4. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 39
slide-52
SLIDE 52 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 39
slide-53
SLIDE 53 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Theory

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 x 10

−4

Mean Cell Delay (Sec) Load Exponential Uniform

Figure 20: Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
Mean Dela y predicted b y theory ( = 8:2) for the trace lab eled 'NCCOSC' and sho wn in Figure 11, using N = 15 input phases. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 40
slide-54
SLIDE 54 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 40
slide-55
SLIDE 55 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Sim ulation

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 x 10

−4

Load Mean Cell Delay (Sec) Exponential Uniform

Figure 21: Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
Mean Dela y
  • btained
from sim ulation
  • f
the trace lab eled 'NCCOSC' and sho wn Figure 11. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 41
slide-56
SLIDE 56 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 41
slide-57
SLIDE 57 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer size, x Log10(P(Q>x)) load=.4 load=.7 Exponential Uniform

Figure 22: Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
Cell loss probabilit y
  • btained
from sim ulation
  • f
the trace lab eled 'NCCOSC' and sho wn Figure 11. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 42
slide-58
SLIDE 58 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 42
slide-59
SLIDE 59 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Load Log10(P(Q>x)) Exponential Uniform

Figure 23: Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
Cell loss probabilit y estimate
  • btained
for a xed buer size
  • f
15 cells from sim ulation
  • f
  • n
the trace lab eled 'NCCOSC' and sho wn in Figure 11. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 43
slide-60
SLIDE 60 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 43
slide-61
SLIDE 61 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Theory

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 x 10

−4

Load Mean Cell Delay (Secs) Exponeetial Uniform

Figure 24: Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
Mean Dela y predicted b y theory ( = 1:2), for the trace lab eled 'Phillips' and sho wn in Figure 14, using N = 15 input phases. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 44
slide-62
SLIDE 62 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 44
slide-63
SLIDE 63 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Sim ulation

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 x 10

−4

Load Mean Cell Delay(Sec) Uniform Exponential

Figure 25: Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
Mean Dela y
  • btained
from sim ulation
  • f
the trace lab eled 'Phillips' and Figure 14. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 45
slide-64
SLIDE 64 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 45
slide-65
SLIDE 65 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 −5 −4.5 −4 −3.5 −3 −2.5 −2 −1.5 −1 −0.5 Load Log(P(Q>x)) Exponential Uniform

Figure 26: Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
Cell loss probabilit y estimate
  • btained
for a xed buer size
  • f
30 cells from sim ulation
  • f
the trace lab eled 'Phillips' and sho wn Figure 14. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 46
slide-66
SLIDE 66 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 46
slide-67
SLIDE 67 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Theory

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 x 10

−4

Load Mean Cell Delay ( Secs) Exponential Uniform

Figure 27: Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
Mean Dela y predicted b y theory ( = 2:2) for the trace lab eled NRL and sho wn in Figure 17, using N = 15 input phases. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 47
slide-68
SLIDE 68 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 47
slide-69
SLIDE 69 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Sim ulation

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1 2 x 10

−4

Load Mean Cell Delay (Sec) Exponential Uniform

Figure 28: Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
Mean Dela y
  • btained
from sim ulation
  • f
the trace lab eled NRL and sho wn in Figure 17. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 48
slide-70
SLIDE 70 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 48
slide-71
SLIDE 71 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Load log(P(Q>x)) Exponential Uniform

Figure 29: Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
Cell loss probabilit y estimate
  • btained
for a buer size
  • f
25 cells from sim ulation
  • f
the trace lab eled NRL and sho wn in Figure 17. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 49
slide-72
SLIDE 72 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 49
slide-73
SLIDE 73 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Lag(1 unit = 60 secs) Autocorrelation Function Pareto/Exponential Trace data

Figure 30: Second
  • rder
statistics
  • btained
from trace data and P areto/Exp
  • nen
tial mo del for the trace lab eled 'NCCOSC' and sho wn in Figure 11. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 50
slide-74
SLIDE 74 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 50
slide-75
SLIDE 75 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Lag (1 unit = 60 seconds) Autocorrelation Function Pareto/Exponential Trace data

Figure 31: Second
  • rder
statistics
  • btained
from trace data and P areto/Exp
  • nen
tial mo del for the trace lab eled 'Phillips' and sho wn in Figure 14. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 51
slide-76
SLIDE 76 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 51
slide-77
SLIDE 77 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

50 100 150 200 250 300 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Lag (1 unit = 60 secs) Autocorrelation Function Pareto/Exponential Trace data

Figure 32: Second
  • rder
statistics
  • btained
from trace data and P areto/Exp
  • nen
tial mo del for the trace lab eled 'NRL' and sho wn in Figure 17. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 52
slide-78
SLIDE 78 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 52
slide-79
SLIDE 79 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Load Mean Cell Delay (Seconds) N=10 N=15 N=25 N=35

Figure 33: Eect
  • f
dieren t n um b er
  • f
phases
  • n
mean cell dela y demonstrated using the trace lab eled 'NCCOSC' and sho wn in Figure 11. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 53
slide-80
SLIDE 80 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 53
slide-81
SLIDE 81 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 −10 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Buffer Size, x Log10(P(Q>x)) N=10 N=15 N=25 N=35

Figure 34: Eect
  • f
dieren t n um b er
  • f
phases
  • n
cell loss probabilit y demonstrated using the trace lab eled 'NCCOSC' and sho wn in Figure 11. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 54
slide-82
SLIDE 82 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
Conclusions
  • A
simple phase mo dulated mo del as w ell as a p erformance ev aluation tec hnique w ere dev elop ed in this study to mo del trac in wide area A TM net w
  • rks.
  • Metho
dology w as v alidated with extensiv e trace driv en sim ulations p erformed using collected data traces from the AAI A TM W AN.
  • The
exp erimen tal ev aluation
  • f
the mo del is done in terms
  • f
mean cell dela y and cell loss probabilit y .
  • The
study establishes non-P
  • isson
nature
  • f
trac
  • n
an early national scale A TM net w
  • rk,
the AAI net w
  • rk.
  • Eect
  • f
trac micro-dynamics
  • n
queueing p erformance w ere in v estigated.
  • In
the presence
  • f
LRD, mean dela y estimate is relativ ely in v arian t to the actual micro-dynamics.
  • A
lo w loads cell loss probabilit y w as found to b e sensitiv e to micro-dynamics.
  • A
t higher loads, bursts
  • n
the macro-scale, dominate the cell loss in the queue and the micro dynamics pla y a minor role. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 55
slide-83
SLIDE 83 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
  • Logarithm
  • f
the cell loss probabilit y has a linear relationship to load in the case
  • f
exp
  • nen
tially distributed in ter-arriv al times, but is non-linear in the case
  • f
real net w
  • rk
trace data.
  • Second
  • rder
statistics are mo deled reasonably . A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 56
slide-84
SLIDE 84 Mo deling and Analysis
  • f
T rac in High Sp eed Net w
  • rks
F uture W
  • rk
  • Simple
mo del
  • Signican
t complexit y can b e added. Eects
  • f
the UPC sc heme and UPC parameters.
  • Adding
a p erio dic comp
  • nen
t to tak e in to accoun t the p erio dicit y
  • f
the input pro cess.
  • Considering
the eects
  • f
dieren t theoretical innite-v ariance distributions.
  • Dev
eloping analytical expressions for studying eects
  • f
micro-dynamics
  • n
cell-loss.
  • Dev
eloping expressions for computing the auto correlation function n umerically .
  • Constructing
trac mo dels with phase dep enden t micro-dynamic distributions. A CTS A TM In ternet w
  • rk
Pro ject 57