Mobility Inequality in the United States 1 download slides at: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mobility

Inequality in the United States 1

download slides at: www.inequality.com/slides

Inequality in the United States

Mobility

Source:: This is a modified version of Figure 4 in Isaacs, Julia B. 2008. “Economic Mobility of Families Across Generations.” Getting Ahead or Losing Ground: Economic Mobility in America. Economic Mobility Project, http:// www.economicmobility.org/reports_and_research/mobility_in_america. Data: Panel Study of Income Dynamics, a nationally representative sample of families tracked since 1968.

2

Parents’ Income Quintile

Children’s Mobility Linked to Parent’s Income

39% 19% 6% 23% 17% 11% 14% 23% 19% 15% 24% 23% 9% 17% 42%

Bottom quintile Second quintile Middle quintile Fourth quintile Top quintile Bottom Middle Top

% of Children in Each Income Quintile As Adults

This figure shows the adult incomes of children with parents in the bottom, middle, and top income quintiles. There’s a lot of mobility among kids born in the middle of the income distribution—roughly a fifth of those kids end up in each of the five quintiles as adults. However, there’s much more mobility “stickiness” at the top and bottom of the income distribution, with 42% of kids born into the bottom income quintile remaining there as adults, and 39%

• f kids born into the top quintile remaining

there as adults. download slides at: www.inequality.com/slides

Inequality in the United States 3

Upward Mobility Low Among African Americans

Born in Bottom Quintile Born in Forth Quintile

Source:: This is a modified version of Figure 6 in Isaacs, Julia B. 2008. “Economic Mobility of Families Across Generations.” Getting Ahead

• r Losing Ground: Economic Mobility in America. Economic Mobility

Project, http://www.economicmobility.org/reports_and_research/ mobility_in_america. Data: Panel Study of Income Dynamics, a nationally representative sample of families tracked since 1968.

11% 26% 0% 4% 8% 22% 33% 0% 9% 12% 21% 19% 0% 13% 25% 40% 14% 0% 22% 24% 6% 8% 0% 53% 31%

Bottom quintile Second quintile Middle quintile Fourth quintile Top quintile White White Black Black

% of Children in Each Income Quintile As Adults

This figure shows differences in social mobility between white and black

• children. Among children born to

parents in the bottom income quintile, over half of black children remain there as adults while only 31% of white children remain there. White children also do better at the top of the income distribution. More than half of white children born into the fourth quintile stay in the top two quintiles as adults, compared to only about a third of black children born in the fourth quintile. Mobility download slides at: www.inequality.com/slides

Inequality in the United States 4

Social Mobility in Other Countries Compared to the United States

Source: This is a modified version of Figure 3 in Sawhill, Isabel and John

• E. Morton. 2007. “Economic Mobility: Is the American Dream Alive and

Well?” Economic Mobility Project, http://www.economicmobility.org/ reports_and_research/mobility_in_america. Data: Corak, Miles. 2006. “Do Poor Children Become Poor Adults? Lessons from a Cross Country Comparison of Generational Earnings Mobility.” Research on Economic Inequality 13:143-188.

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

U K G e r m a n y S w e d e n C a n a d a F r a n c e U S F i n l a n d N

• r

w a y D e n m a r k

This figure shows how rates of mobility in the United States compare to rates in comparable nations. Despite its reputation as the “land of opportunity,” researchers who study mobility have consistently found that there is less mobility in the United States than in most other European and English- speaking countries. Among the nine countries shown here, all but one have more mobility than the U.S., and four have more than twice as much mobility.

Mobility Rate as a Ratio of the U.S. Rate

Mobility download slides at: www.inequality.com/slides

Inequality in the United States

Source: This figure is created using table 3.4 (page 123)

• f Harding, David J., Christopher Jencks, Leonard M.

Lopoo, and Susan E. Mayer. 2005. “The changing effect of family background on the incomes of American adults.” Pages 100-144 in Unequal Changes: Family Background and Economic Success, edited by Samuel Bowles, Herbert Gintis, and Melissa Osborne Groves. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Data: General Social Survey.

5

Social Mobility in the 1970’s, 1980’s, & 1990’s

Born in Bottom Quartile Born in Top Quartile

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1970s 1980s 1990s 1970s 1980s 1990s

38% 39% 38% 0% 13% 9% 10% 29% 29% 30% 0% 21% 21% 20% 21% 20% 20% 0% 26% 30% 30% 12% 12% 12% 0% 41% 39% 40%

Bottom quartile Second quartile Third quartile Top quartile

%

• f

C h i l d r e n i n E a c h I n c

• m

e Q u a r t i l e a s A d u l t s

This figure shows the trend in social mobility from the 1970s to the 1990s. As this chart shows, the adult income destinations of children born into the bottom and top quartiles have remained remarkably stable, despite the income distribution of Americans becoming more unequal during those decades. Mobility download slides at: www.inequality.com/slides

Inequality in the United States

Contributors

Kendra Bischoff Anmol Chaddha Erin Cumberworth Sharon Jank Carly Knight Bridget Lavelle Krystale Littlejohn Lindsay Owens David Pedulla Kristin Perkins Sharon Jank Ariela Schachter Jordan Segall Chris Wimer Education Debt Mobility Gender Politics Health Race & Ethnicity Wealth Employment Poverty Income Immigration Violent Crime Family

kendrab1@stanford.edu achaddha@fas.harvard.edu ecumberw@stanford.edu sjank@stanford.edu crknight@fas.harvard.edu blavelle@umich.edu klittlej@stanford.edu lowens@stanford.edu dpedulla@princeton.edu kperkins@fas.harvard.edu sjank@stanford.edu arielas1@stanford.edu jsegall@stanford.edu cwimer@stanford.edu

download slides at: www.inequality.com/slides download slides at: www.inequality.com/slides