Mobility Measurement of Non- Denatured Protein and Protein Cluster Ions by DMA-MS
Christopher J. Hogan1 & Juan Fernandez de la Mora2
1 Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota 2 Mechanical Engineering, Yale University
Mobility Measurement of Non- Denatured Protein and Protein Cluster - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Mobility Measurement of Non- Denatured Protein and Protein Cluster Ions by DMA-MS Christopher J. Hogan 1 & Juan Fernandez de la Mora 2 1 Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota 2 Mechanical Engineering, Yale University Outline
1 Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota 2 Mechanical Engineering, Yale University
Source: www.waters.com Source: Shelimov et al., 1997
Monomobile Ions
SEADM DMA P4
Electrospray Ionization Chamber Separation Region To MS
DMA p
2
Zp : ion mobility Inlet Outlet δ
Selected Ion
+ L
Sheath Velocity, U
VI VO VDMA= VI - VO
DMA System Control Box Blower
With Triethylammonium+ From Hogan et al. 2009 With Ammonium Acetate+
(Tetraheptylammonium-Bromide)2 Tetraheptylammonium+
R > 50
Lysosyme Ions, no declustering
Concanavalin A hexamers (~150 kDa)
declustering
peaks
protein ions (increases peak FWHM)
between the DMA and MS.
specific multimer ion with a specific charge state
with declustering
g B g i I i g
2
polarization observed (still a small effect with charge reducing buffer)
GroEL 14 mers, Electrosprayed in NH4Ac buffer
g B g i I i g
2
Momentum Accommodation coefficient In Air (and N2), known to be 0.91 1,2.
259-270.
drop data for the motion of small particles in air. Journal of Aerosol Science 1982, 13, 537.
dg: bath gas diameter di: ion “diameter”, independent of bath gas. For sufficiently large spherical ions, di is the volume diameter
Ω: Collision cross-section. Gas dependent, but best used for model (EHSS) comparisons (if the model is fine enough to capture multiple scattering events)
EMI-BF4 cluster measurement from Larriba et al., in prep
g B g i I i g
2
from Larriba et al., in prep Singly Charged Doubly Charged
αI = 0.91, using known volumes
known volume fraction.
difference between predictions and measurements)
0.3nm in inferring di from Z, z, measurements
Kaufman et al., 1996
et al., 2001 and Kaddis et al., 2007.
cm-3
0.67 g cm-3
to solute adducts
– Clemmer and coworkers: 3.89 nm (αI=0), 3.37 nm (αI = 0.91) – This study: 4.01-4.18 nm (αI=0), 3.40-3.54 nm (αI = 0.91) – Fernandez-Lima et al. (2010, MALDI, +1 ion): 3.40 nm (αI=0), 2.89 (αI = 0.91)
– Clemmer and coworkers: 3.63 nm (αI=0), 3.09 nm (αI = 0.91) – This study: 3.85-4.00 nm (αI=0), 3.26-3.39 nm (αI = 0.91) – Fernandez-Lima et al. (2010, MALDI, +1 ion): 3.34 nm (αI=0), 2.84 (αI = 0.91)