Mobile County Demand-Response Transit Feasibility Study Stakeholder - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mobile county demand response transit feasibility study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Mobile County Demand-Response Transit Feasibility Study Stakeholder - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 Mobile County Demand-Response Transit Feasibility Study Stakeholder Meeting | July 2020 Via. Proprietary & Confidential Study Goals and Objectives 2 Context: Wave Transit service has a limited service area. 94% of all trips


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • Via. Proprietary & Confidential

Stakeholder Meeting | July 2020 Mobile County Demand-Response Transit Feasibility Study

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Study Goals and Objectives

Context:

  • Wave Transit service has a limited service area.
  • 94% of all trips rely on private vehicles.
  • No agency in Mobile County has been designated to receive FTA

Section 5311 Rural Areas funding, which would likely be available if a provider were designated. Study Goals:

  • Does Mobile County require a rural transit service?
  • Who would use the service?
  • If so, what type of service would be most suitable?
  • How should the service be funded?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Task 1: Transit Needs Assessment

Subtasks:

  • Engaged ~40 stakeholders
  • Reviewed existing transit options
  • Reviewed socio-economic data

Conclusions:

  • Most of the trips in Mobile County are not accessible using

Wave Transit

  • Seniors, low-income individuals, youth, and job seekers are

likely to use a rural transit service

  • Access to healthcare is a critical use-case
  • Some transportation services exist but they are focused on

specific needs - e.g., healthcare trips for certain individual.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Task 2: Transit Service Analysis

Conclusions:

  • A countywide rural and urban service is desirable:

○ Don’t allow trips that can be completed using Wave Transit ○ Demand may outstrip vehicle capacity as the service grows

  • A demand-response service will be most efficient and

user-friendly (short walks, moderate wait times)

  • Smaller vehicles (e.g. six-seater vans) would be appropriate

given the low density of ridership

  • Based on peer counties, Mobile County may have demand

for 200 - 500 trips per day

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Task 3: Transit Service Cost

Conclusions:

  • Service can be scaled depending on funding available
  • Estimated cost is $1.0 - $2.0M per year.
  • A larger budget would mean more vehicles, delivering

shorter wait times and more trips.

  • As the service grows, vehicles can gradually be added to the

fleet (can scale with demand).

  • The main costs are driver wages and vehicle purchase or

leasing.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Task 4: Transit Funding Sources

Conclusions:

  • Section 5311 - Rural and Small Area Grant is designed for exactly this

purpose ○ No agency in Mobile County has applied for this funding ○ Typically covers more than half of total service cost

  • Fares, advertising, and other funding sources can reduce the funding gap

further

  • Approximately $300-$500k in local funding will be required

○ Typically provided by county commission and other local government agencies ○ Supplemented by non-profits and other agencies who may be interested in outsourcing their transportation needs ○ Conversations with employers and other private sector organizations have not identified many promising funding sources.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Next Steps

  • 1. Build community

support.

  • 2. Secure funding.
  • 3. Launch the service.
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Questions for this group?

  • 1. Do you have

feedback on the report?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Questions for this group?

  • 2. What can you do

to help ensure that the idea progresses from here ?